Just As True Today As It Was In 1779
|
|
Thread rating:  |
D. Spencer Hines - 02 Jul 2008 13:24 GMT "Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!"
-- George Washington (letter to James Warren, 31 March 1779)
Jack Linthicum - 02 Jul 2008 13:31 GMT > "Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!" > > -- George Washington (letter to James Warren, 31 March 1779) "Government is not reason; it is not eloquence. It is power. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." ---George Washington
“Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism.” ---George Washington
James Hogg - 02 Jul 2008 13:36 GMT On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 13:24:29 +0100, some naive hero worshipper posting under the pseudonym <panther@excelsior.com> wrote:
>"Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!" > >-- George Washington (letter to James Warren, 31 March 1779) And it's just as true to point out that they all say this. All revolutionaries and insurgents have justified thier actions in these terms, long before 1779, and they still do so.
James
am05@hotmail.com - 02 Jul 2008 16:24 GMT > On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 13:24:29 +0100, some naive hero worshipper posting > under the pseudonym <pant...@excelsior.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > revolutionaries and insurgents have justified thier actions in these > terms, long before 1779, and they still do so. Speaking for the whole 'mankind' was not an universal habit in the earlier insurgencies. Quite often, it was something much more local and easier to understand, like "Morta Alla Francia, Italia Anela" or "Kill the Papists!". Abstract thinking in the terms of a brotherhood of men (and related demagoguery) was not typical before Enlightenment.
Raymond O'Hara - 02 Jul 2008 14:53 GMT > "Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!" > > -- George Washington (letter to James Warren, 31 March 1779) the chimpenfuhrer has ruined that.
Nebulous - 02 Jul 2008 20:32 GMT "Raymond O'Hara" <raymond-ohara@hotmail.com> wrote in message
7 October 1488 Second day of parliament in the presence of our supreme lord the king
[1488/10/3]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
Sederunt Present on the same day:
a.. For the clergy b.. [William Scheves], archbishop of St Andrews c.. [Robert Blackadder], bishop of Glasgow d.. [George Brown, bishop of] Dunkeld e.. [William Elphinstone, bishop of] Aberdeen f.. [George Vaus, bishop of] Galloway g.. [James Chisholm, bishop of] Dunblane h.. [John Campbell, bishop of the] Isles i.. [John Hepburn], prior of St Andrews j.. [George Shaw], abbot of Paisley k.. [Robert Ker, abbot] of Kelso l.. [Robert Bellenden, abbot of] Holyrood m.. [Henry Abercrombie, abbot of] Cambuskenneth n.. [David Brown, abbot of] Melrose o.. [Peter, abbot of] Newbattle p.. [Andrew Cavers, abbot of] Lindores q.. [George Murray, abbot of] Inchaffray r.. [Michael Harrower, abbot of] Inchcolm s.. [Patrick Vaus], prior of Whithorn t.. [Patrick MacCulloch], abbot of Soulseat u.. [John Schanwell], abbot of Coupar [Angus] v.. [Alexander Inglis], archdeacon of St Andrews w.. [Archibald Whitelaw, archdeacon of Lothian], secretary x.. [Walter Drummond], rector of St Andrews y.. [David Meldrum], official of St Andrews z.. [Patrick Leche], official of Glasgow aa.. [Walter Bunch], abbot of Balmerino ab.. [William Bunche], abbot of Kilwinning ac.. [Andrew Lidderdale], abbot of Dryburgh ad.. [Robert Harrower], prior of Pluscarden ae.. [William Rutherford], prior of Restenneth af.. [John Liston], provost of St Salvator's College ag.. D[ean] of St Andrews ah.. Master Hugh Spens ai.. Master Martin Wan a.. For the barons b.. Colin [Campbell], earl of Argyll, chancellor etc. c.. Archibald [Douglas], earl of Angus d.. [George Gordon], earl of Huntly? e.. James [Douglas], earl of Morton f.. William [Hay], earl of Erroll g.. William [Keith], earl Marischal h.. John [Stewart], earl of Lennox i.. George [Leslie], earl of Rothes j.. [John Stewart], earl of Atholl k.. [James Stewart], earl of Buchan? l.. [Patrick Hepburn], lord Hailes, master [of the king's] household m.. [James Hamilton], lord Hamilton n.. [Robert Lyle], lord Lyle, justiciar o.. [John Lyon], lord Glamis p.. [Andrew Gray, lord] Gray q.. [Laurence Oliphant, lord] Oliphant r.. [Hugh Montgomery, lord] Montgomery s.. [John Drummond, lord] Drummond t.. [John Maxwell, lord] Maxwell u.. [William Graham, lord] Graham v.. [John Carlyle, lord] Carlyle w.. [George Haliburton, lord] Dirleton x.. Alexander Home, chamberlain y.. [Archibald Campbell], master of Argyll z.. [Matthew Stewart], master of Lennox aa.. Alexander Stewart of Avondale ab.. Constable of Dundee ac.. James Ogilvy of Findlater, knight ad.. Lord [of] Craigie ae.. Walter Kerr af.. Patrick Home ag.. Archibald Edmonstone ah.. Lord of Drum ai.. [Campbell of Loudoun], sheriff of Ayr aj.. William Seton of Meldrum a.. Commissioners b.. Edinburgh c.. Dundee d.. Stirling e.. Perth f.. Linlithgow g.. Haddington h.. St Andrews i.. Renfrew j.. Rutherglen k.. Aberdeen l.. Dumfries m.. Elgin and Forres n.. Rothesay o.. Irvine p.. Ayr [1488/10/4]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
Judicial proceeding: continuation of summons On the which second day of parliament, with the lord king sitting in person, James [Stewart], earl of Buchan, [being] often called by royal summons and [by] the tenor of the same under the testimonial of the aforenoted king's great seal directed to answer the said lord our king and his justiciar in the present parliament for certain treasonous actions contained in the said summons, but not compearing, it was continued by the lord our king until tomorrow at the tenth hour, in the same form that it is now and without prejudice of party.
