 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
History Forum / General / British History / April 2007Rudy Giuliani Warns Of 'New 9/11' If The Democrats Win
Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win By: Roger Simon April 25, 2007 The Politico MANCHESTER, N.H. —- Rudy Giuliani said if a Democrat is elected president in 2008, America will be at risk for another terrorist attack on the scale of Sept. 11, 2001. But if a Republican is elected, he said, especially if it is him, terrorist attacks can be anticipated and stopped. “If any Republican is elected president ---- and I think obviously I would be the best at this ---- we will remain on offense and will anticipate what [the terrorists] will do and try to stop them before they do it,” Giuliani said. The former New York City mayor, currently leading in all national polls for the Republican nomination for president, said Tuesday night that America would ultimately defeat terrorism no matter which party gains the White House. “But the question is how long will it take and how many casualties will we have?” Giuliani said. “If we are on defense [with a Democratic president], we will have more losses and it will go on longer.” “I listen a little to the Democrats and if one of them gets elected, we are going on defense,” Giuliani continued. “We will wave the white flag on Iraq. We will cut back on the Patriot Act, electronic surveillance, interrogation and we will be back to our pre-Sept. 11 attitude of defense.” ALL QUITE TRUE. BACK TO OUR 9/10 ATTITUDES. ---- DSH He added: “The Democrats do not understand the full nature and scope of the terrorist war against us.” BINGO! NANCY PELOSI WON'T EVEN GO TO THE BRIEFINGS. -- DSH After his speech to the Rockingham County Lincoln Day Dinner, I asked him about his statements and Giuliani said flatly: “America will be safer with a Republican president.” Giuliani, whose past positions on abortion, gun control and gay rights have made him anathema to some in his party, believes his tough stance on national defense and his post-Sept. 11 reputation as a fighter of terrorism will be his trump card with doubting Republicans. “This war ends when they stop coming here to kill us!” Giuliani said in his speech. “Never, ever again will this country ever be on defense waiting for [terrorists] to attack us if I have anything to say about it. And make no mistake, the Democrats want to put us back on defense!” Giuliani said terrorists “hate us and not because of anything bad we have done; it has nothing to do with Israel and Palestine. They hate us for the freedoms we have and the freedoms we want to share with the world.” Giuliani continued: “The freedoms we have are in conflict with the perverted, maniacal interpretation of their religion.” He said Americans would fight for “freedom for women, the freedom of elections, freedom of religion and the freedom of our economy.” Addressing the terrorists directly, Giuliani said: “We are not giving that up, and you are not going to take it from us!” The crowd thundered its approval. Giuliani also said that America had been naive about terrorism in the past and had missed obvious signals. "They were at war with us before we realized it, going back to ’90s with all the Americans killed by the PLO and Hezbollah and Hamas,” he said. “They came here and killed us in 1993 [with the first attack on New York’s World Trade Center, in which six people died], and we didn’t get it. We didn’t get it that this was a war. Then Sept. 11, 2001, happened, and we got it.” > Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > [the terrorists] will do and try to stop them before they do it,” Giuliani > said. Republicans wouldn't be like the idiot democrat Bush in 2001 an unprepared bumbling clown. they would show a quality professional response unlike the Democrats Controling FEMA during Katrina. Why if there had been a republican as Mayor of New York in 2001 they never would have attacked. The democratic president and Mayor of new york were totally Responsble for 9/11 Vote Giulinai and throw those Democrats responsible for 9/11 out of the White House right Vince >> Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win >> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > bumbling clown. they would show a quality professional response unlike > the Democrats Controling FEMA during Katrina. The really frightening thought is this: What if 9/11 happened during the Clinton administration? We'd probably wind up attacking Tasmania. Honu >>> Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win >>> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > >Honu On the contrary, Clinton fired missiles at the country which attacked US interests. Bush couldn't even get that right! What a ridiculous a.shole - if he represented the best the Republicans had on offer, Christ on'y knows what your worst must be like. The mind simply boggles! >>>> Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win >>>> [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > On the contrary, Clinton fired missiles at the country which attacked > US interests. Whoop-di-doo! That showed 'em! > Bush couldn't even get that right! What a ridiculous a.shole - if he > represented the best the Republicans had on offer, Christ on'y knows > what your worst must be like. > > The mind simply boggles! It certainly boggles when one reads the crap that the liberals believe... Honu >>>>> Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > >Honu