Queen Elizabeth II To Visit The United States
|
|
Thread rating:  |
D. Spencer Hines - 28 Mar 2007 22:43 GMT Excellent!
Absolutely Smashing! <g>
She will be Most Welcome.
God Save The Queen!
First-Rate Tune Too...
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_Save_the_Queen>
DSH ----------------------------------------------------------
Buzz Grows Over Queen's Upcoming U.S. Stay
LONDON, March 28, 2007 CBS News ----------------------------------------------------------
(CBS) It was party time at Buckingham Palace, as Britain's Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip entertained a few hundred of their closest American friends. Close, says CBS News correspondent Mark Phillips, because they live in Britain.
Among them, actor Don Johnson of "Miami Vice" fame.
It quickly became clear, Phillips observed, that the show hadn't been a palace must-see, since Johnson had to explain to some guests that he's an actor!
The reception was in honor of the Queen's six-day visit to the United States in early May, her fourth state visit to America. During her first, she was a guest of President Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Many presidents have come and gone in that time, but she's still here.
When you've been head of state for 55 years, the numbers add up, Phillips points out. Ten American presidents, 8 of whom she'd meet, 325 official foreign visits -- you might think, at 80 years of age, the Queen had seen enough of the world and it of her.
But, Phillips notes, she is riding a new wave of popularity both in Britain and the U.S. since the release of the hit movie, "The Queen." Her portrayal by Helen Mirren won the actress an Oscar and the real queen new fans.
As well it should have. -- DSH
This trip commemorates the 400th anniversary of the first English settlement in American at Jamestown, the first permanent English settlement in the New World, and artifacts were on display for the palace guests. The Queen is also slated to attend the Kentucky Derby and visit with President and Laura Bush.
Good Choice of places to visit and enjoy. -- DSH
The Queen, too, will soon be on display, when celebrity photographer Annie Leibovitz will take the official photo for the state visit.
Says Philips, "Move over, Tony Soprano. The glossies are about to get a new cover girl!" ------------------------------
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
onlyme - 28 Mar 2007 22:51 GMT > Excellent! > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > First-Rate Tune Too... Wonder if she'll be appearing on Jerry Springer with Fergy?
JAF - 28 Mar 2007 22:54 GMT >But, Phillips notes, she is riding a new wave of popularity both in Britain >and the U.S. since the release of the hit movie, "The Queen." Bollocks. It's Helen Mirren who's popular, not Mrs. Windsor. And if you like Brenda so much, f.cking keep her.
 Signature JAF anarchatntlworldfullstopcom "If god wanted me to believe in him, he'd exist" Linda Smith, writer, broadcaster, comedian.
JAF - 28 Mar 2007 23:32 GMT >DSH > >Buzz Grows Over Queen's Upcoming U.S. Stay You Merkins have absolutely no sense of history, do you? You fought a war (and won it, which must be notable for it's rarity value for Merkins) to free yourself from the yoke of that bunch of inbred tosspots. And now look at you, sucking up like a greedy little piglet at the old sow's teat. How soon they forget. Still, at least, if she's got to meet the Bushes, it won't be all fun. Serve her bloody well right too.
 Signature JAF anarchatntlworldfullstopcom "If god wanted me to believe in him, he'd exist" Linda Smith, writer, broadcaster, comedian.
kj - 29 Mar 2007 12:59 GMT >> DSH >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > the old sow's teat. How soon they forget. Still, at least, if she's got to > meet the Bushes, it won't be all fun. Serve her bloody well right too. which war did they win?
In technical terms they are still there so they were the benefactors of the British descsion to not continue the war as we were fully commited elsewhere...but the colonist never won and without this descsion it is doubful they would have.
Anyway, rebelled against their rightful owners and then elected a Geordie as President......
John of Aix - 29 Mar 2007 20:43 GMT >>> DSH >>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >> her bloody well right too. > which war did they win? They beat Grenada. f.cking brilliant, it was. They didn't even have John Wayne with them at the time.
Count Baldoni - 29 Mar 2007 06:20 GMT | Excellent! | [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] | | Lux et Veritas et Libertas They must keep that stupid buuger Princ Phillip as far away from the Red Indian and black man as nuch as possible. He just can't be trusted to keep his trap shut.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 121 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try SPAMfighter for free now!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 121 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try SPAMfighter for free now!