[1488/10/5]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
Committee members: lords of the articles a.. Lords elected for the articles: b.. a.. For the clergy b.. [Robert Blackadder], bishop of Glasgow c.. [George Brown, bishop of] Dunkeld d.. [George Vaus, bishop of] Galloway e.. [John Hepburn], prior of St Andrews f.. [Archibald Whitelaw, archdeacon of Lothian], secretary g.. [William Knollis, preceptor of Torphichen], treasurer h.. Master Martin Wan i.. [James Lindsay], archdeacon of Glasgow j.. [Alexander Inglis, archdeacon of St Andrews], clerk register a.. For the barons b.. [Colin Campbell, earl of Argyll], chancellor c.. [Archibald Douglas], earl of Angus d.. [George Gordon, earl of] Huntly e.. [William Hay, earl of] Erroll f.. [Patrick Hepburn], lord Hailes, master [of the king's] household g.. [John Stewart], earl of Lennox h.. [Robert Lyle], lord Lyle i.. [Hugh Montgomery], lord of Montgomery j.. [Laurence Oliphant], lord Oliphant k.. [Andrew Gray], lord Gray l.. [John Drummond], lord Drummond m.. Alexander Home of that Ilk, chamberlain n.. Patrick Home o.. Master Richard Lawson a.. Commissioners b.. Henry Preston for Edinburgh c.. John Knollis for Aberdeen d.. John Hepburn for Haddington e.. Alexander Bunche for Perth f.. Alexander Fowlis for Linlithgow [1488/10/6]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
Committee members: lords auditors of causes and complaints a.. On the same day the lords elected to the causes: b.. a.. For the clergy b.. [William Elphinstone], bishop of Aberdeen c.. [George Shaw], abbot of Paisley d.. Master Patrick Leche, official of Glasgow a.. For the barons b.. [William Keith], earl Marischal c.. [John Drummond], lord Drummond d.. [John Lyon], lord Glamis a.. For the commissioners b.. James Crichton - 'non por' c.. William Monorgund d.. Duncan Forrester
D. Spencer Hines - 02 Jul 2008 15:46 GMT "Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!"
-- George Washington (letter to James Warren, 31 March 1779) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, George Herbert Walker Bush, George Walker Bush -- and many others have held to this principle as well.
One does not often think of Washington as a PASSIONATE man -- he is often considered as dour, austere and remote -- as he could appear to some of the poguenoscenti.
But this statement puts the lie to that -- as do many of his other letters.
That being said, like Charles de Gaulle, George Washington understood the importance of the requisite Remoteness & Dignity of Command.
Personal letters are one thing -- personal demeanor is another.
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Deus Vult
William Black - 02 Jul 2008 16:48 GMT > "Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!" > > -- George Washington (letter to James Warren, 31 March 1779) All revolutionaries come out with crap like that:
"the honour and liberty of parliament, for which we unanimously fight, without seeking our own interests..."
Oliver Cromwell....
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
Jack Linthicum - 02 Jul 2008 18:17 GMT On Jul 2, 11:48 am, "William Black" <william.bl...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> > "Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!" > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach > Time for tea. "Just as true today as it was in 1779" is not exactly total backing for the statement that follows
am05@hotmail.com - 02 Jul 2008 18:52 GMT > On Jul 2, 11:48 am, "William Black" <william.bl...@hotmail.co.uk> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > "Just as true today as it was in 1779" is not exactly total backing > for the statement that follows One may argue that the cause of 1779 (whatever it was) did not REALLY apply to the WHOLE 'makind' so, the 'Just as true....' may, quite well, mean 'BS'. :-)
Nebulous - 02 Jul 2008 20:35 GMT <am05@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:db4655e8-57b0-4b90-8f6f-
11 October 1488 [1488/10/20]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
Procedure: preamble In the parliament of the most excellent prince and our lord, the lord James IV, by the grace of God most illustrious king of Scots, held at Edinburgh in the tolbooth of the same on Saturday 11 October 1488 in the presence of the noble and powerful lords Colin [Campbell], earl of Argyll, lord Campbell and Lorne, chancellor of the said lord our king, Robert [Lyle], lord Lyle, John [Lyon], lord Glamis, Andrew [Gray], lord Gray, Laurence [Oliphant], lord Oliphant, and John [Drummond], lord Drummond, commissioners of parliament and justiciars of the lord our king specially constituted in this part.
Judicial proceeding: continuation of summons [1488/10/21]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
On which day John Ross of Montgreenan [being] often called by royal summons and by the tenor of the same under the testimonial of the aforesaid king's great seal directed to personally answer the said lord our king in the present parliament for certain treasonous actions contained in the said summons, but not compearing, it was continued until next Monday 13 October, with continuation of days, in the same form as they are now without prejudice of party.
[1488/10/22]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
On the same day Cuthbert Murray of Cockpool [being] often called by royal summons and by the tenor of the same under the testimonial of the aforesaid king's great seal directed to personally answer the said lord our king for certain treasonous actions contained in the said summons, but not compearing, it was continued until next Monday 13 October, with continuation of days, in the same form as they are now without prejudice of party.
Nebulous - 02 Jul 2008 20:34 GMT "Jack Linthicum" <jacklinthicum@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:07eb7ac1-
10 October 1488 [1488/10/17]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
Procedure: preamble In the parliament of our most excellent prince and our lord, the lord James IV, by the grace of God most illustrious king of Scots, held at Edinburgh in the tolbooth of the same on Friday 10 October 1488 in the presence of the noble and powerful lords Colin [Campbell], earl of Argyll, lord Campbell and Lorne, chancellor, Robert [Lyle], lord Lyle, John [Lyon], lord Glamis, Andrew [Gray], lord Gray, Laurence [Oliphant], lord Oliphant, and John [Drummond], lord Drummond, commissioners of parliament and justiciars of the said lord our king specially constituted in this part.
