History Forum / General / British History / February 2008

The British Revolution
Archibald Maule Ramsay

The Nameless War

"It was fated that England should be the first of a series of
Revolutions, which is not yet finished."

    With these cryptic words Isaac Disraeli, father of Benjamin Earl
of Beaconsfield, commenced his two volume life of Charles I published
in 1851. A work of astonishing detail and insight, much information
for which, he states, was obtained from the records of one Melchior de
Salom, French envoy in England during that period.

    The scene opens with distant glimpses of the British Kingdom
based upon Christianity, and its own ancient traditions; these
sanctions binding Monarchy, Church, State, nobles and the people in
one solemn bond on the one hand; on the other hand, the ominous
rumblings of Calvinism.

    Calvin, who came to Geneva from France, where his name was spelt
Cauin, *possibly a French effort to spell Cohen, organized great
numbers of revolutionary orators, not a few of whom were inflicted
upon England and Scotland. Thus was laid the groundwork for revolution
under a cloak of religious fervour.

   *Note. At a B'nai B'rith meeting in Paris reported in 'Catholic
Gazette' in Feb 1936 he was claimed to be of Jewish extraction.

    On both sides of the Tweed these demagogues contracted all
religion into rigid observance of the "Sabbath." To use the words of
Isaac Disraeli,

   "The nation was artfully divided into Sabbatarians and Sabbath
breakers."

   "Calvin deemed the Sabbath to have been a Jewish ordinance,
limited to the sacred people."

He goes on to say that when these Calvinists held the country in their
power,

   "it seemed that religion chiefly consisted of Sabbatarian rigours;
and that a British senate had been transformed into a company of
Hebrew Rabbins":

and later

   "In 1650, after the execution of the King, an Act was passed
inflicting penalties for a breach of the Sabbath."

   Buckingham, Strafford and Laud are the three chief figures round
the King in these early stages: Men on whose loyalty to himself, the
nation, and the ancient tradition Charles can rely.

    Buckingham, the trusted friend of King James I, and of those who
had saved his life at the time of the Gowrie Conspiracy (of ominous
cabalistic associations) was assassinated in the early years of King
Charles' reign under mysterious circumstances.

    Strafford, who had been in his early days inclined to follow the
opposite faction, later left them; and became a staunch and devoted
adherent of the King.

    This opposition faction became steadily more hostile to Charles
and by the time that they were led by Pym and decided to impeach
Strafford. "The King," writes Disraeli, "regarded this faction as his
enemies"; and he states that the head of this faction was the Earl of
Bedford.

    Walsh, the eminent Catholic historian, states that a Jew wine
merchant named Roussel was the founder of this family in Tudor times.
With the impeachment and execution of Strafford, the powers behind the
rising Calvinist, or Cohenist, Conspiracy began to reveal themselves,
and their focus, the City of London.

    At this time there suddenly began to appear from the City armed
mobs of "Operatives" (the medieval equivalent for "workers" no doubt).
Let me quote Disraeli:

   "They were said to amount to ten thousand ...

   with war-like weapons. It was a militia for insurgency at all
seasons, and might be depended upon for any work of destruction at the
cheapest rate ...

   as these sallied forth with daggers and bludgeons (from the city)
the inference is obvious that this train of explosion must have been
long laid."

    It must indeed; and we must recollect here, that at this time
Strafford was still unexecuted, and civil war in the minds of none but
of those behind the scenes, who evidently had long since resolved upon
and planned it.

    These armed mobs of "workers" intimidated all and sundry,
including both Houses of Parliament and the Palace at critical
moments, exactly on the model employed later by the "Sacred Bands" and
the "Marseillais" in the French Revolution.

    Isaac Disraeli draws again and again startling parallels between
this and the French Revolution; Notably in his passages on the Press,
"no longer under restraint," and the deluge of revolutionary pamphlets
and leaflets. He writes:

   "From 1640 to 1660, about 30,000 appear to have started up."

And later,

   "the collection of French revolutionary pamphlets now stands by
the side of the French tracts of the age of Charles I, as abundant in
number and as fierce in passion. . .

   Whose hand behind the curtain played the strings  . . .

   could post up a correct list of 59 commoners, branding them with
the odious title of 'Straffordians or betrayers of their country'."

    Whose hand indeed? But Disraeli who knew so much, now discreetly
draws a veil over that iron curtain; and it is left to us to complete
the revelation.

    To do so we must turn to such other works as the Jewish
Encyclopedia, Sombart's work, The Jews and Modern Capitalism, and
others. From these we learn that Cromwell, the chief figure of the
revolution, was in close contact with the powerful Jew financiers in
Holland; and was in fact paid large sums of money by Manasseh Ben
Israel; whilst Fernandez Carvajal, "The Great Jew" as he was called,
was the chief contractor of the New Model Army.

In The Jews in England we read:

   "1643 brought a large contingent of Jews to England, their
rallying point was the house of the Portuguese Ambassador De Souza, a
Marano (secret Jew). Prominent among them was Fernandez Carvajal, a
great financier and army contractor."

