Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / British History / February 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Hillary Plays The Gender Card Again

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
D. Spencer Hines - 29 Feb 2008 18:05 GMT
There she goes again!...

Always whining.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas
-----------------------------------------

Clinton: Playing Field for Her as Candidate Not Even Because of Her Gender
February 28, 2008

Jake Tapper

ABC News

In an interview with ABC News' Cynthia McFadden to air on this evening's
"Nightline," Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., says it's tougher for her to run
as a woman than it is for her male opponent.

Asked why she thinks so many women may be feeling sorry for her, Clinton
said, "I think a lot of women project their own feelings and their lives
onto me, and they see how hard this is.  It's hard.  It's hard being a woman
out there.  It is obviously challenging with some of the things that are
said that are not even personal to me so much as they are about women.

A play for the Female Vote, of course.  "Poor Little Me". -- DSH

"And I think women just sort of shake their head," [sic] Clinton continued.

"My friends do.  They say, 'Oh, my gosh, this is so hard.' Well, it's
supposed to be hard.  I'm running for the hardest job in the world.  No one
has ever done this.  No woman has ever won a presidential primary before I
won New Hampshire.  This is hard. And I don't expect any sympathy, I don't
expect any kind of, you know, allowances or special privileges, because I
knew what I was getting myself into.

"Every so often I just wish that it were a little more of an even playing
field," she said, "but, you know, I play on whatever field is out there."

Of course, it might be observed that it likely hasn't exactly been a
complete walk in the park for an African-American to run for president,
either.

But apparently Clinton thinks -- based on this comment -- that the "playing
field" is easier for a black man than a white woman.

I also wonder if former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C. -- and all the other men
vanquished by Clinton (and Obama) so handily -- think that they had an easy
go of it.

What do you think?

- jpt

February 28, 2008
ebe - 29 Feb 2008 18:57 GMT
> There she goes again!...
>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>
> February 28, 2008

Hi,

The issue is that she is not a running as the woman president, she is
running as the president. When someone runs as the president, they are
the president representing everyone in the US, not just their
particular special interest.
J A - 29 Feb 2008 23:34 GMT
> There she goes again!...
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> "Every so often I just wish that it were a little more of an even playing
> field," she said, "but, you know, I play on whatever field is out there."

Even playing field?

Nobody would know who she is if she hadn't been Clinton's wife. She's
running against a guy who nobody heard of a year ago.

She was handed health care reform in the ealry '90's and she played
right into her opponents' hands and wrecked it.

She got a seat in the Senate nearly handed to her and got an existing
political machine handed to her for her Presidential run.

She was handed money and a machine for getting this nomination and
recent news reporting on her management of the campaign says she's
screwed that up, too.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.