Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / British History / April 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New York Times Circulation Sharply Down While Wall Street Journal Gains

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
D. Spencer Hines - 29 Apr 2008 05:09 GMT
How Sweet It Is!

The Market Speaks...

-- "The New York Times lost more than 150,000 copies on Sunday.  Circulation
on that day fell a whopping 9.2% to 1,476,400.  The paper's daily
circulation declined 3.8% to 1,077,256."

"Pinch" Sulzberger, the NYT publisher, and his Far-Left Politics are a
DISASTER.

Creative Capitalism and Creative Destruction Among Firms.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas
-------------------------------------------------------------------

New FAS-FAX: Steep Decline at 'NYT' While 'WSJ' Gains

By Jennifer Saba

Published: April 28, 2008 8:00 AM ET

NEW YORK Print circulation continues on its steep downward slide, the Audit
Bureau of Circulations revealed this morning in releasing the latest numbers
for some of the country's largest dailies in the six-month period ending
March 31, 2008. When a full analysis appears it is expected to find,
according to sources, the biggest dip yet, about 3.5% daily and 4.5 for
Sunday.

The following circulation compares the new data to the same period a year
ago. Daily circulation is the Monday-through-Friday average.

-- The New York Times lost more than 150,000 copies on Sunday. Circulation
on that day fell a whopping 9.2% to 1,476,400. The paper's daily circulation
declined 3.8% to 1,077,256.

According to New York Times spokeswoman Diane McNulty, the company had
budgeted for the declines in Sunday and daily circulation. Two-thirds of the
Sunday loss stemmed from the elimination of bonus days and third-party bulk
copies. Also: the paper had a single copy and home delivery price increase
in July. The paper also focused on growing "highly profitable circulation,"
she noted.

-- At The Washington Post, daily circulation decreased 3.5% to 673,180 and
Sunday dropped 4.3% to 890,163.

-- Meanwhile, daily circulation at The Wall Street Journal grew a fraction
of a percent, up 0.3% to 2,069,463 copies. At USA Today, circulation inched
up 0.27%* to 2,284,219. (Correction: the original version of this story said
USA Today's daily circulation was up 2.7%.)

-- The New York Post lost over 3% daily and more than 8% on Sunday.

-- Daily circulation at The Orange County Register plunged 11.9% to 250,724
and Sunday fell 5.3% to 311,982.

-- In Los Angeles, the Times lost more than 40,000 daily copies. Daily
circulation there was down 5.1% to 773,884. Sunday declined 6.0% to
1,101,981.

-- The San Francisco Chronicle reported that daily circulation dropped 4.2%
to 370,345, while Sunday dropped 3.0% to 424,603.

-- The Boston Globe's daily circulation fell 8.3% to 350,605. Sunday
declined 6.4% to 525,959.

-- The Miami Herald reported daily circulation lost more than 11% with
240,223 copies while Sunday dropped 9% to 311,245.

-- Daily circulation at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution declined 8.5% to
326,907 while Sunday fell 5.0% to 497,149.

-- Daily and Sunday circulation at the Chicago Tribune both dropped 4.4% to
541,663 and 898,703, respectively. In a statement released this morning, the
paper noted that it increased its readership with its other products like
the free Redeye and its Web site.

"We are proud of the fact that in today's intensely competitive media
environment, we have grown both our print and online audiences," Scott
Smith, publisher of the Chicago Tribune, said in a statement.

-- Daily circulation at The Indianapolis Star slipped 2.3% to 255,303 while
Sunday tumbled more than 8% to 324,349.

-- Good news in Baltimore: The Sun made a slight gain in daily circulation,
up 0.1% (about 200 copies) to 232,360. Sunday circulation was down slightly
1.2% to 372,970.

-- Daily circulation at The St. Louis Post-Dispatch plunged 8.5%
Monday-Friday to 255,057. However, the paper managed to grow its Sunday
circulation by 1.6% to 414,564.
James Hogg - 29 Apr 2008 09:32 GMT
>How Sweet It Is!
>
>The Market Speaks...

