Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / British History / October 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Bush Warns Of World War III If Iran Goes Nuclear

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
D. Spencer Hines - 17 Oct 2007 20:18 GMT
Hmmmmmmmm...

DSH
------------------------------------------

Bush warns of World War III if Iran goes nuclear

Oct 17, 2007
AFP

US President George W. Bush said Wednesday that he had warned world
leaders they must prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons "if you're
interested in avoiding World War III."

"We've got a leader in Iran who has announced that he wants to destroy
Israel," Bush said at a White House press conference after Russia cautioned
against military action against Tehran's suspect atomic program.

"So I've told people that, if you're interested in avoiding World War
III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from having
the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon," said Bush.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Exitus Acta Probat
Vince - 17 Oct 2007 20:25 GMT
> Hmmmmmmmm...
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Exitus Acta Probat

Who is going to line up with Iran to make it a "world war"

Vince
Jack Linthicum - 17 Oct 2007 20:59 GMT
> > Hmmmmmmmm...
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Vince

Venezuela and Myanmar
Cory Bhreckan - 17 Oct 2007 21:12 GMT
>>> Hmmmmmmmm...
>>> DSH
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Venezuela and Myanmar

Holy crap!!! We're doomed!

Signature

"For the stronger we our houses do build,
The less chance we have of being killed." - William Topaz McGonagall

Paul J Gans - 17 Oct 2007 23:41 GMT
In soc.history.medieval Jack Linthicum <jacklinthicum@earthlink.net> wrote:

>> Who is going to line up with Iran to make it a "world war"
>>
>> Vince

>Venezuela and Myanmar

Does anyone need to be told that we've been down this road
before?  At some point perhaps Americans will become tired
of a President who goes to war because he wants to.

Remember when Bush was rattling on about North Korea?  Finally,
ghod knows why, he decided that talking to North Korea was
better than going to war with North Korea.  Perhaps the
Chinese scared him off?  Who knows?

But it worked and North Korea is dismantling its nuclear
program.

Perhaps we could try to sit down and talk to Iran?  They've
certainly asked us to.  Certainly the Government of Iran is
totally rational compared to North Korea.  And what do we
have to loose?

Signature

  --- Paul J. Gans

Jeffrey Turner - 17 Oct 2007 23:51 GMT
> In soc.history.medieval Jack Linthicum <jacklinthicum@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> before?  At some point perhaps Americans will become tired
> of a President who goes to war because he wants to.

Right wingers are dumber than dirt.  If glorious leader says
that Iran is a threat - without any evidence and contrary to
all known history - then they will be scared of Iran and ready
to invade it.

--Jeff

Signature

Jesus Saves - and takes half damage.

The Highlander - 18 Oct 2007 01:27 GMT
>In soc.history.medieval Jack Linthicum <jacklinthicum@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>totally rational compared to North Korea.  And what do we
>have to loose?

Credibility. And it's lose, not loose. The last loosing saw Iraq
filled with American soldiers.
La N - 18 Oct 2007 01:42 GMT
>> > Hmmmmmmmm...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Venezuela and Myanmar

Maybe Israel if it has nothing better to do that day ...

- nilita
La N - 18 Oct 2007 02:21 GMT
>>> > Hmmmmmmmm...
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> Maybe Israel if it has nothing better to do that day ...

Ooops ... I meant to put Israel on the side of the U.S. ... doh!

- nilita
dapra - 18 Oct 2007 06:02 GMT
>>>>>Hmmmmmmmm...
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> - nilita

You shouldn't have corrected yourself. It made me think of some
interesting possibilities.

But, it's hard to leave the hard core, imperial base of yours. Though,
you have come a long way babe.
John Briggs - 18 Oct 2007 17:42 GMT
>>>>> Hmmmmmmmm...
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Ooops ... I meant to put Israel on the side of the U.S. ... doh!

What makes you think that Israel is on the side of the US?
Signature

John Briggs

Adam Whyte-Settlar - 19 Oct 2007 16:16 GMT
>>>>>> Hmmmmmmmm...
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> What makes you think that Israel is on the side of the US?

I think he meant 'US on the side of Israel'
Completely different.
La N - 19 Oct 2007 16:20 GMT
>>>>>>> Hmmmmmmmm...
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> I think he meant 'US on the side of Israel'
> Completely different.

Except I'm a she not a he .. :)

- nilita
Adam Whyte-Settlar - 19 Oct 2007 18:14 GMT
>>>>>>>> Hmmmmmmmm...
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
> Except I'm a she not a he .. :)

Cite?
Peter Skelton - 19 Oct 2007 18:27 GMT
>>>>>>>>> Hmmmmmmmm...
>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
>Cite?

What you actually want is a sight.

Peter Skelton
Cory Bhreckan - 19 Oct 2007 19:20 GMT
>>>>>>>>>> Hmmmmmmmm...
>>>>>>>>>> DSH
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> Peter Skelton

http://tinyurl.com/2hfdg9

Signature

"For the stronger we our houses do build,
The less chance we have of being killed." - William Topaz McGonagall

La N - 19 Oct 2007 19:23 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmmmmmmm...
>>>>>>>>>>> DSH
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2hfdg9

Boop-boop-de-doop.  BAM!

- nilita
Conway Caine - 20 Oct 2007 16:54 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>> Hmmmmmmmm...
>>>>>>>>>>> DSH
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2hfdg9

I'm in love.
Conway Caine - 20 Oct 2007 16:53 GMT
>>>>>>>>> Hmmmmmmmm...
>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> Cite?

You want photies?
ebe - 17 Oct 2007 21:09 GMT
> > Hmmmmmmmm...
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Vince

Hi,

Russian already has with Putin's visit and announcement yesterday. In
addition, he has suggested that nations bordering the Caspian sea form
an alliance for their area and resources. The problem is that we need
a better secretary of state. It is easy for a secretary of state to
get us into a war and re-start a new semi-cold war with Russia,
however, a good one keeps us out of war and still is able to have
maintain our goals and objectives.