Judicial proceeding: continuation of summons [1488/10/18]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
On which day John Ross of Montgreenan [being] often called by royal summons and by the tenor of the same under the testimonial of the great seal of the aforesaid king directed to personally answer the said lord our king for certain treasonous actions contained in the said summons, but not compearing, it was continued until tomorrow in the same form as they are now and without prejudice of party.
[1488/10/19]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
The same day Cuthbert Murray of Cockpool [being] often called by royal summons and by the tenor of the same under the testimonial of the aforesaid king's great seal directed to personally answer the said lord our king for certain treasonous actions contained in the said summons, but not compearing, it was continued until tomorrow in the same form as they are now and without prejudice of party.
Nebulous - 02 Jul 2008 20:33 GMT "William Black" <william.black@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
9 October 1488 [1488/10/12]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
Procedure: preamble In the parliament of the most excellent prince and our lord, the lord James IV, by the grace of God most illustrious king of Scots, held and begun at Edinburgh in the tolbooth of the same on Thursday 9 October 1488 by the said supreme lord our king in his personal presence.
[1488/10/13]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
Judicial proceeding: remission of treason of James Stewart, earl of Buchan ?On the same day James [Stewart], earl of Buchan placed himself under the remission of our aforesaid lord the king, for his treasonable venture into the realm of England to [Henry VII], the king thereof, and for treasonably communicating and working with the said king of England towards the inbringing of certain Englishmen to the destruction of the realm and lieges of Scotland; and for instigating and causing the said king of England to enter the realm of Scotland in person with his arms and an abundance of men; and for the treasonable art, part, counsel and assistance given and exhibited to Andrew [Stewart], bishop of Moray, Alexander [Forbes], lord Forbes, John [Ramsay], lord Bothwell, John Ross of Montgreenan, John Murray of Touchadam, Stephen Lockhart of Cleghorn, and James Homyll, tailor, in the fabrication of a commission and certain documents to the king of England by John, lord Bothwell and Henry Wyatt, an English messenger, towards the breaking of the peace and truces entered into by [James III], our supreme lord the king's late father and parliament with the king of England, against the common good and the public interest, and to the perpetual destruction of the realm - by virtue of which a war was proclaimed upon one part of the realm, and diverse lieges of that part were impoverished, plundered, killed and put to the fire - and to the perpetual subjection of the crown of Scotland to the obedience and allegiance of the king of England; and for the treasonable art, part, counsel and assistance given and shown to the said persons in the fabrication of a certain commission, and [in] sending it to [Henry Percy], earl of Northumberland and lord William Tyler, an English knight, to the effect that they, by virtue of the said commission and the power of his council sent and directed to them, [should give] remissions to all Scots taking the part of the English against our supreme lord the king and his faithful lieges; and for the treasonable art, part, counsel and assistance given and shown to the said persons in the sending and dispatch of John, lord Bothwell on several occasions to the king of England, to the destruction and perpetual subjection of the crown of Scotland to the allegiance and obedience of the said king of England; and for the treasonable art, part, counsel and assistance given and shown to John Ross of Hawkhead, knight, John Ross of Montgreenan and Stephen Lockhart of Cleghorn and Thomas Fotheringham of Powrie in bringing forth our supreme lord the king's said late father at Blackness, with arms and an abundance of men, for the destruction of our supreme lord the king and the lords adhering to him, heedful that our said supreme lord the king at that time, like everyone else, stood ready to fulfil the [agreements] sent, promised and subscribed with his sign manual, which he offered to our said lord king [who was] then the prince, which things were, by his counsel, broken, ruptured and spurned, for which reason the earls [George Gordon, earl of] Huntly, [William Hay, earl of] Erroll, [William Keith, earl] Marischal [and] [John Lyon], lord Glamis left him, the said James, and his faction, and returned to their own territories; and for the treasonable art, part, counsel and assistance given and shown to the said persons in preparation and array for the field of battle against our said supreme lord the king at Blackness, in which place a new treaty was made, and the said James, earl of Buchan, William [Ruthven], lord Ruthven, Thomas Fotheringham of Powrie [and] William Murray of Tullibardine were given [as] sureties for the completion of the [treaties] already promised.
