Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / British History / May 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Excellent Presidential Speech At The Coast Guard Academy -- 23 May 2007

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
D. Spencer Hines - 26 May 2007 03:57 GMT
Here's the entire speech.

We'll focus on parts of it later.

DSH
-------------------------------------------------

President Bush Delivers Commencement Address at United States Coast Guard
Academy -- 23 May 2007

11:41 A.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, all. Admiral Allen, thank you for that kind
introduction. Admiral Burhoe, congratulations on your promotion. Academy
staff and faculty, Congressman Chris Shays, state and local officials,
distinguished guests, proud families and, most importantly, members of the
Class of 2007: thanks for having me.

It's a privilege to stand with the future leaders of the United States
Coast Guard. Before you receive your degrees today, I want to make sure that
you have learned your "indoc." What is the Coast Guard?

CADETS: Mr. President, the Coast Guard is the hard nucleus about which the
Navy forms in times of war, sir! (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: I probably shouldn't relay that to the Secretary of the Navy.
(Laughter.)

I see a few "RCF Warriors" out there. Some of you earned demerits for
failing to correct your storage [sic], others got caught crawling under the
fence on your way to Connecticut College. (Laughter.) However you got
bagged, help has arrived. (Laughter.) In keeping with longstanding
tradition, I hereby absolve all cadets who are on restriction for minor
conduct offenses. (Applause.) I'll leave it to Admiral Burhoe to define
exactly what "minor" means. (Laughter.)

More than 6,000 young Americans applied to join the Coast Guard Academy
Class of 2007, and today just 228 will walk across this stage to receive
your diploma and commission. You're a select few, and each of you worked
really hard to get to this moment: survived R-Day, Swab Summer, and Friday
morning drill practice with a kind and gentle soul, Chief Dillmann.
(Laughter.) You learned to brace up, do orderlies, square meals, and eat
"hamsters" with your "eyes in the boat." You arrived on this campus as
"swabs" -- and today you will leave as proud officers of the United States
Coast Guard. (Applause.) Your teachers are proud, your parents are thrilled,
and your Commander-in-Chief is grateful for your devotion to duty.
Congratulations to you all. (Applause.)

You didn't make it to this day on your own. Many of you had the help of a
special faculty member who mentored -- mentored you along the way. Others
made it only through as a result of the intervention of one man: Hopley
Yeaton -- he's the patron saint of the Square Root Club. For the moms and
dads, the Square Root Club is an association of students whose GPA is so low
that when you take its square root, it grows larger. (Laughter.)
Unfortunately, they didn't have that club where I went to college --
(laughter) -- perhaps you'll make me an honorary member. (Laughter.)

Whether you're graduating today at the top of your class, or by the skin of
your teeth, your presence on this field is a tremendous accomplishment. And
it would not have been possible without the support of the families who
believed in you and encouraged you. So I ask all the parents and loved ones
here today to stand and be recognized by the class of 2007. (Applause.)

The degree you've earned will command respect wherever you go, and you will
carry the lessons you learned here for the rest of your lives. This Academy
has tested your minds, your bodies, and your character, and having passed
these trials, you now embark on a voyage as officers in the oldest
continuous Maritime service.

The history of the Coast Guard dates back more than two centuries, to the
Revenue Cutter Service, established under the presidency of George
Washington -- or as I call him, the first George W. (Laughter and applause.)
Since its inception, the Coast Guard has conducted search and rescue
missions, enforced our maritime laws, protected our marine environment, come
to the aid of stranded boaters, and helped staunch the flow of illegal drugs
and illegal migrants to our shores. And in this new century, the Coast Guard
continues to carry out these vital missions.

Americans rely on the Coast Guard in times of disaster. When Hurricane
Katrina hit our nation's Gulf Coast, the men and women of the Coast Guard
swung into action, hanging from helicopters, pulling people off rooftops and
out of trees, and rescuing more than 33,000 people. (Applause.) When storms
and floods and tragedy strike, Americans know that they can count on the
United States Coast Guard. (Applause.)

Americans relied on the Coast Guard on September the 11th, 2001. After
terrorists struck the Twin Towers, the Coast Guard station on Staten Island
put out a call for "all available boats," and organized a massive flotilla
of military and civilian craft that evacuated hundreds of thousands of
people from lower Manhattan. It was the largest waterborne evacuation in our
nation's history. And in the days that followed, the men and women of the
Coast Guard stayed on the job, assisting operations at Ground Zero, sending
chaplains to comfort the bereaved, and coordinating a round-the-clock
defense of New York Harbor and other vital ports. In a time of crisis, the
Coast Guard did its job, and did it well. (Applause.)

On September the 11th, the home front you protect became a battlefront in a
new and unprecedented war. That day, our nation changed forever, and so did
the mission of the United States Coast Guard. This service assumed new and
essential responsibilities: to defend our nation against terrorist
infiltration, and to help stop new attacks before they kill our people.