Let's see what the free market of ideas says about the poster using
the bogus e-mail address panther@excelsior.com

Let's see now, where is it, ah yes, here:

http://groups.google.co.uk/groups/profile?enc_user=8kZNbhUAAAD5ALzSUpxBwvmofQfWS
85uwxPASLy3uohZw5h5t_8vdA


In 7935 ratings this poster has been awarded an average of one star.
According to the Google rating system, one star means:
"Poor, I would not recommend this post"

Market survey brought to you by

James Hogg
Jack Linthicum - 29 Apr 2008 11:44 GMT
> How Sweet It Is!
>
[quoted text clipped - 89 lines]
> Monday-Friday to 255,057. However, the paper managed to grow its Sunday
> circulation by 1.6% to 414,564.

Mr. Murdoch has said publicly that he wants to make The Journal more
of a general-interest newspaper, to compete more directly with The New
York Times, though he insists he will not diminish its coverage of
business.

The front page has fewer business articles and fewer of the long,
offbeat features that were a signature of the paper.

"down goes Frazier"

April 22, 2008
Wall St. Journal Editor Expected to Resign
By RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA

Marcus W. Brauchli will step down as the top-ranking editor of The
Wall Street Journal after less than a year in the job, four people
briefed on the matter said on Monday, just four months after Rupert
Murdoch took control of the paper.

Mr. Brauchli, 46, will announce his resignation soon, according to
friends and current and former colleagues, all of whom requested
anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter. They
differed as to whether he was being forced out as managing editor of
The Journal, one of the most coveted posts in journalism, or leaving
out of frustration.

The news of his pending resignation was first reported on Time
magazine’s Web site.

Since December, when Mr. Murdoch’s News Corporation bought Dow Jones &
Company, publisher of The Journal, he has immersed himself in the
newspaper’s daily operations and quickly made changes in its shape and
style. Friends and colleagues say that Mr. Brauchli has been
frustrated with some changes, and with the sense that he did not have
the control over the newspaper that he was promised.

On Monday night, both Mr. Murdoch and Mr. Brauchli attended a dinner
of the Atlantic Council, a group promoting international cooperation,
at which Mr. Murdoch was being honored. Approached there, Mr. Murdoch
declined to comment about any change in editors; Mr. Brauchli said, “I
can’t talk.”

Mr. Murdoch has said publicly that he wants to make The Journal more
of a general-interest newspaper, to compete more directly with The New
York Times, though he insists he will not diminish its coverage of
business.

To that end, The Journal has increased its coverage of other areas,
notably politics, and the bulk of its first section is being devoted
to general-interest news. The front page has fewer business articles
and fewer of the long, offbeat features that were a signature of the
paper.

Journal newsroom employees say that Mr. Murdoch and the publisher he
installed, Robert J. Thomson, have made it clear that they think the
paper has too many editors, and have instructed Mr. Brauchli to thin
the ranks, potentially making room in the headcount for more
reporters. Two people briefed on Mr. Brauchli’s thinking said that had
become a major point of contention.

Under an agreement between the News Corporation and the Bancroft
family, who owned a controlling interest in Dow Jones for more than a
century, sole power over the newsroom was to rest with the managing
editor — Mr. Brauchli — and Mr. Murdoch could not remove him without
the consent of a committee of independent overseers. But even the
people within Dow Jones who supported that pact said that it would be
all but impossible to keep the new owner from having his way.

The Journal’s Web site reported Monday night that Mr. Thomson — who
was most recently the top editor of The Times of London, another News
Corporation property —may serve as an interim replacement for Mr.
Brauchli.

Reporters and other editors say that while Mr. Brauchli agreed with
some of the changes made in recent months, it was clear that many of
them were dictated from above, and that he questioned the shift toward
general-interest news. And Mr. Thomson has come to be seen in the
newsroom as a supereditor, looking over Mr. Brauchli’s shoulder.

Mr. Brauchli, a former foreign correspondent who has been with Dow
Jones since 1984, was named managing editor in April 2007, and took
the helm the next month. He was a popular choice in the newsroom,
where he is well liked and respected.

The Journal has weekday circulation in the United States of more than
two million, second only to USA Today.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.