JAF - 29 Mar 2007 09:01 GMT >I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It's a shame you're not using a decent newsreader, one which lets you trim posts.
 Signature JAF anarchatntlworldfullstopcom "If god wanted me to believe in him, he'd exist" Linda Smith, writer, broadcaster, comedian.
Count Baldoni - 29 Mar 2007 14:57 GMT || I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. | | It's a shame you're not using a decent newsreader, one which lets you | trim posts. I don't give a monkeys for all this. I am not renewing the damn thing and the best part about it is I don't get to read the advert.
Was that all or was there some topic you wanted to discuss ?
 Signature "A horse a horse, my kingdom for a horse".
I haven't had a winner for six months.
The Count
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 125 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try SPAMfighter for free now!
John of Aix - 29 Mar 2007 21:04 GMT >>> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. >> >> It's a shame you're not using a decent newsreader, one which lets you >> trim posts. > > I don't give a monkeys monkey's
> for all this. I am not renewing the damn > thing and the best part about it is I don't get to read the advert. No capito.
> Was that all or was there some topic you wanted to discuss ? Yeah, your crap posting style. I don't mind a digression into other subjectsbutlet's get this one sorted out first.
OK, calmos.
Sure, we're all lazy sometimes but what we post here might be read by hundreds of thousands of people and, given the many crossposts above, perhaps in many different countries. I think it behoves us therefore, if we consider ourselves a little civilized, to make our posts legible, cut out the stuff that isn't needed to follow the thread or isn't pertinent to the reply, without treasoning the OP. Or even reformat if you are really kind, lots of >>>> can play havoc with layout and make posts very unpleasant to read, whatever their content.
It's up to you of course, and I don't want to lecture you, but for bme this sort of thing is just 'savoir vivre', doesn't cost anything and makes life a little more pleasant for everyone.
D. Spencer Hines - 29 Mar 2007 21:10 GMT I entirely agree...
Except for the "hundreds of thousands". <g>
Most posters are just too lazy to edit and trim.
DSH
> Sure, we're all lazy sometimes but what we post here might be read by > hundreds of thousands of people and, given the many crossposts above, [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > [sic] this sort of thing is just 'savoir vivre', doesn't cost anything > and makes life a little more pleasant for everyone. John of Aix - 29 Mar 2007 20:52 GMT >> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. > > It's a shame you're not using a decent newsreader, one which lets you > trim posts. I don't use a decent newsreader (well according to the noble geeks here I think) that is <hangs head>, OE.
But it ain't the newsreader that counts, it is the capacity to hold down the left mouse button; select the extraneous text and press the Del key. Not much to ask I wouldn't think and if Mr the Count Baldoni can't do it then he can go f.ck himself.
JAF - 29 Mar 2007 22:02 GMT >>> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >I don't use a decent newsreader (well according to the noble geeks here >I think) that is <hangs head>, OE. I didn't even look to see what flavour of newsreader was in use - there was more than a soupçon of sarcasm in there.
 Signature JAF anarchatntlworldfullstopcom http://www.renewforfreedom.org/
Decerebrate Skink - 29 Mar 2007 22:06 GMT "JAF" <anarchSPAMKILLER@ntlworld.com> wrotted
>>I don't use a decent newsreader (well according to the noble geeks here >>I think) that is <hangs head>, OE. > > I didn't even look to see what flavour of newsreader was in use - there > was > more than a soupçon of sarcasm in there. Where the f.ck did you manage to get a soupçon at this time of night?
JAF - 29 Mar 2007 23:26 GMT >"JAF" <anarchSPAMKILLER@ntlworld.com> wrotted > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >Where the f.ck did you manage to get a soupçon at this time of night? Oh, it's an old one that's been in the back of the fridge for yonks.
