On Oct 16, 9:14 pm, "M. Ranjit Mathews"
<ranjit_math...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Condemn the present Turkey for a past government's
> doing?
> Would anyone consider condemning the present
> Vatican Cty for the Albigensian genocide?
I condemn all genocides, not present-day persons
who did not participate in them. In my post, I am
talking about genocide, and my criticism of the
present-day Turks is over their unwillingness to
recognize the crime of genocide, NOT their
participation in it! (Just as I criticize Mr. Cohen
for the same thing: NOT for having a kind heart and
being a sweetheart, which I'm sure he has/is, but for
not calling a spade a spade.) This is ALL about our
willingness to call a genocide a genocide--it may
appear to be a matter of some slight importance to
many, but ask the few Holocaust survivors whether
they might accept changing the definition of The
Holocaust to merely "an unfortunate mass-murder"
instead of The Holocaust. Then we'll talk.
S D Rodrian
http://poems.sdrodrian.com
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
http://mp3s.sdrodrian.com
All religions are local.
Only science is universal.
RE:
Richard Cohen's contention that condemning
genocide "will serve no earthly purpose" is
one of the most incomprehensibly inhuman
and shameful statements I have ever heard
an American "journalist" make!
Will not Mr. Cohen propose next that The United
States should also begin to deny the Holocaust
in order to promote better cooperation from Iran?
Ah, no, wait: This would hurt our ties with Israel
... therefore no. Mr. Cohen might not propose that
--After all, America's moral stand ought to have
nothing to do with right or wrong, only with crass
expedience!
But surely Mr. Cohen WOULD propose the denial
of the Holocaust if an important ally like Germany
were still engaged in protecting its NAZI heritage!
Turkey has never been and is certainly NOT now
a stable nation in the ocean of instability that is
the Islamic lands. And anybody who banks on this
self-evident myth is going to go bust: 15 million
"Turks" are in reality only "Turk-occupied" Kurds
who will not rest until they have taken their part
of Turkey into Kurdistan no matter how powerful
or long their subjugation by the Turks is. And it's
time that the world begins acknowledging this...
and working for its inevitability.
Turkey will NEVER be a stable nation until it is
a nation of Turks alone, and does not hold the
territories of another people as if it were its own
(let alone 15 million foreigners who do not wish
to be Turks).
For the United States to refrain from "offending"
a country such as Turkey merely for the sake of
money is a disgrace this generation of Americans
will have to answer to history for as well as to all
future generations of Americans.
The reason Turkey is engaged in this reprehensible
and unforgivable denial of the Armenian Holocaust
is NOT because it was perpetrated by some ancient
and bygone Turkish government (albeit it was) but
because its most ardent and enthusiastic perpetrators
and instigators were her Muslim Imams--who roused
their "congregations" to butcher as many human
beings as they could get their hands on simply
because they were NOT Muslims ... encouraging
their "men" to murder, to rape, and to steal the
properties of their pitiful victims exactly as the
Koran advocates [you can read more on this at:
http://www.godofreason.com/new-page-60.htm
--Overwhelming proof of this is contained in the
numberless confessions of contrition and remorse
by Turks who actually took part in the genocide!
So an admission that this was indeed the case
would be, in no uncertain terms, a condemnation
and indictment of the blood-thirsty nature of Islam
itself. [SEE: http://islamisbad.com ] This, the
Islamists of Turkey, understandably, will never do.
It is impossible to deny the Armenian Genocide.
The only thing the genocide deniers can do is to
bring shame & dishonor on themselves, Mr. Cohen.
As for America's relations with Turkey: NOTE how
quickly and over what disgraceful reasons Turkey
itself would consider such relations to have been
brought to an end. And then try to imagine over
what future nonsense might the Turks again threaten
to bring them to an end. Are these relations in as
good a footing, as stable and enduring as some
"interests" would like to have us believe they are?
There comes a time when men of good conscience
must act on their good will and do the right thing
regardless of the cost. And if the cost is imperiling
relations with a Turkey that time & time again thinks
nothing of imperiling relations with us over their
most wicked principles, then I say indeed: "When
the rope is rotten, it is sometimes better to cut it."
S D Rodrian
http://poems.sdrodrian.com
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
http://mp3s.sdrodrian.com
All religions are local.
Only science is universal.
RE:
"Turkey's War on the Truth" By Richard Cohen
Tuesday, October 16, 2007; Page A19 Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/15/AR2007101501323.
html?hpid=opinionsbox1
"It goes without saying that the House resolution
condemning Turkey for the "genocide" of Armenians
from 1915 to 1923 will serve no earthly purpose and--"
I could not read more without getting physically ill.
*****************************************
On Oct 18, 3:09 pm, "davesvi...@aol.com"
<davesvi...@aol.com> wrote:
> apparently we actually didn't read the same piece.
> If you had bothered to read the entire well written
> editorial, the point of which is, the truth should be
> told, it ends with the statement: "Call it genocide
> or call it something else, but there is only one
> thing to call Turkey's insistence that it and its power
> will determine the truth: unacceptable." Dave
I stand by my criticism of the part I criticized.
If you disagree with what I wrote about what I wrote
about: Fine. I, for one, did not have anything to say
about whatever it was I didn't have anything to say
about, obviously. This is self-evident enough
to not even have to be written about. Therefore
it shall not remain unwritten about, as you can see.
S D Rodrian
http://poems.sdrodrian.com
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
http://mp3s.sdrodrian.com
All religions are local.
Only science is universal.
.
Ray O'Hara - 24 Oct 2007 22:51 GMT
> On Oct 16, 9:14 pm, "M. Ranjit Mathews"
> <ranjit_math...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> who did not participate in them. In my post, I am
> talking about genocide,
all you are doing is trimng to show how wonderful and moral you are and how
evil others are.
there are plenty of current massacres to be upset over what happened 100
years ago might as well have been 1000.
seen any hittites lately?
australia.radio.broadcast.moderated (Keitha)_ - 25 Oct 2007 02:07 GMT
Dream on
Turkey will wipe you lot of the face of the earth
http://groups.google.com/group/australiapoliticsmoderated/browse_thread/thread/3
534bd1daeeb683d
Chris Hills - 25 Oct 2007 09:39 GMT
In message <1193274476.808351.18730@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
"australia.radio.broadcast.moderated (Keitha)_" <nswamfm@yahoo.com>
writes
>Dream on
>Turkey will wipe you lot of the face of the earth
>http://groups.google.com/group/australiapoliticsmoderated/browse_thread/
>thread/3534bd1daeeb683d
From personal experience I can tell you Turkey will not wipe the Kurds
off the face of the earth. (I was there when Iraq tried... this was
when the US was actively supplying Saddam)
The Kurds and the Afghans are very similar. A loose collection of
communities as opposed to a nation. Unconquerable and ungovernable for
the last 3000 years.
As they are split across Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria there is no way
any one or two countries can solve the problem. It will need concerted
and co-ordinated effort from all four. As the US is the main influence
in Iraq I can't see the US co-operating with Iran and Syria.