As part of Operation Noble Eagle, the men and women of the Coast Guard are
protecting more than 360 ports and more than 95,000 miles of coastline.
Overseas, the Coast Guard is conducting maritime intercept operations in the
Persian Gulf, patrolling the waters off Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The men and
women of the Coast Guard are serving with courage, and the American people
are grateful to live behind your Shield of Freedom.

Soon you'll join your fellow Coasties in carrying out these and other
missions. And this Academy has prepared you well for the new challenges you
will face in this war on terror. During your time here, you've taken courses
in terrorist tactics and counterterrorism strategies; you've studied
radiation detection, remote sensing, and the handling of hazardous
materials; you participated in military exercises that have prepared you for
the threats of this new century.

You'll need all this training to help keep your fellow citizens safe. In
this war, we face a brutal enemy that has already killed thousands in our
midst, and is determined to bring even greater destruction to our shores.
We're blessed that there has not been another terrorist attack on our
homeland in the past five-and-a-half years. This is not for lack of effort
on the part of the enemy. Since 9/11, al Qaeda and its allies have succeeded
in carrying out horrific attacks across the world; al Qaeda leaders have
repeatedly made clear they intend to strike our country again.

In January of last year, Osama bin Laden warned the American people:
"Operations are under preparation and you will see them on your own ground
once they are finished." Seven months later, British authorities broke up
the most ambitious known al Qaeda threat to the homeland since the 9/11
attacks: a plot to blow up passenger airplanes flying to America. Our
intelligence community believes that this plot was just two or three weeks
away from execution. If it had been carried out, it could have rivaled 9/11
in death and destruction.

This was not the first al Qaeda plot that has been foiled since 9/11. In
December 2001 we captured an al Qaeda operative named Ali Salih al-Mari. Our
intelligence community believes that Ali Salih was training in poisons at an
al Qaeda camp in Afghanistan, and had been sent to the United States before
September the 11th to serve as a sleeper agent ready for follow-on attacks.
He was ordered to our country by 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, who
is now in U.S. custody. Our intelligence community believes that KSM brought
Ali Salih to meet Osama bin Laden, where he pledged his loyalty to the al
Qaeda leader and offered himself up as a martyr. Among the potential targets
our intelligence community believes this al Qaeda operative discussed with
KSM were water reservoirs, the New York Stock Exchange, and United States
military academies such as this one.

We also broke up two other post-9/11 aviation plots. The first, in 2002,
was a plot by Khalid Sheikh Mohammad to repeat the destruction of 9/11 by
sending operatives to hijack an airplane and fly into the tallest building
on the West Coast. During a hearing at Guantanamo Bay just two months ago,
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad stated that the intended target was the Library Tower
in Los Angeles. And in 2003, we uncovered and stopped a plot led by another
suspected senior al Qaeda operative named Abu Bakr al-Azdi. Our intelligence
community believes this plot was to be another East Coast aviation attack,
including multiple airplanes that had been hijacked and then crashing into
targets in the United States.

There is a reason that these and other plots have thus far not succeeded:
Since September the 11th, we have taken bold action at home and abroad to
keep our people safe.

To help stop new attacks on our country, we have undertaken the most
sweeping reorganization of the federal government since the start of the
Cold War. We created the new Department of Homeland Security, merging 22
different government organizations, including the Coast Guard, into a single
Department with a clear mission: to protect America from future attacks.

To stop new attacks on our country, we've strengthened our nation's
intelligence community. We created the position of the Director of National
Intelligence to ensure our intelligence agencies operate as a single,
unified enterprise. We created the National Counter Terrorism Center, where
the FBI, the CIA, and other agencies work side by side to track terrorist
threats across the world. We directed the National Security Agency to
monitor international terrorist communications. We established a program run
by the CIA to detain and question key terrorist leaders and operatives.
These measures are vital. These measures are working. And these measures
have helped prevent an attack on our homeland. (Applause.)

To help stop new attacks on our country, we passed the Patriot Act, breaking
down the walls that had prevented federal law enforcement and intelligence
communities from sharing information about potential terrorist activities.
We've transformed the FBI into an agency whose primary focus is stopping
terrorist attacks. We've expanded the number of FBI Joint Terrorism Task
Forces from 35 before 9/11 to more than a hundred today. And we saw their
effectiveness recently when one of these teams helped disrupt a plot by a
group of al Qaeda-inspired extremists to kill American soldiers at Fort Dix,
New Jersey.

To help stop new attacks on our country, we launched the BioWatch program,
placing state-of-the-art equipment in major U.S. cities to detect biological
agents. To help prevent terrorists from bringing nuclear or radiological
weapons into our county, we're placing radiation detectors in all major U.S.
ports. We placed advanced screening equipment and U.S. Homeland Security
personnel at foreign ports, so we can pre-screen cargo headed for America.
We're determined to stop the world's most dangerous men from striking
America with the world's most dangerous weapons. And the Coast Guard is on
the front line of this battle. (Applause.)