Diana, Tan Ascot,
McD on 82nd street in Kenosha (9-10 am) or (1:30-3 pm) usually
Barnes and Noble, Racine (Tuesdays and Friday about 7:15 pm, cafe and
cooca with whipped cream)
Vince - 17 Oct 2007 21:24 GMT
>>> Hmmmmmmmm...
>>> DSH
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> Barnes and Noble, Racine (Tuesdays and Friday about 7:15 pm, cafe and
> cooca with whipped cream)

then the risk is not Iran but Russia
They already have nukes

Vince
John Briggs - 17 Oct 2007 21:40 GMT
>>>> Hmmmmmmmm...
>>>> DSH
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> then the risk is not Iran but Russia
> They already have nukes

Let me get this clear: Bush wants to start World War III in order to prevent
World War III?
Signature

John Briggs

Paul J Gans - 17 Oct 2007 23:43 GMT
In soc.history.medieval Vince <firelaw@firelaw.us> wrote:
>>>> Hmmmmmmmm...
>>>> DSH
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>> Barnes and Noble, Racine (Tuesdays and Friday about 7:15 pm, cafe and
>> cooca with whipped cream)

>then the risk is not Iran but Russia
>They already have nukes

Russia has refused to actually send the enriched uranium the
Iranians bought from them a couple of years back.  Putin was
asked about it when he was in Iran.  He gave an evasive
answer.

The meaning was clear.  Talk.  Putin wants Iran to talk.  And
Putin wants the US to talk.  Putin is not in favor of a nuclear
Iran.  He's got enough Islamic problems of his own.

Signature

  --- Paul J. Gans

The Highlander - 18 Oct 2007 01:30 GMT
>In soc.history.medieval Vince <firelaw@firelaw.us> wrote:
>>>>> Hmmmmmmmm...
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>Putin wants the US to talk.  Putin is not in favor of a nuclear
>Iran.  He's got enough Islamic problems of his own.

Chechnya et al. And amusingy, they were originally part of the Iranian
Empire, until the Russians grabbed them.
Richard Casady - 17 Oct 2007 21:54 GMT
>> Hmmmmmmmm...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>> the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon," said Bush.
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>> Lux et Veritas et Libertas
>>
>> Exitus Acta Probat


>Who is going to line up with Iran to make it a "world war"

The entire world against Iran qualifies as a world war. Japan was
alone at the end, but it was still WWII.

Casady
D. Spencer Hines - 17 Oct 2007 22:10 GMT
Don't forget Hamas and Hezbollah.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas
God's Creator! - 17 Oct 2007 22:29 GMT
> Don't forget Hamas and Hezbollah.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>  

Thus Spake:  *G* *O* *D* *S*   *C* *R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*

So what has  Hamas and Hezbollah. threatened the U.S. with lately?  :-D

  God's Creator!  8-)
( Sorry,  I don't forgive sh.t! )
Signature

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Todays U.S. "Judaism Vs. Islamism Wars"  News:
    .  http://www.antiwar.com .
    .  http://icasualties.org/oif/ .
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mark Borgerson - 17 Oct 2007 23:24 GMT
> >> Hmmmmmmmm...
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> The entire world against Iran qualifies as a world war. Japan was
> alone at the end, but it was still WWII.

One difference is that WWII against Japan was carried on in China,
IndoChina, and the Pacific Islands.

The entire world  against Saddam in 1990 didn't qualify as a world
war---why should the entire world against Iran today qualify?

Mark Borgerson
Ray O'Hara - 17 Oct 2007 23:26 GMT
> > >> Hmmmmmmmm...
> > >>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Mark Borgerson

p;enty pf countries didn't participate against saddam in the first gulf
war.
William Black - 17 Oct 2007 22:07 GMT
> Who is going to line up with Iran to make it a "world war"

More to the point,  who's going to line up with the USA?

Signature

William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time,  like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.

willshak - 17 Oct 2007 22:28 GMT
on 10/17/2007 5:07 PM William Black said the following:

>  
>> Who is going to line up with Iran to make it a "world war"
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>  
Every country that has suffered radical Islamic terror. Except the French.

Signature

Bill
In Hamptonburgh, NY
To email, remove the double zeroes after @

William Black - 17 Oct 2007 22:44 GMT
> on 10/17/2007 5:07 PM William Black said the following:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
> Every country that has suffered radical Islamic terror. Except the French.

No no no...

That was last week.

These days the French are just about the only European country who'd
actually go to war with the USA against Iran.

Trying to get a British Labour government out on another American military
adventure is a non-starter of almost epic proportions.  The last one almost
brought the government down.

The Italians won't play again either,  the Spaniards have already walked
from Iraq and the Germans might want to play but would have serious
political problems if they did.

The Poles will want to fight,  just to piss off the Russians,  and they
share that with the Baltics,  but that's your lot...

The other point is that most of Europe has suffered from terrorists,
Islamic and not,  and we're not afraid of them.  They're a nuisance.

If we went to war over people sponsoring terrorists we'd have bombed New
York some time ago...

Oh yes,   which terrorists do Iran sponsor who blow up anywhere but bits of
Israel?

Signature

William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time,  like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.

The Time Traveler - 17 Oct 2007 23:08 GMT
>  
>> on 10/17/2007 5:07 PM William Black said the following:
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
>  
The Time Traveler... Observed:

And Now!!
    America's  famous   *Home-Grown-South-American  Terrorist*  
  --->  http://www.northamerican.com/  
 --->  http://www.airborne-ranger.com/ranger/wannabees/OllieNorth.html

                             Osama  Bin Laden... WHO!

The Time Traveler
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Lead, follow, or get the  HELL  out  of  the  way!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Don Harstad - 18 Oct 2007 04:04 GMT
> If we went to war over people sponsoring terrorists we'd have bombed New
> York some time ago...

Yeah.  Right.

Don H.
David Nicholls - 20 Oct 2007 07:06 GMT
>> If we went to war over people sponsoring terrorists we'd have bombed New
>> York some time ago...
>>
> Yeah.  Right.