    In January of the previous year, the attempted arrest of the five
members had set in violent motion the armed gangs of "Operatives"
already mentioned, from the city. Revolutionary pamphlets were
broadcasted on this occasion, as Disraeli tells us:

   "Bearing the ominous insurrectionary cry of 'To your tents, O
Israel'."

    Shortly after this the King and the Royal Family left the Palace
of Whitehall.

    The five members with armed mobs and banners accompanying them,
were given a triumphal return to Westminster. The stage was now set
for the advent of Carvajal and his Jews and the rise of their creature
Cromwell.

    The scene now changes. The Civil War has taken its course. The
year is 1647: Naseby has been won and lost. The King is virtually a
prisoner, while treated as an honoured guest at Holmby House.

    According to a letter published in Plain English (a weekly review
published by the North British Publishing Co. and edited by the late
Lord Alfred Douglas.) on 3rd September, 1921:

        "The Learned Elders have been in existence for a much longer
period than they have perhaps suspected.

        My friend, Mr. L. D. van Valckert, of Amsterdam, has recently
sent me a letter containing two extracts from the Synagogue at
Mulheim. The volume in which they are contained was lost at some
period during the Napoleonic Wars, and has recently come into Mr. van
Valckert's possession.

        It is written in German, and contains extracts of letters
sent and received by the authorities of the Mulheim Synagogue. The
first entry he sends me is of a letter received:

       16th June, 1647

       From O.C. (i.e. Oliver Cromwell), by Ebenezer Pratt.

            In return for financial support will advocate admission
of Jews to England: This however impossible while Charles living.

       Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for
which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be
assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for
procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape.

            In reply was dispatched the following:

       12th July, 1647

   To O.C. by E. Pratt.

            Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and
Jews admitted. Assassination too dangerous. Charles shall be given
opportunity to escape:  His recapture will make trial and execution
possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms
until trial commences."

    With this information now at our disposal, the subsequent moves
on the part of the regicides stand out with a new clearness. On 4th
June, 1647, Cornet Joyce, acting on secret orders from Cromwell
himself, and, according to Disraeli, unknown even to General-in-Chief
Fairfax, descended upon Holmby House with 500 picked revolutionary
troopers, and seized the King. According to Disraeli,

   "The plan was arranged on May 30th at a secret meeting held at
Cromwell's house, though later Cromwell pretending that it was without
his concurrence."

    This move coincided with a sudden development in the army; the
rise of the 'Levelers" and "Rationalists." Their doctrines were those
of the French revolutionaries; in fact, what we know today as
Communism. These were the regicides, who four times "purged"
Parliament, till there was left finally 50 members, Communist-like
themselves, known later as the Rump.

    To return to the letter from Mulheim Synagogue of the 12th June,
1647, and its cunning suggestion that attempted escape should be used
as a pretext for execution. Just such an event took place, on 12th
November of that year. Hollis and Ludlow consider the flight as a
stratagem of Cromwell's. Isaac Disraeli states:

   "Contemporary historians have decided that the King from the day
of his deportation from Holmby to his escape to the Isle of Wight was
throughout the dupe of Cromwell."

    Little more remains to be said. Cromwell had carried out the
orders from the Synagogue, and now it only remained to stage the mock
trial.

    Maneuvering for position continued for some time. And it became
apparent that the House of Commons, even in their partially "purged"
condition, were in favour of coming to an agreement with the King. On
5th December, 1648, the House sat all night; and finally carried the
question, "That the King's concessions were satisfactory to a
settlement."

    Should such agreement have been reached, of course, Cromwell
would not have received the large sums of money which he was hoping to
get from the Jews. He struck again. On the night of December 6th,
Colonel Pryde, on his instructions, carried out the last and most
famous "purge" of the House of Commons, known as "Pryde's Purge."

    On 4th January, the Communist remnant of 50 members, the Rump,
invested themselves with "the supreme authority."

    On 9th January "a High Court of Justice" to try the King was
proclaimed. Two-thirds of its members were Levelers from the Army.
Algernon Sidney warned Cromwell:

   "First, the King can be tried by no court. Second, no man can be
tried by this court."

So writes Hugh Ross Williamson in his Charles and Cromwell; and he
adds a finishing touch to the effect that

   "no English lawyer could be found to draw up the charge, which was
eventually entrusted to an accommodating alien, Isaac Dorislaus."

    Needless to say, Isaac Dorislaus was exactly the same sort of
alien as Carvajal and Manasseh Ben Israel and the other financiers who
paid the "Protector" his blood money.

    The Jews were once again permitted to land freely in England in
spite of strong protests by the sub-committee of the Council of State,
which declared that they would be a grave menace to the State and the
Christian religion. Perhaps it is due to their protests that the
actual act of banishment has never to this day been repealed.

   "The English Revolution under Charles I was unlike any preceding
one ...

   From that time and event we contemplate in our history the phases
of revolution." Isaac Disraeli

    There were many more to follow on similar lines, notably in
France.

