Re: Casino Royale -- A Killer Movie
|
|
Thread rating:  |
D. Spencer Hines - 30 Nov 2006 09:22 GMT 33,000 BA passengers alerted over radiation
By Duncan Gardham 30/11/2006 The Telegraph
Thousands of British Airways passengers were caught in a radiation scare last night after traces of a substance, thought to be the same that killed the former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko, were found on two planes.
Around 33,000 passengers are believed to have flown on 221 flights across Europe since the traces were found earlier in the month....
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=WV43222W314OLQFIQMFCFGGAVC BQYIV0?xml=/news/2006/11/30/npoison30.xml>
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Martin - 30 Nov 2006 18:42 GMT > 33,000 BA passengers alerted over radiation > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Around 33,000 passengers are believed to have flown on 221 flights > across Europe since the traces were found earlier in the month.... The food on BA was always a bit below par I thought, even in first class. I wouldn't panic even so, the sensitivity of modern detection devices is quite incredible - some might fairly say 'overly sensitive'. Polonium is often found in anti-static devices, such as brushes for cleaning camera lenses etc. It glows in the dark too...
On this subject, testing for drugs and drug residues has become big business these days, with more and more paranoid companies running 'routine tests' on their employees, to find out if they have been naughty. Whether they are doing their jobs well is immaterial. I myself discovered this recently, being rather surprised when 'sampled' and found to have morphine in my system. Odd, I thought. I'm sure I would have remembered taking morphine? Not good for anyone working on sensitive electronic aerospace equipment, I had to agree. It turned out to be a pain killer I was taking for a bad knee, available over-the-counter in any pharmacy in the UK for a couple of quid. The (paltry) trace of codeine contained in it registered as morphine...
I expect we'll be seeing more and more of this nonsense in the future, so watch out everyone! Cheers Martin
D. Spencer Hines - 30 Nov 2006 21:06 GMT It's quite amusing to see how many rampant, ignorant pogues think there is still a KGB, with its virtually limitless budget and skilled operatives.
There has not been a KGB since 1991 -- that's how far out of date these ignorant pogues are.
There is only the FSB today [Federal'naya Sluzhba Bezopasnosti]----- paltry and shriveled by comparison.
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Westprog - 01 Dec 2006 12:43 GMT > It's quite amusing to see how many rampant, ignorant pogues think there is > still a KGB, with its virtually limitless budget and skilled operatives. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > There is only the FSB today [Federal'naya Sluzhba Bezopasnosti]----- paltry > and shriveled by comparison. It's just an "Old comrades association".
--
J/
SOTW: "Make Somebody Happy Here" - Bushplant http://societies.csc.tcd.ie/~gamers/leprecon/ http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/405.pdf
D. Spencer Hines - 04 Dec 2006 22:33 GMT Recte:
Tiglath is not "sharing insults" -- as Pogue Black would have it.
Tiglath is simply Telling The TRUTH about Pogue Black -- he's a Fat Pig.
Pogue Black, of course, has a marked AVERSION to the Truth and Lives In Denial.
Pogue Black HIMSELF says he is FAT.
Read, Mark, Learn & Inwardly Digest: --------------------------------------------------------
"Erm..."
"I am fat."
Pogue Black -- 26 October 2004
And:
"I'm far too old and fat to go fighting young people full of hate and indignation and a desire to make the world a better place."
Pogue Black -- 23 February 2005 ------------------------------------------------------
Pogue Black takes yet another Egregious Pratfall...
KAWHOMP!!!
KERSPLAT!!!
As those massive, blubbery buttocks crash to the floor...
Victoria, it just doesn't get any better than this.
Enjoy The Show!
'Nuff Said.
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Veritas Vos Liberabit
>> Mine did. But it might not if the driver speaks with his mouth full of >> fish and chips like fat people tend to do. > > My my, isn't it nice when people agree with Hines and share his insults. > > It makes it so easy to justify your remarks later... D. Spencer Hines - 06 Dec 2006 23:59 GMT Yes, Pogue Highgonader often seasons his blarney with a soupçon of truth.
No Surprises There...
DSH
>C Cannon wrote:
>> Read about the great Yorkshire emigration to Nova Scotia in the 1770s: >> http://www.blupete.com/Hist/NovaScotiaBk2/Part1/Ch05.htm#rfn18 [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Ripley and environs, but some truth in Mr Highlander's story, I'm glad to > say. D. Spencer Hines - 07 Dec 2006 22:26 GMT Ian Fleming: Personal Quotes:
"I always make it a rule never to look back. Otherwise, I'd ask myself how I could write such piffle and live with myself, day after day."
Reported last words, to the ambulance attendants: "Awfully sorry to trouble you chaps."
