 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
History Forum / General / British History / March 2007Re: Topic For Paper?
Deeeeelightful! Victoria, it just doesn't get any better than this. Enjoy! Pogue Swain, like many Left-Wing, none-too-bright graduate students at fourth and fifth tier universities, is VERY easy to con -- and Reedy has successfully done so, with VERY little effort on his part. Indeed he has Pogue Swain salivating. P. T. Barnum was right -- there's another little sucker born every minute. Hilarious! This reasonably clever student is getting several SHM and AHB people to write his 20-page paper for him.... But they aren't clever or smart enough to realize it -- and how they are being used. All he has to do is mine their posts -- piece things together -- compare and contrast -- add an introduction, a conclusion and a little interstitial material and... Voila! He has his 20-page paper. The naïve pogues and poguettes are even giving him an extensive list for his BIBLIOGRAPHY -- so he will have that too, with very little effort on his part. Reedy is using the SHM people as unpaid research assistants, sounding boards and contributors for various ideas and approaches, as well as factual material and analysis. We note with amusement that SOME of the naïve pogues and poguettes have been less willing to be conned by Reedy, SINCE my initial post -- while others, the stupidest and most naïve of all continue to play the assigned role of the designated fool and flummoxed patsy. How Sweet It Is! DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Deus Vult Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum > Deeeeelightful! > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > successfully done so, with VERY little effort on his part. Indeed he has > Pogue Swain salivating. How come I rarely get designated as a pogue? I'm disappointed. [ SNIP ] > We note with amusement that SOME of the naïve pogues and poguettes have > been less willing to be conned by Reedy, SINCE my initial post -- while > others, the stupidest and most naïve of all continue to play the assigned > role of the designated fool and flummoxed patsy. "We" note? Who's "we"? You have a friend?!? > How Sweet It Is! > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum Do you actually know Latin, or do you laboriously scour the Internet for Latin snippets that other people have already dreamed up? AHS >[ SNIP ] >> We note with amusement that SOME of the naïve pogues and poguettes have [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >"We" note? Who's "we"? You have a friend?!? All schizophrenics have friends ...... Eugene L Griessel The word DOG never bit anybody. >>[ SNIP ] >>> We note with amusement that SOME of the naïve pogues and poguettes have [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > All schizophrenics have friends ...... Heheheh ... Hines truly is very well acquainted with the voices in his head ...%) - nilita Arved Sandstrom wrote about DSH & mottos: > Do you actually know Latin, or do you laboriously scour the Internet for > Latin snippets that other people have already dreamed up? I find it odd that he never uses the motto of the one place he surely belongs: Parcere subjectis. Cheers CJA > Arved Sandstrom wrote > about DSH & mottos: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I find it odd that he never uses the motto of the one place he surely > belongs: Parcere subjectis. "Et debellare superbos!"  SignatureAndrew Chaplin SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO (If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.) > "CJ Adams" <bluebell@start.ca> wrote >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Andrew Chaplin wrote: > "Et debellare superbos!" Only the first part is over the gate. ;-) Cheers CJ Adams Arte et Marte > Deeeeelightful! > [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > the stupidest and most naïve of all continue to play the assigned role of > the designated fool and flummoxed patsy. So prove it, Hinesy, write that 20 page paper using only our posts. Since we both know you can't do it, you resort to this sort of sad invective. How pathetic. D. Spencer Hines wrote: > Deeeeelightful! By George, I think he's got it! Another adjective to go with "hilarious". And what a fine pair they make. Now another five years mouthing words from his Grade 1 grammar and he might find yet another! Hope he learns to spell this new one by then. Eugene L Griessel A popular vote does not confer wisdom, intelligence or morality. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.