    In 1897 a further important clue to these mysterious happenings
fell into Gentile hands in the shape of the Protocols of the Elders of
Zion. In that document we read this remarkable sentence:

   "Remember the French Revolution, the secrets of its preparation
are well known to us for it was entirely the work of our
hands."[Protocol No.3]

    The Elders might have made the passage even fuller, and written,

   "Remember the British and French revolutions, the secrets of which
are well known to us for they were entirely the work of our hands."

    The difficult problem of the subjugation of both Kingdoms was
still however unsolved. Scotland was Royalist before everything else;
and she had proclaimed Charles II King. Cromwell's armies marched
round Scotland, aided by their Geneva sympathizers, dispensing Judaic
barbarity; but Scotland still called Charles II King. He moreover
accepted the Presbyterian form of Christianity for Scotland; and
slowly but steadily the feeling in England began to come round to the
Scottish point of view.

    Finally upon the death of Cromwell, all Britain welcomed the
King's restoration to the throne of England.

    In 1660 Charles II returned; but there was an important
difference between the Kingdom he had fled from as a boy, and the one
to which he returned as King. The enemies of Kingship were entrenched
within his kingdom now, and as soon as the stage should be set for
renewing the propaganda against the papacy and so, dividing once more
persons, all of whom considered themselves as part of Christ's Church,
the next attack would develop.

    The next attack would aim at placing the control of the finances
of both Kingdoms in the hands of the Jews, who were now firmly
ensconced within.

    Charles evidently had no consciousness of the Jewish problem or
plans, or the menace they held for his peoples. The wisdom and
experience of Edward I had become lost in the centuries of segregation
from the Jewish virus. A consciousness of the danger to the Crown in
placing his enemies in possession of the weapon of a "Popish Plot" cry
he did retain.

    With James II's accession, the crisis could not be long delayed.
The most unscrupulous pamphleteering and propaganda was soon in full
swing against him, and it is no surprise to find that many of the
vilest pamphlets were actually printed in Holland. This country was
now quite openly the focus for all disaffected persons; and
considerable comings and goings took place during these years.

    Stories were brought to the King that his own brother-in-law had
joined those who plotted against him; but he utterly refused to credit
them, or take any action till news came that the expedition against
himself was actually under way.

    The chief figure amongst those who deserted James at that crucial
juncture was John Churchill, first Duke of Marlborough. It is
interesting to read in the Jewish Encyclopedia that this Duke for many
years received not less than 6,000 pounds a year from the Dutch Jew
Solomon Medina.

    The real objective of the "Glorious Revolution" was achieved a
few years later in 1694, when the Royal consent was given for the
setting up of the "Bank of England" and the institution of the
National Debt.

    This charter handed over to an anonymous committee the Royal
prerogative of minting money; converted the basis of wealth to gold;
and enabled the international money lenders to secure their loans on
the taxes of the country, instead of the doubtful undertaking of some
ruler or potentate which was all the security they could previously
obtain.

    From that time economic machinery was set in motion which
ultimately reduced all wealth to the fictitious terms of gold which
the Jews control; and drained away the life blood of the land, the
real wealth which was the birthright of the British peoples.

[Note: Germany's most successful economic system was NOT backed by
gold. He eluded the blood-sucking grip of the Zionist Jew Money
Masters, therefore "Germany must be destroyed!" and Adolf Hitler
vilified down through ages so the uninformed will DEMAND their
government return to the gold standard. — jackie]

    The political and economic union of England and Scotland was
shortly afterwards forced upon Scotland with wholesale corruption, and
in defiance of formal protests from every county and borough. The main
objects of the Union were to suppress the Royal Mint in Scotland, and
to force upon her, too, responsibility for the "National Debt."

    The grip of the moneylender was now complete throughout Britain.
The danger was that the members of the new joint Parliament would
sooner or later, in the spirit of their ancestors, challenge this
state of affairs. To provide against this, therefore, the party system
was now brought into being, frustrating true national reaction and
enabling the wire-pullers to divide and rule; using their newly-
established financial power to ensure that their own men and their own
policies should secure the limelight, and sufficient support from
their newspapers, pamphlets, and banking accounts to carry the day.

    Gold was soon to become the basis of loans, ten times the size of
the amount deposited. In other words, 100 pounds in gold would be
legal security for 1,000 pounds of loan; at 3% therefore 100 pounds in
gold could earn 30 pounds interest annually with no more trouble to
the lender than the keeping of a few ledger entries.

    The owner of 100 pounds of land, however, still must work every
hour of daylight in order to make perhaps 4%. The end of the process
must only be a matter of time. The moneylenders must become
millionaires; those who own and work the land, the Englishman and the
Scotsman, must be ruined. The process has continued inexorably till
now, when it is nearly completed.

    It has been hypocritically camouflaged by clever propaganda as
helping the poor by mulcting the rich. It has been in reality nothing
of the kind. It has been in the main the deliberate ruination of the
landed classes, the leaders among the Gentiles, and their supplanting
by the Jew financiers and their hangers-on.