Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / Ancient History / December 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Iosipos !!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Yannis the Macedonian - 13 Dec 2004 20:53 GMT
Iosipos ( a Jew scholar of 1st c AD ) wrote: " ¸ëëçí ùí, åé Ìáêåäþí "
that is "if you are Greek then you are Macedonian"
I just heard it in 4E TV channel of Thessaloniki's Church.
Can anyone look for the passage on Iosipos' writings ??

Macedonians were always Greeks. As you see, the name Macedonian could be a
name for all Greeks!
Yannis
Macedonia, Greece
Anastassios Retzios - 13 Dec 2004 21:51 GMT
I would gather that you are referring to Josephus, who wrote the
history of the Jewish rebellion of AD 67.  His work is available in
most bookstores.

ADR
Anastassios Retzios - 13 Dec 2004 22:42 GMT
Yannis:

Here is the URL for the whole work of Flavius Josephus translated into
English.  Search it for whatever string you want.

http://www.ccel.org/j/josephus/JOSEPHUS.HTM

Josephus speaks of Greeks and Macedonians as separate political
entities and mixes the two as Greeks or Grecians (Helladikoi).
However, in the section of the book dealing with conquest of Judea by
Alexander, he makes it clear that the Macedonians were Greeks.  When
Alexander entered Jerusalem, the high priesthood showed him the entry
in the Bible in which Daniel had prophesized that the Empire of the
Persians would be conquered by a Greek.  Alexander said that it was a
clear reference to him.  The episode shows that the Jews regarded the
Macedonians as Greeks and that Alexander regarded himself as Greek.
Here is the relevant passage from Josephus:

"......5. And when he understood that he was not far from the city, he
went out in procession, with the priests and the multitude of the
citizens. The procession was venerable, and the manner of it different
from that of other nations. It reached to a place called Sapha, which
name, translated into Greek, signifies a prospect, for you have thence
a prospect both of Jerusalem and of the temple. And when the
Phoenicians and the Chaldeans that followed him thought they should
have liberty to plunder the city, and torment the high priest to death,
which the king's displeasure fairly promised them, the very reverse of
it happened; for Alexander, when he saw the multitude at a distance, in
white garments, while the priests stood clothed with fine linen, and
the high priest in purple and scarlet clothing, with his mitre on his
head, having the golden plate whereon the name of God was engraved, he
approached by himself, and adored that name, and first saluted the high
priest. The Jews also did all together, with one voice, salute
Alexander, and encompass him about; whereupon the kings of Syria and
the rest were surprised at what Alexander had done, and supposed him
disordered in his mind. However, Parmenio alone went up to him, and
asked him how it came to pass that, when all others adored him, he
should adore the high priest of the Jews? To whom he replied, "I did
not adore him, but that God who hath honored him with his high
priesthood; for I saw this very person in a dream, in this very habit,
when I was at Dios in Macedonia, who, when I was considering with
myself how I might obtain the dominion of Asia, exhorted me to make no
delay, but boldly to pass over the sea thither, for that he would
conduct my army, and would give me the dominion over the Persians;
whence it is that, having seen no other in that habit, and now seeing
this person in it, and remembering that vision, and the exhortation
which I had in my dream, I believe that I bring this army under the
Divine conduct, and shall therewith conquer Darius, and destroy the
power of the Persians, and that all things will succeed according to
what is in my own mind." And when he had said this to Parmenio, and had
given the high priest his right hand, the priests ran along by him, and
he came into the city. And when he went up into the temple, he offered
sacrifice to God, according to the high priest's direction, and
magnificently treated both the high priest and the priests. And when
the Book of Daniel was showed him (23) wherein Daniel declared that one
of the Greeks should destroy the empire of the Persians, he supposed
that himself was the person intended. And as he was then glad, he
dismissed the multitude for the present; but the next day he called
them to him, and bid them ask what favors they pleased of him;
whereupon the high priest desired that they might enjoy the laws of
their forefathers, and might pay no tribute on the seventh year. He
granted all they desired. And when they entreared him that he would
permit the Jews in Babylon and Media to enjoy their own laws also, he
willingly promised to do hereafter what they desired. And when he said
to the multitude, that if any of them would enlist themselves in his
army, on this condition, that they should continue under the laws of
their forefathers, and live according to them, he was willing to take
them with him, many were ready to accompany him in his wars. ......"
Zhivko Apostolovski - 15 Dec 2004 08:19 GMT
He, heh, he... You are clutching at straws clown?

Here is your crystal clear answer, which you know very well, but I don't see
you showing it in your post, clown, for obvious reasons. Thus with great
pleasure :-) : Josephus - Book XII - Chapter 3 :
"1. THE Jews also obtained honors from the kings of Asia when they became
their auxiliaries; for Seleucus Nicator made them citizens in those cities
which he built in Asia, and in the lower Syria, and in the metropolis
itself, Antioch; and gave them privileges equal to those of the MACEDONIANS
and GREEKS, who were the inhabitants, insomuch that these privileges
continue to this very day...

Everywhere in Josephus' writings the Macedonians are identified only as they
should be identified, moron. And that is: MACEDONIANS.

Another thing you fail to mention about Josephus, grkoman-propagandist, is
the greek (language) influence prior to the coming of the Macedonians to
these (asian) lands. The greek language is very well established in these
lands. After all, the roots of the modern day greeks can be found there (and
in Africa). Aah... If you only had mirrors. :-)

Regards to all sub-Saharan "Black Athenians" :-)

Zhivko

> Yannis:
>
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
> their forefathers, and live according to them, he was willing to take
> them with him, many were ready to accompany him in his wars. ......"
Jim Webster - 15 Dec 2004 08:37 GMT
> He, heh, he... You are clutching at straws clown?
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> and GREEKS, who were the inhabitants, insomuch that these privileges
> continue to this very day...

unfortunately in Seleucid official parlance, a 'Macedonian' was a military
settler who, when called up, fought in either the Hypaspists or the phalanx.
Macedonian had become a technical military term like 'Tarentine'.