To help stop new attacks on our country, we've strengthened international
cooperation in the fight against terror. A coalition of more than 90
nations -- nearly one-half of the world -- is working together to dry up
terrorist financing and bring terrorist leaders to justice. We launched the
Proliferation Security Initiative, a vast coalition of nations that are
working to stop shipments of weapons of mass destruction on land, at sea,
and in the air. With our allies, we have uncovered and shut down the A.Q.
Khan network, which had supplied nuclear-related equipment and plans to
terrorist states, including Iran and North Korea. With Great Britain, we
convinced the leader of Libya to abandon his country's pursuit of weapons of
mass destruction. The key components of Libya's nuclear program are now
locked up in a storage facility right here in the United States. And today
the world is safer because Libya is out of the nuclear weapons business.
(Applause.)

All these steps are making our country safer, but we're not yet safe. To
strike our country, the terrorists only have to be right once; to protect
our country, we have to be right 100 percent of the time. That means the
best way to protect our people is to take the fight to the enemy. So after
9/11, I vowed to America that we would go on the offense against the
terrorists, fighting them across the world so we do not have to face them
here at home. And since 9/11, that is precisely what that United States of
America has done. (Applause.)

In Afghanistan, we removed a regime that gave sanctuary and support to al
Qaeda as they planned the 9/11 attacks. Today, because we acted, the
terrorist camps in Afghanistan have been shut down, 25 million people have
been liberated, and the Afghan people have an elected government that is
fighting terrorists, instead of harboring them. (Applause.)

The Taliban and al Qaeda are seeking to roll back Afghanistan's democratic
progress -- but forces from 40 nations, including every member of NATO, are
helping the Afghan people defend their democratic gains. Earlier this month,
Afghan, American, and NATO forces tracked down and killed a top Taliban
commander in Afghanistan. His death has sent a clear message to all who
would challenge Afghanistan's young democracy: We drove al Qaeda and the
Taliban out of power, and they're not going to be allowed to return to
power. (Applause.)

In Iraq, we removed a cruel dictator who harbored terrorists, paid the
families of Palestinian suicide bombers, invaded his neighbors, defied the
United Nations Security Council, pursued and used weapons of mass
destruction. Iraq, the United States and the world are better off without
Saddam Hussein in power. (Applause.) And today the Iraqi people are building
a young democracy on the rubble of Saddam Hussein's tyranny. In December
2005, nearly 12 million Iraqis demonstrated their desire to be free, going
to the polls and choosing a new government under the most progressive,
democratic constitution in the Arab world.

In 2006, a thinking enemy responded to this progress and struck back with
brutality. They staged sensational attacks that led to a tragic escalation
of sectarian rage and reprisal. If the sectarian violence continued to
spiral out of control, the Iraqi government would have been in danger of
collapse. The ensuing chaos would embolden Iran, which is fueling the
violence, and al Qaeda, a key driver of Iraq's sectarian conflict. The chaos
could eventually spread across the Middle East, and generations of Americans
would be in even greater danger.

So I had a choice to make: withdraw our troops, or send reinforcements to
help the Iraqis quell the sectarian violence. I decided to send more troops
with a new mission: to help the Iraqi government secure their population and
get control of Baghdad. As we carry out the new strategy, the Iraqi
government has a lot of work to do. They must meet its responsibility to the
Iraqi people and achieve benchmarks it has set, including adoption of a
national oil law, preparations for provincial elections, progress on a new
de-Baathification policy, and a review of the Iraqi constitution. The Iraqi
people must see that their government is taking action to bring their
country together and give all of Iraq's a stake in a peaceful future.

Now, in 2007, we are at a pivotal moment in this battle. There are many
destructive forces in Iraq trying to stop this strategy from succeeding --
the most destructive is al Qaeda. Al Qaeda knows that a democratic Iraq is a
threat to their ambitions to impose their hateful ideology across the Middle
East. And al Qaeda knows that our presence in Iraq is a direct threat to
their existence in Iraq. Our security depends on helping the Iraqis succeed
and defeating Iraq -- al Qaeda in Iraq. (Applause.)

Some in our country question whether the battle in Iraq is part of the war
on terror. Among the terrorists, there's no doubt. Hear the words of Osama
bin Laden: He calls the struggle in Iraq a "war of destiny." He proclaimed
"the war is for you or for us to win. If we win it, it means your defeat and
disgrace forever."

Bin Laden is matching his words with action. He attempted to send a new
commander to Iraq, an Iraqi-born terrorist named Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi.
According to our intelligence community, this terrorist had been a senior
advisor to bin Laden, he served as his top commander in Afghanistan, he was
responsible for all al Qaeda's military operations against our coalition in
that country. Abd al-Hadi never made it to Iraq. He was captured last year,
and he was recently he was transferred to the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo
Bay.

