> What did wealthy private citizens do with their accumulated wealth to
> ensure security? For example, assume Herodotus was a very affluent
> retired trader living in Thurii in 435 BC. What security options would
> he have had available to protect his hypothetical amassed fortune?
But what does 'protect' mean? It depends what this retired trader wants
in the long run.
(1) Fame, kudos, a pleasant after-life. Then he can present public
buildings etc. to Thurii or rich dedications in temples.
(2) Riches to pass on to his descendants. Then he doesn't retire after
all. He invests the money in other people's trading ventures. Some of
the law speeches of Demosthenes and others (Athens, not Thurii, but
close!) relate to people who did exactly this. And maybe he buys land:
I'm not sure to what extent he would buy land, and to what extent he
would gather it via family links. Making family links also becomes
easier with more money -- you give a good dowry when women in the
family marry, and thus you get links with other rich families.
blank - 17 Jan 2006 07:10 GMT
> > What did wealthy private citizens do with their accumulated wealth
> > to ensure security? For example, assume Herodotus was a very
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> easier with more money -- you give a good dowry when women in the
> family marry, and thus you get links with other rich families.
OK, let me put the question another way: could private citizens
deposit property (eg gold or gems) is the city treasury for
safekeeping? If not, what options were available to secure their
liquid assets?
Matt Giwer - 17 Jan 2006 09:19 GMT
>>>What did wealthy private citizens do with their accumulated wealth
>>>to ensure security? For example, assume Herodotus was a very
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>easier with more money -- you give a good dowry when women in the
>>family marry, and thus you get links with other rich families.
> OK, let me put the question another way: could private citizens
> deposit property (eg gold or gems) is the city treasury for
> safekeeping? If not, what options were available to secure their
> liquid assets?
Some time ago there was a rather long post on the subject of actually protecting gold. I remember a
little of it but can't vouch for it. In some cases there was something like a city treasury. In
other cases the richest started a "vault" with guards and got richer protecting the gold of others
or the rich got together and did the same thing. There was also hiding in house, under floor tiles,
buried, dispersed and about anything else you can think of to avoid a simple burglary. Caches of
buried coins are often found.
The article was much more interesting. Have you googled it?
There was on odd tale of a Greek city, perhaps not the only one, where it was illegal for
individuals to remove their gold from the city, illegal as in death penalty. As I have not come
across a right of a city to use the indivual's wealth as its own I haven't figured out the point of
the law.

Signature
The only legitimate value of a voting public is to hold a government
acountable by means other than a revolution.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 3568
nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
book review http://www.giwersworld.org/israel/willing-executioners.phtml a7
gnenian - 19 Jan 2006 16:46 GMT
> >>>What did wealthy private citizens do with their accumulated wealth
> >>>to ensure security? For example, assume Herodotus was a very
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
> book review http://www.giwersworld.org/israel/willing-executioners.phtml a7
All the gold plate on the statues in the acropolis are often considered
to have been a national reserve and to have been intended as such. When
the Spartans invaded the Athenians would remove the gold and valuables
from the smaller temples that were doing the same thing to the
acropolis.
The story of the greek city that couldnt remove gold was probably
sparta were this was true. Also - spartan coins weighed about a tonne
each (literally!) and were not meant to be exchangable.
The austerity this resulted in is supposed to have made them run wild
with corruption when outside sparta
gnenian - 19 Jan 2006 16:53 GMT
> > >>>What did wealthy private citizens do with their accumulated wealth
> > >>>to ensure security? For example, assume Herodotus was a very
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> The austerity this resulted in is supposed to have made them run wild
> with corruption when outside sparta
Or is that some islanders somewhere? Anyway it was crap. Made of Iron
oor something but the same applied to gold.
rick++ - 18 Jan 2006 14:26 GMT
Sometimes temples held important things,
more like wills and contracts.
puttster - 25 Jan 2006 02:28 GMT
here http://viking.som.yale.edu/will/finciv/chapter1.htm you will get some
insight into the very sophisticated financing used in Mesopotamia in the
early 2nd century BC. In that stable economy, 30 year loans were made, at
rates similar to today's. Persons acted as banks, borrowing at low rates and
lending the principal several times over. Syndicates, partnerships,
investments in cargo ships, grain futures... Most of the vehicles we have
today were available for the investor.
Unfortunately the greeks did not understand the usefulness of interest, nor
did the moslems or christians, so for several thousand years the security
options for the wealthy were more limited. But back in 1700 BC anyway, the
options were many.
> > What did wealthy private citizens do with their accumulated wealth to
> > ensure security? For example, assume Herodotus was a very affluent
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> easier with more money -- you give a good dowry when women in the
> family marry, and thus you get links with other rich families.