Two recent pieces about domestication of cows in Europe.
First an abstract of a paper (Scheu et al), then a doctoral
thesis (Anderung).
The 20 pp introduction of Anderung is also a good read on
genetics and domestication of sheep, goat, pig, horse and
cow.
___________________________________
Scheu, A.; J. Burger; S. Hartz, U. Schmölcke, D. Heinrich,
A. Tresset & R. Bollongino (2006)
"Aurochs or domesticated cattle? Ancient DNA analyses
of early animal husbandry in Northern Germany"
Second International Symposium on Biomolecular
Archaeology Stockholm, Sweden, 7-9 September 2006
http://tinyurl.com/2p7wrj [all abstracts. PDF 89 pp, 420 kb]
"For several hundred years beginning in approximately
5450 BC, the Mesolithic Ertebølle/Ellerbek culture in
the Southwest Baltic region coexisted with adjacent
Neolithic cultures to the south and east of the river
Elbe. During this time of coexistence, acculturation
processes led to the adoption of Neolithic elements
by the Mesolithic population of East Holstein.
Recovered artifacts evidence regular contact with
farming cultures and archaeo-palynological analyses
show that agriculture may even have been practiced
on a small scale. This assumption is supported by
archaeo-zoological analyses showing that Mesolithic
bone samples from the Rosenhof LA 58 site are from
fully domesticated cattle.
However, skepticism of these results has often
resulted from the professed diagnostic problem of
overlap in size between small female aurochs and
large male cattle. In addition, morphological analyses
can give no unequivocal information on whether the
presumed cattle are the result of independent
domestication of indigenous aurochs populations, or
domesticated animals introduced through direct
contact with Neolithic settlers.
To contribute to clarification of these questions, we
analyzed ancient mt- and ncDNA of several presumed
domesticated cattle from the site Rosenhof LA 58. In
addition to haplotype determination on the basis of
the HVR I region within the mitochondrial d-loop, we
successfully amplified parts of zinc finger genes on
the X- and Y-chromosomes for sexing.
The results show that all bone samples stem from
female individuals. However, only one of these
samples revealed a lineage that occurs in
domesticated cattle."
___________________________________
Anderung, Cecilia (2006)
"Genetic Analyses of Bovid Remains and the Origin of
Early European Cattle"
http://tinyurl.com/2fz2xb
[Diva/Uppsala. full text PDF 66 pp, 815 kb]
Abstract
"The aurochs Bos primigenius, extinct since 1627,
was the wild progenitor of cattle. It is believed that all
European cattle originate from one domestication
event in the Near East 10 000 years ago. However,
it is evident from the archaeological record that the
aurochs survived into historic time and spent many
years existing alongside domestic cattle. Thus, a
question posed is whether aurochsen were locally
domesticated or incorporated into early domestic
cattle stock.
In this thesis, genetic techniques are applied to
ancient and modern DNA from bovids in order to study
questions relating to the origin of early European
cattle. DNA from ancient specimens is fragmented
and in greatly reduced quantity. Therefore
mitochondrial DNA, present in many copies in the
living cell, has long been dominating the ancient DNA
research field. Analyses of ancient DNA presented in
this work are based on both mitochondrial DNA and
nuclear DNA, through the study of Single Nuclear
Polymorohism (SNPs). A method for typing ancient
SNPs was developed and applied to ancient cattle
bones.
Mitochondrial DNA of cattle is structured into five
geographically distributed lineages, the dominant
lineage in Europe is also found in the Near East
where additional lineages are found. This pattern has
been attributed to the proposed domestication event
in the Near East from where cattle carrying the single
lineage were brought to Europe.
However, the results presented here show that cattle
domestication was more complicated than previously
suggested. SNP data from extant cattle and bones
from cattle and aurochs point towards a hybridisation
event. European cattle appear indeed to have been
domesticated in the Near East and brought in to the
European continent from there. However, once in
Europe, hybridisation with local aurochsen took place.
It appears therefore that today's cattle descend both
from both Anatolian and European aurochsen."
___________________________________
--
p.a.
Day Brown - 22 Jan 2007 09:57 GMT
Thanx Peter. Very informative.
I think it mite be useful to consider the relationship the Saami have
with reindeer, which AFAIK, are not that different from Carbou.
Is this domestication, or symbiosis? My own experience with cattle, (I
was born on a farm) was that there was a lotta personality diffs. Some
breeds are more docile, but in any breed, you'll find some who are easy
to deal with, and some that are obnoxious.
In primitive times, I can see how some of the more laid back stock mite
find it more agreeable to live in close proximity to hominds, viewing
their predation less stressful than that of wolves. But stock wanders
around, they didnt have fences, so some hybridization was inevitable.
Gimbutas shows us figures of cattle dating from 5000 BCE, I believe,
rendered in fired clay. With large thick shorter horns more typical of
the Anatolian & Semetic breeds, altho the figures come from the lower
Danube region. Notably as well, there are some that are rendered with a
human figure apparently vaulting over the horns, not unlike that seen
in Minoan frescos. This suggests to me some stock that were *trained*
to participate in this kind of gymanstics.
Naturally, the more docile bulls would have been used.
Hayabusa - 25 Jan 2007 20:13 GMT
>Anderung, Cecilia (2006)
>"Genetic Analyses of Bovid Remains and the Origin of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Abstract
> However, the results presented here show that cattle
> domestication was more complicated than previously
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> It appears therefore that today's cattle descend both
> from both Anatolian and European aurochsen."
I think that is a nice finding. It explains how the animal species
survived the genetic bottleneck that comes with domestication.
Domestication of such animals is anything but a straightforward
process because usually, wild animals in captivity do not reproduce.
TX, Peter.
Hayabusa
Peter Alaca - 25 Jan 2007 21:00 GMT
>> Anderung, Cecilia (2006)
>> "Genetic Analyses of Bovid Remains and the Origin of
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> It appears therefore that today's cattle descend both
>> from both Anatolian and European aurochsen."
> I think that is a nice finding. It explains how the animal species
> survived the genetic bottleneck that comes with domestication.
> Domestication of such animals is anything but a straightforward
> process because usually, wild animals in captivity do not reproduce.
But it is complicated. The conclusion of Anderung is that
cattle mixed with auroch, while the results of Scheu at all
for northern Germany show mainly the use of auroch, with
hardly any domesticated cattle.
Were the aurochs only hunted, or also milked (like the Saami
with reindeer)?
To give you an idea is here a very nice picture of a herd of 'free'
living Heck cattle ('reconstructed' auroch) and Konik horses in
the Oostvaardersplassen.
http://oostvaardersplassen.biofaan.nl/panoramaas/index.html
(Imagine this mixed with many Red and Roe deer, Buzzards
and White tailed Eagles. A realy spectaculair sight)

Signature
p.a.
Uwe Müller - 26 Jan 2007 06:54 GMT
> >> Anderung, Cecilia (2006)
> >> "Genetic Analyses of Bovid Remains and the Origin of
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> (Imagine this mixed with many Red and Roe deer, Buzzards
> and White tailed Eagles. A realy spectaculair sight)
More pictures at http://www.auerochsen.de/
have fun
Uwe Mueller
Hayabusa - 27 Jan 2007 09:08 GMT
>> >> Anderung, Cecilia (2006)
>> >> "Genetic Analyses of Bovid Remains and the Origin of
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
>Uwe Mueller