Displaying a remarkable lack of foresight, c. mid-1950s: "My James Bond novels are really for a very specialized, limited market. I am not counting the great unwashed public and do not expect them to fancy anything I write."
"I wanted the simplest, dullest, plainest-sounding name I could find, James Bond was much better than something more interesting like 'Peregrine Maltravers.' Exotic things would happen to and around him but he would be a neutral figure - an anonymous blunt instrument wielded by a Government Department."
The target of my books lay somewhere between the solar plexus and the upper thigh. [From The Daily Express, 1962]
D. Spencer Hines - 10 Dec 2006 00:46 GMT It's Saturday night, he's drunk and he's deathly afraid of trying to post anything substantive -- because he knows it will read as incoherent gibberish.
So he sticks to inane, puerile and non-substantive one-liners.
'Nuff Said.
DSH
> "Martin" <martin.reboul@spamfuktiscali.co.uk> wrote in > news:457b34f5_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com: [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > Understand? > This exchange is over - you lost. Live with it. D. Spencer Hines - 10 Dec 2006 06:24 GMT True Enough...
They are the types who in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps -- or indeed in any difficult situation, not just in the Armed Forces -- NEVER volunteer for anything OR pull their weight in the boat.
Nor are they Creative Risk-Takers -- they don't have the brains, the guts or the nerves for it.
Purely Herd Animals...
Sheep.
Herd Animals just HATE Individualists -- who frighten them, confuse them and make them feel grossly inferior -- indeed serve to expose them for the frightfully boring little pissants they are.
DSH
> On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 21:24:55 -0000, "D. Spencer Hines" > <poguemidden@hotmail.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > The views expressed in this post are > not necessarily those of The Highlander. D. Spencer Hines - 10 Dec 2006 19:17 GMT Well, that certainly accurately describes "Surreyman" = Alan Spencer = Horsellman Rarebit = Pogue Surreyman.
Too Cowardly To Use His Real Name...
He represents the real dregs of SHM and AHB -- the bottom of the barrel.
Even his WIFE thinks he's an aged, desk-bound twit: --------------------------------------------------------------------
"I'm not the aged desk-bound twit that some seem to think (including my wife!)."
Alan Spencer, Alias "Surreyman" -- certified, aged desk-bound Left-Wing, Surrey-Brit twit -----------------------------------------------------------------------
The hilarious bastard can't even afford to stay in his present home after he retires -- so he's getting rid of his precious "COLLECTIONS".
> So...why are you moving? [DSH] "From a large-ish expensive-ish Surrey dump to a cheapish dump wherever to add a few noughts to the collapsed UK pensions industry's performance. How the hell did all this get onto this newsgroup! History, I s'pose, of the antique Surreyman!"
Surreyman
[Drunk when he posted that, no doubt. -- DSH]
"As always, you're being far too simplistic. It's not just a matter of 150+ beer mugs. She has to clean 'em. But she's now s'posed to be retired too ... Their ceiling to floor display shelving has to come as well. And even the beer mugs rank second to the books. So if the mugs are allowed, the books must be there. And approx. 250 ft. of their shelving. This is already taxing whichever hovel we'll be downgrading to. And part and parcel of the deal are all my Nigerian, Yemeni and numerous other A-rab knives & thingies. And my framed antique map collections need several hundred sq. ft. of walls. And the Empire stamp collections. I mean, a man can't leave his life behind ........ I think, after some 40 years she's starting to cotton on, so she knows it just ain't a matter of a few beer mugs! ........ We haven't even yet got around to discussing non-essentials like which beds etc. Gawd, even thinking about retiring's too bloody tiring."
Surreyman -----------------------------------------
Hilarious!
Abject, Hilarious, Debilitated Jerk -- That's Our "Surreyman".
Were he not here we'd have to invent him as the SHM/AHB equivalent of Al Capp's KIGMY ["Kick Me"]
How Sweet It Is!
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Exitus Acta Probat
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 17:59:47 -0000, "D. Spencer Hines" > <poguemidden@hotmail.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] >>> >>> The Highlander D. Spencer Hines - 11 Dec 2006 16:47 GMT Recte:
Hilarious!
It's ALSO quite amusing to see how many arrogant, ignorant pogues think Hawai'i is in the TROPICS and is therefore TROPICAL.
It is NOT.
How Sweet It Is!
Creative Slumming Is Great Fun!
As More Pogues Gravitate To USENET We Move From Dumb, to Dumber and then to Dumbest.
Christmas, Thanksgiving, Washington's Birthday, Theodore Roosevelt's Birthday, Abraham Lincoln's Birthday and Guy Fawkes Day In December!
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum
D. Spencer Hines - 20 Dec 2006 01:37 GMT > To me, any whisky is "hard stuff," while beer, wine, and the like are not. > This is a conclusion with which I would expect most others to agree. Puerile...