Jim Webster
Anastassios Retzios - 15 Dec 2004 19:04 GMT
Hey, idiot....I have happened to have read the whole of Josephus and I
have remarked on the use of the term Macedonians, Greeks (Hellene),
Grecians (Helladitai) and Macedonians.  If you read the text, you would
soon find out that although he may occassionally use the term
Macedonians and Greeks (as he should, because they were different
political entities), Josephus, most of the time, utilizes the term
Greek (which occurs ten times more often in the text that the term
Macedonian).  Now, it is also evident in Josephus that the Macedonians
speak Greek and in the paragraph I have posted it is clear that
Josephus, the high priesthood of Judea and Alexander consider the
Macedonians as Greeks.

So, instead of lining up you usual insults that result from your
miniscule mind, deal with the facts.

And, because, exchanging opinions with you is like cleaning my arse
with barbed wire, this is the last time that I would be posting a reply
to your ravings.

ADR
Zhivko Apostolovski - 18 Dec 2004 10:06 GMT
Moron,

You are not the only one to have read Josephus.

Macedonians and Greeks are clearly identified (mentioned) as different
entities, full stop, moron. Josephus does not state they were different
"political entities". "Political entities" is your warping of the truth,
grkoman.

And if you have read all from Joesphus, as you state, then you would have
noticed (I stated this in the previous post) that the greek (language)
influence in that part of the world was long before the arrival of the
Macedonians there, thus Josephus and the rest of the population there would
have been much more familiar with the Greeks and their language than with
anything Macedonian at the time of their arrival. Thus, there is nothing
Josephus' narrative on the meeting between Alexander and the high priest
that supports your LIE (the Macedonians being considered as Greeks),
grkoman.

I will leave you the following quote from Waldemar Heckel, grkoman
propagandist:

"It is clear from the extant historians that the lost sources  made a CLEAR
DISTINCTION BETWEEN MACEDONIANS
AND GREEKS - ethnically, culturally and linguistically - and THIS MUST BE AN
ACCURATE REFLECTION OF
CONTEMPORARY ATTITUDES....."

The "extant historians" includes Josephus, grkoman? Yes? Offcourse it does.
I rest my case, grkoman. :-)))

Zhivko

PS Would the some greek, or grkoman be so kind and tell me the meaning of
"Filipou",or "Alexandrou" (as inscribed on the coins)? :-)

> Hey, idiot....I have happened to have read the whole of Josephus and I
> have remarked on the use of the term Macedonians, Greeks (Hellene),
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> ADR
Yannis the Macedonian - 18 Dec 2004 13:24 GMT
> Moron,
>
> You are not the only one to have read Josephus.
> Macedonians and Greeks are clearly identified (mentioned) as different
.....................................
> Zhivko

Like Athenians and Spartans!
Macedonians named after Greek names AAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLL the cities they
built or renamed. Thus they were  always Greeks or a very peculiar people.
Yannis
Macedonia, Greece
Jason K. Lambrou - 18 Dec 2004 15:20 GMT
WTF is a ZHIVKO? is that a vodka on the rocks drinker.
> Moron,
>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>>
>>ADR
Anastassios Retzios - 18 Dec 2004 15:53 GMT
>Moron,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>that supports your LIE (the Macedonians being considered as Greeks),
>grkoman.

Zhivko,  

I can excuse you for not knowing history.  What I cannot excuse is you
making comments based on your ignorance of history.  

Greek did not become widespread in Eastern Meditteranea until well
after the conquests of Alexander the Great.  Prior the arrival of
Alexander at Palestine, Aramaic, Babylonian and Persian were the
languages spoken.  Prior to the arrival of the Greeks in the area (and
the incorporation of Palestine mainly in the Ptolemaic kingdom), there
was not a single Greek colony in these parts and even in Egypt, Greeks
were limited to conducting commerce into the city of Navkratis.
Therefore, there was hardly an aquaintance of Greek prior the
establishement of Greek colonies and the Greek dynasties in that part
of the world.  

In fact, even during the Hellenistic times, Greek did not spread that
much away from the cities.  It was Christianity and the Bible and
imperial edicts that forced Hellenization much later on.

The undeniable fact of the story of Josephus is that the priesthood of
Jerusalem identified Alexander as a Greek and Alexander, of course,
accepted this characterization.  If Alexander was not demonstrably a
Greek, why would the priests have made such statements?  

So, chill...and think of some better excuses.

ADR
Panayiotis - 20 Dec 2004 21:59 GMT
> Macedonians and Greeks are clearly identified (mentioned) as different
> entities, full stop, moron.

Zhivko,
1. Back in 1955, one of our professors gave us the task to write an essay on
Macedonia.
We were told that Slavs from present-day-FYROM in Canada, U.S. and Australia
were
propagandizing that Macedonians were not Greeks and that Macedonia is not
Greek.
No mention, then, about being descendants of the ancient Macedonians and
Alexander the Great. It all started later. New improved edition.