Why don't you just massacre them all if you hate them so much? The NRA would probably help by loaning you a few howitzers to destroy the Castro District and other sink holes where Liberals gather to plot the downfall of the United States. My conclusion is that Republicans are a psychopathic conspiracy, all eagerly hoping for a chance to murder somebody. Have any of you ever actually killed another human being, or is all this the result of sniffing too much testosterone and spending hours watching reruns of Charles Bronson knocking off muggers in New York? It could be fun, raping Liberal women and letting the KKK have a free hand with their children... http://www.worldmilitaria.com/newsite/Media/HorstWesselLied.mp3 Die Fahne hoch! Die Reihen fest geschlossen! SA marschiert mit ruhig festem Schritt. Kameraden, die Rotfront und Reaktion erschossen, Marschiern im Geist in unsern Reihen mit. Die Straße frei den braunen Bataillonen! Die Straße frei dem Sturmabteilungsmann! Es schaun aufs Hakenkreuz voll Hoffnung schon Millionen, Der Tag für Freiheit und für Brot bricht an. Zum letztenmal wird nun Appell geblasen. Zum Kampfe stehn wir alle schon bereit. Bald flattern Hitlerfahnen über alle Straßen. Die Knechtschaft dauert nur noch kurze Zeit. Der Führer smiles down on you with approval! SIEG HEIL! SIEG HEIL! SIEG HEIL! Godwin's Law be damned! Republicans rule! Someone is engaging in hate speech. >Someone is engaging in hate speech. No kidding! Who? > On 26 Apr 2007 13:46:10 -0700, "DavidE.Powell" > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > No kidding! Who? Look in a mirror. You have passed irrationality a long time back. In article <1177620370.176858.32130@r3g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, David_Powell3006@msn.com mumbled > Someone is engaging in hate speech. Not any use trying to prosecute. He is too stupid to understand what he is saying. -- Usenetsaurus n. an early pedantic internet mammal, who survived on a diet of static text and cascading "threads." In article <f6d0339s5ih5q4ovn3genifh8mad255qd1@4ax.com>, micheil@shaw.ca mumbled > On the contrary, Clinton fired missiles at the country which attacked > US interests. Perhaps he did. Now which one was it ? Serbia ? Sudan ? Afganistan under the Taliban ? Iraq ? Yeh he sure was effective now wasn't he.. -- Usenetsaurus n. an early pedantic internet mammal, who survived on a diet of static text and cascading "threads." >> Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win >> [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > >Vince A very sensible bit of satire. Guiliani did a decent, albeit not spectacular job as mayor of New York. *If* he survives his cancer and avoids another divisive sex scandal, he might do an adequate job as President. Outside of his appearance of calm on 9/11, his failure to enhance the general security of the city in the months after the attack and his utter incompetence at actually managing the disaster itself certainly gives me pause, as do his many personality quirks. Far from deterring terrorist attacks on Americans, Republican policy almost seems to incite them. Happily, most Republicans seem to prefer *someone else*, too. The current fundraising leader for the Republicans is neither Guiliani nor McCain, but Mitt Romney, who is beating either by a 3:2 margin through 3/31. > Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > But if a Republican is elected, he said, especially > if it is him, terrorist attacks can be anticipated and stopped. Rudy should start to explain why the Republicans allowed 911 to happen in the first place. Until he do that he should shut up. > “If any Republican is elected president ---- and I think obviously I would > be the best at this ---- we will remain on offense and will anticipate what [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > didn’t get it that this was a war. Then Sept. 11, 2001, happened, and we > got it.” >> Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Rudy should start to explain why the Republicans allowed 911 to happen in > the first place. Until he do that he should shut up. No one "allowed" it to happen. It was your shipping boy Clinton that had the intel first. It was your whipping boy Clinton that had 3 opportunities to have bin Laden turned over to him. No one, democrat or republican. "allowed" 9/11 to happen. The democrats are just as guilty as everyone else. Honu >>> Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win >>> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >No one "allowed" it to happen. Your party allowed it to happen. You;re guilty of grosas negligence and one of the most disgusting examples ever of attacking a country to rip off its its oil. The Republicans aren't fit to shovel sh.t from one sh.t to another. You've managed to make terrorism an international problem; you getting smacked all over the shop in Iraq, and you're giving countries like Russian and China the idea that maybe taking out the US mightn't be too difficult. >It was your shipping boy Clinton that had the intel first. It was your >whipping boy Clinton that had 3 opportunities to have bin Laden turned over >to him. > >No one, democrat or republican. "allowed" 9/11 to happen. The democrats are >just as guilty as everyone else. What bullshit! You're not even man enough to shoulder the blame! A bunch of f.cking children playing games with the world's safety and playing it badly. Time you started paying real armies to clean up your pathetic messes. >Honu > Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win This guy is as big a loser in his own way as what we have now. Maybe that flip-flopper with the gold tablets thing going isn't so bad afterall... >> Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win > > This guy is as big a loser in his own way as what we have now. > > Maybe that flip-flopper with the gold tablets thing going isn't so bad > afterall... As opposed to Billary and Obama? The democrats have no room to call anyone else losers. Honu > >> Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win > > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Honu speaking of democrats and calling people losers..