Often American Lingo -- left over from Prohibition Days.
Sophisticated folks would do better to just specify what sort of ethanol product they are referring to -- rather than characterizing them as "hard" or "soft".
Does Oklahoma have "Dry Counties"?
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Fortem Posce Animum
D. Spencer Hines - 20 Dec 2006 05:56 GMT Recte:
"Hard Liquor" -- is a term not favored by sophisticated, enlightened, _au courant_ people -- who simply say "Champagne" -- "Scotch" -- "Cognac" -- "Claret" [as the Brits do] -- "Bourbon" -- "Sauterne" -- "Burgundy" -- "Bordeaux" and so forth -- as I pointed out previously.
Pogue Scatterbrain [Satterfield] who is NOT very sophisticated, _au courant_ or enlightened -- prefers to use it -- because it's part of his Native Culture in Oklahoma.
Not Surprising -- Not Surprising At All.
Pogues Will Be Pogues...
It's also in the TAX LAW -- Pogue Scatterbrain, an ex-lawyer [he allegedly no longer practices, so he tells us] -- ergo the Federal "Revenuers" -- always wanting to tax booze -- can get their pound of flesh. Pogue Brannigan has helpfully told us about the tax laws.
Further, Pogue Scatterbrain was AFRAID to answer my question about "Dry Counties" in Oklahoma -- where he lives -- because THAT shows that Christian Fundamentalists [whom Pogue Scatterbrain has Great Distrust and Dislike for] STILL have the Great Power in Oklahoma to set Prohibition Rules in an entire County -- wherein alcohol is regulated sharply. Different Rules pertain in each county.
In FACT -- 31 of the 77 Counties in Oklahoma ARE DRY, in one way or another.
That's over 40% of the Oklahoma counties. -----------------------------------------------------
"Thirty-one Oklahoma counties remain "dry," according to ABLE. But even the counties that permit liquor sales by the drink do so with an assortment of caveats, including no on-site consumption on Sundays."
"Nineteen counties have prohibitions that will keep businesses from having New Year's events at which alcohol other than low-point beer is served, Patton said."
"Twenty-nine of the state's "wet" counties prohibit liquor consumption at restaurants, taverns and casinos during certain hours on Sundays." ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, as we know, New Year's Eve is a SUNDAY.
Pogue Scatterbrain wanted to HIDE revelation about the "Dry Counties" -- whereas I think you have a Right To Know.
Vide Infra: --------------------------------------------------------------------
Sunday holiday dry for some
By RHETT MORGAN World Staff Writer 12/13/2006
There are Oklahoma counties that won't serve liquor on New Year's Eve. Thousands of Oklahoma revelers bent on toasting 2007 will face a sobering reality on New Year's Eve.
Twenty-nine of the state's "wet" counties prohibit liquor consumption at restaurants, taverns and casinos during certain hours on Sundays.
And this year, New Year's Eve is a Sunday.
The law, which doesn't pertain to the intake of low-point -- or 3.2 beer -- affects many counties in northeastern Oklahoma, including Cherokee, Mayes, Muskogee, Payne and Rogers, said Marta Patton, deputy director for the state's Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission.
"They can go back and re-vote, which is what I told them the last time somebody called about it," Patton said of the New Year's Eve restrictions. "This doesn't happen very often, but when it does, it certainly can set you loose if you're not expecting it."
The 1959 Oklahoma constitutional amendment that halted more than a half century of Prohibition in the state included a requirement that liquor stores close on Sundays, certain holidays and election days while the polls are open. Last month, voters OK'd a state question that ended the election-day liquor ban.
The county-option amendment adopted in 1984, however, allowed Oklahoma counties with liquor by the drink to decide for themselves when bars and restaurants could serve alcohol.
Thirty-one Oklahoma counties remain "dry," according to ABLE. But even the counties that permit liquor sales by the drink do so with an assortment of caveats, including no on-site consumption on Sundays.
Nineteen counties have prohibitions that will keep businesses from having New Year's events at which alcohol other than low-point beer is served, Patton said.
A Rogers County proposition approved in April 1985 permits the "retail sale of alcoholic beverages by the individual drink for on-premises consumption" on all days except Sunday, Thanksgiving and Christmas, said Terri Thomas, Rogers County Election Board secretary.
The county's proposition bans the sale of liquor from 2 a.m. Sunday, meaning partygoers will not be able to uncork the sparkling wine until after midnight New Year's Eve. When Sunday turns into Monday and 2006 officially becomes 2007, revelers will again be able to legally purchase the bubbly and mixed drinks.
Questions about the measure are so common in Rogers County that residents often ask to review the ballot language in person, Thomas said.