There is a reason that bin Laden sent one of his most experienced
paramilitary leaders to Iraq: He believes that if al Qaeda can drive us out,
they can establish Iraq as a new terrorist sanctuary. Our intelligence
community believes that, "al Qaeda leaders see victory in Iraq -- the heart
of the caliphate and currently the most active front in their war -- as a
religious and strategic imperative." If al Qaeda succeeds in Iraq, they
would pursue their stated goals of turning that nation into a base from
which to overthrow moderate governments in the region, impose their hateful
ideology on millions, and launch new attacks on America and other nations.
Victory in Iraq is important for Osama bin Laden -- and victory in Iraq is
vital for the United States of America. (Applause.)

I've often warned that if we fail in Iraq, the enemy will follow us home.
Many ask: How do you know? Today, I'd like to share some information with
you that attests to al Qaeda's intentions. According to our intelligence
community, in January 2005, Osama bin Laden tasked the terrorist Zarqawi --
who was then al Qaeda's top leader in Iraq -- with forming a cell to conduct
terrorist attacks outside of Iraq. Bin Laden emphasized that America should
be Zarqawi's number one priority in terms of foreign attacks. Zarqawi
welcomed this direction; he claimed that he had already come up with some
good proposals.

To help Zarqawi in these efforts, our intelligence community reports that
bin Laden then tasked one of his top terrorist operatives, Hamza Rabia, to
send Zarqawi a briefing on al Qaeda's external operations, including
information about operations against the American homeland. Our intelligence
community reports that a senior al Qaeda leader, Abu Faraj al-Libi, went
further and suggested that bin Laden actually send Rabia, himself, to Iraq
to help plan external operations. Abu Faraj later speculated that if this
effort proved successful, al Qaeda might one day prepare the majority of its
external operations from Iraq.

In May of 2005, Abu Faraj was captured and taken into CIA custody. Several
months later, in December 2005, Rabia was killed in Pakistan. Several months
after that, in June of 2006, the terrorist Zarqawi was killed by American
forces in Iraq. Successes like these are blows to al Qaeda. They're a
testament to steps we have taken to strengthen our intelligence, work
closely with partners overseas, and keep the pressure on the enemy by
staying on the offense. (Applause.)

Despite our pressure, despite the setbacks that al Qaeda has suffered, it
remains extremely dangerous. As we've surged our forces in Iraq, al Qaeda
has responded with a surge of its own. The terrorists' goal in Iraq is to
reignite sectarian violence and break support for the war here at home. And
they believe they're succeeding. A few weeks ago, al Qaeda's number two,
second in command, Zawahiri, issued a video in which he gloated that al
Qaeda's "movement of violence" has "forced the Americans to accept a
pullout -- about which they only differ in regard to its timing." We can
expect al Qaeda to continue its campaign of high profile attacks, including
deadly suicide bombings and assassinations. And as they do, our troops will
face more fighting and increased risks in the weeks and months ahead.

The fight in Iraq is tough, but my point today to you is the fight is
essential to our security -- al Qaeda's leaders inside and outside of Iraq
have not given up on their objective of attacking America again. Now, many
critics compare the battle in Iraq to the situation we faced in Vietnam.
There are many differences between the two conflicts, but one stands out
above all: The enemy in Vietnam had neither the intent nor the capability to
strike our homeland. The enemy in Iraq does. Nine-eleven taught us that to
protect the American people, we must fight the terrorists where they live so
that we don't have to fight them where we live. (Applause.)

The question for our elected leaders is: Do we comprehend the danger of an
al Qaeda victory in Iraq, and will we do what it takes to stop them? However
difficult the fight in Iraq has become, we must win it. Al Qaeda is public
enemy number one for Iraq's young democracy, and al Qaeda is public enemy
number one for America, as well. And that is why we must support our troops,
we must support the Iraqi government, and we must defeat al Qaeda in Iraq.
(Applause.)

We're thankful to the military, the intelligence, and law enforcement
personnel who work tirelessly to stop new attacks on our country. With every
plot they foil, every terrorist they capture, we learn more about the
enemy's plans and persistence. In the minds of al Qaeda leaders, 9/11 was
just a down-payment on violence yet to come. It's tempting to believe that
the calm here at home after September the 11th means that the danger to our
country has passed. I see the intelligence every day. The danger has not
passed. Here in America, we're living in the eye of a storm. All around us,
dangerous winds are swirling, and these winds could reach our shores at any
moment.

The men and women of the Coast Guard know how to navigate the storm. We're
counting on you to help America weather the challenges that lie ahead. As
you begin your Coast Guard careers, you can approach the future with
confidence, because our nation has faced dangerous enemies before, and
emerged victorious every time. Terrorists can try to kill the innocent, but
they cannot kill the desire for liberty that burns in the hearts of millions
across the earth. The power of freedom defeated the ideologies of fascism
and communism in the last century, and freedom will defeat the hateful
ideologies of the terrorists in this century.

