Sci.Archaeology, established in May 1991, is an
unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion
of archaeology in its many aspects.
Charter
1. To exchange information on various concerns
in archaeology, including method and theory, pot
hunting, egyptology, typology, dating, and other
related topics.
2. To facilitate ongoing debates and comments on
ideas or research that may not necessarily be in a
publishable form.
3. To query other interested archaeologists about
resources which could be made generally available.
(e.g. programs, images, data, references, but not
exact site locations).
4. To keep each other informed on upcoming events
of interest to social science researchers and
computing in the field of archaeology.
=======================================
End of charter
=======================================
"Archaeology is the study of past cultural
behaviour, from the beginnings of the human
species to events that happened yesterday,
through the material remains, or artefacts, that
people leave behind. By carefully applying
scientific techniques in excavation and analysis
of their findings, archaeologists attempt to
reconstruct past lifeways and understand why
different customs developed and evolved.
Archaeology is a part of anthropology, because
it studies individuals and their different cultures,
even if limited to the past. This is the most
interesting aspect of archaeology: it is a way to
understand humanity and ourselves. Archaeology
is also a part of history, but it is more reliable
sometimes because while history uses essentially
written documents, archaeology uses material
evidence.
A description of facts can be very precious, but if
we have only one description, or descriptions
from only one point of view, we can not be sure to
know a true part of the past. Individuals in fact
can lie or simply see things in a convenient way."
"History is an interpretation of the past based on
ancient/old writings. Archaeology is different from
history especially for the methods used. It can
help and complement history by offering studies
on materials to be compared with documents to
have a clearer idea of how the interpretation was
done. But also archaeology, when beginning from
an evidence arrives to an inference, interprets
data; for this reason archaeologists must be
careful trying to explain the background culture in
the present they have and which part of the
evidence they focused: an objective interpretation
is impossible. History uses archaeology also for
the periods when written documents were not
available, particularly prehistory, but more
extensively for any period for which there are no
documents available."
Università Ca' Foscari ,Venezia. Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia
http://lettere.unive.it/materiale_didattico/archeologia_egea/1.htm
Peter Alaca - 28 Jun 2007 16:16 GMT
> Sci.Archaeology, established in May 1991, is an
> unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
> Università Ca' Foscari ,Venezia. Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia
> http://lettere.unive.it/materiale_didattico/archeologia_egea/1.htm