We searched encyclopaedias, Greek and English, and we came up with certain
passages that helped us present our arguments and disprove their
allegations.
Searching the Internet, today, I came up with a few passages that we had
discovered then, in books and encyclopaedias

A. Read the following. The webpage address is given for easy reference:

http://www.anemos.com/Diaspora/macedonia/Macedonia_FAQ.html
"Euripides lived many years and died in Macedonia. Many of his tragedies
were written and played while he was in Macedonia. This would have been
impossible, had the Macedonians been 'barbarians' (non-Greek). This is
because in one of these tragedies, 'Iphigeneia in Aulis', the Greek
superiority over the barbarians is emphasized.
The following epigram in memory of Euripides which is attributed by some
authors to Thucydides may give us more light to the actual beliefs of the
people of that time (and possibly Thucydides)
"MNHMA MEN ELLAS APAS' EYRIPIDOU, OSTEA D' ISXEI GH MAKEDVN, H GAR DEJATO
TERMA BIOU".
In brief, Macedonia, the land that holds the bones of Euripides is
considered part of Greece".

B. MIT classics is elightening on this subject, where Iphigenia is talking
to her mother
Clytaemnestra (in Euripides' Iphigenia at Avlis):

IPHIGENIA: And it is but right, mother, that Hellenes should rule
barbarians,
but not barbarians Hellenes, those being slaves, while these are free.

http://classics.mit.edu/Euripides/iphi_aul.pl.txt

C. Take a look at what Strabo said at a time when there was no FYROM and no
dispute
over the name:
"And Macedonia, of course, is a part of Greece."
(Strabo VII, Frg. 9 [Loeb, H.L. Jones])

IN CONCLUSION: Strabo says it very clearly, i.e. Macedonia is a part of
Greece.

Now, on Euripides. How could he dare say that Greeks should rule the
barbarians,
if Macedonians were not Greeks, i.e barbarians? Those days, it was a common
belief that
anyone not Greek was a barbarian. And, he presented his argument through his
tragedy (Iphigenia at Avlis) in front of the Macedonian King Archelaos (?)
and the
theater full of Macedonians.

Did I forget Herodotus, the father of History, whom you sometimes consider
a reliable source, but if he does not suit your objective, unreliable and
not to be trusted.

Regards,
Panayiotis
June R Harton - 23 Dec 2004 10:14 GMT
Nicely done, friend.

From:  Spirit of Truth

(using June's e-mail to communicate to you)!
June R Harton - 23 Dec 2004 08:08 GMT
You have ZERO case, Bulgar, only hot air. Any full reading of ALL
ancient historians identify the Macedonians as Greeks. Also, ALL
well read modern historians had no choice but to come to the same
conclusion.

For fair use only:

"The Macedonian people and their kings were of Greek stock, as their
traditions and the scanty remains of their language combine to testify."
John Bagnell Bury, "A History of Greece to the Death of Alexander the
Great", The Modern Library, New Uork, 1913

"It seems more and more certain that the Macedonians were a Greek tribe
related to the Dorians. However, as they stayed high up in the distant
north, they could not participate in the progress of civilization of the
Greek people that migrated southward...".
Ul. Wilcken, Alexandre le Grand, op. cit., p. 33:

"A strong Illyrian and Thracian influence can thus be recognized in
Macedonian speech and manners. These however are only trifles compared
with the Greek character of the Macedonian nationality; for example the
names of the true full blooded Macedonians, especially of the princes
and nobles, are purely Greek in their formation and sounds."
Ulrich Wilcken, "Alexander the Great", Norton & Company, 1967

"And yet when we take into account the political conditions, religion and
morals of the Macedonians, our conviction is strengthened that they were a
Greek race akin to the Dorians."
Ulrich Wilcken, "Alexander the Great", Norton publications, 1967.

"the majority of the new generation of historians ......
agree, and rightly so, that the Macedonians were Greeks".
Herman Bengtson, Griechische Geschichte4, Muenchen 1969, p. 305:

"That the Macedonians were of Greek stock seems certain. The claim
made by the Argead dynasty to be of Argive descent may be no more
than a generally accepted myth, but Macedonian proper names, such as
Ptolemaios or Philippos, are good Greek names, and the names of the
Macedonian months, although differed from those of Athens or Sparta,
were also Greek. The language spoken by the Macedonians, which
Greeks of the classical period found intelligible, appears to have been
a primitive north-west Greek dialect,
much influenced by the languages of the neighboring barbarians."
J.R. Hamilton, "Alexander the Great", London, 1973

"These plains would be the envy of any Greek visitor who crossed their
southern border by the narrow vale of Tempe and the foot of Mount Olympus.
He would pass the frontier post of Heraclion, town of Heracles, and stop at
the harbour town of Dion, named after the Greek god Zeus, ancestor of the
Macedonian kings, and site of a yearly nine-day festival of the arts in
honour of Zeus and the nine Greek Muses. There he would walk through city
gates in a wall of brick, down the paved length of a sacred way, between the
theatre, gymnasiums and a temple with Doric pillars: suitably, the nearby
villages were linked with the myth of Orpheus, the famous bard of Greek
legend. He was still in a world of Greek gods and sacrifices, of Greek plays
and Greek language, though the natives might speak Greek with a northern
accent which hardened 'ch' into 'g'. 'th' into 'd' and pronounced King
Philip as 'Bilip'. Bearing on up the coast, he would find the plain no less
abundant and the towns more defiantly Greek."
Robin Lane Fox, "Alexander the Great", The Dial Press Publications, 1974

"In favour of the Greek identity of the Macedonians is what we know of their
language: the place-names, names of the months and personal names,
which are without exception Greek in roots and form. This suggests that
they did not merely use Greek as a lingua franca, but spoke it as natives
(though with a local accent which turns Philip into Bilip, for example).
The Macedonians' own traditions derived their royal house from one
Argeas, son of Macedon, son of Zeus, and asserted that a new dynasty,
the Temenids, had its origin in the sixth century from emigrants from Argos
in Greece, the first of these kings was Perdiccas. This tradition became
a most important part of the cultural identity of Macedon.  It enabled
Alexander I to compete at the Olympic Games (which only true Hellenes
were allowed to do).... The Macedonians, then, were racially Greek."
Richard Stoneman, "Alexander the Great", Routiledge, London and
New York, 1977