[1488/10/14]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
Judicial proceeding: process of forfeiture against John Ramsay, lord Bothwell Forfeiture of John [Ramsay], lord Bothwell
On that day Carrick pursuivant, sheriff in this matter, compeared in court, and presented a certain royal summons directed to him under the testimony of the royal great seal, for the summoning of John [Ramsay], lord Bothwell before our aforesaid lord the king and the three estates of his realm gathered at the same place, the tenor of which summons follows and is thus:
James, by the grace of God king of Scots, to his sheriff and bailies of Lanark, also to Lyon king of arms, Rothesay, Ross, Snowdon [and] Marchmont heralds, Unicorn, Ormond, Carrick, Bute [and] Montrose pursuivants, Hector Meldrum [and] William Campbell, macers, [and] Simon Sperdour, John Keir, Donald Malynny and George Shaw, courants, and any of them jointly and severally, our sheriffs in this matter, greeting. We commission you and order that you summon, lawfully and peremptorily, before witnesses, John, lord Bothwell - by apprehending him personally if you are able to come upon him, otherwise at the castle of Bothwell, and by public proclamation at the market cross of our burgh of Lanark, so that in this manner the summons can likely come to his notice - to compear personally before us in our next parliament, to be held at Edinburgh on Wednesday 8 October next to come, with continuation of days, to answer to us in our aforesaid parliament for treasonably leading astray and misleading the late James king of Scots, our deceased prince, against the common good, the public interest and our realm, causing him to oppress his prelates, barons, burgesses and lieges by common selling and buying of justice to their ultimate ruin, by the force of which thing foreign merchants coming to our kingdom were utterly ruined and plundered, so that nothing [...] for supplying food to the kingdom, they dared not enter the said kingdom; and for the treasonable art, part, counsel and assistance given and shown to James [Stewart], earl of Buchan in his treasonable venture and passage into the realm of England, and for treasonably communicating and working with the aforesaid [Henry VII], king of England towards the inbringing of certain Englishmen to the destruction of our realm and lieges; and for the treasonable art and part with the said earl of Buchan in causing and instigating the said king of England, as far as he could, to enter our said kingdom in person with arms and an abundance of men, to the destruction of us and our lieges; and for the treasonable art, part, counsel and assistance given and exhibited to Andrew [Stewart], bishop of Moray, James, earl of Buchan [and] Alexander [Forbes], lord Forbes in the fabrication of a commission and certain documents to the king of England by you, John, and Henry Wyatt, an English messenger, towards the breaking of the peace and truces entered into by our late father and his parliament and the king of England, against the common good and the public interest, and to the perpetual destruction of the realm, by virtue of which a war was proclaimed upon one part of our realm, and diverse lieges of that part were plundered, killed and put to the fire - and for the treasonable bearing of the said commission and documents to the king of England, to the perpetual subjection of our realm to the obedience of the king of England; and for the treasonable art, part and counsel in the fabrication of a certain commission, and [in] sending it to [Henry Percy], earl of Northumberland and lord William Tyler, an English knight, to the effect that they, by virtue of the said commission and power, should give remissions to all Scots taking the part of the English against our supreme lord the king and his faithful lieges; and for the treasonable art, part and counsel given and shown to the said persons in causing our said late father to break various agreements and concords promised to us, at that time the prince, subscribed with our late father's sign manual, for the common peace and tranquillity of the realm, and to repudiate those things which were at various times promised, and [which] were broken, and not observed by you and yours, by reason of which breach the earl[s] [George Gordon, earl of] Huntly, [William Hay, earl of] Erroll, [William Keith, earl] Marischal [and] [John Lyon], lord Glamis left his faction, and went into to their own localities; and for the treasonable art, part and counsel given and shown to the said persons in advising our aforesaid late father to go forth from Edinburgh Castle with arms and an abundance of men, after diverse agreements made by him at Blackness and elsewhere were broken, in order to attack us, his son, at that time the prince, at Stirling; and upon a great many other charges and treasonable offences wickedly perpetrated by the same John against us and our realm, [and] to submit to the law. Intimating to the said John that whether or not he compear at the said day and place, with continuation of days, we will nevertheless proceed with the administration of justice in the aforesaid matters. And return the present letters, duly executed, and the endorsement of the same, to the bearer. And be you, who shall execute the presents, at that place on the said day in our presence, bringing with you written evidence of your summons by way of discharge, or the witnesses themselves. For the doing whereof we entrust our fullest power in this matter to you and any of yours, jointly and severally, by the tenor of the presents. Given under the testimony of our great seal, at Edinburgh, 2 August in the first year of our reign [1488].
After the reading of this summons, the same sheriff in the present parliament proved the said summons lawfully executed, by his endorsement and certain witnesses contained in the same endorsement produced and sworn by him for this purpose there, in court, namely John Hamilton of Woodhall and Patrick Hamilton, the tenor of which endorsement is thus:
On 6 August 1488 I, Carrick pursuivant, went in person to the main houses of Bothwell, and there summoned John, lord Bothwell to compear before our sovereign lord in person in his parliament to be held at Edinburgh on 8 October next, with continuation of days, to answer his highness on all the points and articles and crimes of treason contained in these our sovereign lord's letters, before these witnesses John of Hamilton, Patrick of Hamilton, John Baxter and James Echiston. And then the next day, 7 August, I, the said Carrick pursuivant, went to Lanark market cross and there by public proclamation summoned and warned the said John, lord Bothwell to compear in person before our sovereign lord in his aforesaid parliament, to answer his highness on all the points, articles and crimes of treason contained in these our sovereign lord's letters, and according to the tenor of the same before these witnesses George Aitkinson, William Forrester, bailies of Lanark, Thomas Weir and John Mowat, with various others, in testimony of which I have set my signet hereto.
John, lord Bothwell being often called by strength of the aforesaid summons and the tenor thereof to answer to our said lord the king in the present parliament upon all the treasonable actions contained in the said summons, and not compearing at the lawful time of day when he was expected, the order and process of the continuations of the said summons having being seen and understood by the aforementioned lords, barons and commissioners of the burghs to have proceeded thus far according to law, Colin [Campbell], earl of Argyll, lord Campbell and Lorne, chancellor of our lord the king and in his name, at his express command, asked and sought of the said lords, barons and commissioners of the burghs their judgement and the decree of parliament in the process of the said John, lord Bothwell, if he was guilty of the charges of treason aforenamed [and] contained in the said summons. Which lords, barons and commissioners of the burghs, the estates of his realm, being carefully and ripely advised, found and each man individually delivered that the said Lord Bothwell was guilty of all the charges of the treasonous actions contained in said summons, except for the time of Blackness; and therefore it was given in judgement or finding of forfeiture by the mouth of Alexander Dempster, dempster of parliament, in the manner and form which follows in the vernacular.
This court of parliament shows for law and I give for doom that for as much as it is found by judgement of parliament that John [Ramsay], lord Bothwell has committed and undertaken treason against our sovereign lord the king and his realm in all the aforenoted points and articles contained in the summons made for that, except the occurrence at Blackness, that therefore he has forfeited to our sovereign lord the king his life, lands, offices, goods movable and unmovable and all his other possessions that he held within the realm of Scotland, forever to remain with our said sovereign lord, his heirs and successors for his treason and offence, and that I give for doom.
