 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
History Forum / General / Archaeology / October 2007Suggestion
May I suggest, although I am a fairly newby in this group, that the old concept of shunning might apply here. The clown seems to feel anything less than a court order is approval of his exhibiting his prejudices and whacko ideas on this newsgroup. Jack Linthicum schrieb: > May I suggest, although I am a fairly newby in this group, that the > old concept of shunning might apply here. The clown seems to feel > anything less than a court order is approval of his exhibiting his > prejudices and whacko ideas on this newsgroup. I was wondering, why you didn't just put him in the litter box and be done with. have fun Uwe Mueller Uwe M?ller wrote: > I was wondering, why you didn't just put him in the litter box and be > done with. But the cat is already putting him (or a reasonable facsimile thereof ) into the litter box George schrieb: >> I was wondering, why you didn't just put him in the litter box and be >> done with. > > But the cat is already putting him (or a reasonable facsimile > thereof ) into the litter box Then let's hope the cat doesn't take that as an insult. have fun Uwe Mueller > May I suggest, although I am a fairly newby in this group, that the > old concept of shunning might apply here. The clown seems to feel > anything less than a court order is approval of his exhibiting his > prejudices and whacko ideas on this newsgroup. A court order? Naah, after a careful study of a link to the first match in Google he is sure that he has the approval of God himself. But I think you are right. That's why I already killfiled the troll in this group.  Signaturep.a. >May I suggest, although I am a fairly newby in this group, that the >old concept of shunning might apply here. The clown seems to feel >anything less than a court order is approval of his exhibiting his >prejudices and whacko ideas on this newsgroup. You got it, mate. I just put Carl in my twit filter. Because so many here are willing to play Carl's game, the only real answer is to inform people that, while they are free to feed the Carl troll, those who feed trollz often end up in the twit filter along with the trollz. One last time just for luck: Piss off, Carl. On Oct 27, 11:22 am, m...@privacy.net wrote: > >May I suggest, although I am a fairly newby in this group, that the > >old concept of shunning might apply here. The clown seems to feel [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Piss off, Carl. Go back to your hot project and don't bother the adults. On Oct 27, 7:46 am, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net> wrote: > May I suggest, although I am a fairly newby in this group, that the > old concept of shunning might apply here. The clown seems to feel > anything less than a court order is approval of his exhibiting his > prejudices and whacko ideas on this newsgroup. I don't think a court order would sway him. His wife divorced him, but he doesn't accept that he is divorced! But you are right. I have him killfiled in Thunderbird, but occasionally have had to use Google Groups when my ISP is playing silly buggers with Usenet. For which I have not used the available killfile-analog. Plus, watching Carl be Carl has all the queer attraction of a very slo-mo train wreck. I will do what I can to refrain from replying to him on GG, too. >May I suggest, although I am a fairly newby in this group, that the >old concept of shunning might apply here. The clown seems to feel >anything less than a court order is approval of his exhibiting his >prejudices and whacko ideas on this newsgroup. I've been both suggesting and practising this for some time. 'Ignore thread' and kill-files are useful tools. Eric Stevens > May I suggest, although I am a fairly newby in this group, that the > old concept of shunning might apply here. The clown seems to feel > anything less than a court order is approval of his exhibiting his > prejudices and whacko ideas on this newsgroup. At least once a year and usually more frequently some believer appears to save us from ourselves. It also happens in soc.history.ancient and there usually in the form of the illiterate and ignorant idea that the OT contains real history instead of being total myth. The last time it happened in sci.arch it was so bad I dropped out for nearly three years as I do not consider myself an old-timer here as I do in s.h.a and s.h.w-i. SignatureIs there anything Israel cannot do? As all criticism of Israel is antisemitism what can it do worthy of criticism? As it can do nothing worthy of criticism, there are no limits on what it can do. -- The Iron Webmaster, 3863 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml flying saucers http://www.giwersworld.org/flyingsa.html a2 The last time it happened in sci.arch it was so bad > I dropped out for nearly three years as I do not consider myself an old-timer > here as I do in s.h.a and s.h.w-i. And this is supposed to be bad? For whom? On Oct 28, 11:34 am, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net> wrote: > The last time it happened in sci.arch it was so bad > > > I dropped out for nearly three years as I do not consider myself an old-timer > > here as I do in s.h.a and s.h.w-i. > > And this is supposed to be bad? For whom? Not me. Is this another stay/go or piss off/piss on poll? :-) > On Oct 28, 11:34 am, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Is this another stay/go or piss off/piss on poll? :-) With Matt once it gets past a certain stage it's always "go". If there are no brown shirts, crooked crosses and funny ideas about a bunch of horsemen who destroyed the Indus civilization it's pretty tame. >> On Oct 28, 11:34 am, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net> >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > are no brown shirts, crooked crosses and funny ideas about a bunch of > horsemen who destroyed the Indus civilization it's pretty tame. Mostly what I point out is there is no physical evidence for anything significant in the OT and that all the major characters are mythical. Stick around and you may possibly learn not to believe without physical evidence. SignatureIf foreign troops were running loose in the US Americans would be killing them. I have no idea why Americans are pissed when Iraqis do the same thing. -- The Iron Webmaster, 3857 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml http://www.giwersworld.org > The last time it happened in sci.arch it was so bad >> I dropped out for nearly three years as I do not consider myself an old-timer >> here as I do in s.h.a and s.h.w-i. > And this is supposed to be bad? For whom? You newbies are always encouraged to ask questions. In this case you will have to ask those who stayed as I am usually effective in helping to drive the bible believers out of soc.history.ancient. The main problem now is still David the Thiering Stalker in both newsgroups. BTW: I assume you are not one of those who believes without physical evidence that there is any history in the Old Testament. If you do believe, stick around and learn it is all fiction. SignatureI oft times contemplate those with necks of sanguine hue, On how dearly they love the red, the white and the blue. -- The Iron Webmaster, 3870 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml Larry Shiff http://www.giwersworld.org/computers/newsagent.phtml a8 >> May I suggest, although I am a fairly >> newby in this group, that the [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > not consider myself an old-timer here as I > do in s.h.a and s.h.w-i. .org/flyingsa.html a2 Tsk. As a member of the guild of professional trolls let me *expound* our reason d'etre which is to bust up cabals of nose and belly-rubbing, back-scratching, pocket-pissing old farts, wholly immersed in the usual paradigm-wallowing orthodoxies. Bah! >>> May I suggest, although I am a fairly >>> newby in this group, that the [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > Bah! You mean people who believe the Old Testament is other than myth? SignatureThe cure for US politics 1) Only a registered voter may join a political party. 2) A voter can only be a member of one political party at a time. 3) A voter can only contribute money to the party of which he is a member. 4) A voter may not contribute to his party until after one year of membership. -- The Iron Webmaster, 3860 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml Iraqi democracy http://www.giwersworld.org/911/armless.phtml a3 |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.