Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / British History / January 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The Brutish Empire ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Michael Gooding - 20 Jan 2006 13:50 GMT
Dear Marge,
An article in the UK's Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1690606,00.html

lambasts us Brits for being beastly to the Sinhalese 2 centuries ago,
the implication (to me, anyway) being that we must be ashamed of our
imperial past.  I have to admit that I'm quite proud and would say that
it's (a) wrong to judge past actions by modern criteria and (b) likely
that any country colonised by Britain would have been colonised by any
one of another dozen or so European powers and would have been a lot
worse off.

I'm also a bit sick of being asked to apologise, although I see nothing
wrong with the Japanese and Germans being forced to own to past
offences.  Does this make me a hypocrite ?

yrs,

Confused of Barking
John Cartmell - 20 Jan 2006 15:00 GMT
> An article in the UK's Guardian

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1690606,00.html

> lambasts us Brits for being beastly to the Sinhalese 2 centuries ago,
> the implication (to me, anyway) being that we must be ashamed of our
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> one of another dozen or so European powers and would have been a lot
> worse off.

I'm not quite sure who should be lambasted or ashamed. Is it all Brits, does
that include Brits who might be descendants of Sinhalese who emigrated to this
country, is it just the descendants of anyone who behaved badly, or just those
who own property & goods wrongly taken at that time? And can any of us
descended from those who, though UK British at the time, were equally
oppressed by the same people who reportedly did badly by the Sinhalese, be
required to be ashamed?

Signature

    John Cartmell    john@ followed by finnybank.com     0845 006 8822
    Qercus magazine    FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527        www.finnybank.com
    Qercus - the best guide to RISC OS computing
                                                     

Thur - 20 Jan 2006 15:49 GMT
>> An article in the UK's Guardian
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> oppressed by the same people who reportedly did badly by the Sinhalese, be
> required to be ashamed?

Whatever, I find the idea that guilt must be carried down
generations a puzzle.
We are always making judgements of history of some kind
or another, and despite ourselves we make those judgements
with some kind of predudice based upon the cultural absorbence
from childhood.

"If we are to celebrate Britishness as the chancellor wants
"us to do then the lesser-known aspects of our past ought
"to be thrown into the mix.

"lesser-known aspects of our past"
That's a good-un. Try All our History.
Signature

Thur

jimcolli@pacbell.net - 23 Jan 2006 11:53 GMT
> >> An article in the UK's Guardian
> >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> > oppressed by the same people who reportedly did badly by the Sinhalese, be
> > required to be ashamed?

> Whatever, I find the idea that guilt must be carried down
> generations a puzzle.

Precisely.

[,,,]

> "If we are to celebrate Britishness as the chancellor wants
> "us to do then the lesser-known aspects of our past ought
> "to be thrown into the mix.

Well, an Englishman allegedly invented the modern version of the
flush toilet, without which nearly all innovation could never
occur.  This is confirmed in a Wikipedia article which
apologizes for a "regrettably Anglocentric" version but
thoughtfully includes a piccie of a flush toilet for readers
who don't know what one looks like.

--

So I was listening to BBC 4 on WiFi in California in the
coffee bar at the back of a Borders Books store, at
about 5 pm my time when it was approaching 1 am
in London.  They began playing the nightly "Sailing
By," which precedes the marine weathercast.  The
music is intended to induce sleep, sex, or whatever
it is that people do an hour past midnight.  And if the
music doesn't do the trick, certainly the monotonous
marine report will.

A store clerk comes by, asks if she can take my
coffee cup and says I was snoring.  "Snoring
loudly, sir," I think she put it with a degree of
disapproving finality.  The "sir" ending with
falling pitch in America is approximately
equivalent to the English "old boy" form
of address with rising pitch.

The last thing I remember before nodding off was
a comedy skit with a diminutive sounding woman
with a voice that sounded like the Queen's calling
up Tony Blair and asking in a cockey accent --
she had recently visited his residence, no? --
"Your place or mine, then?"  That's British in the
best sense of the word.