Judicial proceeding: continuation of summons [1488/10/15]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
On the same day John Ross of Montgreenan [being] often called by royal summons and by the tenor of the same under the testimonial of the aforesaid king's great seal directed to personally answer the said lord our king for certain treasonous actions contained in the said summons, and not compearing, it was continued until tomorrow in the same form as they are now without prejudice of party.
[1488/10/16]*[print] [email] [cite] [preceding] [following]
On the same day Cuthbert Murray of Cockpool [being] often called by royal summons and by the tenor of the same under the testimonial of the aforesaid king's great seal directed to personally answer the said lord our king for certain treasonous actions contained in the said summons, and not compearing, it was continued until tomorrow in the same form as it is now without prejudice of party.
conwaycaine - 03 Jul 2008 14:16 GMT >> "Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!" >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Oliver Cromwell.... Comparing Oliver Cromwell to George Washington are we?
John Briggs - 03 Jul 2008 14:18 GMT >>> "Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!" >>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Comparing Oliver Cromwell to George Washington are we? It's a reasonable comparison.
 Signature John Briggs
am05@hotmail.com - 03 Jul 2008 16:48 GMT > >>> "Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!" > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > It's a reasonable comparison. What about Washington and Nappy? (well, Nappy did not start French Revolution but he was extremely fond of a pseudo-revolutionary demagoguery, at least for a while...)
John Briggs - 03 Jul 2008 17:59 GMT >>>>> "Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!" >> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Revolution but he was extremely fond of a pseudo-revolutionary > demagoguery, at least for a while...) There's no comparison - Napoleon is way ahead, both as a general and as a politician. Did anyone mention Hitler?
:-)  Signature John Briggs
am05@hotmail.com - 03 Jul 2008 19:19 GMT > a...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > There's no comparison - Napoleon is way ahead, both as a general and as a > politician. But, unlike George and Oliver, he lost at the end. Shoudl we consider loosers like him? :-)
> Did anyone mention Hitler? > :-) Well, Adolph does not fit the bill because, unlike all these rebels mentioned before, he came to power quite legitimately. :-)
William Black - 03 Jul 2008 19:32 GMT On Jul 3, 12:59 pm, "John Briggs" <john.brig...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> a...@hotmail.com wrote: > > On Jul 3, 9:18 am, "John Briggs" <john.brig...@ntlworld.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > There's no comparison - Napoleon is way ahead, both as a general and as a > politician. But, unlike George and Oliver, he lost at the end. Shoudl we consider loosers like him? :-)
--------------------------
Washington and Cromwell were revolutionaries who died at home in bed, beloved by most, and feared by a reasonable number as well, as the greatest revolutionaries are prone to do.
See also Lenin, Simon Bolivar (well,. it was on a ship), Mao, Garibaldi, Ho, Fairfax, Edward IV, Bollingbroke and one assumes, in the fullness of time, Castro...
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
> Did anyone mention Hitler? > :-) Well, Adolph does not fit the bill because, unlike all these rebels mentioned before, he came to power quite legitimately. :-)
conwaycaine - 04 Jul 2008 15:47 GMT <Snip>
> Washington and Cromwell were revolutionaries who died at home in bed, > beloved by most, and feared by a reasonable number as well, as the > greatest revolutionaries are prone to do. "Beloved" Oliver Cromwell? Beloved by whom?
William Black - 04 Jul 2008 18:17 GMT > <Snip> > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > "Beloved" Oliver Cromwell? > Beloved by whom? Henry Ireton for a start.
And probably a reasonable proportion of the men he led to victory.
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
Andrew Robert Breen - 04 Jul 2008 21:42 GMT >> <Snip> >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >And probably a reasonable proportion of the men he led to victory. and - forty-odd years on - Sam Peyps rated him as one of the (IIRC) 3 most admirable british monarchs (Sam's assessment and terminology, not mine).
 Signature Andy Breen ~ Not speaking on behalf of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth Feng Shui: an ancient oriental art for extracting money from the gullible (Martin Sinclair)
William Black - 04 Jul 2008 22:40 GMT >>> <Snip> >>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > 3 most admirable british monarchs (Sam's assessment and terminology, > not mine). Reasonably honest, didn't chase women, incorruptible, religious, excellent general, started the British Empire in its modern form, chopped the head off a king, sacked all the bishops.
What's not to like?
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
Keith Willshaw - 05 Jul 2008 12:33 GMT >> and - forty-odd years on - Sam Peyps rated him as one of the (IIRC) >> 3 most admirable british monarchs (Sam's assessment and terminology, [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > What's not to like? He was intolerant, the campaign in Ireland was brutal involving mass execution, the repression of Catholicism. The seizure of catholic owned land and its assignment to protestant settlers laid the basis for the problems that remain in NI to this day. The rule of the major-generals who he appointed came close to starting a new civil war
He was unable to accept criticism, one of the ironies of history is that when faced with a newly elected parliament that refused to approve his taxation plans he did exactly the same thing as Charles I, dismissed parliament.
His last and ultimately greatest failure was that he left no strategy for succession. It was only his personallity that held the state together, when he died it fell apart.
Keith
Jack Linthicum - 05 Jul 2008 12:56 GMT > >> and - forty-odd years on - Sam Peyps rated him as one of the (IIRC) > >> 3 most admirable british monarchs (Sam's assessment and terminology, [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Keith Might add that the creation of an Irish army in 1640 was a much a cause of the troubles that Cromwell inherited as anything. Everyone suspected that this group would be used by Charles to crush either Parliament or the Scots.