Victory in this struggle will require valor and determination and
persistence, and these qualities can be found in abundance in the Class of
2007. (Applause.)

Your class has chosen a motto: Let Courage Part the Seas. America will be
counting on your courage in the years to come. You will take your oath as
Coast Guard officers in a time of war, knowing all the risks your service
entails. I thank each of you for your bold decision to wear the uniform. My
call to you is this: Trust in the power of freedom to overcome tyranny and
terror; show leadership in freedom's defense, and character in all you do;
be ready for anything. The Coasties who came before you never thought they
would be organizing a flotilla in New York Harbor, or patrolling distant
coasts in the Persian Gulf. Like them, you will serve in ways you cannot
imagine today. But if you bring the skills and creativity you learned at
this Academy to every task, our nation's security will be in good hands.
(Applause.)

You leave this Academy "strong in resolve to be worthy of the traditions of
commissioned officers in the United States Coast Guard."

I respect your passion for service, and the courage of your choice. Your
country is grateful, and proud of each of you. Congratulations. God bless.
Semper Paratus. (Applause.)

END 12:14 P.M. EDT
Ray O'Hara - 26 May 2007 04:13 GMT
> Here's the entire speech.
>
> We'll focus on parts of it later.

yeah, he sees the intllegence. he saw the intellegence  pre-9/11 and screwed
up. he saw the WMD intel and screwed that up.
he was told new orleans was flooding and he screwed that up. nothing the
chimpler has to say has a shred of credibility with the electorate.
Jack Linthicum - 26 May 2007 11:41 GMT
> > Here's the entire speech.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> he was told new orleans was flooding and he screwed that up. nothing the
> chimpler has to say has a shred of credibility with the electorate.

and he had the whole scenario laid out for him by the CIA two months
before he hurried up the war so the use of false information would not
be detected, immediately. This is the same speech he could have given
on "Mission Accomplished Day" May 1, 2003. Since the al-Qaeda
connection was a lie Bush's statement yesterday is moot.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-intel26may26,0,1834215.stor
y?coll=la-home-center

>From the Los Angeles Times
Bush was twice warned of Iraq challenges
Prewar reports alerted the president to the difficulty of establishing
democracy, among other assessments that proved accurate.
By James Gerstenzang
Times Staff Writer

May 26, 2007

WASHINGTON - Two months before the invasion of Iraq, U.S. intelligence
agencies twice warned the Bush administration that establishing a
democracy there would prove difficult and that Al Qaeda would use
political instability to increase its operations, according to a
Senate report released Friday.

The report, issued by the Senate Intelligence Committee, brought to
light once-classified warnings that accurately forecast many of the
military and political problems the Bush administration and Iraqi
officials have faced since the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003.

These warnings were distributed to senior officials with daily access
to President Bush and others at the very top of the administration,
the report states.

Although many names were left blank to protect members of the
intelligence community, the report's 81-page list of who received the
predictions included figures throughout the national security
bureaucracy.

One of those was then-deputy national security advisor Stephen J.
Hadley, now the national security advisor.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV (D-
W.Va.), said the report demonstrated that "the intelligence community
gave the administration plenty of warning about the difficulties we
would face if the decision was made to go to war."

He added: "These dire warnings were widely distributed at the highest
levels of government, and it's clear that the administration didn't
plan for any of them."

Unlike previous studies of the buildup to the war, the Senate report
did not focus on the intelligence community's flawed information,
which included overstated assessments of Iraq's potential for
developing weapons of mass destruction.

The committee's ranking Republican, Sen. Christopher S. Bond of
Missouri, criticized the report, saying that it highlighted only
elements that seemed important in retrospect and that it distorted
what was presented to policymakers in 2003.

He said the committee's inquiry into the intelligence community's
prewar assessments "has become too embroiled in politics and
partisanship to produce an accurate and meaningful report."

At a news conference Thursday, Bush was asked about the impending
release of the report. He responded that "going into Iraq, we were
warned about a lot of things, some of which happened, some of which
didn't happen.

"I weighed the risks and rewards of any decision," he said,
reiterating his view that removing Saddam Hussein from power was worth
the price.

Bush also said, "Al Qaeda is going to fight us wherever we are."

The report spotlighted two documents prepared in January 2003 by the
National Intelligence Council. One document was titled "Regional
Consequences of Regime Change in Iraq," the other "Principal
Challenges in Post-Saddam Iraq."

These papers warned that:

?  Establishing "an Iraqi democracy would be a long, difficult and
probably turbulent process, with potential for backsliding into Iraq's
tradition of authoritarianism."

?  Unless the occupying forces prevented it, "score settling would
occur throughout Iraq between those associated with Saddam's regime
and those who have suffered most under it."

?  Among the majority Shiite population, which Saddam had kept out of
power, a political form of Islam could take root, "particularly if
economic recovery were slow and foreign troops remained in the country
for a long period."

?  Iran would probably try to shape the post-Hussein Iraq, in a bid to
position itself as a regional power.