The only war worthy of the nomenclature the
Brits have started in recent years was to get the
Falklands / Malvinas back from the Argentine military
government that occupied them.  And then, as if to
prove Big G were on the side of Whitehall,
the Argentine colonels were practically made to
drown when they waded into the sea
weighed down by their own chest medals.
One is reminded of the parting of the Red
Sea.

As far I'm concerned, you can retain southern
Hindustan and Ceylon if the Sinhalese ever want
you back.

Jim Collier,
near San Francisco
Vaughan Sanders - 24 Jan 2006 18:26 GMT
snip

> So I was listening to BBC 4 on WiFi in California in the
> coffee bar at the back of a Borders Books store, at
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> music doesn't do the trick, certainly the monotonous
> marine report will.

The shipping forecast is the best programme on the radio.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/coast/shipping/
I'm still not happy about FitzRoy, Maggie would have never stood for it.

Jamie
Vaughan Sanders - 25 Jan 2006 18:07 GMT
> snip
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Jamie

Some prat at the beeb has now axed the theme tune I wake up to.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006801,00.html

Jamie
Andrew Chaplin - 25 Jan 2006 18:52 GMT
> Some prat at the beeb has now axed the theme tune I wake up to.
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006801,00.html

Those musical tags are more important than we would have people believe.
When I was a boy, the BBC news was still broadcast on CBC Radio just after
the news at noon and began with Safroni's great march, "Imperial Echoes." It
ended with Holst's "Jupiter: Bringer of Jollity" (can't say the producers
didn't have a sense of irony) from "The Planets." Radio Canada used to
signal the news at the top of the hour with the first four notes of "O
Canada," the way the first four notes of Beethoven's Fifth Symphony to
signal "V" for victory was used during the Second War. The CBC's burst of
beeps it uses to break into shceduled programming for special news
broadcasts can still rouse me from a deep sleep.

It's likely a sign of my advancing age, but I do wish they would leave well
enough alone.
Signature

Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)

Vaughan Sanders - 25 Jan 2006 21:32 GMT
>> Some prat at the beeb has now axed the theme tune I wake up to.
>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006801,00.html
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> It's likely a sign of my advancing age, but I do wish they would leave
> well enough alone.

If it wasn't for the shipping forecast I would tune the alarm back to radio
2 in protest :-))

Jamie
jimcolli@pacbell.net - 26 Jan 2006 15:55 GMT
> If it wasn't for the shipping forecast I would tune the alarm back to radio
> 2 in protest :-))

Heard something last night which caught my fancy.
Radio 4 comes back on in the middle of the night with kids'
programs intended to be re-played to a kid audience during
school hours.

I was pretty absorbed in what I was doing last night -- this
was about 8 pm my time -- though I normally would have
changed stations when the children's stuff started.  Instead,
I heard something with the opening of Mendelssohn's "Hebrides
Overture," or Fingal's Cave as it is known.  (They would never
make American children listen to such beautiful music, although
they do get a nice sampling of "Appalachian Spring".)  It was
a serial version of a juvenile novel called "The Wreck
of the Zanzibar."  It is set in the Isles of Scilly, far south
of the Hebrides, in the first decade of the last century.
But its significance as a brooding picture in C-minor
of Britain's windward Atlantic coasts was not lost.
Nicely done.

--

Check out the home page of www.jim-collier.com.
Vaughan Sanders - 26 Jan 2006 20:37 GMT
>> If it wasn't for the shipping forecast I would tune the alarm back to
>> radio
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> of Britain's windward Atlantic coasts was not lost.
> Nicely done.

You can listen again here.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/schoolradio/drama/firststepsindrama.shtml

Jamie
jimcolli@pacbell.net - 28 Jan 2006 23:50 GMT
> > Some prat at the beeb has now axed the theme tune I wake up to.
> > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006801,00.html
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> beeps it uses to break into shceduled programming for special news
> broadcasts can still rouse me from a deep sleep.

