On Mar 29, 12:12 pm, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
> > REFERENCEhttp://www.friendsofpast.org/earliest-americans/
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://www.andaman.org/BOOK/chapter54/text54.htm
Prof. Niède Guidon - discoverer, excavator, and centre of permanent
controversy
http://www.andaman.org/BOOK/chapter54/text-PedraFurada/text-PedraFurada.htm#guidon
Pedra Furada site (Piaui) - 36,000 years old - Brazil
JTEM - 29 Mar 2008 20:30 GMT
> Prof. Niède Guidon - discoverer, excavator, and centre of
> permanent controversy
> http://www.andaman.org/BOOK/chapter54/text-PedraFurada/text-PedraFura...
Part of the problem here is that you're an idiot.
See (and I'm speaking figuratively), "Clovis" isn't a person,
it isn't even so much a reference to a type of point. What it
is is a reference to a culture.
"Clovis culture."
This would be quite a spell off from, say, individuals or
even isolated groups arriving in the Americas earlier.
Now I'm sure you still don't get it so I'll explain it a different
way...
It is entirely possible -- even likely -- that isolated individuals
or even small groups had been arriving in the "new world"
from the very first moments they were capable of it... which
they most likely were on the order of 40,000 years ago. But..
What is important is NOT when the first of our ancestors
arrived in the Americas, but when humans took root in
the Americas.... culture.
There came a point when, instead of marooned individuals
or groups, people put down roots in the Americas, there
was a population of people who viewed the Americas as
home... a growing population... spreading...