Novak: Attorney General Edwards In An Obama Administration?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
D. Spencer Hines - 26 Jan 2008 09:15 GMT Attorney General Edwards?
An Inside Report by Robert Novak
Friday, January 25, 2008
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Illinois Democrats close to Sen. Barack Obama are quietly passing the word that John Edwards will be named attorney general in an Obama administration.
Installation at the Justice Department of multimillionaire trial lawyer Edwards would please not only the union leaders supporting him for president but organized labor in general. The unions relish the prospect of an unequivocal labor partisan as the nation's top legal officer.
In public debates, Obama and Edwards often seem to bond together in alliance against front-running Sen. Hillary Clinton. While running a poor third, Edwards could collect a substantial bag of delegates under the Democratic Party's proportional representation. Edwards then could try to turn his delegates over to Obama in the still unlikely event of a deadlocked Democratic National Convention.
Vince - 26 Jan 2008 16:17 GMT > Attorney General Edwards? > > An Inside Report by Robert Novak Robert Novak is a shill not a reporter
Vince
D. Spencer Hines - 26 Jan 2008 20:59 GMT Nonsense...
He's a very reputable reporter and has been for decades.
DSH
>> Attorney General Edwards? >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Vince ----------------------------------------------
Attorney General Edwards?
An Inside Report by Robert Novak
Friday, January 25, 2008
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Illinois Democrats close to Sen. Barack Obama are quietly passing the word that John Edwards will be named attorney general in an Obama administration.
Installation at the Justice Department of multimillionaire trial lawyer Edwards would please not only the union leaders supporting him for president but organized labor in general. The unions relish the prospect of an unequivocal labor partisan as the nation's top legal officer.
In public debates, Obama and Edwards often seem to bond together in alliance against front-running Sen. Hillary Clinton. While running a poor third, Edwards could collect a substantial bag of delegates under the Democratic Party's proportional representation. Edwards then could try to turn his delegates over to Obama in the still unlikely event of a deadlocked Democratic National Convention.
Vince - 26 Jan 2008 22:06 GMT > Nonsense... > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> Vince > ---------------------------------------------- He ruined Valerie Plame at the behest of and for the benefit of the White House to accomplish a republican political agenda. He kept secret his republican sources but was happy to ruin the career of the non-political wife of a bush Critic He knew it They knew it she knew, we know it
he is a shill
Vince
Cory Bhreckan - 26 Jan 2008 23:04 GMT >> Nonsense... >> [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > he is a shill And a traitor. He placed all the CIA operatives involved with Brewster Jennings in danger. Who knows how many Americans died as a result of his partisan treason.
> Vince
 Signature "For the stronger we our houses do build, The less chance we have of being killed." - William Topaz McGonagall
La N - 27 Jan 2008 00:03 GMT >>> Nonsense... >>> [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > Jennings in danger. Who knows how many Americans died as a result of his > partisan treason. I had the pleasure of seeing him walk off in frustration and humiliation from CNN's Crossfire towards the end of his career there. After a day's suspension, he came back to apologize to the viewers for his childish behaviour.
- nilita
Jack Linthicum - 27 Jan 2008 15:15 GMT On Jan 26, 6:04 pm, Cory Bhreckan <coryvreckan@NO_SPAM.verizon.net> wrote:
> >> Nonsense... > [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > "For the stronger we our houses do build, > The less chance we have of being killed." - William Topaz McGonagall One, it's on the Wall of Honor at CIA with no name just a star
La N - 27 Jan 2008 15:23 GMT > On Jan 26, 6:04 pm, Cory Bhreckan <coryvreckan@NO_SPAM.verizon.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > One, it's on the Wall of Honor at CIA with no name just a star Speaking of CIA, here's a recent obit of a Yale University prof who wrote a book about the CIA and taught many of our Presidents. I don't think Hines would like to see what the prof said of a couple of his favourite people:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/education/27westerfield.html?_r=1&ref=educatio n&oref=slogin
January 27, 2008 H. Bradford Westerfield, Influential Yale Professor, Is Dead at 79 By DOUGLAS MARTIN H. Bradford Westerfield, a Yale political scientist whose courses attracted 10,000 students, mostly undergraduates, among them President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, died on Jan. 19 in Watch Hill, R.I. He was 79.
The cause was complications of Parkinson's disease, his son, Leland Avery Westerfield, said. H. Bradford Westerfield lived in Watch Hill and Hamden, Conn.