Well, I was doing pretty well with "Master Team" (BBC 4, Saturday
at 2300 GMT) when Peter Snow asked the panel to identify *what*
the planets of Holst were the bringers-of for Venus, Mars, Jupiter
and Saturn.  Jupiter is bringer of jollity, we've established, and I
would have guessed "beauty" or "love" for Venus and "wisdom"
for Saturn.  But no cigar, which I wouldn't permit in my
house anyway.
hippo - 20 Jan 2006 16:15 GMT
"John Cartmell" wrote in message

> In article Michael Gooding  wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> oppressed by the same people who reportedly did badly by the Sinhalese, be
> required to be ashamed?

It's clearly a general remark as is the article in the Guardian. I don't
believe in genetically transmitted guilt, national or otherwise, anyway but
British Imperialism certainly did as much good as it did evil. You Brits
stopped the extermination of the Shona people at the hands of the Ndebele in
what is now Zimbabwe, united India and gave it its only common language, and
created the greatest economic powerhouse per capita in modern history in
Hong Kong to name but a few. -the Troll
Dave - 20 Jan 2006 16:19 GMT
>Dear Marge,
>An article in the UK's Guardian
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>Confused of Barking

Anyone who reads the Guardian should be ashamed.
Vaughan Sanders - 20 Jan 2006 18:41 GMT
>>Dear Marge,
>>An article in the UK's Guardian
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Anyone who reads the Guardian should be ashamed.

Yep, staffed by some very odd people and a resident madwoman named Polly T.

Actually to take Ceylon we paid the Swiss mercenaries of the Dutch East
India Company more money.
http://www.lib.mq.edu.au/digital/under/research/biographies/agnew.html
The King of Kandy was about the most barbaric so and so that the British
Empire ever came across, btw.

Jonathan Steele is apparently their senior foreign correspondent.
"Two books that came out last year on Britain's suppression of the Mau Mau
rebellion in Kenya in the 1950s uncovered brutality and mass murder, ordered
by the British authorities, on a scale that matched Kandy in 1815."

I doubt he has ever heard of the "Groundnut Scheme", this prat insults
people like my uncle who worked on it.

"That same fairness demands that we assess and teach our history accurately.
The growing number of Britons who are not descended from an empire-building
or empire-running past know from their own families' oral reminiscences, and
from the white-supremacist chauvinism they encounter, that the textbook
story of Britain's past is a lie. Recognising our true history is what the
chancellor's Britishness campaign should focus on."
Yep, Rhodesia was a sh.t-hole before Mugabe put it right.

Jamie
a.spencer3 - 20 Jan 2006 20:31 GMT
>> "Two books that came out last year on Britain's suppression of the Mau
Mau
> rebellion in Kenya in the 1950s uncovered brutality and mass murder, ordered
> by the British authorities, on a scale that matched Kandy in 1815."

Jesus wept, I thought he was talking about the Mau Mau until I got to the
end.
That xxxx xxxxxxxxx needs to get his head sorted.

Surreyman
hippo - 20 Jan 2006 20:45 GMT
"Vaughan Sanders" wrote in message

> Yep, Rhodesia was a sh.t-hole before Mugabe put it right.

Still makes me crazy all these years later. Rhodesia had the highest Black
literacy rate, longest life expectancy, and lowest infant mortality rate in
all Africa. Now it is a sh.t-hole like you say. I don't think the Guardian
is saying too much about it, bastards. I get really tired of saying 'told
you so' when it is too damned late. The only thing makes me feel better is I
called the US controller of foreign assets a f**king Nazi when he seized the
assets of the Rhodesian Information Office with the sole purpose of shutting
down their little monthly publication 'Rhodesia Today'. I reminded him we
could find Pravda on the news stands. He blamed the UN, bastards. All the
***holes who worked against the Smith government should be required to live
in the mess they made for a year. -the Troll
a.spencer3 - 20 Jan 2006 21:01 GMT
> "Vaughan Sanders" wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> ***holes who worked against the Smith government should be required to live
> in the mess they made for a year. -the Troll

We've been close friends with a couple for some 50 years. He's UK white.
She's Asian (Indian) from (then) Rhodesia. They met there and married there
with no prob whatsoever under the Smith regime.
They couldn't even have looked at each other in some other countries.
Coincidentally, I've just returned today from a funeral. Another 50-year
friendship. He's UK white, she was Asian Indian in (then) British Guiana.
Again, they married there.
At a rough count we probably have some half-dozen mixed marriage friendships
from the same era, all due to and thanks to the Empire, of course.