 Signature JAF anarchatntlworldfullstopcom http://www.renewforfreedom.org/
Julian Richards - 29 Mar 2007 22:34 GMT >>I don't use a decent newsreader (well according to the noble geeks here >>I think) that is <hangs head>, OE. > >I didn't even look to see what flavour of newsreader was in use - there was >more than a soupçon of sarcasm in there. For shm
Header-statistics for: Newsreader (grouped, per user) (based on msgs with bodies within last 100 days)
soc.history.medieval 380 100.00% (probe count) 118 31.05% "Microsoft Outlook" 108 28.42% G2/1.0 39 10.26% "Forte Agent" 22 5.79% "Mozilla/NetScape" 13 3.42% "Forte Free Agent" 13 3.42% Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) 10 2.63% "Xnews" 6 1.58% "Turnpike" 6 1.58% Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) 5 1.32% (not set) 5 1.32% "Gravity" 5 1.32% "MT-NewsWatcher" 4 1.05% "TIN" 3 0.79% "trn" 2 0.53% Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) 2 0.53% Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16386 2 0.53% Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070221) 2 0.53% "slrn" 2 0.53% "Gnus" 13 3.42% (others)
--
Julian Richards
www.richardsuk.f9.co.uk Website of "Robot Wars" middleweight "Broadsword IV"
THIS MESSAGE WAS POSTED FROM SOC.HISTORY.MEDIEVAL
Robert Peffers. - 30 Mar 2007 00:35 GMT >>I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. > > It's a shame you're not using a decent newsreader, one which lets you trim > posts. Indeed, what a pity that your newsreader stops you from trimming headers, "alt.history.british,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.scottish,soc.history.medieval,uk.local.hampshire,uk.misc,uk.politics.misc", for example.
 Signature
Robert Peffers, Kelty, Fife, Scotland, (UK).
Cuddly Duddly - 30 Mar 2007 00:24 GMT >> | Lux et Veritas et Libertas > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >and not get arrested for speaking his mind. Would all Englishmen enjoyed >the same privilege D. Spencer Hines - 29 Mar 2007 07:36 GMT _The Queen_ will be released on DVD in Region One on 24 April.
_Casino Royale_ was released on 13 March.
And _The Charge of the Light Brigade_* was released Tuesday, 27 March.
NICE TIMING...
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
* The 1936 Errol Flynn/Olivia de Havilland/Michael Curtiz Version.
Balaklava
"As an inside joke, the Russian commander bears an uncanny resemblance to Joseph Stalin."
"Under the direction of Michael Curtiz, the slam-bang action sequences of this movie provide memorable thrills. The fighting at Chokoti is both exciting and unsettling as women and children fall before rebel bullets."
"The staging of the charge is impressive, if controversial. Many of the horses were destroyed because of injuries from the deliberate tripping. As the lancers charge into the face of roaring canon, to the right of them, to the left of them, in front of them, quotes from Tennyson's poem appear on screen."
"The shot of the fallen lancer still holding aloft the billowing Union Jack in his lifeless hand is great imagery. "When can their glory fade?""
The Tony Richardson 1968 version is much more Historically Accurate -- and a Masterpiece too -- but perhaps not as much fun and Anti-Empire & Anti-Military to a Great Extent.
Watch and Enjoy both versions -- before the Queen's visit.
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
me@privacy.net - 29 Mar 2007 12:26 GMT John of Aix - 29 Mar 2007 20:41 GMT > Excellent! > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > First-Rate Tune Too... Let's not exaggerate, 'God Save The Queen' is probably the world's most boring national anthem. Listen to the Welsh boyo, or the Irish Soldier's Song or the stirring (but bloodthirsty) La Marseillaise (aux armes citoyens, formez nos bataillons. Marchons, marchons, que sang impur abreuve nos sillons). 'God save Brenda' wouldn't even make 999 in a world hymn hit parade.
onlyme - 29 Mar 2007 20:45 GMT > > Excellent! > > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Let's not exaggerate, 'God Save The Queen' is probably the world's most > boring national anthem. Billy Connolly would agree with that....he suggested the same lyrics...but set to 'The archers' theme-tune (If I recall correctly).