?  Al Qaeda would probably take advantage of the war to increase its
terrorist activities, and the lines between it and other terrorist
groups "could become blurred."

Each of these assessments was prescient. And Bush now cites the danger
posed by Al Qaeda forces in Iraq as a major reason for resisting calls
that the U.S. begin decreasing its troop levels and set a firm
deadline for withdrawal.

In early 2003, even as their deputies were receiving the intelligence
community papers, top administration officials - among them Vice
President Dick Cheney and then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld -
publicly speculated that U.S. troops would be greeted warmly as
liberators and gave no hint that some analysts were raising red flags
about difficulties to come.

One assessment disclosed in the Senate report missed the mark; it
predicted that heightened terrorist threats worldwide stemming from
the war would decline, after an initial spike, in three to five years
after the invasion. That decline has not occurred, according to State
Department officials who monitor such threats.

The Senate committee approved the release of its report by a vote of
10-5. Republican Sens. Olympia Snowe of Maine and Chuck Hagel of
Nebraska joined the Democratic majority in supporting its publication.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), a member of the panel, praised the
compilation of the cautions circulated by the intelligence community
but said the report should have critiqued more thoroughly how the
assessments were handled within the administration.
soup - 30 May 2007 19:08 GMT
> yeah, he sees the intllegence.
Please do not cross post

Signature

www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk

Fred J. McCall - 31 May 2007 01:33 GMT
:> yeah, he sees the intllegence.
:Please do not cross post

Please do not be a dumbass and add to the noise.

Signature

"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
                                     --G. Behn

Eris - 26 May 2007 05:43 GMT
> Here's the entire speech.
>
[quoted text clipped - 172 lines]
>
> read more ?

The coast guard academy what next a new Mac Donald's opening ? Has any
other president been afforded such a an  honor as this?
Jack Linthicum - 26 May 2007 11:43 GMT
> > Here's the entire speech.
>
[quoted text clipped - 175 lines]
> The coast guard academy what next a new Mac Donald's opening ? Has any
> other president been afforded such a an  honor as this?

You go with the venue you have, not the venue you want. 228 plus blank
stares are better than trying to talk to the White House Press Corps.
soup - 30 May 2007 19:09 GMT
> You go with the venue you have, not the venue you want. 228 plus blank
> stares are better than trying to talk to the White House Press Corps.

Please do not cross post

Signature

www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk

Fred J. McCall - 31 May 2007 01:33 GMT
:> You go with the venue you have, not the venue you want. 228 plus blank
:> stares are better than trying to talk to the White House Press Corps.
:>
:Please do not cross post

Please do not be a dumbass and add to the noise.

Signature

"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
                                     --G. Behn

Tiglath - 31 May 2007 06:41 GMT
> :> You go with the venue you have, not the venue you want. 228 plus blank
> :> stares are better than trying to talk to the White House Press Corps.
> :>
> :Please do not cross post
>
> Please do not be a dumbass and add to the noise.

NoGall fiercely defends his monopoly.
Fred J. McCall - 31 May 2007 08:46 GMT
:> :> You go with the venue you have, not the venue you want. 228 plus blank
:> :> stares are better than trying to talk to the White House Press Corps.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
:
:NoGall fiercely defends his monopoly.

Tiglet of PooPoo Corners continues to stroke his own feces.

Signature

"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
                              -- Thomas Jefferson

BigRedWingsFan - 26 May 2007 16:19 GMT
On May 25, 10:57 pm, "D. Spencer Hines" <pant...@excelsior.com> wrote:
> Here's the entire speech.
>
[quoted text clipped - 212 lines]
>
> read more »

The coast guard academy what next a new Mac Donald's opening ? Has any
other president been afforded such a an  honor as this?

Clinton in 2000 for starters and your hero, LBJ, in 1964.  That enough?  How
about you list your speaking engagements?  People like you are not normally
allowed near schools for good reason so I doubt you have any.
soup - 30 May 2007 19:10 GMT
> The coast guard academy what next a new Mac Donald's opening ? Has any
> other president been afforded such a an  honor as this?

Please do not cross post

Signature

www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk

Ray O'Hara - 30 May 2007 19:36 GMT
> > The coast guard academy what next a new Mac Donald's opening ? Has any
> > other president been afforded such a an  honor as this?
>
> Please do not cross post

its the usenet fool, get over it and yourself.
asclero@zdnetonebox.com - 30 May 2007 21:06 GMT
"soup" <1@invalid.com> wrote in message news:J6j7i.
28132$Ro3.21996@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

>> The coast guard academy what next a new Mac Donald's opening ? Has any
>> other president been afforded such a an  honor as this?
>
> Please do not cross post
>
> --
Requests don't work.  Jackasses can't help it, bray they must.

Just keep killfiling them whenever they pop up to heehaw.  After a
week or so, you'll only be killfiling one or two new ones per day,
sometimes none.  Actually, there aren't that many of them infesting
any particular newsgroup-- it just seems that way because they are so
busy at it.
J Antero - 26 May 2007 15:36 GMT
Detestable little git.