"Modern scholarship, after many generations of argument, now almost
unanimously recognizes them as Greeks, a branch of the Dorians and
"Northwest Greeks" who, after long residence in the north Pindus region,
migrated eastward. The Macedonian language has not survived in any written
text, but the names of individuals, places, gods, months and the like
suggest strongly that it was a Greek dialect. Macedonians institutes, both
secular and religious, had marked Hellenic characteristics, and legends
identify or link the people with the Dorians."
John V.A. Fine, "The Ancient Greeks a Critical History", Harvard University
Press, Massachusetts, 1983

Taken from N. G. L. Hammond's "The Macedonian State:
The Origins, Institution and History," Calrendon Press, Oxford,
1989, pp. 413.pp. 12-14:"
4. The Language of the Macedonians.
What language did these 'Macedones' speak? The name itself
is Greek in root and in ethnic termination. It probably means
'highlanders,' and it is comparable to Greek tribal names such
as 'Orestai' amd 'Oreitai,' meaning 'mountain-men.' A reputedly
earlier variant, 'Maketai,' has the same root, which means 'high,'
as in the Greek adjective 'makednos' or the noun mekos.'
The genealogy of eponymous ancestors which Hesiod
recorded (p. 3 above) has a bearing on the question of Greek
speech. First, Hesiod made Macedon a brother of Magnes;
as we know from inscriptions that the Magnetes spoke the Aeolic
dialect of the Greek language, we have a predisposition to
suppose that the Macedones spoke the Aeolic dialect.
Secondly, Hesiod made Macedon and Magnes first cousins
of Hellen's three sons -- Dorus, Xouthus, and Aeolus -- who
were the founders of three dialects of Greek speech, namely
Doric, Ionic, and Aeolic. Hesiod would not have recored this
relationship, unless he had believed, probably in the seventh
century, that the Macedones were a Greek-speaking people.
The next evidence comes from Persia. At the turn of the
sixth century the Persians described the tribute-paying peoples
of their province in Europe, and one of them was the
'yauna takabara,' which meant the 'Greeks wearing the hat.'
[27] There were Greeks in Greek city-states here
and there in the province, but they were of various origins
and not distinguished by a common hat, the 'kausia.'
We conclude that the Persians believed the Macedonians to
be speakers of Greek. Finally, in the latter part of the fifth
century a Greek historian, Hellanicus, visited Macedonia and
modified Hesiod's genealogy by bringing Macedon and his
descendants firmly into the Aeolic branch of the Greek-speaking
family.
[28] Hesiod, Persia, Hellanicus had no motive for making
a false statement about the language of the Macedonians,
who were then an obscure and not a powerful people.
Their independent testimonies should be accepted as
conclusive. That, however, is not the opinion of most scholars.
They disregard or fail to assess the evidence which I have cited,
[29] and they turn instead to 'Macedonian' words and names,
or/and to literary references. Philologists have studied words
which have been cited as 'Macedonian' in ancient lexica and
glossaries, and they have come to no certain conclusion; for
some of the words are clearly Greek, and some are clearly not
Greek. That is not surprising; for as the territory of the
Macedonians expanded, they overlaid and lived with peoples
who spoke Illyrian, Paeonian, Thracian and Phrygian, and they
certainly borrowed words from them which excited the authors
of lexica and glossaries. The philological studies result in a
verdict, in my opinion, of 'non liquet.' [30]
The toponyms of the Macedonian homeland are
the most significant. Nearly all of them are Greek: Pieria, Lebaea,
Heracleum, Dium, Petra, Leibethra, Aegae, Aegydium, Acesae,
Acesamenae; the rivers Helicon, Aeson, Leucus, Baphyras, Sardon,
Elpe'u's, Mitys; lake Ascuris and the region Lapathus.
The mountain names Olympus and Titarium may be pre-Greek;
Edessa, the earlier name for the place where Aegae was founded,
and its river Ascordus were Phrygian. [31]
The deities worshipped by the Macedones and the names
which they gave to the months were predominantly Greek,
and there is no doubt that these were not borrowings.
To Greek literary writers before the Hellenistic period the
Macedonians were 'barbarians.' The term referred to their way
of life and their institutions, which were those of the 'ethne' and
not of the city-state, and it did not refer to their speech. We can
see this in the case of Epirus. There Thucydides called the tribes
'barbarians.' But inscriptions found in Epirus have shown conclusively
that the Epirote tribes in Thucydides' lifetime were speaking Greek
and used names which were Greek. [32]
In the following century 'barbarian' was only one of the abusive
terms applied by Demosthenes to Philip of Macedon and his people.[33]
In passages which refer to the Macedonian soldiers of Alexander
the Great and the early successors there are mentions of
a Macedonian dialect, such as was likely to have been spoken in the
original Macedonian homeland. On one occassion Alexander
'called out to his guardsmen in Macedonian ('Makedonisti'),
as this [viz. the use of 'Macedonian'] was a signal ('symbolon') that
there was a serious riot.' Normally Alexander and his soldiers
spoke standard Greek, the 'koine,' and that was what the Persians
who were to fight alongside the Macedonians were taught. So the
order 'in Macedonian' was unique, in that all other orders were in
the 'koine.' [34] it is satisfactorily explained as an order in broad
dialect, just as in the Highland Regiment a special order for a particular
purpose could be given in broad Scots by a Scottish officer who
usually spoke the King's English.The use of this dialect among
themselves was a characteristic of the Macedonian soldiers
(rather that the officers) of the King's Army. This point is made
clear in the report -- not in itself dependable -- of the trial of
a Macedonian officer before an Assembly of Macedonians, in
which the officer (Philotas) was mocked for not speaking in dialect. [35]
In 321 when a non-Macedonian general, Eumenes, wanted
to make contact with a hostile group of Macedonian infantrymen,
he sent a Macedonian to speak to them in the Macedonian dialect,
in order to win their confidence. Subsequently, when they and the
other Macdonian soldiers were serving with Eumenes, they
expresed their affection for him by hailing him in the Macedonian dialect
('Makedonisti'). [36] He was to be one of themselves. As Curtius
observed, 'not a man among the Macedonians could bear to part
with a jot of his ancestral customs.' The use of this dialect was one
way in which the Macedonians expressed their apartness from the
world of the Greek city-states. [27] See J. M. Balcer in 'Historia' 37
(1988) 7.[28] FGrH 4 F 74 [29] Most recently E. Badian in
Barr-Sharrar 33-51 disregards the evidence as set out
in e.g. HM 2.39-54, when it goes against his view that the
Macedonians (whom he does not define) spoke a language other
than Greek. [30] The matter is dicussed at some length
in HM 2. 39-54 with reference especially to O. Hoffmann,
'Die Makedonen, ihre Sprache und ihre Volkstun' (Goettingen, 1906)
and J. Kalleris, Les Anciens Macedoniens I (Athens, 1954);
see also Kalleris II and R. A. Crossland in the CAH 3.1.843ff.
[31] For Edessa see HM 1.165 and for the Phrygians
in Macedonia 407-14. Olympus occurs as a Phrygian personal
name. [32] See Hammond, 'Epirus' 419ff. and 525ff.
[33] As Badian, loc. cit. 42, rightly observes: 'this, of course,
is simple abuse.'[34] Plu. 'Alex.'51.6[35] Curtius 6.8.34-6.
[36] PSI XII 2(1951) no. 1284, Plu. Eun.14.11.
Badian, loc. cit. 41 and 50 n.66, discusses the former
and not the latter, which hardly bears out his theory that
Eumenes 'could not directly communicate with Macedonian
soldiers,' and presumably they with him. Badian says in his
note that he is not concerned with the argument as to whether
Macedonian was a 'dialect' or 'a language.' Such an argument
seems to me to be at the heart of the matter. We have a
similar problem in regard to Epirus, where some had thought
the language of the people was Illyrian. In Plu.'Pyrrh.'1.3
reference was made to 'the local 'phone,'' which to me means
'dialect' of Greek; it is so in this instance because Plutarch
is saying that Achilles was called 'in the local 'phone' Aspestos.'
The word 'Aspestos' elsewhere was peculiar to Greek epic,
but it survived in Epirus in normal speech. It is of course
a Greek and not an Illyrian word. See Hammond, 'Epirus' 525ff.,
for the Greek being the language of central Epirus
in the fifth century B.C.      "

