Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / British History / December 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Thomas Sowell: Unpromising Times

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
D. Spencer Hines - 26 Dec 2007 19:52 GMT
December 26, 2007

Unpromising Times
Primary elections and secondary candidates.

By Thomas Sowell

           Apparently there is nobody among either the Democrats or the
Republicans who is going to cause a runaway stampede like that which toppled
all the Republican front-runners in 1940, when the convention delegates
began loudly chanting “We want Wilkie!”

           It is a struggle to keep awake during most of the so-called
“debates” among the small army of candidates in both parties. At least the
primaries will put an end to those awful spectacles.

           It is much too early to try to guess who is going to win either
party’s nomination. The most we can have at this point are some general
impressions.

           None of the candidates looks truly inspiring at this point. I
wouldn’t buy a used car from most of them, nor a brand new car from some of
them.

           John Edwards is the easiest to peg. He looks just like the phony
that he is.

           His talk about poor children going to bed hungry may rouse the
far left in his party but in fact the lowest-income people are even more
obese than the rest of us, not that the facts make the slightest difference
to Senator Edwards.

           As an attorney, Edwards conned millions of dollars out of
gullible juries, using junk science to create the impression that it was the
fault of doctors when babies were born with birth defects.

           Republicans, as usual, seem to have more people who would make
good presidents than people who would make good presidential candidates.
Unfortunately for them, we have elections instead of coronations.

           Fred Thompson seems to have the best policy positions and the
best political track record among the Republican candidates — and the least
effective presentation of himself.

           If Senator Thompson can beat the odds and become president, he
would probably be better than most of those who have been in the White House
in recent times — though that is not extravagant praise.

           The only candidate of either party who truly looks presidential
is Mitt Romney. It was unfortunate that Mike Huckabee and others have tried
to make his religion an issue.

           John F. Kennedy was supposed to have taken that issue out of
politics — and Huckabee’s bringing it back in ought to disqualify him for a
shot at the White House, even aside from Governor Huckabee’s wholesale
pardons of criminals and his raising taxes.

           Romney and Giuliani are both articulate Republicans — and it is
rare for the Republicans to have two at one time. Some presidential election
years they haven’t even had one.

           If Romney’s and Giuliani’s track records in office matched their
ability to talk, either of them could unite and lead their party to victory.
But that is no small “if.”

           When it comes to articulation, no one can beat Barack Obama. He
can even convince people that he has new ideas, when in fact they are old
1960s ideas that have failed repeatedly, ever since that irresponsible
decade.

           John McCain seems to be having a little resurgence but it is
hard to believe that Republicans are so desperate as to support a man who
joined with far left Democrat Russ Feingold to restrict free speech in the
name of “campaign finance reform” and with Ted Kennedy to sponsor a bill
giving amnesty to illegal immigrants.

           Then there is Hillary Clinton, formerly known as “front-runner”
Hillary Clinton or the “inevitable” candidate Hillary Clinton.

           It is painful to watch her trying to act human and it would be
even more painful to see the Clintons back in the White House that they
disgraced in so many ways.

           She might even be shameless enough to put him on the Supreme
Court, where he could ruin the law of the land, as many of his own judicial
appointees are already doing in the federal courts.

           As for the other candidates in both parties, the big question is
why anyone takes them seriously as candidates to lead the nation at a time
of huge dangers that terrorists will end up with nuclear weapons, whether
from Iran or Pakistan.

           This nation has come back from unpromising times before. Let’s
hope that we have not already used up all our luck.
Dean A. Markley - 26 Dec 2007 20:07 GMT
> December 26, 2007
>
[quoted text clipped - 90 lines]
>             This nation has come back from unpromising times before. Let’s
> hope that we have not already used up all our luck.

OK, I am now officially tired of you and your garbage posting drivel.

As someone else said here:  PLONK!
Charlie Wilkes - 26 Dec 2007 20:33 GMT
> December 26, 2007
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> time of huge dangers that terrorists will end up with nuclear weapons,
> whether from Iran or Pakistan.

America needs a president who will instill FEAR!