They would have done better to invite Karl Rove.

Why bother with the monkey when you can get the organ grinder?
D. Spencer Hines - 26 May 2007 20:49 GMT
You'll need all this training to help keep your fellow citizens safe. In
this war, we face a brutal enemy that has already killed thousands in our
midst, and is determined to bring even greater destruction to our shores.
We're blessed that there has not been another terrorist attack on our
homeland in the past five-and-a-half years. This is not for lack of effort
on the part of the enemy. Since 9/11, al Qaeda and its allies have succeeded
in carrying out horrific attacks across the world; al Qaeda leaders have
repeatedly made clear they intend to strike our country again.

In January of last year, Osama bin Laden warned the American people:
"Operations are under preparation and you will see them on your own ground
once they are finished." Seven months later, British authorities broke up
the most ambitious known al Qaeda threat to the homeland since the 9/11
attacks: a plot to blow up passenger airplanes flying to America. Our
intelligence community believes that this plot was just two or three weeks
away from execution. If it had been carried out, it could have rivaled 9/11
in death and destruction.

President of the United States George Walker Bush
D. Spencer Hines - 27 May 2007 00:10 GMT
We forget, or never knew, about the many Islamofascist Jihadist Terrorist
plots that have been FOILED.

Here are a few.

DSH
---------------------------------------------------

This was not the first al Qaeda plot that has been foiled since 9/11.  In
December 2001 we captured an al Qaeda operative named Ali Salih al-Mari. Our
intelligence community believes that Ali Salih was training in poisons at an
al Qaeda camp in Afghanistan, and had been sent to the United States before
September the 11th to serve as a sleeper agent ready for follow-on attacks.

He was ordered to our country by 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, who
is now in U.S. custody. Our intelligence community believes that KSM brought
Ali Salih to meet Osama bin Laden, where he pledged his loyalty to the al
Qaeda leader and offered himself up as a martyr. Among the potential targets
our intelligence community believes this al Qaeda operative discussed with
KSM were water reservoirs, the New York Stock Exchange, and United States
military academies such as this one.

We also broke up two other post-9/11 aviation plots. The first, in 2002,
was a plot by Khalid Sheikh Mohammad to repeat the destruction of 9/11 by
sending operatives to hijack an airplane and fly into the tallest building
on the West Coast. During a hearing at Guantanamo Bay just two months ago,
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad stated that the intended target was the Library Tower
in Los Angeles. And in 2003, we uncovered and stopped a plot led by another
suspected senior al Qaeda operative named Abu Bakr al-Azdi. Our intelligence
community believes this plot was to be another East Coast aviation attack,
including multiple airplanes that had been hijacked and then crashing into
targets in the United States.

There is a reason that these and other plots have thus far not succeeded:
Since September the 11th, we have taken bold action at home and abroad to
keep our people safe.

President of the United States George Walker Bush
D. Spencer Hines - 27 May 2007 02:38 GMT
We forget, or never knew, about the many steps our Federal Government has
taken better to defend and protect us since 9/11.

As Mayor Rudy Giuliani has pointed out, we couldn't just work on defense.

We had to go on OFFENSE against the terrorists.

DSH
------------------------------------------------------

To help stop new attacks on our country, we have undertaken the most
sweeping reorganization of the federal government since the start of the
Cold War. We created the new Department of Homeland Security, merging 22
different government organizations, including the Coast Guard, into a single
Department with a clear mission: to protect America from future attacks.

To stop new attacks on our country, we've strengthened our nation's
intelligence community. We created the position of the Director of National
Intelligence to ensure our intelligence agencies operate as a single,
unified enterprise. We created the National Counter Terrorism Center, where
the FBI, the CIA, and other agencies work side by side to track terrorist
threats across the world. We directed the National Security Agency to
monitor international terrorist communications. We established a program run
by the CIA to detain and question key terrorist leaders and operatives.
These measures are vital. These measures are working. And these measures
have helped prevent an attack on our homeland. (Applause.)

To help stop new attacks on our country, we passed the Patriot Act, breaking
down the walls that had prevented federal law enforcement and intelligence
communities from sharing information about potential terrorist activities.
We've transformed the FBI into an agency whose primary focus is stopping
terrorist attacks. We've expanded the number of FBI Joint Terrorism Task
Forces from 35 before 9/11 to more than a hundred today. And we saw their
effectiveness recently when one of these teams helped disrupt a plot by a
group of al Qaeda-inspired extremists to kill American soldiers at Fort Dix,
New Jersey.

To help stop new attacks on our country, we launched the BioWatch program,
placing state-of-the-art equipment in major U.S. cities to detect biological
agents. To help prevent terrorists from bringing nuclear or radiological
weapons into our county, we're placing radiation detectors in all major U.S.
ports. We placed advanced screening equipment and U.S. Homeland Security
personnel at foreign ports, so we can pre-screen cargo headed for America.
We're determined to stop the world's most dangerous men from striking
America with the world's most dangerous weapons. And the Coast Guard is on
the front line of this battle. (Applause.)