Signature
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
William Black - 25 Oct 2007 17:18 GMT
>>Dream on
>>Turkey will wipe you lot of the face of the earth
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> co-ordinated effort from all four. As the US is the main influence in Iraq
> I can't see the US co-operating with Iran and Syria.
The Turks don't want to kill them all.
They just want them to stop raiding over the US controlled border.
Turkey has already announced that if the US can't control that border then
Turkey will.
This is just short of calling the PKK 'US sponsored'.

Signature
William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.
Chris Hills - 25 Oct 2007 17:59 GMT
>>>Dream on
>>>Turkey will wipe you lot of the face of the earth
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>The Turks don't want to kill them all.
I agree (25% of Turkey is Kurdish) I was just pointing out no one is
going to "wipe them off the face of the earth" as was suggested above.
>They just want them to stop raiding over the US controlled border.
A perennial problem on that border. I spent an entertaining
super/autumn there.
>Turkey has already announced that if the US can't control that border then
>Turkey will.
>This is just short of calling the PKK 'US sponsored'.
You mean that Turkey is treating Iraq/USA the same way the US is
treating Iran? How ironic. :-)
The US has the problem that the only part of Iraq that is quiet and
stable (and not killing lots of Americans) is the Kurdish area. If the
US has to start getting the Kurds to behave it will be even further up
sh.t creek. The Kurds will start ignoring the Americans and then you
will have the interesting problem of the US treating the Kurds in the
same way Saddam did.
I refer you to my posts in 2002 when I said if the US went in to Iraq
and got rid of Saddam the Iranians would "influence" the south and the
Kurds would go for an independent state.
So Iran and Turkey are having problems with the Kurds and the Americans
are on a knife edge. The is in a no win situation. They need to pick
the least worst option

Signature
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
William Black - 25 Oct 2007 18:11 GMT
>>Turkey has already announced that if the US can't control that border then
>>Turkey will.
>>This is just short of calling the PKK 'US sponsored'.
>
> You mean that Turkey is treating Iraq/USA the same way the US is treating
> Iran? How ironic. :-)
Isn't it.
Almost beautiful...
> I refer you to my posts in 2002 when I said if the US went in to Iraq and
> got rid of Saddam the Iranians would "influence" the south and the Kurds
> would go for an independent state.
And I refer you to mine where I said that an independent Kurdistan would
have two Turkish armoured corps over the border raising hell within 48
hours.

Signature
William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.
Chris Hills - 25 Oct 2007 18:56 GMT
>>>Turkey has already announced that if the US can't control that border then
>>>Turkey will.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>have two Turkish armoured corps over the border raising hell within 48
>hours.
The Turks have that in [Turkish] Kurdistan now, as the Iranians do in
[Iranian] Kurdistan.
It is only in Iraqi Kurdistan where the US needs the Kurds that they are
able to move.....
For some reason the Kurdish parts of Syria are generally fairly quiet.
However the Syrian border is generally far more heavily guarded due to
the oil fields in North East Syria

Signature
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
William Black - 25 Oct 2007 19:41 GMT
>>>>Turkey has already announced that if the US can't control that border
>>>>then
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> However the Syrian border is generally far more heavily guarded due to the
> oil fields in North East Syria
And that one little detail everyone always forgets...
Syria is run by a gang of psychopaths who'll liquidate anyone who even
thinks of stepping out line.

Signature
William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.
Chris Hills - 25 Oct 2007 21:05 GMT
>>>>>Turkey has already announced that if the US can't control that border
>>>>>then
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>Syria is run by a gang of psychopaths who'll liquidate anyone who even
>thinks of stepping out line.
Yes. In fact they run a set up not far different to Iraq when it was run
by Saddam and supported by the USA

Signature
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Ray O'Hara - 26 Oct 2007 04:10 GMT
> >>>>>Turkey has already announced that if the US can't control that border
> >>>>>then
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> Yes. In fact they run a set up not far different to Iraq when it was run
> by Saddam and supported by the USA
yes that's the middle east.
you have a choice of secular psychopaths or religious psychopaths.
Ray O'Hara - 26 Oct 2007 04:06 GMT
> And I refer you to mine where I said that an independent Kurdistan would
> have two Turkish armoured corps over the border raising hell within 48
> hours.
iran wouldn't react any better.
if there were no kurds iraq would be partitioned