"That the Macedonians and their kings did in fact
speak a dialect of Greek and bore Greek names
may be regarded nowadays as certain."
Malcolm Errington, "A History of Macedonia",
Univ. of California Press, LA, 1990 Pg 3

Who Are The Macedonians 1995
Pgs 15/16
"Also, following Alexander's death, the rapid spread of Koine
based on Attic Greek made any distinction between Greek
and the language of 'the Macedonians' an academic one which
opposing camps continue to fight over. That Greek so easily
subsumed the local Macedonian dialect would indicate that
the dialect in Philip's time was not far removed from Greek
after all."

A.B. Boworth, "Conquest and Empire", Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998,
Canto Edition
"Alexander ruled the world as his father had ruled Macedon, concentrating
power in his own hands and office to his Companions. In nationality the
Companions remained overwhemingly Hellenic."

---From Cambridge, Ancient Histories.
The evidence for the language of the Macedonians has been reviewed
and discussed by Kalleris and Hammond, Griffith, and many others, all
contending that it was a dialect of Greek.  The increasing volume of
surviving public and private inscriptions makes it quite clear that there
was no written language but Greek. There may be room for argument
over spoken forms, or at least over local survivals of earlier occupancy,
but it is hard to imagine what kind of authority might sustain that. There
is no evidence for a different "Macedonian" language that cannot be
as easily explained in terms of dialect or accent.

"Ancient allegations that the Macedonians were non-Greeks all had their
origin in Athens at the time of the struggle with Philip II. Then as now,
political struggle created the prejudice. The orator Aischines once even
found it necessary, in order to counteract the prejudice vigorously fomented
by his opponents, to defend Philip on this issue and describe him at a
meeting of the Athenian Popular Assembly as being 'Entirely Greek'.
Demosthenes' allegations were lent on appearance of credibility by the fact,
apparent to every observer, that the life-style of the Macedonians, being
determined by specific geographical and historical conditions, was different
from that of a Greek city-state. This alien way of life was, however, common
to western Greeks of Epeiros, Akarnania and Aitolia, as well as to the
Macedonians, and their fundamental Greek nationality was never doubted.
Only as a consequence of the political disagreement with Macedonia was
the issue raised at all."
Malcolm Errington, "A History of Macedonia", Univ. of California Press,
LA, 1990

"The Molossians were the strongest and, decisive for Macedonia, most
easterly of the three most important Epeirot tribes, which, like Macedonia
but unlike the Thesprotians and the Chaonians, still retained their
monarchy. They were Greeks, spoke a similar dialect to that of Macedonia,
suffered just as much from the depredations of the Illyrians and were in
principle the natural partners of the Macedonian king who wished to tackle
the Illyrian problem at its roots."
Malcolm Errington, "A History of Macedonia", California University Press,
1990.