Actually under Bush philosophy of "he who supports terrorists is a
terrorist", UK would have bombed Boston as the principal financial backers
of the IRA (who caused over 3000 deaths, remember their weapon was the
Armalite (M-16) not the AK-47) !

David
Vince - 20 Oct 2007 15:32 GMT
>>> If we went to war over people sponsoring terrorists we'd have
>>> bombed New York some time ago...
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> David

 According to the CAIN research project at the University of Ulster,
[84] the Provisional IRA was responsible for the deaths of 1,821 people
during the Troubles up to 2001. This figure represents 48.4 percent of
the total fatalities in the conflict.

     * 621 of these casualties were civilians.
     * A total of 655 were British armed forces; 465 from the British
Army, 190 were from the Ulster Defence Regiment (a part time local
British Army reserve unit).
     * 272 were members of the Royal Ulster Constabulary, 14 were former
Royal Ulster Constabulary members, six were British Police, 20 were
Northern Ireland Prison Service officers, two were former prison officers.
     * A further 35 were loyalist paramilitaries (21 Ulster Defence
Association (UDA), three former UDA, 11 Ulster Volunteer Force).
     * Six were Gardaí and one was Irish Army.
     * About 180 were republican paramilitaries, including 12 Official
IRA members, one Irish People's Liberation Organisation member, 63
alleged informers and 103 accidental deaths of Provisional IRA members
due to premature explosions.

As noted the IRA caused less than half the deaths during the troubles.
The loyalists and Brits caused the other half.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provisional_IRA_campaign_1969-1997#Loyalists_and_th
e_IRA_-_killing_and_reprisals


Im on record that the IRA wre murderous thugs, but the terror tactics
went both way.  Better bomb whitehall too

Vince
James Hogg - 20 Oct 2007 16:09 GMT
>>>> If we went to war over people sponsoring terrorists we'd have
>>>> bombed New York some time ago...
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>As noted the IRA caused less than half the deaths during the troubles.
>The loyalists and Brits caused the other half.

Only if you include among "loyalists and Brits" the following
organizations:

Irish National Liberation Army
Irish People's Liberation Organisation
Irish People's Liberation Organisation Belfast Brigade
Official Irish Republican Army
People's Liberation Army
People's Republican Army
real Irish Republican Army
Saor Eire
Catholic Reaction Force
and other non-specific Republican groups

http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/sutton/tables/Organisation_Responsible.html

I get a figure of 58% deaths caused by all the republican groups
together.

James
Vince - 20 Oct 2007 16:43 GMT
>>>>> If we went to war over people sponsoring terrorists we'd have
>>>>> bombed New York some time ago...
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>
> James

not hung up on the numbers, and a certain percentage of the republican
deaths were their own people
The point was 3000 was an incorrect number and that terror went both ways

Vince
a.spencer3 - 20 Oct 2007 16:13 GMT
> >>> If we went to war over people sponsoring terrorists we'd have
> >>> bombed New York some time ago...
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> As noted the IRA caused less than half the deaths during the troubles.
> The loyalists and Brits caused the other half.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provisional_IRA_campaign_1969-1997#Loyalists_an
d_the_IRA_-_killing_and_reprisals

> Im on record that the IRA wre murderous thugs, but the terror tactics
> went both way.  Better bomb whitehall too

So both sides in any conflict are murderous thugs and terrorists?

Surreyman
Jack Linthicum - 20 Oct 2007 16:15 GMT
> > >>> If we went to war over people sponsoring terrorists we'd have
> > >>> bombed New York some time ago...
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> Surreyman

There is some doubt about a Franciscan-Templar dust up but usually
both sides lack gentility.
Vince - 20 Oct 2007 16:45 GMT
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provisional_IRA_campaign_1969-1997#Loyalists_an
>  d_the_IRA_-_killing_and_reprisals
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Surreyman

No, but in Ireland it was especially nasty on both sides especially for
the late 20th century.

Vince
John Briggs - 20 Oct 2007 19:22 GMT
>> So both sides in any conflict are murderous thugs and terrorists?
>
> No, but in Ireland it was especially nasty on both sides especially
> for the late 20th century.

Except that the overall homicide rate *at the height of The Troubles* was
less than that in New York.
Signature

John Briggs

Vince - 20 Oct 2007 20:26 GMT
>>> So both sides in any conflict are murderous thugs and terrorists?
>> No, but in Ireland it was especially nasty on both sides especially
>> for the late 20th century.
>
> Except that the overall homicide rate *at the height of The Troubles* was
> less than that in New York.

1) What is your denominator Ireland or ulster?

2) doesn't keep it from being nasty

Vince
John Briggs - 20 Oct 2007 20:39 GMT
>>>> So both sides in any conflict are murderous thugs and terrorists?
>>> No, but in Ireland it was especially nasty on both sides especially
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> 1) What is your denominator Ireland or ulster?

Neither: Northern Ireland.

> 2) doesn't keep it from being nasty

Like New York?
:-)
Signature

John Briggs

Vince - 20 Oct 2007 21:23 GMT
>>>>> So both sides in any conflict are murderous thugs and terrorists?
>>>> No, but in Ireland it was especially nasty on both sides especially
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Neither: Northern Ireland.

Oh so you mean the gerrymandered British occupied Ireland

>> 2) doesn't keep it from being nasty
>
> Like New York?
> :-)

Fair enough
city or state?

please provide a cite

Vince
John Briggs - 20 Oct 2007 21:55 GMT
>>>>>> So both sides in any conflict are murderous thugs and terrorists?
>>>>> No, but in Ireland it was especially nasty on both sides
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> please provide a cite

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_homicide_rate
Signature

John Briggs

Vince - 20 Oct 2007 23:10 GMT
>>>>>>> So both sides in any conflict are murderous thugs and terrorists?
>>>>>> No, but in Ireland it was especially nasty on both sides
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_homicide_rate

didn't catch ny

Vince
John Briggs - 20 Oct 2007 23:17 GMT
>>>>>>>> So both sides in any conflict are murderous thugs and
>>>>>>>> terrorists?
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> didn't catch ny

NY has better stats that the USA as a whole?
Signature

John Briggs

Vince - 21 Oct 2007 14:31 GMT
>>>>>>>>> So both sides in any conflict are murderous thugs and
>>>>>>>>> terrorists?
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> NY has better stats that the USA as a whole?
as an urban area it is one of the safest large cities

Again, it depends on what you are comparing.