Surreyman
a.spencer3 - 20 Jan 2006 21:02 GMT
> > "Vaughan Sanders" wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> At a rough count we probably have some half-dozen mixed marriage friendships
> from the same era, all due to and thanks to the Empire, of course.

PS: And all I ended up with was a Spanish/German (duck!).

Surreyman
hippo - 20 Jan 2006 22:35 GMT
"a.spencer3" wrote in message

> PS: And all I ended up with was a Spanish/German (duck!).

Hey, she can talk to the Spanish doctors looking after you in your old age
and make sure they transplant the right organ ...... if they know what an
organ is, of course, besides the thing in churches one plays Bach on which
are fortunately too large to fit in. -the Troll
a.spencer3 - 21 Jan 2006 10:08 GMT
> "a.spencer3" wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> organ is, of course, besides the thing in churches one plays Bach on which
> are fortunately too large to fit in. -the Troll

Nah - I reckon my belly would take one.

Surreyman
hippo - 21 Jan 2006 14:36 GMT
"a.spencer3" wrote in message

> "hippo" wrote in message

>> > PS: And all I ended up with was a Spanish/German (duck!).
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
> Nah - I reckon my belly would take one.

Not one of the really big Spanish ones, lucky for you. Nope, in Spain the
problem is likelier they would put someone's lunch in by mistake or that the
proper organ went slightly off in the fridge and no one can tell over the
garlic, rancid olive oil, and chorizo. Yup, I can see how being married to a
Spanish duck could be useful if I were planning to move to Spain which, of
course, I'm not and wouldn't.  :^) -the Troll
a.spencer3 - 21 Jan 2006 16:59 GMT
> "a.spencer3" wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Spanish duck could be useful if I were planning to move to Spain which, of
> course, I'm not and wouldn't.  :^) -the Troll

Well, she's a bit de-Spanished now - it was her Grandmother, I think. The
Spanish & German immigrants have been well filtered by coming down through
solid Cockney stock (and a bit of Irish)!
She doesn't even speak the language, so she's a bit useless all round,
really (duck!).

Surreyman
hippo - 21 Jan 2006 18:37 GMT
"a.spencer3" wrote in message

> "hippo" wrote in message

>>  >> > PS: And all I ended up with was a Spanish/German (duck!).
>> >>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> She doesn't even speak the language, so she's a bit useless all round,
> really (duck!).

Tough luck.

Voted best joke in Australia:

Man walks into bedroom with a sheep under his arm and says, " this is the
pig I have been sleeping with when you have headaches."
Wife in bed says, "I think you will find that is a sheep, idiot."
Man rejoins, "I think you will find I wasn't speaking to you."  -the Troll
Vaughan Sanders - 21 Jan 2006 19:20 GMT
snip

> Voted best joke in Australia:
>
> Man walks into bedroom with a sheep under his arm and says, " this is the
> pig I have been sleeping with when you have headaches."
> Wife in bed says, "I think you will find that is a sheep, idiot."
> Man rejoins, "I think you will find I wasn't speaking to you."  -the Troll

:-))

Jamie
D. Spencer Hines - 21 Jan 2006 22:07 GMT
That is indeed VERY good.

Let's hear from the Scots -- they are experts on this.

DSH

> snip
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Jamie
gnenian - 21 Jan 2006 22:33 GMT
> That is indeed VERY good.
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> >
> > Jamie

A whole seperate species of cow with, non-intuitively, uniquely in the
world, RED hair amongst the worlds largest red hair population per head
of population and STILL sheep shagging jokes.