The Irish decided to kill all the colonists planted there to "civilize" them.
http://www.british-civil-wars.co.uk/timelines/1640.htm
William Black - 05 Jul 2008 17:06 GMT >>> and - forty-odd years on - Sam Peyps rated him as one of the (IIRC) >>> 3 most admirable british monarchs (Sam's assessment and terminology, [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > He was intolerant, the campaign in Ireland was brutal involving mass > execution, the repression of Catholicism. Catholicism had been repressed for many years.
Margret of York wasn't pressed to death in Cromwell's time.
Mind you, she wasn't pressed to death for being a Catholic either...
As for mass executions...
That's a new one on me.
I'm not sure that he ever did anything that was considered 'against the rules and usages of war'.
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
Keith Willshaw - 05 Jul 2008 18:31 GMT >> He was intolerant, the campaign in Ireland was brutal involving mass >> execution, the repression of Catholicism. > > Catholicism had been repressed for many years. Not in Ireland
> Margret of York wasn't pressed to death in Cromwell's time. > > Mind you, she wasn't pressed to death for being a Catholic either... So thats its totally irrelevant
> As for mass executions... > > That's a new one on me. Really.
> I'm not sure that he ever did anything that was considered 'against the > rules and usages of war'. Excecuting the garrison of Millmount Fort after they had surrendered on the promise of fair treatment certainly qualifies. Burning down the Catholic churches in the town wasnt exactly honorable bevhaviour and neither were his actions at Kilkenny.. On that occasion when the walls were breached the garrison in accordance with the rules of war offered their surrender. Cromell hanged all the officers and any priests found.
At Wexford while negotiations with the defenders of Wexford were ongoing and after the castle had already been surrendered Cromwell's army fired on the town and his army killed over 2000 soldiers, many of whom had already surrendered and shot down around 1500 civilians as they attempted to flee the town. Most of the town was burned after having been looted. Less than 20 parliamentarian soldiers were killed.
Cromwell's response to criticism of that even was "they were made with their blood to answer for the cruelties they had exercised upon diverse poor Protestants"
Keith
Andrew Swallow - 05 Jul 2008 21:55 GMT [snip]
> As for mass executions... > > That's a new one on me. > > I'm not sure that he ever did anything that was considered 'against the > rules and usages of war'. Cromwell did kill a lot of Irish men. He sold POWs into slavery/indentured servitude over in the Americas, particularly the West Indies. He got rid of surplus Irish women in a similar way.
Andrew Swallow
William Black - 05 Jul 2008 22:41 GMT > [snip] > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > particularly the West Indies. > He got rid of surplus Irish women in a similar way. So nothing on the scale of, say, Magdeburg?
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
conwaycaine - 05 Jul 2008 15:35 GMT >>>> <Snip> >>>> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > What's not to like? And devastated the Irish countryside. Yes indeed, a sterling individual. ("Religious" is a bit of an understatement, Mister Black)
William Black - 05 Jul 2008 17:27 GMT >>>>> <Snip> >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > And devastated the Irish countryside. And pacified Ireland for two hundred years.
You've got to remember who you're dealing with.
If they couldn't take a joke they shouldn't have started making trouble.
What exactly did they expect? Someone to wander over and say 'Now look chaps, this just isn't cricket you know'
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
conwaycaine - 06 Jul 2008 17:29 GMT > "conwaycaine" <conwaycaine@bellsouth.net> wrote in message <Snip>
>> And devastated the Irish countryside. > > And pacified Ireland for two hundred years. By pacification, you mean the subjugation of an entire people. Yep, you Brits did go about the would, pacifying as you went. (And you fellows weere there a bit longer than two hundred years. In fact, you still infest the Six Counties)
> You've got to remember who you're dealing with. > If they couldn't take a joke they shouldn't have started making trouble. It's ever so much easier when the victim offers no resistence......
> What exactly did they expect? Someone to wander over and say 'Now look > chaps, this just isn't cricket you know' So the thought of an independent Ireland wasn't "Cricket"? Oh that would go over well in Dublin.
William Black - 06 Jul 2008 18:22 GMT >> And pacified Ireland for two hundred years. > > By pacification, you mean the subjugation of an entire people. > Yep, you Brits did go about the would, pacifying as you went. > (And you fellows weere there a bit longer than two hundred years. In fact, > you still infest the Six Counties) W'd love to get out.
However every so often they have a vote and decide they don't want us to go...
>> You've got to remember who you're dealing with. >> If they couldn't take a joke they shouldn't have started making trouble. > > It's ever so much easier when the victim offers no resistence...... But they did offer resistance.
If they'd come out with their hands up there would have been no reason to storm thjose towns.
>> What exactly did they expect? Someone to wander over and say 'Now look >> chaps, this just isn't cricket you know' > > So the thought of an independent Ireland wasn't "Cricket"? At the time, not.
You can blame the Normans for that.
Interestingly theIrish never do...
> Oh that would go over well in Dublin. You know someone who cares?
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
conwaycaine - 06 Jul 2008 23:44 GMT <Snip>
>>> And pacified Ireland for two hundred years. >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > However every so often they have a vote and decide they don't want us to > go... ***********
"They" being Ian Paisley and his crowd. The Republicans would even help you pack.
>>> You've got to remember who you're dealing with. >>> If they couldn't take a joke they shouldn't have started making trouble. >> >> It's ever so much easier when the victim offers no resistence...... > But they did offer resistance. ************
That is my point, Mister Black, and a response to your " they shouldn't have started making trouble" comment.
> If they'd come out with their hands up there would have been no reason to > storm thjose towns. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > You can blame the Normans for that. > Interestingly theIrish never do... **********
The reason for that is that the Normans ended up more Irish than the Irish.