"A new force began to make itself felt on the northern fringe of Hellas, the
kingdom of Macedon.  Some people -Macedonians for the most part- claimed
it to be a Greek state and part of the Greek world. The Macedonians spoke
Greek and attended Hellenic festivals; their kings claimed to be descented
from Greek families- from Achilles, the great Achaean hero of the Iliad, no
less."
J.M. Roberts, "A Short History of the World", Oxford University Press, New
York, 1993

"Philip was born a Greek of the most aristocratic, indeed of divine,
descent... Philip was both a Greek and a Macedonian, even as
Demosthenes was a Greek and an Athenian...The Macedonians
over whom Philip was to rule were an outlying family member
of the Greek-speaking peoples."
NGL Hammond, "Philip of Macedon", Duckworth & Co. Ltd.,
London, 1994

"As subjects of the king the Upper Macedonians were henceforth on the
same footing as the original Macedonians, in that they could qualify for
service in the King's Forces and thereby obtain the elite citizenship. At
one bound the territory, the population and wealth of the kingdom were
doubled. Moreover since the great majority of the new subjects were
speakers of the West Greek dialect, the enlarged army was
Greek-speaking throughout."
NGL Hammond, "Philip of Macedon", Gerald Duckword & Ltd, London,
1994

MACEDON
"Outlying Greek kingdom north of Thessaly, inland from the Thermaic Gulf,
on the northwest Aegean coast...Its name came from an ancient Greek
word meaning highlanders...Macedon was inhabited by various peoples
of Dorian-Greek, Illyrian, and Thracian descent, who spoke a Greek dialect
and worshipped Greek gods...Unification and modernization came gradually,
at the hands of kings of Dorian descent."
David Sacks, "A Dictionary of the Ancient Greek World.", Oxford, 1995

"Certainly the Thracians and the Illyrians were non-Greek speakers,
but in the northwest, the peoples of Molossis {Epirot province}, Orestis
and Lynkestis spoke West Greek. It is also accepted that the Macedonians
spoke a dialect of Greek and although they absorbed other groups into
their territory, they were essentially Greeks."
Robert Morkot, "The Penguin Historical Atlas of Ancient Greece",
Penguin Publ., 1996

from:  Spirit of Truth

(using June's e-mail to communicate to you)!
June R Harton - 16 Dec 2004 05:19 GMT
What did I tell you about posting lies, Bulgar?

For those that didn't know....

One only has to look here to see that the Fyrom Slavic majority, like that
last poster, are simply West Bulgarians and have no connection to
'Macedonia' anything:

In a letter to Prof. Marin Drinov of May 25, 1888 Kuzman Shapkarev writes:
"But even stranger is the name Macedonians, which was imposed on us only 10
to 15 years ago by outsiders, and not as something by our own
intellectuals... Yet the people in Macedonia know nothing of that ancient
name, reintroduced today with a cunning aim on the one hand and a stupid one
on the other. They know the older word: "Bugari", although mispronounced:
they have even adopted it as peculiarly theirs, inapplicable to other
Bulgarians. You can find more about this in the introduction to the booklets
I am sending you. They call their own Macedono-Bulgarian dialect the
"Bugarski language", while the rest of the Bulgarian dialects they refer to
as the "Shopski language". (Makedonski pregled, IX, 2, 1934, p. 55; the
original letter is kept in the Marin Drinov Museum in Sofia, and it is
available for examination and study)
Here is the text in the original:

"No pochudno e imeto Makedonci, koeto naskoro, edvay predi 10-15 godini, ni
natrapiha i to otvqn, a ne kakto nyakoi mislyat ot samata nasha
inteligenciya... Narodqt obache v Makedoniya ne znae nishto za tova
arhaichesko, a dnes, s lukava cel ot edna strana, s glupeshka ot druga,
podnoveno prozvishte; toy si znae postaroto: Bugari, makar i nepravilno
proiznasyano, daje osvoyava si go kato sobstveno i preimushtestveno svoe,
nejeli za drugite Bqlgari. Za tova shte vidite i v predgovora na izpratenite
mi knijici. Toy naricha Bugarski ezik svoeto Makaedono-bqlgarsko narechie,
kogato drugite bqlgarski narechiya naricha Shopski."

And here:

Reference source for Gotse Delchev's numerous utterings of 'We are
Bulgarians'......

http://www.ucc.ie/staff/jprodr/macedonia/macmodnat2.html

Even Gotse Delchev, the famous Macedonian revolutionary leader, whose nom de
guerre was Ahil (Achilles), refers to "the Slavs of Macedonia as
'Bulgarians' in an offhanded manner without seeming to indicate that such a
designation was a point of contention" (Perry 1988:23).
In his correspondence Gotse Delchev often states clearly and simply, "We are
Bulgarians" (MacDermott 1978:192,273).

And here:

For fair use only.

http://members.tripod.com/~dimobetchev/documents/ilinden.htm

" Considering the critical and terrible situation that the Bulgarian
population of the Bitola Vilayet found itself in and following the ravages
and cruelties done by the Turkish troops and irregulars, ... considering
the fact that everything Bulgarian runs the risk of perishing and
disappearing without a trace because of violence, hunger, and the upcoming
misery, the Head Quarters finds it to be its obligation to draw the
attention of the respected Bulgarian government to the pernicious
consequences vis-a-vis the Bulgarian nation, in case the latter does not
fulfill its duty  towards its brethren of race here in an imposing fashion
which is necessary by virtue of the present ordeal for the common Bulgarian
Fatherland...

...Being in command of our people's movement, we appeal to you on behalf of
the enslaved Bulgarian to help him in the most effective way - by waging
war.We believe that the response of the people in free Bulgaria will be the
same.

... No bulgarian school is opened, neither will it be opened... Nobody
thinks of education when he is outlawed by the state  because he bears the
name Bulgar...

Waiting for your patriotic intervention, we are pleased to inform you that
we have in our disposition the armed forces we have spared by now.