Dr. Westerfield's former students in four decades of teaching, who also included Senators John Kerry and Joseph I. Lieberman and assorted cabinet officers, White House advisers and intelligence officials, often cited his influence in framing their approach to public policy.
Mr. Cheney repeatedly said Dr. Westerfield helped shape his hard-line approach to foreign policy. But an article in The Nation in 2004 reported that Dr. Westerfield came to regret the hard-nosed lessons Mr. Cheney said he had learned. Dr. Westerfield explained that his own politics had become much more dovish since advocating uncompromising anticommunism in classes Mr. Cheney attended, transformed in large part by America's troubles in the Vietnam War.
Dr. Westerfield characterized the current Bush administration as overly confrontational, calling that "precisely the wrong approach."
He was known for writing and teaching about foreign policy with a particular emphasis on espionage, offering one of the first courses at any American university on intelligence and covert operations, which students playfully christened "Spies and Lies."
At his death, Dr. Westerfield was the Damon Wells Professor of International Studies. He appreciated the fact that Mr. Wells had been his student, his family said.
Holt Bradford Westerfield, a descendant of William Bradford, second governor of Plymouth colony, was born on March 7, 1928, in Rome, where his father, Ray Bert Westerfield, an economics professor at Yale, was on sabbatical.
The younger Dr. Westerfield graduated at 16 from the Choate School and at 19 from Yale, where he was president of the political union and the debate association.
He earned his doctorate from Harvard, where he studied intelligence services. His thesis became his first book, "Foreign Policy and Party Politics: Pearl Harbor to Korea" (1955). He taught at Harvard and the University of Chicago and spent a year studying Congress as a fellow of the American Political Science Association.
In 1957, he joined Yale as an assistant professor of international relations, and stayed there until his retirement in 2001. He later held college teaching and research positions in England, Australia and the United States.
His books included "The Instruments of America's Foreign Policy" (1963), and selections from an internal publication of the Central Intelligence Agency, which he edited as "Inside C.I.A.'s Private World: Declassified Articles From the Agency's Internal Journal, 1955-92" (1995). The C.I.A. chose him to edit the book partly because he was independent of the agency.
Dr. Westerfield held several Yale administrative positions, including director of undergraduate studies and director of graduate studies.
In 1960, he married the former Carolyn Elizabeth Hess, and the Rev. William Sloane Coffin Jr., then the Yale chaplain, officiated at a communion service held in conjunction with the marriage ceremony. Dr. Westerfield and Dr. Coffin later engaged in lively debates on Vietnam, with Dr. Westerfield the hawk and Dr. Coffin the dove. At the time, Dr. Westerfield said he was worried about a communist takeover of the United States.
When he later rejected his more bellicose views, he said he had no regrets for the earlier militancy. "I don't blame myself any longer for having misled those students," he said in The Hartford Courant in 2003.
In addition to his wife and his son, Leland, who lives in Greenwich, Conn., Dr. Westerfield is survived by his daughter, Pamela Westerfield Bingham, of Manhattan; his brother, Putney, of Hillsborough, Calif., and four granddaughters.
Jack Linthicum - 27 Jan 2008 15:30 GMT > > On Jan 26, 6:04 pm, Cory Bhreckan <coryvreckan@NO_SPAM.verizon.net> > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 119 lines] > Manhattan; his brother, Putney, of Hillsborough, Calif., and four > granddaughters. You would be surprised how many of the people in academia in that period (1955-1995) were CIA recruiters, if only offering an alternative lifestyle for that "European Tour" 20th Century style. I ran into at least three from Cal at meetings in the 60s and I know several more from places like Cal and Stanford were consulted, because I saw their names on reports. I would even guess more than two Canadians were involved.
Deirdre Sholto Douglas - 27 Jan 2008 16:55 GMT > On Jan 26, 6:04 pm, Cory Bhreckan <coryvreckan@NO_SPAM.verizon.net> > wrote:
> > And a traitor. He placed all the CIA operatives involved with Brewster > > Jennings in danger. Who knows how many Americans died as a result of his > > partisan treason. > > > One, it's on the Wall of Honor at CIA with no name just a star Does the star represent one person or all people who have been killed while operating covertly? How many stars without names are there?
Deirdre
Jack Linthicum - 27 Jan 2008 17:34 GMT On Jan 27, 11:55 am, Deirdre Sholto Douglas <finch.enter...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > On Jan 26, 6:04 pm, Cory Bhreckan <coryvreckan@NO_SPAM.verizon.net> > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Deirdre One per person, 87 as of late 2007, 33 without names.