>> Oh that would go over well in Dublin. > > You know someone who cares? Come to think of it, no.
conwaycaine - 05 Jul 2008 15:33 GMT >>> <Snip> >>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > 3 most admirable british monarchs (Sam's assessment and terminology, > not mine). Ireton AND Pepys? Surely then Cromwell was the victim of bad press.
My Grandfather was born and raised in Aberystwyth I can still remember him speaking Welsh. Sounded like a bunch of leaky steam pipes he did. ;=)
Jeffrey Hamilton - 05 Jul 2008 20:57 GMT >>>> <Snip> >>>> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > Sounded like a bunch of leaky steam pipes he did. > ;=) My maternal grandfather came from Llanwrst, North Wales. He too was speaker of gaelic, my mom, living in Llanwrst, remembers speaking gaelic until she was about five years old.
cheers.....Jeff
Surreyman - 06 Jul 2008 12:03 GMT > >> In article <g4llua$6n...@registered.motzarella.org>, > [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > - Show quoted text - I doubt they called it Gaelic in Llanwrst.
Surreyman
Andrew Chaplin - 06 Jul 2008 12:20 GMT >>>>> <Snip> >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > of gaelic, my mom, living in Llanwrst, remembers speaking gaelic until she > was about five years old. Gaelic? In Wales?
 Signature Andrew Chaplin SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO (If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)
Jeffrey Hamilton - 07 Jul 2008 16:06 GMT >>>>>> <Snip> >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Gaelic? In Wales? Strange as it sounds now, I always thought Welsh was a form of Gaelic . Oh well.
cheers....Jeff
Cory Bhreckan - 07 Jul 2008 16:12 GMT >>>>>>> <Snip> >>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > cheers....Jeff Not only do you learn something new but you get ridiculed mercilessly. That's a two-fer.
 Signature "For the stronger we our houses do build, The less chance we have of being killed." - William Topaz McGonagall
Jeffrey Hamilton - 08 Jul 2008 00:17 GMT >>>>>>>> <Snip> >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > Not only do you learn something new but you get ridiculed mercilessly. > That's a two-fer. I dare say, it keeps one honest_and_humble.
cheers.....Jeff
Cory Bhreckan - 08 Jul 2008 16:07 GMT >>>>>>>>> <Snip> >>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > cheers.....Jeff Just trying to be helpful.
 Signature "For the stronger we our houses do build, The less chance we have of being killed." - William Topaz McGonagall
conwaycaine - 08 Jul 2008 19:33 GMT <Snip>
>> I dare say, it keeps one honest_and_humble. >> >> cheers.....Jeff > > Just trying to be helpful. That will be the day...........
Raymond O'Hara - 07 Jul 2008 16:52 GMT > Strange as it sounds now, I always thought Welsh was a form of Gaelic . > Oh well. > > cheers....Jeff Welsh (Cymraeg or y Gymraeg, pronounced [k?m'r???g] and [? g?m'r???g]), is a member of the Brythonic branch of Celtic spoken natively in Wales (Cymru), in England by some along the Welsh border and in the Welsh immigrant colony in the Chubut Valley in Argentine Patagonia.
conwaycaine - 06 Jul 2008 17:24 GMT >>>>> <Snip> >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > speaker of gaelic, my mom, living in Llanwrst, remembers speaking gaelic > until she was about five years old. Jeffery, The Highlander will be along momentarily to explain the difference between Gaelic and Welsh. ;=)
Jeffrey Hamilton - 07 Jul 2008 15:13 GMT >>>>>> <Snip> >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > difference between Gaelic and Welsh. > ;=) Yes no doubt, several other kind posters have already advised me of the foolishness of my ways.
cheers....Jeff
La N - 07 Jul 2008 15:25 GMT >>>>>>> <Snip> >>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > Yes no doubt, several other kind posters have already advised me of the > foolishness of my ways. You probably need a spanking. btw, the itinerant family of one of my siblings has been residing in Wales for the past 3 or 4 years. The kids, whom I saw at Christmas and New Years, have picked up a delightful Welsh lilt to their English which is their second language after Swedish. They are taking Welsh language lessons at their respective schools.
- nilita
Jeffrey Hamilton - 07 Jul 2008 16:20 GMT >>>>>>>> <Snip> >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > You probably need a spanking. Undoubtedly, bottom's up.
> btw, the itinerant family of one of my siblings has been residing in Wales > for the past 3 or 4 years. The kids, whom I saw at Christmas and New > Years, have picked up a delightful Welsh lilt to their English which is > their second language after Swedish. They are taking Welsh language > lessons at their respective schools. It never ceases to amaze me how easily and quickly children pick-up foreigh languages.
I struggle with merely trying to keep up with a constantly changing English.
Between re-writing for *political correctness* and the introduction of *big business* induced definitions, I just never have the time to learn a *furrin* language.
Oh well.
cheers....Jeff
> - nilita La N - 07 Jul 2008 21:24 GMT > > I struggle with merely trying to keep up with a constantly changing > > English. > > Between re-writing for *political correctness* and the introduction of > *big business* induced definitions, I just never have the time to learn a > *furrin* language. "Big Business", as in corporate-speak, such as:
"outside the box"
"team player"
"win/win"
"fast track"
"critical path"
gaaaaaaaggggghhhh ......
- nilita
Raymond O'Hara - 07 Jul 2008 22:30 GMT >> > I struggle with merely trying to keep up with a constantly changing >> > English. [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > - nilita "bingo" from an ad where some are playing business jargon bingo.
Jeffrey Hamilton - 08 Jul 2008 02:40 GMT >> > I struggle with merely trying to keep up with a constantly changing >> > English. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > gaaaaaaaggggghhhh ...... My all-time favourite is *right-sizing*. The phuck who coined that should be shot.
cheers....Jeff
> - nilita conwaycaine - 05 Jul 2008 15:31 GMT >> <Snip> >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > And probably a reasonable proportion of the men he led to victory. Oh well, if Henry Ireton loved the murdering scum, why then he must have been all right!!
conwaycaine - 04 Jul 2008 15:45 GMT >>>> "Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!" >>>> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > It's a reasonable comparison. Oh my Lord!
