I have read that Dickens was an astute observer of people, that he would
note the way people spoke and their mannerisms. Give a Dickens scholar a
name from Dickens's literature and the scholar will give you the name of the
real person Dickens had in mind.
Yet it seems to me that there is more to Dickens characters than that.. It
seems to me that Scrooge, for example, is more than just a portrait of some
old miser Dickens might have known.
Scrooge's ghostly visitors did not tell Scrooge anything he did not already
know. Scrooge saw his own unhappy childhood, his broken engagement and the
happiness his lost fiancé found in another man. He saw the goodness of his
sister and his nephew and his own faults in clear terms. Scrooge could not
deny what he saw so acted on it to put things right.
How did Dickens know to show us Scrooge in such a way? I think not by
simply noting and portraying people around him, but by having an
understanding of human nature that was ahead of his time.
Acknowledging problems and coming to terms with them is right out of Freud's
book. But Dickens was a generation before Freud. No, Dickens was no simple
caricature artist. Rather, he was an insightful man indeed!
Anyway, that's my opinion.
Merry Christmas, and God Bless Us All!
RK
raymond o'hara - 24 Dec 2003 14:55 GMT
"Rod Keys" <rkeys@comcast.net> wrote in message
my votes for best versions of " a christmas carrol " in no particular
order
mr magoo's christmas carrol, the alistair sim christmas carol , and the
albert finney scrooge .
it's a great story .
John Cartmell - 24 Dec 2003 15:16 GMT
> How did Dickens know to show us Scrooge in such a way? I think not by
> simply noting and portraying people around him, but by having an
> understanding of human nature that was ahead of his time.
But behind Shakespeare who was ahead of his time?
> But Dickens was a generation before Freud.
Presumably you're assumng that Freud got something right? I'd challenge
that. Neither shakespeare nor Dickens were ahead of their time - just
excellent observers and story-tellers. With the advantage of Shakespeare,
Dickens (and others - not forgetting the Greeks) Freud made some
observations but was not such a good story-teller and his claim to be
telling some sort of objective truth has crumbled except amongst blind
adherents.

Signature
John Cartmell john@ followed by finnybank.com FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527
Qercus magazine & FD Games www.finnybank.com www.acornuser.com
Qercus - a fusion of Acorn Publisher & Acorn User magazines
hippo - 25 Dec 2003 02:58 GMT
"John Cartmell" wrote in message
> In article Rod Keys wrote:
> > How did Dickens know to show us Scrooge in such a way? I think not by
> > simply noting and portraying people around him, but by having an
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> telling some sort of objective truth has crumbled except amongst blind
> adherents.
This will never do. I agree completely. -the Troll