La N - 27 Jan 2008 17:49 GMT > On Jan 27, 11:55 am, Deirdre Sholto Douglas > <finch.enter...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > One per person, 87 as of late 2007, 33 without names. "Without names" meaning *secret* even after death?
- nilita
Jack Linthicum - 27 Jan 2008 18:00 GMT > > On Jan 27, 11:55 am, Deirdre Sholto Douglas > > <finch.enter...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > - nilita Yes, there is an explanation someplace as to why, even after 40 or 50 years that holds true. Example:
https://www.cia.gov/news-information/featured-story-archive/james-j-mcgrath.html
La N - 27 Jan 2008 18:07 GMT >> > On Jan 27, 11:55 am, Deirdre Sholto Douglas >> > <finch.enter...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > https://www.cia.gov/news-information/featured-story-archive/james-j-mcgrath.html Cool. I guess their survivors can't even speak about their loved ones much then.
- nilita
Les Cargill - 27 Jan 2008 18:33 GMT >> On Jan 27, 11:55 am, Deirdre Sholto Douglas >> <finch.enter...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > - nilita Yes.
-- Les Cargill
Cory Bhreckan - 27 Jan 2008 22:50 GMT > On Jan 26, 6:04 pm, Cory Bhreckan <coryvreckan@NO_SPAM.verizon.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > One, it's on the Wall of Honor at CIA with no name just a star What about foreign operatives? Are they normally placed on the Wall?
 Signature "For the stronger we our houses do build, The less chance we have of being killed." - William Topaz McGonagall
Jack Linthicum - 27 Jan 2008 22:58 GMT On Jan 27, 5:50 pm, Cory Bhreckan <coryvreckan@NO_SPAM.verizon.net> wrote:
> > On Jan 26, 6:04 pm, Cory Bhreckan <coryvreckan@NO_SPAM.verizon.net> > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > "For the stronger we our houses do build, > The less chance we have of being killed." - William Topaz McGonagall I don't think so, the inscription reads:
"IN HONOR OF THOSE MEMBERS OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES IN THE SERVICE OF THEIR COUNTRY."
here is a slightly dated (1997) account of what the wall is about.
http://www.fiu.edu/~fcf/ray.washingtonpost.cia91897.html
J A - 26 Jan 2008 23:27 GMT > Nonsense... > > He's a very reputable reporter and has been for decades. He and his dead partner used to bribe people to leak to them.
The bribe was to create sham stories that made the leaker look good.
"Very reputable reporter"? Reputable reporters don't write lies - or leak CIA idnetities for poltical hacks handling a braindead pseudo President.
J A - 26 Jan 2008 23:23 GMT > In public debates, Obama and Edwards often seem to bond together in alliance > against front-running Sen. Hillary Clinton. While running a poor third, > Edwards could collect a substantial bag of delegates under the Democratic > Party's proportional representation. Edwards then could try to turn his > delegates over to Obama in the still unlikely event of a deadlocked > Democratic National Convention. If he does turn his delegates away from Clinton's wife, then he's performing an important service for the country.
dapra - 27 Jan 2008 02:19 GMT > Attorney General Edwards? > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > delegates over to Obama in the still unlikely event of a deadlocked > Democratic National Convention. So, the Prince of Darkness, Novak after being an enabler of the Bush regimes dirty tricksters outing a CIA agent, back in business. He must be protecting the Corporate Oligarchies candidate, Hillary. The right wing reactionaries must have given up on all of their pitiful candidates.
Since Bill "Was the Best Republican President We've Had in a While". according to Greenspan. They hope for the second best Republican president, Hillary.
Jack Linthicum - 28 Jan 2008 15:47 GMT > Attorney General Edwards? > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > delegates over to Obama in the still unlikely event of a deadlocked > Democratic National Convention. http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/01/28/premature_maybe_ag_edwards.html
"Terry McAuliffe, Clinton's campaign chairman, spent two days at the trial lawyers' conference, delicately searching for donors among the -- mostly -- Edwards faithful. He said he was asked several times about the potential for Edwards to have a role within a potential Clinton administration, and the topic of attorney general did come up. But McAuliffe noted it would be a felony to promise someone a cabinet post in exchange for political support."
That's Bob Novak alright, abetting a felony
|
|
|