The Head Quarters of the Ilinden Uprising"

Damian GRUEV, Boris SARAFOV, Atanas LOZANTCHEV

This memorandum was handed to Dr.Kozhuharov, the Bulgarian consul in Bitola,

and transmitted by him to the government in Sofia with report N441 from
September 17th, 1903. "

And here:

http://www.bulgaria.com/VMRO/document.htm

http://www.bulgaria.com/VMRO/documen1.htm

http://www.bulgaria.com/VMRO/documen2.htm

http://www.bulgaria.com/VMRO/documen3.htm

http://www.bulgaria.com/VMRO/drzhava.htm

http://www.bulgaria.com/VMRO/exarchy.htm

http://w3.tyenet.com/kozlich/mapovska4a.htm

And finally here

http://www.bulgaria.com/VMRO/bitola06.htm

http://www.historymuseum.org/items.php3?nid=199&name=ochrid

from:  Spirit of Truth

(using June's e-mail to communicate to you)!
June R Harton - 16 Dec 2004 05:57 GMT
Btw, Bulgar...

Apart from your nonsense above, Bulgarian, what are you going to
do to get out of being Bulgarian:

http://www.historymuseum.org/items.php3?nid=199&name=ochrid

http://www.bulgaria.com/VMRO/exarchy.htm

http://www.bulgaria.com/VMRO/documen3.htm

And see below even though poster foolisly calls the West Bulgarians
of FYROM Macedonians he does post the actual correct date....
you and the Fyromians are nothing but Bulgarians:

In article <3808B850.3A6D@uqah.uquebec.ca>, Tinko Eftimov
<eftimov@uqah.uquebec.ca> wrote:

" I have some data concerning the blood tests needed in so
much as contemporary Macedonians and Bulgarians are concerned:

This is from a study by acad. Metodi Popov published in
Bulgaria in 1959. The data is presented in one of the latest issues of
the "Macedonia" newspaper, Sofia.

The blood tests have shown the following results by blood
groups:

Group 0: 36.41% (Bul) vs. 37.17% (Mac)
Group A: 40.85% (Bul) vs. 41.50% (Mac)
Group B: 15.03% (Bul) vs. 13.2% (Mac)
Group AB: 7.71% (Bul) vs. 7.97% (Mac)
Groups A+AB/B+AN: 2.14% (Bul) vs. 2.33% (Mac)"

from:  Spirit of Truth

(using June's e-mail to communicate to you)!
Dorian West - 16 Dec 2004 14:10 GMT
Macedonians and Greek?? What does this prove triangle-headed steppe Mongol
Slave??? That you are Macedonians or that Macedonians aren't Greeks???
Therefore when we say Britain and Europe, Germany and Europe, Italy and
Europe, Romans and Italians, Spartans and Greeks, Athenians and Greeks and
so on, do we imply that the former is exclusive from the latter and
vice-versa or are we using linguistic shorthand? Which is it steppe
Mongol???

You see, I told you Greeks not to give these steppe Mongols rudimentary
building blocks of civilisation - an alphabet and a religion. The steppe
Mongol Slaves are at least 2,000 years from being able to use them. What you
should have done is destroy them utterly and you would have saved many Greek
lives.

When we say Macedonians and Greeks do we somehow transfer Macedonia - a
timeless Greek province into the hands of triangle-headed steppe Mongols
such as yourself???? Would you have us write Macedonians and Athenians and
Spartans and Epirots and Thebans and Thessalians and Cretans and Thracians
and Argives and Mytilinians and Samiotes and Peloponnesians and and and and?
Are we that stupid or fanatical to write it all out like this?

Anyway what kind of pig-ugly name is Zhivko???? Do you use that in the real
world. No wonder people laugh and spit at you. Change that ugly name pal,
it's not doing you any favours, believe me?

Disregards to steppe Mongolslaves from cannibal Asia - you're all pieces of
commie sh.t and murderous beasts.

> He, heh, he... You are clutching at straws clown?
>
[quoted text clipped - 93 lines]
>> their forefathers, and live according to them, he was willing to take
>> them with him, many were ready to accompany him in his wars. ......"
Martin Edwards - 16 Dec 2004 18:21 GMT
> Macedonians and Greek?? What does this prove triangle-headed steppe Mongol
> Slave??? That you are Macedonians or that Macedonians aren't Greeks???
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> should have done is destroy them utterly and you would have saved many Greek
> lives.

Çok güzel.
Signature

You can't fool me: there ain't no Sanity Clause.  -Chico Marx

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Agora/1955

Jason K. Lambrou - 17 Dec 2004 04:42 GMT
>> Macedonians and Greek?? What does this prove triangle-headed steppe
>> Mongol Slave??? That you are Macedonians or that Macedonians aren't
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Çok güzel.
you too pato/maricon chulo
Martin Edwards - 17 Dec 2004 18:32 GMT
>> Çok güzel.
>
> you too pato/maricon chulo

Cripes!  I only said "Very nice".  How typically Christian,
Signature

You can't fool me: there ain't no Sanity Clause.  -Chico Marx

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Agora/1955

June R Harton - 21 Dec 2004 06:54 GMT
There is no doubt. They are clearly identified as Greek.

http://www.ukans.edu/history/index/europe/ancient_rome/E
/Roman/Texts/Plutarch/Lives/Antony*.html