Humans and their Humour about their Scottish enemies!
ray o'hara - 21 Jan 2006 22:39 GMT
> > That is indeed VERY good.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Humans and their Humour about their Scottish enemies!

never thought about that. but you make a very good point.
a.spencer3 - 22 Jan 2006 11:20 GMT
> "a.spencer3" wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> Wife in bed says, "I think you will find that is a sheep, idiot."
> Man rejoins, "I think you will find I wasn't speaking to you."  -the Troll

Passed straight around our joke circuit!

Surreyman
hippo - 20 Jan 2006 22:28 GMT
"a.spencer3" wrote in message

> "hippo" wrote in message

>> "Vaughan Sanders" wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> friendships
> from the same era, all due to and thanks to the Empire, of course.

Yup, and IMO you maligned-by-the-Guardian colonialists were doing a far
better job governing than either native regimes or any other colonial power.
The only folks who had problems in Rhodesia were terrorists. Make no mistake
minority rule is wrong, but it's stupid to turn governments over to folks
from tribal cultures untrained to govern. -the Troll
John Cartmell - 21 Jan 2006 00:55 GMT
> Yup, and IMO you maligned-by-the-Guardian colonialists were doing a far
> better job governing than either native regimes or any other colonial
> power. The only folks who had problems in Rhodesia were terrorists. Make
> no mistake minority rule is wrong, but it's stupid to turn governments
> over to folks from tribal cultures untrained to govern.

You'll have noticed my view of the current Zimbabwe regime - but I do still
consider that the Smith government had much responsibility for the present
state of affairs. What they did then was wrong; what they allowed to develop
was wronger.

Signature

    John Cartmell    john@ followed by finnybank.com     0845 006 8822
    Qercus magazine    FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527        www.finnybank.com
    Qercus - the best guide to RISC OS computing
                                                     

hippo - 21 Jan 2006 04:15 GMT
"John Cartmell" wrote in message

> In article hippo wrote:

>> Yup, and IMO you maligned-by-the-Guardian colonialists were doing a far
>> better job governing than either native regimes or any other colonial
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> develop
> was wronger.

Smith said at the time that the majority blacks were not ready for the
responsibilities of government. He was right. What should have been done was
a gradual program of introducing democracy on the village and local levels,
a degree of power sharing to include elected advisory boards on all levels
of government, parallel government jobs, and the development of individual
natives who did well in secondary schooling for advanced work, and perhaps
even education abroad in law and government. Rhodesia already had the
highest level of black literacy in all of Africa which is a good starting
point. Now it doesn't and what was unfair minority rule is now majority
oppression, dictatorship, and a ruined economy with little hope for the
future for anyone black or white. Idealism is fine if applied as a long term
goal. Revolution and too rapid change is stupid and it always has been
because it does not consider the human ability to adjust. I will admit that
the older I get the harder it is to adjust to changes even to something as
simple as mechanical appliances like this little black machine I'm typing
on.  -the Troll
John Cartmell - 21 Jan 2006 10:06 GMT
> "John Cartmell" wrote in message

> > In article hippo wrote:

> >> Yup, and IMO you maligned-by-the-Guardian colonialists were doing a far
> >> better job governing than either native regimes or any other colonial
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> > present state of affairs. What they did then was wrong; what they allowed
> > to develop was wronger.

> Smith said at the time that the majority blacks were not ready for the
> responsibilities of government. He was right.
Possibly true; but neither were Smith & cronies.

> What should have been done was a gradual program of introducing democracy
> on the village and local levels, a degree of power sharing to include
> elected advisory boards on all levels of government, parallel government
> jobs, and the development of individual natives who did well in secondary
> schooling for advanced work, and perhaps even education abroad in law and
> government.
Yes!

> Rhodesia already had the highest level of black literacy in all of Africa
> which is a good starting point. Now it doesn't and what was unfair minority
> rule is now majority oppression, dictatorship, and a ruined economy with
> little hope for the future for anyone black or white. Idealism is fine if
> applied as a long term goal.
Movement in the right direction is essential.

