Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / British History / September 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Re: John Isaac Bates [1598-1666] Gateway Ancestor From Kent

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
D. Spencer Hines - 28 Sep 2006 18:42 GMT
> Well, that then makes you some sort of unfeasibly distant relative of
> mine too.
> --
>
> Julian Richards
-------------------------------------------------------------------

No, not necessarily true at all.

Julian doesn't understand genealogical relationships.

If A is related to B and also to C that does not mean B and C are
necessarily, indubitably related.

It's about COMMON ANCESTORS.

Just because Hines and Richards have some Common Ancestors and Hines and
Satterfield ALSO have some Common Ancestors does NOT mean that Richards and
Satterfield necessarily and indubitably have Common Ancestors too.

Put your thinking cap on, Julian.

DSH

"Julian Richards" <julian@spam-me-not.co.uk> wrote in message
news:l81oh2ho6s9ng6118stqldlffidduik31b@4ax.com...

> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:25:44 -0500, Grey Satterfield
> <gsatterfield@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>I don't recall how I am descended from John Bates.  My late wife was a
>>serious genealogist and knew as much as anyone about the musty old
>>Satterfield family.  While she explained it all to me when she found the
>>connection I don't remember the details.  It does seem, though, that she
>>found a relationship between Bates and one of my 18th Century ancestors,
>>Bidwell Satterfield.
>>
>>That Spencer and I are related is remarkable, indeed.  Should I laugh or
>>cry?  Should Spencer?  :)
>
> Well, that then makes you some sort of unfeasibly distant relative of
> mine too.
> --
>
> Julian Richards
D. Spencer Hines - 28 Sep 2006 20:01 GMT
Followup To My Last:

Further, Julian Richards and I may not be related either.

Julian has said he is related to Fletcher Christian [1764-1793] Master's
Mate of HMS Bounty.

Hines is also related to Fletcher Christian.  Neither Hines nor Richards is
a descendant of Fletcher Christian.

But that doesn't necessarily mean Hines and Richards are related because
THEY must have Common Ancestors to be related -- not just both be related to
Fletcher Christian.

However, with respect to John Isaac Bates [1598-1666], an English emigrant
from Kent to Virginia circa 1623, the postulated situation is quite
different.

Spencer Hines is a descendant of John Isaac Bates, a 10th great-grandson.

Grey Satterfield says his wife told him he is ALSO descended from John Isaac
Bates -- she was the genealogist in the family.

Sadly, Grey's wife is deceased, God Bless Her, and Grey seems to have lost
or destroyed her papers -- so he doesn't seem to be able to tell us HOW he
descends from John Isaac Bates -- if, in truth, he does.

But, if Grey IS a descendant of John Isaac Bates then he and Spencer ARE
related -- because they have a Common Ancestor.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Vires et Honor
D. Spencer Hines - 28 Sep 2006 20:10 GMT
>> Well, that then makes you some sort of unfeasibly [sic] distant relative
>> of mine too.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Grey Satterfield
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Hilarious!

Grey doesn't understand Genealogical Relationships either.

See my previous posts in this thread.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas
D. Spencer Hines - 28 Sep 2006 20:28 GMT
Stephen Tarleton [1637-1687], who married Susannah Bates, the daughter of
John Isaac Bates, was quite a pistol.

Do you descend from him, Grey?

Stephen apparently lived a very colorful life, to the detriment of his
reputation, before his marriage to Susannah Bates.  In 1659 he was 22 years
old and living in York County, Virginia, where he was an appraiser of
tobacco.  He was required to appear in court to answer the deposition of
Mary Gunnell, a servant girl, on 12 April 1660.  Mary stated that "Stephen
Torlington got her with child and did use her several times by day and also
by night in her master's hall and also in other places."

Susannah is not mentioned in her father's will.  Perhaps he disapproved of
the marriage.

Stephen was living in New Kent County by 1663.  He patented 394 acres there.

In 1676, he took part in Bacon's Rebellion against Governor Berkeley.  This
Rebellion was led by Nathaniel Bacon (1647-1676) who was an advocate of
unlimited expansion for the European settlers, at the expense of the Native
American Indians.

Bacon died and the group broke apart.  Several of the leading instigators
were executed, but Stephen Tarleton petitioned for mercy and a pardon, and
was exonerated.  Hmmmm... How could Stephen have been totally "exonerated"
if he admitted guilt, sought mercy and the granting of a pardon?  A pardon
is not necessarily an exoneration.

Stephen appears to have still been a pistol however.  In 1682 he was part of
the Blissland Parish Grievances, a protest directly to the Crown against the
alleged oppression of the Governor.  Additionally, in May 1682 he was taken
into the custody of the Sheriff of York County for "words that greatly
encouraged an uprising in which many tobacco, plants were destroyed in
protest against increased taxes.

Tobacco plants, crops, and stored stockpiles were destroyed by the planters
rather than selling them to the crown's buyers.  This uprising was the last
of its kind until the events which led to the American Revolution.
-----------------------------

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

And A Raspberry To King George III
D. Spencer Hines - 28 Sep 2006 22:02 GMT
Hilarious!

The canard about "six degrees of separation" refers to acquaintance NOT
genealogy.

DSH

> On 9/28/06 2:42 PM, in article ra9oh2t9e2t0jbvvdrh28r0prrek6n0799@4ax.com,
> "Julian Richards" <julian@spam-me-not.co.uk> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Grey Satterfield
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.