Vince
a.spencer3 - 21 Oct 2007 11:05 GMT
> > Oh so you mean the gerrymandered British occupied Ireland

Oh - do we have an agenda here?

Surreyman
John Briggs - 21 Oct 2007 20:47 GMT
>>> Oh so you mean the gerrymandered British occupied Ireland
>
> Oh - do we have an agenda here?

There's a curious tale to tell about gerrymandering in Northern Ireland...
Signature

John Briggs

Baldoni - 22 Oct 2007 17:47 GMT
John Briggs wrote :
>>>> Oh so you mean the gerrymandered British occupied Ireland
>>
>> Oh - do we have an agenda here?
>
> There's a curious tale to tell about gerrymandering in Northern Ireland...

Were you ever a French teacher John ?

I know the name.

Signature

Count Baldoni

John Briggs - 22 Oct 2007 17:53 GMT
> John Briggs wrote :
>>>>> Oh so you mean the gerrymandered British occupied Ireland
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> I know the name.

Not that I am aware of :-)
Signature

John Briggs

John Briggs - 20 Oct 2007 19:18 GMT
>>>> If we went to war over people sponsoring terrorists we'd have
>>>> bombed New York some time ago...
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> As noted the IRA caused less than half the deaths during the troubles.
> The loyalists and Brits caused the other half.

Not so: "Approximately 60% of the victims were killed by republicans, 30% by
loyalists and 10% by the British, Irish and Northern Irish security forces."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Troubles
Signature

John Briggs

Vince - 20 Oct 2007 20:25 GMT
>>>>> If we went to war over people sponsoring terrorists we'd have
>>>>> bombed New York some time ago...
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Troubles

people disagree on the count
but I have no problem with the ballpark
(part of the problem  is how to count republicans killed by themselves
or other republicans

Vince
William Black - 20 Oct 2007 20:41 GMT
> people disagree on the count
> but I have no problem with the ballpark
> (part of the problem  is how to count republicans killed by themselves or
> other republicans

I find it interesting that only the republicans find keeping score an issue.

And only then if they can add the people murdered by the various Protestant
factions to those killed by the security forces.

The security forces were never interested in 'the score',  the Protestant
terrorists were too fragmented to care (they seem to have hated each other
far more than they hated anyone else) and the IRA and its various factions
and breakaway organisations seem to have killed as many of their own as
anyone else.

Signature

William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time,  like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.

Brian Sharrock - 21 Oct 2007 10:02 GMT
>>>> If we went to war over people sponsoring terrorists we'd have
>>>> bombed New York some time ago...
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> Vince

The murderous thugs _DID_ bomb Whitehall! !

<http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE7DA123BF93BA35751C0A96795826
0&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=print
>

Feb 8 1981 The New York Times refers;-
"IRA Attacks 10 Downing Street With Mortar Fire .... "

For those ignorant of the geography, ... the van mounted mortar tubes were
located at the intersection of Horse Guards Avenue and Whitehall (for this
purpose a street containing the front doors of many Ministries and Downing
Street is a short street off Whitehall. So the 'murderous thugs' followed
the clamour of the Maryland Irish-passport purchasing Professor.
Vince - 21 Oct 2007 14:48 GMT
>> Im on record that the IRA wre murderous thugs, but the terror tactics went
>> both way.  Better bomb whitehall too
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Street is a short street off Whitehall. So the 'murderous thugs' followed
> the clamour of the Maryland Irish-passport purchasing Professor.

The  original suggestion was

>>>>> If we went to war over people sponsoring terrorists we'd have
>>>>> bombed New York some time ago...

I simply pointed out that the terror went both ways.

As to passports Did you steal your passport?   Or did you stroll in and
tell them how important you are or did you purchase  it like anyone else?

My grandfather and Father were both Irish Citizens.  I was an Irish
citizen from birth

Vince
Brian Sharrock - 21 Oct 2007 18:36 GMT
>>> Im on record that the IRA wre murderous thugs, but the terror tactics
>>> went both way.  Better bomb whitehall too
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> As to passports Did you steal your passport?   Or did you stroll in and
> tell them how important you are or did you purchase  it like anyone else?

As a matter of record, I was given (issued) with my first (adult) passport
by a grateful nation recogniing my status as a 'Government Employee' in lieu
of any other issued  body armour!

Subsequent passports were paid for by my employers in order for me to travel
the world on their behalf.

I had to purchase my last passport which to my regret is the vile burgundy
style issued for an exorbitant amount of money; curiously enough I first
needed to acquire a new passport to flash at the Garda Siochana at Dublin
Airport because my 'true-blue' passport had expired just before my nephew's
marriage!

So; in order; I didn't steal a passport. nor did _I_  pay for my first
couple,

{ I did stroll into the Grosvenor Square Embassy to have my first USA Visa
stamped into the passport -but the alacrity with which it was entered was
(I'm sure) merely because of the courtesy of the Government clerks and not
because of 'my importance' - the hostile stares from the huge queue (line)
of applicants I bypassed were (i'm sure) directed to the smart dress of the
pair of Marines who escorted me from the kerb-side door to the
'visa-stamping' counter.}.

> My grandfather and Father were both Irish Citizens.  I was an Irish
> citizen from birth

AIUI, from your previous posts, AIUI your grandfather left Ulster (Province
not 'Northern Ireland' statelet) and presumably became a Citizen of the
United States?

Did he swear the 'Oath of Allegience' which inter-alia requires the
applicant to; -
"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and
abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state,
or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or
citizen; "

Was your father born in Ireland or was he a 'natural citizens ' of the USA
being born in USA and presumably being White and prior to 1952 thereby being
relieved  of the obligation to swear an Oath of Allegience?