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt_YcQlYxyY redc1c4, since you brought up the subject %-)  Signature"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear considerable watching." Army Officer's Guide >> >> Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win >> > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > redc1c4, Sorry, but I automatically ignore any link to youtube. Anything on youtube is worthless, and only resides there because not other site will host it. Honu >>> >> Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win >>> > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > >Honu Spoken like a true loser and rednecked cracker. In article <3vd033182nvsgt91v5hn5luqj3jnrs15i7@4ax.com>, micheil@shaw.ca mumbled > Spoken like a true loser and rednecked cracker. I always love it when subjects of the Queen call people names. -- Usenetsaurus n. an early pedantic internet mammal, who survived on a diet of static text and cascading "threads." [..........] >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt_YcQlYxyY >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Honu > *I* *AM* Thus Spake: The U.S. has a _lot_ more to worry about than Al Qaida attacks. Racism is on the rise, the beginnings of a (U.S.) *Insurgency* ---> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OO18F4aKGzQ&feature=dir *I* *Am* (The One) Signature----------------------------------------------------------------------------- There are none so blind as those who do not want to see, and close their feeble mind tighter to see even less. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > The democrats have no room to call anyone else losers. Moron - you don't even know who I was refering to. > Honu > Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > is elected president in 2008, America will be at risk for another terrorist > attack on the scale of Sept. 11, 2001. rudy was mayor when the first attack happened, he was so good at preventing terror attacks that on the second attack 3 large buildings were destroyed {the towers and the 40 story WTC7} AND 3000 were killed. yeah he has shown how capable he is. >>Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > {the towers and the 40 story WTC7} AND 3000 were killed. yeah he has shown > how capable he is. David Dinkins was the mayor of New York City during the World Trade Center bombing on February 26, 2003. Rudy Giuliani didn't become the mayor until January 1, 2004. ALV >>> Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win >>> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > ALV Oops, sorry about the typos there. I meant to say that David Dinkins was the mayor of New York City on February 26, 1993 during the World Trade Center Bombing. Rudy Giuliani didn't become mayor until January 1, 1994. ALV Many of us understood what you meant. Dinkins was mayor at the time of the FIRST WTC terrorist attack, NOT Giuliani. Bill Clinton was President. DSH >> David Dinkins was the mayor of New York City during the World Trade >> Center bombing on February 26, 2003. Rudy Giuliani didn't become the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > ALV It's not as if all memories are erased when a new mayor or president is elected. It is possible for a leader to prevent a repeat of a tragedy that did not happen first during his tenure. Therefore, Giuliani and Bush are still the leaders who failed to prevent attacks that had been tried before. Is partisanship that strong that direct the mind to absurdities as that suggested below. I am so very glad I don't give a f.ck for any particular party, as long as someone does a reasonable job. > Many of us understood what you meant. > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >> >> ALV >>>> Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win >>>> [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > ALV This must be the political version of correlation analysis. In fact whoever was mayor has nothing to do with most events in the big city. I remember the Coconut Grove fire in Boston in November of 1942, killing over 400 people. Okay, I don't remember it, my father told me. No one blamed the mayor, and no, it was not James Michael Curley - he was between political jobs and jail sentences. Anyway, people die of lung cancer, and most of them drank a cola drink in their lifetime. No, they are not necessarily related, but people can find patterns in everything. Good Point! O'Hara never checks the facts before he posts. David Dinkins was one of the worst mayors NYC has had in modern times. DSH >>>Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win >>> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > ALV |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.