"It's one of those things that's requested enough that it's kept in a desk drawer pretty handy so we don't have to go back to the actual election file and pull it out," she said.
Among the largest entertainment venues touched by the law will be the Cherokee Casino at Catoosa. The tribe, whose mixed beverage permit is through the state of Oklahoma, also operates a casino at the Will Rogers Downs in Rogers County near Claremore.
"We've had big New Year's crowds with and without being able to serve alcohol," tribal spokesman Mike Miller said. "We know some people make that part of their New Year's experience, and we will have that available just after midnight.
"It's still going to be a great place to be New Year's Eve."
Jim McCarter, bar manager at American Legion Post 141 in Claremore, said the Legion is moving up its New Year's Eve party one day because of the liquor ban. Other places such as the local Elks Lodge and Veterans of Foreign Wars post are doing the same, he said.
"Everybody here in the county is running a party either Friday or Saturday night," McCarter said.
Angela Smalygo, manager at the Chili's restaurant in Claremore, said she doesn't expect customers to linger much past suppertime Dec. 31, which is typical for that evening.
"Every place in Claremore will be closed way before midnight," she said. "I think they eat and then go to parties or off to Tulsa.
"We're so used to it now. People don't understand why they can go to Owasso and get it (liquor), another 15 miles away, but I think they understand that it's not my law."
A proposition to amend Rogers County's 1985 liquor option has never gone to a vote, Thomas said. But Rogers County Commissioners Randy Baldridge and Gerry Payne say they have fielded queries from eateries and casinos that would like to see the measure altered.
"The way that it was voted in is the way that it would have to be changed," said Payne, a commissioner since 1991 who is in his final month of office. "Other than that, it's never been an issue at all. There just hasn't been enough interest over the years."
http://www.tulsaworld.com/NewsStory.asp?ID=061213_To_A1_Sunda54931 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pogue Scatterbrain has, once again, been caught by the short hairs and then hoist with his own petar.
ZAAAAAAAAAAPPPP!
KAWHOMP!!!
Hilarious!
How Sweet It Is!
An Early Christmas...
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum
Mele Kalikimaka
D. Spencer Hines - 20 Dec 2006 06:10 GMT Many Oklahomans and Texans are Hypocrites, of course.
DSH -----------------------------------------------------------
Walmart incurs the wrath of the fundies over liquor in the Bible Belt
Published by Pam Spaulding August 14th, 2006 in Religion, Business
“This is an unprecedented attack against the family. We are going to fight this tooth and nail…I think Sam Walton, being the family-oriented man he was, would be rolling over in his grave about this. I’m really disappointed in Wal-Mart as a company.”
– the Rev. Ronnie L. Frankens, pastor of Homer Pentecostal Church in Diboll, TX, to cries of “amen” and “praise Jesus.”
Walmart unhinges the bible thumpers yet again, as the retail giant uses its muscle to turn dry counties into wet ones. Expect the press releases to fly soon from the AFA, Focus on the Anus and the rest of those folks over big box distribution of beer and wine. (NYT):
Wal-Mart, based in a dry county in Arkansas, forbids drinking at events held at corporate headquarters. But the giant retailer has made a push in the last year to sell more liquor, along with beer and wine, in its stores.
Attempts by Wal-Mart and others to allow alcohol sales in other places that remain dry — 415 counties in the South and in Kansas still prohibit such sales — are meeting fierce resistance from some church groups and religious leaders. They argue that returning to the days when liquor flowed will mean more family violence, under-age drinking, drunken driving and a general moral decay in the community.
But voters are increasingly likely to follow their pocketbooks rather than the words of their pastors. Alcohol proponents often make the case that liberalizing laws will increase tax revenue and reduce the need for property tax increases, an issue looming large in voters’ minds.
More dry-to-wet measures have passed than have been defeated in the last four years in Texas, Alabama, Kentucky, North Carolina, Tennessee and Kansas, the states where the battles are concentrated. “The communities who effectively make arguments about economic development and tax dollars typically win the votes,” said John Hatch, a political strategist based in Austin, Tex.
These fundies doth protest too much (after all, they are consuming an awful lot of porn; should Walmart or Sam’s stock that?). Any of these dry counties have a whole lot of drinking going on. As if these residents aren’t already driving to bordering counties to booze it up. -----------------------------------------------------------
Hmmmmmmmm...
Provocative.
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
D. Spencer Hines - 24 Dec 2006 21:41 GMT What's the advantage, if any, of a 48-year-old single malt, or even a blended whisky, over a 16-year-old?
"Smoothness"?
"Bite"?
"More Peaty Flavor"?
It sounds like a scam.
DSH
> The Highlander <micheil@shaw.ca> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Eugene L Griessel
|
|
|