John of Aix - 29 Mar 2007 21:26 GMT >>> Excellent! >>> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Billy Connolly would agree with that....he suggested the same > lyrics...but set to 'The archers' theme-tune (If I recall correctly). I've tried, oh yes I've tried, but bugger me, I cannot fit 'God save the queen' to the Archers tune
Should I try with a Scots accent?
onlyme - 29 Mar 2007 21:36 GMT > >>> Excellent! > >>> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Should I try with a Scots accent? Allow me to assist.... http://thepoormouth.blogspot.com/2007/02/while-on-subject-of-god-save-queen.html
onlyme - 29 Mar 2007 21:39 GMT > > >>> Excellent! > > >>> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Allow me to assist.... http://thepoormouth.blogspot.com/2007/02/while-on-subject-of-god-save-queen.html
I may have been wrong about keeping the lyrics though :))
John of Aix - 29 Mar 2007 22:23 GMT >>>>> Excellent! >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > Allow me to assist.... > http://thepoormouth.blogspot.com/2007/02/while-on-subject-of-god-save-queen.html Brilliant sketch for which I thank you, but the bastard still didn't sing the song.
onlyme - 29 Mar 2007 23:42 GMT > >>>>> Excellent! > >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > > > Allow me to assist.... http://thepoormouth.blogspot.com/2007/02/while-on-subject-of-god-save-queen.html
> Brilliant sketch for which I thank you, but the bastard still didn't > sing the song. I know..I must have been wrong about the lyrics staying the same...still good though. I think we should go for it. I especially liked the bit about the immigrants being able to learn it very quickly...
D. Spencer Hines - 30 Mar 2007 00:20 GMT An excellent example of the Loud-Mouthed, Unfunny, Vulgar variant of British Humor...
The sort designed for Proles and Morlocks to appreciate.
'Nuff Said.
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
<http://thepoormouth.blogspot.com/2007/02/while-on-subject-of-god-save-queen.html>
PureGold - 30 Mar 2007 10:26 GMT Wach out there is thief about, she wants America back!
I suggest you refuse her admission. She won't let any of us go.
All of us are slaves.
> An excellent example of the Loud-Mouthed, Unfunny, Vulgar variant of > British [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > <http://thepoormouth.blogspot.com/2007/02/while-on-subject-of-god-save-queen.html> Ian Smith - 30 Mar 2007 10:24 GMT > Excellent! > [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] > > Lux et Veritas et Libertas TRIM THE HEADERS!
Here are the rules for cross-posting:
******************************************************* BEGIN QUOTE
1. As a general rule, only send your post to one newsgroup. Pick that one carefully according to the criterion of relevance, content, readership and the discrete subject matter of your specific post. It is virtually always a mistake to post to eight or ten newsgroups, as some spammers are wont to do.
2. However, if your post genuinely crosses over lines of separation between categories --- and after you have carefully considered your logic --- post with confidence. Generally, this should be a relatively infrequent occurrence. Posting to more than three newsgroups simultaneously would almost always be a bad show and charges of spamming will be thrown at you.
3. Followups can be set to one group, if desired. If the content of a subsequent post in the thread does not justify multiple posting --- cut the followups accordingly to include only the relevant groups.
4. If you cut groups off the distribution of the followups --- tell your audience clearly in your first paragraph what you are doing. People are not mind-readers and will not know what you are up to unless you tell them.
5. Following these quite simple guidelines will ensure you that you reach the audience you desire and do not cast your net too widely.
END QUOTE *******************************************************
You won't believe it, but those sensible rules were posted nine years ago by DSH himself (http://tinyurl.com/2o4yra), evidently before the brain injury occurred. Here are the rules for cross-posting:
******************************************************* BEGIN QUOTE
1. As a general rule, only send your post to one newsgroup. Pick that one carefully according to the criterion of relevance, content, readership and the discrete subject matter of your specific post. It is virtually always a mistake to post to eight or ten newsgroups, as some spammers are wont to do.
2. However, if your post genuinely crosses over lines of separation between categories --- and after you have carefully considered your logic --- post with confidence. Generally, this should be a relatively infrequent occurrence. Posting to more than three newsgroups simultaneously would almost always be a bad show and charges of spamming will be thrown at you.
3. Followups can be set to one group, if desired. If the content of a subsequent post in the thread does not justify multiple posting --- cut the followups accordingly to include only the relevant groups.
4. If you cut groups off the distribution of the followups --- tell your audience clearly in your first paragraph what you are doing. People are not mind-readers and will not know what you are up to unless you tell them.
5. Following these quite simple guidelines will ensure you that you reach the audience you desire and do not cast your net too widely.
END QUOTE *******************************************************
You won't believe it, but those sensible rules were posted nine years ago by DSH himself (http://tinyurl.com/2o4yra), evidently before the brain injury occurred.
|
|
|