Were you born in the USA or Ireland? Have you been required to swear the
'Oath of Allegience' to the USA?

Are you of the opinion that the requirement ,of citizens, to
absolutely and entirely
renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince,
potentate, state, or sovereignty, ... ' doesn't apply  to _YOU_!?Is this
because you think you are too important?

IMHO, you're a PLASTIC PADDY who has bought a passport off a dodgy nation
that'll give away passports to any applicant with a likely story of
grandparents and sufficeint folding stuff to be tucked into the grasping
governments coffers.

If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport from HMG;  ask the opinion
of the Egyptain Grocer!

BTW, as a offspring of Ulster born Grandparents; I too have the spurios
qualifications to purchase an Irish Passport  ... so !

> Vince
Vince - 21 Oct 2007 19:28 GMT
>>>> Im on record that the IRA wre murderous thugs, but the terror tactics
>>>> went both way.  Better bomb whitehall too
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> by a grateful nation recogniing my status as a 'Government Employee' in lieu
> of any other issued  body armour!

ok so you were "important"

> Subsequent passports were paid for by my employers in order for me to travel
> the world on their behalf.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> So; in order; I didn't steal a passport. nor did _I_  pay for my first
> couple,

unless your sacrifice at government salary is a "purchase"
FTR us government folks can have free government official passport only
for official use

> { I did stroll into the Grosvenor Square Embassy to have my first USA Visa
> stamped into the passport -but the alacrity with which it was entered was
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> pair of Marines who escorted me from the kerb-side door to the
> 'visa-stamping' counter.}.

Ill take it that you were"important" enough to jump the queue

>> My grandfather and Father were both Irish Citizens.  I was an Irish
>> citizen from birth
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or
> citizen; "

he left British occupied Ireland in 1915 before the Brits Left.  He came
on a UK passport.  (We have it )He married my Grandmother and my father
was born before he became a US citizen. My father was born in 1918 (in
the USA )while the Brits still occupied Ireland.

> Was your father born in Ireland or was he a 'natural citizens ' of the USA
> being born in USA and presumably being White and prior to 1952 thereby being
> relieved  of the obligation to swear an Oath of Allegience?

My father was born in the USA and traveled to Ireland as a child in
1922.  Under Irish law he was an an Irish citizen

> Were you born in the USA or Ireland? Have you been required to swear the
> 'Oath of Allegience' to the USA?

I am a dual national by the jus sanguinis (Ireland) and the jus soli
(USA) neither requires an oath

> Are you of the opinion that the requirement ,of citizens, to
> absolutely and entirely
> renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince,
> potentate, state, or sovereignty, ... ' doesn't apply  to _YOU_!?Is this
> because you think you are too important?

no because its the law.  The USA never had a problem with dual nationality

> IMHO, you're a PLASTIC PADDY who has bought a passport off a dodgy nation
> that'll give away passports to any applicant with a likely story of
> grandparents and sufficeint folding stuff to be tucked into the grasping
> governments coffers.

Ireland is a sovereign nation, of which I am a citizen and frankly
neither it or I care a rap what a UK "dweller" thinks

> If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport from HMG;  ask the opinion
> of the Egyptain Grocer!

Been to Egypt, lots of times .  They remember the Brits as oppressors.

> BTW, as a offspring of Ulster born Grandparents; I too have the spurios
> qualifications to purchase an Irish Passport  ... so !

Ireland has long welcomed its wayward children

Vincent Brannigan
William Black - 21 Oct 2007 19:40 GMT
>> As a matter of record, I was given (issued) with my first (adult)
>> passport by a grateful nation recogniing my status as a 'Government
>> Employee' in lieu of any other issued  body armour!
>
> ok so you were "important"

Nope.

Just a government servant sent abroad.

If he didn't have a passport they'd buy him one.

He could have been a gardener doing a job at a British Council library,  or
an electrician rewiring an area of an ebbassy

>> So; in order; I didn't steal a passport. nor did _I_  pay for my first
>> couple,
>
> unless your sacrifice at government salary is a "purchase"
> FTR us government folks can have free government official passport only
> for official use

Not in the UK.

Items bought for Civil Servants can be used by them in any manner they wish.

>> If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport from HMG;  ask the
>> opinion of the Egyptain Grocer!
>
> Been to Egypt, lots of times .  They remember the Brits as oppressors.

You missed that one Vince.

'The Egyptian Grocer' is a reference to Mohamed Fayed,  owner of Harrods and
found to be not fit to a British Citizen or hold a British passport...

Signature

William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time,  like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.

Vince - 21 Oct 2007 19:54 GMT
>>> As a matter of record, I was given (issued) with my first (adult)
>>> passport by a grateful nation recogniing my status as a 'Government
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> If he didn't have a passport they'd buy him one.

In the USA only for official duties

> He could have been a gardener doing a job at a British Council library,  or
> an electrician rewiring an area of an ebbassy
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Items bought for Civil Servants can be used by them in any manner they wish.

The USA  requires civil servants to pay for what they use personally

so I'll accept that that in the USA  civil servants work for the people
but in the UK  civil servants have the people groveling for them

no problem

>>> If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport from HMG;  ask the
>>> opinion of the Egyptain Grocer!
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> 'The Egyptian Grocer' is a reference to Mohamed Fayed,  owner of Harrods and
> found to be not fit to a British Citizen or hold a British passport...

Oh I know,i simply ignored it

http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=781&id=1201672002

The brits never  lose a chance at an ethnic or trade slur
no problem

My family was in the grocery business

Vince
James Hogg - 21 Oct 2007 20:30 GMT
>>>> If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport from HMG;  ask the
>>>> opinion of the Egyptain Grocer!
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Oh I know,i simply ignored it

How many people believe that one? Hands up!

James
Adam Whyte-Settlar - 24 Oct 2007 12:51 GMT
>>>>> If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport from HMG;  ask the
>>>>> opinion of the Egyptain Grocer!
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> How many people believe that one? Hands up!