> Revolution and too rapid change is stupid and it always has been because it
> does not consider the human ability to adjust.
It is stupid - but sometimes people see no alternative. Change is dangerous
(cf France late 18th Century & Russia early 20th Century) but no change is
even more dangerous.

Signature

    John Cartmell    john@ followed by finnybank.com     0845 006 8822
    Qercus magazine    FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527        www.finnybank.com
    Qercus - the best guide to RISC OS computing
                                                     

hippo - 21 Jan 2006 15:13 GMT
"John Cartmell" wrote in message

> In article hippo wrote:

>> > You'll have noticed my view of the current Zimbabwe regime - but I do
>> > still consider that the Smith government had much responsibility for
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> Smith said at the time that the majority blacks were not ready for the
>> responsibilities of government. He was right.

> Possibly true; but neither were Smith & cronies.

Yup.

>> What should have been done was a gradual program of introducing democracy
>> on the village and local levels, a degree of power sharing to include
>> elected advisory boards on all levels of government, parallel government
>> jobs, and the development of individual natives who did well in secondary
>> schooling for advanced work, and perhaps even education abroad in law and
>> government.

> Yes!

The success of British colonial rule in India was the trained native
bureaucracy and legal system it left behind which continues to function
today, same as Hong Kong.

The problem with that in Rhodesia is the Smith Government wasn't given the
time or permitted the circumstances. It's hard to reform government in the
face of foreign supported terrorism and UN sponsored economic pressures.
It's also counter indicative to the level of trust needed from both sides.

The problem with the Smith Government was it never really changed its
mindset from 'we can hold on' to 'majority rule is inevitable, we must
prepare for it'. I can speak to that personally having just gone through the
agony, expense, and frustration of admitting women to my old school under
court order. Deep down I knew we couldn't prevail, right or wrong, but
couldn't make myself accept it. Many other alums have never accepted it and
subsequently walked away in disgust. It is the 'bitter pill' reaction of
human beings everywhere.

>> Rhodesia already had the highest level of black literacy in all of Africa
>> which is a good starting point. Now it doesn't and what was unfair
>> minority
>> rule is now majority oppression, dictatorship, and a ruined economy with
>> little hope for the future for anyone black or white. Idealism is fine if
>> applied as a long term goal.

> Movement in the right direction is essential.

No doubt, but first you have to change the mindset of those with the power
to do something about it.

>> Revolution and too rapid change is stupid and it always has been because
>> it
>> does not consider the human ability to adjust.

> It is stupid - but sometimes people see no alternative. Change is
> dangerous
> (cf France late 18th Century & Russia early 20th Century) but no change is
> even more dangerous.

Not always. Russia, for example, would be much further along if the Czars
had stayed in power and at a far lower cost in human lives and misery.
Progress is always better in a gradual straight line without the dislocation
caused by dips, reverses, and too rapid change.

Somewhere along the line we, as a cutlture, are going to see the light and
learn the lesson that social progress can't be plugged like a bottle and too
rapid change just generates foot dragging and resistence, neither of which
is good.  -the Troll
a.spencer3 - 20 Jan 2006 20:25 GMT
> Dear Marge,
> An article in the UK's Guardian
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Confused of Barking

I'm with you, but I ain't confused.
Brit Emp history is one of my main enjoyments - and I was even involved in
the Empire myself before the Winds of Change.
Colonisation happened, for better or for worse.
And all other nations' colonialism was worse than the Brits, overall.
The difference between the Brits and the Japs/Nazis - and, in the colonies,
the Belgians especially, was the intentional use of terror & often mass
murder.
Of course the stories ain't all good, but to ignore that the Empire was
there (as is the case in most UK schools these days) or to apologise for all
(as is the case in the remainder of most other UK schools) is stupid.
See the website for the British Empire & Commonwealth Museum in Bristol,
which usually gets all into perspective.

Surreyman
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.