For fair use only

" On the following day Antony feasted her in his turn, and was ambitious to
surpass her splendour and elegance, but in both regards he was left behind,
and vanquished in these very points, and was first to rail at the meagreness
and rusticity of his own arrangements. Cleopatra observed in the jests of
Antony much of the soldier and the common man, and adopted this manner also
towards him, without restraint now, and boldly. For her beauty, as we are
told, was in itself not altogether incomparable, nor such as to strike those
who saw her; but converse with her had an irresistible charm, and her
presence, combined with the persuasiveness of her discourse and the
character which was somehow diffused about her behaviour towards others, had
something stimulating about it. There was sweetness also in the tones of her
voice; and her tongue, like an instrument of many strings, she could readily
turn to whatever language she pleased, so that in her interviews with
Barbarians she very seldom had need of an interpreter, but made her replies
to most of them herself and unassisted, whether they were Ethiopians,
Troglodytes, Hebrews, Arabians, Syrians, Medes or Parthians. Nay, it is said
that she knew the speech of many other peoples also, although the kings of
Egypt before her had not even made an effort to learn the native language,
and some actually gave up their Macedonian dialect."

from:  Spirit of Truth

(using June's e-mail to communicate to you)!
Yannis the Macedonian - 16 Dec 2004 17:33 GMT
> He, heh, he... You are clutching at straws clown?
...........................................
> Everywhere in Josephus' writings the Macedonians are identified only as they
> should be identified, moron. And that is: MACEDONIANS.

Macedonians never honored Bulgarian heroes like Gruev, Delcev, Misirkov,
Mihailov, Miladinof, Sarafov, ....

> Another thing you fail to mention about Josephus, grkoman-propagandist, is
> the greek (language) influence prior to the coming of the Macedonians to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Regards to all sub-Saharan "Black Athenians" :-)
> Zhivko

Iosippos wrote his books at +80  around. He and the other Jews spoke Greek
because, due to Macedonian campaign, Greek Koine dialect became the lingua
franca of eastern Mediterranean.
Yannis
Macedonia, Greece
Yannis the Macedonian - 16 Dec 2004 17:41 GMT
....................................
> itself, Antioch; and gave them privileges equal to those of the MACEDONIANS
> and GREEKS, who were the inhabitants, insomuch that these privileges
> continue to this very day...
> Everywhere in Josephus' writings the Macedonians are identified only as they
> should be identified, moron. And that is: MACEDONIANS.
.........................................
> Zhivko

As if they ( Greeks and Macedonians ) were brothers ??
Hahahahahahahaha !!

(Like Gruev that called Bulgarians as brothers ??)
Yannis
Macedonia, Greece
rikopal - 14 Dec 2004 09:41 GMT
It well known that the Jews welcomed Alexander as
the Greek who would defeat the Persians.
But the brainwashed Fyromians do not accept that, they
even altered the Bible.They have an excuse for everything and if they don't
they just erase it...

> Iosipos ( a Jew scholar of 1st c AD ) wrote: " ¸ëëçí ùí, åé Ìáêåäþí "
> that is "if you are Greek then you are Macedonian"
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Yannis
> Macedonia, Greece
Dorian West - 14 Dec 2004 11:43 GMT
Can they erase their steppe Mongol heads too? Pure triangle-Asian heads. You
might as well see this
http://www.missworld.tv/bio/bio.sps?iBiographyID=11683 That's Miss FYROM or
should I say Miss Greater Albania. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!!!!!! At least
she hasn't got the steppe Mongol head. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Way to go man!

> It well known that the Jews welcomed Alexander as
> the Greek who would defeat the Persians.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> Yannis
>> Macedonia, Greece
Panayiotis - 16 Dec 2004 00:21 GMT
> It well known that the Jews welcomed Alexander as
> the Greek who would defeat the Persians.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> > Yannis
> > Macedonia, Greece

Dear rikopal,
On 28 Dec 2003, I sent a reply to Yannis' message. It is interesting, I
think!

Dear Yannis,
The original text is very clear.
"King of Greeks" [Alexander], but forged by Skopjeans (for their own use and
nobody else's) centuries later to read "King of Macedonians".
Let me disagree with you on the interpretation of "tragos ton aigon". I
believe it means "the ram of the goats", the leader, and not the ram from
Aigai. Why not from Pella or Dion.
But, this is just a small insignificant detail. The main thing is that the
unforged passage refers to Alexander as the king of Greeks.

I remember Dennis Byzantinos in his extensive, but enlightening presentation
wrote on 9 April 2003, in a message addressed mainly to Bill Nicholov, who
proposed/threatened that the M.O.C. apply to the Pope and join the
Catholics. An excerpt of that message is quoted below:

QUOTE
I say "again" because if our correspondent [Nicholov] is aware the M.O.C.
did
consult the Anglican and Catholic west concerning the new Bible they
would use.The suggestion was that the old one had too many flawed
translations.In reality the oldest copies of the Bible they had were
as accurate as a Cyrilic text could be,the problem was however that
they were in Bulgarian!And obviously they did not want to consult
Greek texts despite the fact that they were the originals.
To their dismay the bible sent back was a nightmare.It seems that both
the Anglican and Catholic bible scholars in Daniels prophecy call the
general who would conquer the Persians,"King of the Greeks"!Oh no,what
have we done.In attempts made to pursuade the western Bible
institutions to write King of Macedon for apparent reasons the
Catholic and Anglican institutions said NO DEAL!(This shows a level of
unequaled stupidity since the Anglican and to a lesser degree Vatican
church have very strong relationships with Oxford Biblical scholars
which would cry bloody murder)

So aside from losing Russian financing perhaps appealing to the
Vatican would have to mean accepting the reference by Daniel
concerning the King of the Greeks.So I stand in full support of this
policy.If faith in the dogma of the Orthodox church means so little to
Mr.Nikolov then he's welcomed to go to the Vatican,and in an act of
Divine justice he will get exactly what he deserves!

Finally if you think Mr. Nicholov, that the Vatican church will cross
swords with all of the Orthodox world and especially with Bartholomew
for a small heresy which has no support outside its borders and shaky
support within,Think again.
UNQUOTE

Happy New Year to all,
Panayiotis
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.