How many people would believe Vince (or anyone else) could miss such an
obvious allusion.
Ah yes - only one.
Vince - 24 Oct 2007 14:18 GMT
>>>>>> If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport from HMG;
>>>>>>  ask the opinion of the Egyptain Grocer!
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> How many people would believe Vince (or anyone else) could miss such
> an obvious allusion. Ah yes - only one.

self delusion
only readers of the Scotsman and certain trashy tabloids ever saw it
if you want to see

do a google Results 1 - 10 of about 28 English and German pages for
"egyptian grocer" Mohamed Fayed.

28 hits

Compare
19,400 English and German pages for professor vincent Brannigan.

And Im hardly a household word

Vince
Deirdre Sholto Douglas - 24 Oct 2007 15:13 GMT
> >>>>>> If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport from HMG;
> >>>>>>  ask the opinion of the Egyptain Grocer!
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> Compare
> 19,400 English and German pages for professor vincent Brannigan.

Actually, more like nine entries for "Professor Vincent
Brannigan" and fifty or so for "Vincent Brannigan".  Unless
you put your search term in quotes to get the _exact_
phrase, you'll return entries for any instance of "Professor",
"Vincent" or "Brannigan".

For example, one of the pages in your 19,400 is "Neighbors
Vincent and Karen Giordano are taking visiting family out so
they ask ...... After hearing about googling one's name, thirtyish
Izobel Brannigan ..."

Deirdre
D. Spencer Hines - 24 Oct 2007 15:29 GMT
Yep, the Old Fraudster, Vincent Brannigan, has been caught by the short
hairs.

DSH

>> >>>>>> If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport from HMG;
>> >>>>>>  ask the opinion of the Egyptain Grocer!
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> Deirdre
Vince - 24 Oct 2007 15:40 GMT
> Yep, the Old Fraudster, Vincent Brannigan, has been caught by the short
> hairs.
>
> DSH

Refine the search any way you want

I still come out way ahead of the Egyptian grocer

Vince

>>>>>>>>> If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport from HMG;
>>>>>>>>>  ask the opinion of the Egyptain Grocer!
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>>
>> Deirdre
D. Spencer Hines - 24 Oct 2007 15:48 GMT
Hilarious!

The Irish Drunk is obviously DESPERATE for praise, respect and adulation.

He's no doubt three sheets to the wind again.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

>> Yep, the Old Fraudster, Vincent Brannigan, has been caught by the short
>> hairs.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Vince
Vince - 24 Oct 2007 16:11 GMT
> Hilarious!
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>
>> Vince

Im still ahead

Vince
Deirdre Sholto Douglas - 24 Oct 2007 18:29 GMT
> > Hilarious!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Im still ahead

So are Dahmer, Gacy and Manson...are you sure you
want to be in their company?

Deirdre
Vince - 24 Oct 2007 18:45 GMT
>>> Hilarious!
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> So are Dahmer, Gacy and Manson...are you sure you
> want to be in their company?

So is Mother Teresa and St Francis of Assisi
all are much more well known than the attribution of the "Egyptian grocer"

Which is the only question

Vince
D. Spencer Hines - 24 Oct 2007 21:55 GMT
How do I come out?  <G>

DSH

>> > Hilarious!
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Deirdre
Jack Linthicum - 24 Oct 2007 22:19 GMT
> How do I come out?  <G>

just tell everyone you are gay
La N - 25 Oct 2007 01:01 GMT
>> How do I come out?  <G>
>
> just tell everyone you are gay

Web  Results 1 - 10 of about 34,500 for gay spencer hines.

- nilita
Conway Caine - 25 Oct 2007 16:25 GMT
>> How do I come out?  <G>
>
> just tell everyone you are gay

Jack, Jack, Jack.
That was terrible.
  ;=)
The Fifeshire Bimbo - 24 Oct 2007 23:23 GMT
> D. Spencer Hines wrote:
>> Hilarious!
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>>> Yep, the Old Fraudster, Vincent Brannigan, has been caught by the short
>>>> hairs.

>>> Refine the search any way you want
>>>
>>> I still come out way ahead of the Egyptian grocer
>
> Im still ahead

Why is it so important to play this childish game of impressing D. Spencer
Hines?
D. Spencer Hines - 25 Oct 2007 00:13 GMT
> Why is it so important to play this childish game of impressing D. Spencer
> Hines?

Because Pogue Brannigan is a volatile combination of an insecure adolescent
boy -- who is trying to prove to me he can piss further than the other
pogues -- with the persona of an Irish Drunk who wants to be loved,
respected, adulated, imitated and listened to -- as he regales us with
Hibernian Blarney.

Add in a dash of Academic Imperiousness...

And we have GRAND ENTERTAINMENT.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum

>>> Hilarious!
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Why is it so important to play this childish game of impressing D. Spencer
> Hines?
Vince - 25 Oct 2007 02:11 GMT
>> Why is it so important to play this childish game of impressing D.
>> Spencer Hines?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> to be loved, respected, adulated, imitated and listened to -- as he
> regales us with Hibernian Blarney.

What a hoot

Sorry

i don't play that
personal nastiness is your game
not mine
you can look it up

Vince
John Briggs - 24 Oct 2007 17:49 GMT
>> Yep, the Old Fraudster, Vincent Brannigan, has been caught by the
>> short hairs.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I still come out way ahead of the Egyptian grocer

Results 1 - 10 of about 276,000 for "Mohamed Al-Fayed"
Signature

John Briggs

Vince - 24 Oct 2007 18:34 GMT
>>> Yep, the Old Fraudster, Vincent Brannigan, has been caught by the
>>> short hairs.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Results 1 - 10 of about 276,000 for "Mohamed Al-Fayed"

The reference was not to Mohamed Al-Fayed

The reference was to the "egyptian grocer"

Vince
John Briggs - 24 Oct 2007 18:44 GMT
>>>> Yep, the Old Fraudster, Vincent Brannigan, has been caught by the
>>>> short hairs.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> The reference was to the "egyptian grocer"