>             This nation has come back from unpromising times before.
>             Let’s
> hope that we have not already used up all our luck.

I guess it would be too much to expect another leader of George W. Bush's
towering stature.  But maybe we will get someone who can form a coherent
sentence now and then...

Charlie
redc1c4 - 26 Dec 2007 21:56 GMT
> > December 26, 2007
> >
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> towering stature.  But maybe we will get someone who can form a coherent
> sentence now and then...

having seen some of the debates, that leaves all the Democrooks out of the
running............

redc1c4,
Thompson/Keyes 08
Signature

"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

D. Spencer Hines - 26 Dec 2007 22:10 GMT
December 26, 2007

Unpromising Times
Primary elections and secondary candidates.

By Thomas Sowell

It is much too early to try to guess who is going to win either
party’s nomination. The most we can have at this point are some general
impressions.

Right! -- DSH

John Edwards is the easiest to peg.  He looks just like the phony
that he is.

Right Again! -- DSH

His talk about poor children going to bed hungry may rouse the
far left in his party but in fact the lowest-income people are even more
obese than the rest of us, not that the facts make the slightest difference
to Senator Edwards.

As an attorney, Edwards conned millions of dollars out of
gullible juries, using junk science to create the impression that it was the
fault of doctors when babies were born with birth defects.

Spot On! -- DSH

When it comes to articulation, no one can beat Barack Obama.  He
can even convince people that he has new ideas, when in fact they are old
1960s ideas that have failed repeatedly, ever since that irresponsible
decade.

Correct. -- DSH

John McCain seems to be having a little resurgence but it is
hard to believe that Republicans are so desperate as to support a man who
joined with far left Democrat Russ Feingold to restrict free speech in the
name of “campaign finance reform” and with Ted Kennedy to sponsor a bill
giving amnesty to illegal immigrants.

Right! -- DSH

Then there is Hillary Clinton, formerly known as “front-runner”
Hillary Clinton or the “inevitable” candidate Hillary Clinton.

It is painful to watch her trying to act human and it would be
even more painful to see the Clintons back in the White House that they
disgraced in so many ways.

Painful Indeed -- But Amusing Nonetheless. -- DSH

She might even be shameless enough to put him on the Supreme
Court, where he could ruin the law of the land, as many of his own judicial
appointees are already doing in the federal courts.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I doubt she could get away with that.  Bubba wouldn't like being moved off
center stage to the Mahogany Prison of the Supreme Court either. --

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Deus Vult
D. Spencer Hines - 27 Dec 2007 00:49 GMT
John Edwards is the easiest to peg.  He looks just like the phony
that he is.

His talk about poor children going to bed hungry may rouse the
far left in his party but in fact the lowest-income people are even more
obese than the rest of us, not that the facts make the slightest difference
to Senator Edwards.

As an attorney, Edwards conned millions of dollars out of
gullible juries, using junk science to create the impression that it was the
fault of doctors when babies were born with birth defects.

Thomas Sowell
---------------------------

Spot On!

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Soldier in a Combat Zone - 27 Dec 2007 16:14 GMT
|December 26, 2007
|
[quoted text clipped - 90 lines]
|            This nation has come back from unpromising times before. Let’s
|hope that we have not already used up all our luck.

At this point, it is very unclear on who will win either parties nomination. The
Clinton "machine" wanted early primaries as a means to wrap up the nomination
then work on the GOP nominee.  However Obama has screwed those plans. In fact he
may well win the nomination.  Frankly too many are just as tired of the Clintons
as they are the Bushes.  It does seem that the democrats may well go into March
or even April without a clear choice.  That will really cost them millions of
dollars that they can not afford.

The GOP is up for grabs.  No clear choice.  Thompson, with Romney as VP, might
be the best choice.  However who knows.  It does seem that the GOP will decide
far faster than the democrats.  Most likely the GOP is less divided than the
democrats, something that the press seems to want to hide.  We may well see a
unified GOP far earlier than the democrats.

The press loves the process of politics.  The rest of us just wish that they
would all go away, especially the press.  Reporters need to get a life, or at
least learn how the rest of us live.  They are more clueless than the
intelligence community.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.