To help stop new attacks on our country, we've strengthened international
cooperation in the fight against terror. A coalition of more than 90
nations -- nearly one-half of the world -- is working together to dry up
terrorist financing and bring terrorist leaders to justice. We launched the
Proliferation Security Initiative, a vast coalition of nations that are
working to stop shipments of weapons of mass destruction on land, at sea,
and in the air. With our allies, we have uncovered and shut down the A.Q.
Khan network, which had supplied nuclear-related equipment and plans to
terrorist states, including Iran and North Korea. With Great Britain, we
convinced the leader of Libya to abandon his country's pursuit of weapons of
mass destruction. The key components of Libya's nuclear program are now
locked up in a storage facility right here in the United States. And today
the world is safer because Libya is out of the nuclear weapons business.
(Applause.)

All these steps are making our country safer, but we're not yet safe. To
strike our country, the terrorists only have to be right once; to protect
our country, we have to be right 100 percent of the time. That means the
best way to protect our people is to take the fight to the enemy. So after
9/11, I vowed to America that we would go on the offense against the
terrorists, fighting them across the world so we do not have to face them
here at home. And since 9/11, that is precisely what that United States of
America has done. (Applause.)

President of the United States George Walker Bush
Tiglath - 27 May 2007 07:20 GMT
Bush knows the Surge is not working.

He is at the point of shame similar to that of L.B. Johnson and McNamara
when they knew the couldn't win and let great dying happen attempting to
save face.

Tragic History Repeated.

Democracy is not taking root, and the Iraqi legislators who mock us, get
ready for a long summer break as our kids die face down in the hot sand.

Meanwhile...  The deception of the gullible continues.

Case in point:

From the speech below, by kindness of Mr. Hines.

"Nine-eleven taught us that to protect the American people, we must fight
the terrorists where they live so that we don't have to fight them where we
live.  Applause.)"

What were they applauding?  Following orders more likely, for there was
nothing worth the applause.

By Bushes twisted logic if we fight them there we won't have to fight them
here.    But didn't Bush just told us that two-years old intelligence he
declassified showed that Bin Laden had been trying to send terrorist from
Iraq to attack America?

That says that Bin Laden can do BOTH, fight us there AND fight us here.
There goes the presidential argument applauded by so many parrot-like
listeners.

Apart from his sophistry that Bin Laden hasn't been found because he is
hiding, Junior works incessantly the genocide card.  First we HAD to remove
Saddam because he was a genocidal tyrant.  And now we can't leave because
genocide would ensue.

What's his the problem with genocide anyway?  There is genocide (sans oil)
going on in Darfur right now and what is Bush doing about it, in effect, to
stop it?

There goes the genocide argument for continuing the war...  (Applause?)

President Bush wanted to be seen as tough not soft, and his only clear
victory is that he has made the Democrats permanently scared of not being
tough enough. which they manage by being soft on Bush.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

> Here's the entire speech.
>
[quoted text clipped - 492 lines]
>
> END 12:14 P.M. EDT
D. Spencer Hines - 27 May 2007 07:50 GMT
Spot On!

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas
-------------------------------------------

All these steps are making our country safer, but we're not yet safe. To
strike our country, the terrorists only have to be right once; to protect
our country, we have to be right 100 percent of the time. That means the
best way to protect our people is to take the fight to the enemy. So after
9/11, I vowed to America that we would go on the offense against the
terrorists, fighting them across the world so we do not have to face them
here at home. And since 9/11, that is precisely what that United States of
America has done. (Applause.)

In Afghanistan, we removed a regime that gave sanctuary and support to al
Qaeda as they planned the 9/11 attacks. Today, because we acted, the
terrorist camps in Afghanistan have been shut down, 25 million people have
been liberated, and the Afghan people have an elected government that is
fighting terrorists, instead of harboring them. (Applause.)

The Taliban and al Qaeda are seeking to roll back Afghanistan's democratic
progress -- but forces from 40 nations, including every member of NATO, are
helping the Afghan people defend their democratic gains. Earlier this month,
Afghan, American, and NATO forces tracked down and killed a top Taliban
commander in Afghanistan. His death has sent a clear message to all who
would challenge Afghanistan's young democracy: We drove al Qaeda and the
Taliban out of power, and they're not going to be allowed to return to
power. (Applause.)

President of the United States George Walker Bush
soup - 30 May 2007 19:07 GMT
> Here's the entire speech.

Please do not cross post
Signature

www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk

Fred J. McCall - 31 May 2007 01:32 GMT
:> Here's the entire speech.
:
:Please do not cross post

Please do not be a dumbass and add to the noise.

Signature

"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
                                     --G. Behn

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.