Results 1 - 10 of about 73 for "egyptian grocer" harrods OR al-fayed OR
fayed

Results 1 - 10 of about 36 for "professor vince brannigan" OR "professor
vincent brannigan"
Signature

John Briggs

Vince - 24 Oct 2007 19:11 GMT
>>>>> Yep, the Old Fraudster, Vincent Brannigan, has been caught by the
>>>>> short hairs.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>  Results 1 - 10 of about 36 for "professor vince brannigan" OR "professor
> vincent brannigan"

you're still "cheating"
if you insist that title must precede name you have to look at

"egyptian grocer al-fayad"  as one phrase

Results 1 - 10 of about 1,310 English and German pages for "Vincent
Brannigan"  (0.35 seconds)

Not to mention that my middle initial is part of my name so you have to
search for Vincent M Brannigan Vince Brannigan and Vincent Brannigan

not to mention viKnce

Vince
James Hogg - 24 Oct 2007 19:16 GMT
>>>>> Yep, the Old Fraudster, Vincent Brannigan, has been caught by the
>>>>> short hairs.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Results 1 - 10 of about 36 for "professor vince brannigan" OR "professor
>vincent brannigan"

You get completely different results if you search Google Images.

Typing in "Vince Brannigan" brings up an incongruous range of
pictures, the first of which is particularly interesting:

http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&um=1&hl=ga&safe=off&q=%22vince+brannigan%22

However did this end up on a Welsh government site?

James
John Briggs - 24 Oct 2007 20:52 GMT
>>>>>> Yep, the Old Fraudster, Vincent Brannigan, has been caught by the
>>>>>> short hairs.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> However did this end up on a Welsh government site?

Well, local government - Cardiganshire Council.  But the real answer is that
Google Images is borken (sic).
Signature

John Briggs

The Highlander - 25 Oct 2007 02:14 GMT
>>>>>>> Yep, the Old Fraudster, Vincent Brannigan, has been caught by the
>>>>>>> short hairs.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>Well, local government - Cardiganshire Council.  But the real answer is that
>Google Images is borken (sic).

I wouldn't say that was entirely true - the Hines Professorship at
Yale looked very prestigious!

http://pilgrim.ceredigion.gov.uk/media/images/i/g/dscn34082.jpg
Vince - 24 Oct 2007 15:31 GMT
>>>>>>>> If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport from HMG;
>>>>>>>>  ask the opinion of the Egyptain Grocer!
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> Deirdre

your google is a little misleading

 302 English and German pages for "vincent Brannigan" professor

1,370 English and German pages for "vincent Brannigan" .

Im also listed as Vince Brannigan

Still a lotmore than 28

if you do egyptian grocer you only get 213 many of whcih are clealry
unconnected

the point still stands

Vince
John Briggs - 24 Oct 2007 17:51 GMT
>>>>>>>>> If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport from HMG;
>>>>>>>>>  ask the opinion of the Egyptain Grocer!
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>
> the point still stands

Results 1 - 10 of about 36 for "professor vince brannigan" OR "professor
vincent brannigan"
Signature

John Briggs

Vince - 24 Oct 2007 18:36 GMT
>>>>>>>>>> If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport
>>>>>>>>>> from HMG; ask the opinion of the Egyptain Grocer!
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> Results 1 - 10 of about 36 for "professor vince brannigan" OR
> "professor vincent brannigan"

301 English and German pages for "Vincent Brannigan" professor .

still beats any reference to the Egyptian grocer

Vince
John Briggs - 24 Oct 2007 18:50 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>> If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport
>>>>>>>>>>> from HMG; ask the opinion of the Egyptain Grocer!
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> still beats any reference to the Egyptian grocer

Results 1 - 10 of about 113 for "vincent brannigan" "university of maryland"
professor

Results 1 - 10 of about 236 for "egyptian grocer"
Signature

John Briggs

Vince - 24 Oct 2007 19:15 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you need to appreciate the worth of a passport
>>>>>>>>>>>> from HMG; ask the opinion of the Egyptain Grocer!
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>
> Results 1 - 10 of about 236 for "egyptian grocer"

still cheating

lots of egyptian  grocers out there who dont own harrods

Attacks against Arabs

California
--In Los Angeles, Adel Karas, an Egyptian grocer was shot and killed.
Egyptian Grocer MURDERED in L.A.!
by Stop Racist Attacks 9:42am Tue Sep 18 '01

A 3rd. "backlash" murder has taken place. An Egyptian Grocer in San
Gabriel is the latest victim to fall to hate.

And all this while my money's about to vanish. It's the duty of the
United Nations to care for us." Mahmoud Amer, an Egyptian grocer, is
unsympathetic. .

The film moves on to its next “victim”: an Egyptian grocer in Brooklyn
who lost some business after 9/11. The grocer blames the media: “The TV
says bad ...

Vince
Deirdre Sholto Douglas - 24 Oct 2007 19:05 GMT
> 301 English and German pages for "Vincent Brannigan" professor .

The only way you get that number is by including
duplicates and sub-sites.

> still beats any reference to the Egyptian grocer

Okay, Vince, you win...your willie is bigger than Al-Fayed's,
we'll all make a note of it.  

(Unfortunately for you, it's not  bigger than mine at 1130
mentions...including dupes and sub-sites...you've got some
catching up to do.)

Ye gawds and sheesh...

Deirdre
Jack Linthicum - 24 Oct 2007 19:10 GMT
On Oct 24, 2:05 pm, Deirdre Sholto Douglas
<finch.enter...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> > 301 English and German pages for "Vincent Brannigan" professor .
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Deirdre

750, 200 are FCC so at least 7 years old
Vince - 24 Oct 2007 19:16 GMT
>> 301 English and German pages for "Vincent Brannigan" professor .
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Deirdre

if you subtract professor and use both versions of my name you get lots

Vince
John Briggs - 24 Oct 2007 20:52 GMT
>>> 301 English and German pages for "Vincent Brannigan" professor .
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> if you subtract professor and use both versions of my name you get
> lots

I've come in late on this, and missed the point: weren't you trying to claim
that you *did* know who "the Egyptian grocer" was, despite evidence to the
contrary?  Did this suddenly morph into a claim that he was more likely to
have heard of you than you of him?
Signature

John Briggs

Vince - 24 Oct 2007 21:07 GMT
>>>> 301 English and German pages for "Vincent Brannigan" professor .
>>> The only way you get that number is by including
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> contrary?  Did this suddenly morph into a claim that he was more likely to
> have heard of you than you of him?

