Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / Ancient History / February 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Fossil manuscripts

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bobby D. Bryant - 27 Feb 2005 18:41 GMT
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4294943.stm

A palaeontologist is proposing treating manuscripts as the
"fossil remains" of populations of manuscripts, in order to
estimate the number in circulation and how it varied with
time, based on biological models for the biological fossil
record.

Signature

Bobby Bryant
Austin, Texas

Seanpit - 27 Feb 2005 19:52 GMT
Evolution via intelligent design . . .  not a problem.

Sean Pitman
www.DetectingDesign.com
John Harshman - 27 Feb 2005 22:52 GMT
> Evolution via intelligent design . . .  not a problem.
>
> Sean Pitman
> www.DetectingDesign.com

It's not evolution at all, Sean. It's more taphonomy. Just because
there's paleontology involved doesn't mean it's about evolution. You
need to learn how to read for comprehension.
John Wilkins - 28 Feb 2005 02:14 GMT
> > Evolution via intelligent design . . .  not a problem.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> there's paleontology involved doesn't mean it's about evolution. You
> need to learn how to read for comprehension.

And the evolution of the manuscripts is not designed, intelligently or
otherwise, even though every manuscript is intelligently copied. Nobosy
*intends* or *designs* those errors to creep in. It happens because even
the most intelligent process of reproduction is liable to error.

And Sean should know this, so I read him as being disingenuous here.
Signature

John S. Wilkins john@wilkins.id.au AA#2207
web: www.wilkins.id.au blog: evolvethought.blogspot.com
Fiat lunch!

Homer Sapiens - 28 Feb 2005 17:40 GMT
Seanpit wrote in response to the lead post regarding manuscripts:
"Evolution via intelligent design . . .  not a problem."

To which the words of Simon and Garfunkel respond eloquently:
"Man, he hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest..."

Your real life examples of intelligent design continue to fail the test
Sean and will do so until you can find some independent evidence other
than arguments from incredulity to indicate that there is a designer
that represents a candidate to complete your design.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.