Two separate issues

yes, I knew who the "Egyptian grocer" is.  5 years part time Visiting
Professor in Glasgow exposed me to the underbelly of uk newspapers.

I know where Harrod's is in Knightsbridge, been there many times. the
stop is convenient when I come in from Heathrow to Bloomsbury

When the reference was used, I made a humorous  twist by calling on my
Egyptian experience to describe the reactions of  the real Egyptian
grocers I'd met

The poster in a juvenile try at a cheap hit claimed BOTH that I'd missed
it and that everyone knew that Fayad was the Egyptian grocer.  He
continued  sarcastic abuse after I said i did know it.

There is certainly no way to "prove" what I knew one way or the other,
but it is fairly easy to prove whether everyone else knows the reference

I therefore replied that I knew it but that few outside of the tabloid
reading Brits would know it. I supported that claim by showing  the tiny
number of references with fayad and Egyptian grocer occurring in a
google search

The google references that refer to myself far outnumber the references
to fayad as the Egyptian grocer.  some posters try to minimize the
number of references to myself by insisting that my professorial title
must precede my name to count .  It doesn't always , even when it occurs
in the same article.  others want to count every reference to and
Egyptian grocer, as if fayad is the only Egyptian grocer.

I rest my case

Vincent M Brannigan
James Hogg - 24 Oct 2007 21:17 GMT
>yes, I knew who the "Egyptian grocer" is.  5 years part time Visiting
>Professor in Glasgow exposed me to the underbelly of uk newspapers.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Egyptian experience to describe the reactions of  the real Egyptian
>grocers I'd met

WHOAREYOUTRYINGTOCONVINCE

see below

That can be read as

Who are you trying to convince?

or

Who are you trying to con, Vince?

James
Vince - 24 Oct 2007 21:40 GMT
>> yes, I knew who the "Egyptian grocer" is.  5 years part time
>> Visiting Professor in Glasgow exposed me to the underbelly of uk
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> see below

I have no concern whatever with what you believe
the record speaks for itself

Vince

> That can be read as
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> James
John Briggs - 25 Oct 2007 00:21 GMT
>>>>> 301 English and German pages for "Vincent Brannigan" professor .
>>>> The only way you get that number is by including
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
> every reference to and Egyptian grocer, as if fayad is the only
> Egyptian grocer.

But the number of web references to you is totally irrelevant to the
question of whether or not Al-Fayed is known as the Egyptian Grocer.
Signature

John Briggs

D. Spencer Hines - 25 Oct 2007 00:44 GMT
> But the number of web references to you [Brannigan] is totally
> irrelevant to the question of whether or not Al-Fayed is known
> as the Egyptian Grocer.
------------------------------------------------------------

Correct...

There appear to be some 768,000 web references to me, just as _D. Spencer
Hines_ alone...

Meaning not a ruddy, damned thing.

This is a VERY SILLY GAME begun by Pogue Brannigan...

ONE of the most stupid, inane and insipid he has begun in this arena -- full
of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Except:

Pogue Brannigan is exposed as a volatile, insecure adolescent boy -- who is
trying to prove to me he can piss further than the other pogues -- combined
with the persona of an Irish Drunk who wants to be loved, respected,
adulated, imitated and listened to -- as he regales us with Hibernian
Blarney.

Add in a dash of Academic Imperiousness...

And we have GRAND ENTERTAINMENT...

But couldn't Lady Baltimore be better represented in these threads?

Surely she could find a better champion to carry her colors.

The same could be said for Lady Bethesda.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum

>> The google references that refer to myself far outnumber the
>> references to fayad as the Egyptian grocer.  some posters try to
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> But the number of web references to you is totally irrelevant to the
> question of whether or not Al-Fayed is known as the Egyptian Grocer.
John Briggs - 25 Oct 2007 01:28 GMT
>> But the number of web references to you [Brannigan] is totally
>> irrelevant to the question of whether or not Al-Fayed is known
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Meaning not a ruddy, damned thing.

No, there are 9,870 To "D. Spencer Hines" - some of them remarkably
uncomplimentary.
Signature

John Briggs

Vince - 25 Oct 2007 02:16 GMT
>> But the number of web references to you [Brannigan] is totally
>> irrelevant to the question of whether or not Al-Fayed is known
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> There appear to be some 768,000 web references to me, just as _D. Spencer
> Hines_ alone...

no one says you are not well known

Vince
Vince - 25 Oct 2007 02:14 GMT
> But the number of web references to you is totally irrelevant to the
> question of whether or not Al-Fayed is known as the Egyptian Grocer.

Its relevant as  a reference point

number of references like the numberer of citations is a first cut at
how well something is known, and to whom .

Vince
The Horny Goat - 28 Oct 2007 18:54 GMT
>> But the number of web references to you is totally irrelevant to the
>> question of whether or not Al-Fayed is known as the Egyptian Grocer.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>number of references like the numberer of citations is a first cut at
>how well something is known, and to whom .

Why? If you Google my name you get 27,000 hits - most of them are NOT
about me (the first 3 or 4 pages are though)
D. Spencer Hines - 24 Oct 2007 21:54 GMT
Deirdre Sholto Douglas has it right.

This is a VERY silly discussion.

The USENET equivalent of an adolescent boy peeing contest -- as to who has
the longest stream.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

>> 301 English and German pages for "Vincent Brannigan" professor .
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Deirdre
Adam Whyte-Settlar - 25 Oct 2007 01:19 GMT
>>>> How many people would believe Vince (or anyone else) could miss such
>>>> an obvious allusion