William Black - 03 Jul 2008 15:43 GMT >>> "Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!" >>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Comparing Oliver Cromwell to George Washington are we? Well they started out pretty similar didn't they.
Farmers who became involved in politics and went on to become successful soldiers revolting against royal authority.
It is possible (nay probable) that Washington was well aware of Cromwell's failings and so deliberately avoided following the path to tyranny.
I think Cromwell was probably a better soldier though. He essentially invented the modern regular army as well as working out how to make cavalry do more than one charge per battle...
Washington was certainly a better politician...
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
Jack Linthicum - 03 Jul 2008 16:09 GMT On Jul 3, 10:43 am, "William Black" <william.bl...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> >>> "Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!" > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach > Time for tea. You know that OC came close to immigrating to Connecticut?
William Black - 03 Jul 2008 16:51 GMT > On Jul 3, 10:43 am, "William Black" <william.bl...@hotmail.co.uk> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >> >> Washington was certainly a better politician...
> You know that OC came close to immigrating to Connecticut? I know he was invited.
I don't know how seriously he considered the offer.
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
Jack Linthicum - 03 Jul 2008 18:31 GMT On Jul 3, 11:51 am, "William Black" <william.bl...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Jul 3, 10:43 am, "William Black" <william.bl...@hotmail.co.uk> > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach > Time for tea. It says in one of the bios that the government prevented him from going but I have seen another statement where he said if some commission or committee had turned out differently he would have gone. Relatives did.
"There appears to be no foundation for the statement that he was stopped by an order of council when on the point of abandoning England for America, though there can be little doubt that the thoughts of emigration suggested themselves to his mind at this period. He viewed the "innovations in religion" with abhorrence. According to Clarendon he told the latter in 1641 that if the Grand Remonstrance had not passed "he would have sold all he had the next morning and never have seen England more." In 1631 he converted his landed property into money, and John Hampden, his cousin, a patentee of Connecticut in 1632, was on the point of emigrating. Cromwell was perhaps arrested in his project by his succession in 1636 to the estate of his uncle Sir Thomas Steward, and to his office of farmer of the cathedral tithes at Ely, whither he now removed." http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Oliver_Cromwell
William Black - 03 Jul 2008 19:03 GMT In 1631 he converted his landed property into
> money, and John Hampden, his cousin, a patentee of Connecticut in > 1632, was on the point of emigrating. But Hampden didn't emigrate, and Hampden was one of the richest men in England.
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
Andrew Robert Breen - 03 Jul 2008 16:57 GMT >On Jul 3, 10:43 am, "William Black" <william.bl...@hotmail.co.uk> >> I think Cromwell was probably a better soldier though. He essentially >> invented the modern regular army as well as working out how to make cavalry >> do more than one charge per battle... >> >> Washington was certainly a better politician...
>You know that OC came close to immigrating to Connecticut? For that matter, GW's father lived in Whitehaven for some time. Wobble things in a slightly different direction and he might have stayed. maybe he'd be remembered in local history circles as a noted colliery viewer..
http://www.whitehavenandwesternlakeland.co.uk/people/mildredgale.htm
 Signature Andy Breen ~ Not speaking on behalf of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth Feng Shui: an ancient oriental art for extracting money from the gullible (Martin Sinclair)
William Black - 03 Jul 2008 17:14 GMT > You know that OC came close to immigrating to Connecticut? Thinking about it, (This is my second answer to this post) Rainsborough, who served the forces of parliament as both admiral and general, and was one of the first New Model Army colonels, came from America to fight, so it may not have made that much difference...
Mind you, he made old Oliver look politically like some namby pamby easy going liberal.
He's the man who said, in open debate:
"For really I think that the poorest he that is in England have a life to live, as the greatest he: and therefore truly, sir, I think it's clear, that every man that is to live under a government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that government."
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
Raymond O'Hara - 05 Jul 2008 16:48 GMT >> You know that OC came close to immigrating to Connecticut? > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > that every man that is to live under a government ought first by his own > consent to put himself under that government." william goffe, one of the regicides of charlie 1, is thought to be 'the angel of hadley' an old man who led the towns people to victory during King Phillip's War' 1676, hadley is in central massachusetts,. massachusetts being puritan was a good hiding place after the restoration
am05@hotmail.com - 03 Jul 2008 16:46 GMT On Jul 3, 10:43 am, "William Black" <william.bl...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> >>> "Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!" > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Farmers Owner of a plantation is hardly a 'farmer' unless you are stretching definition really far. :-)
And Cromwell, except period oif 1631-36 officially qualified as 'gentry' (having income of more than $300 per year).
>who became involved in politics and went on to become successful > soldiers revolting against royal authority. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > He essentially > invented the modern regular army He definitely created the modern ENGLISH regular army but I'm afraid that on a continent the title was stolen by Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden (national permanent army with a regular pay, regulated organization of the branches, etc.)
> as well as working out how to make cavalry > do more than one charge per battle... At Breitenfeld, Papppenheim's cuirassires charged 7 times and Swedish cavalry, after defeating Pappenheim, re-formed and attacked Tilly's artillery and infantry. BTW, GA is credited with an 'introduction' of a charge with sword in hand (which, IIRC, he borrowed from the Poles).
Which, of course, does not diminish Cromwell's merits as a general.
> Washington was certainly a better politician... Cromwell was operating in a different time frame and under a seriously different set of the circumstances. He did quite well for this specific time and place.
William Black - 03 Jul 2008 17:02 GMT Cromwell was operating in a different time frame and under a seriously different set of the circumstances. He did quite well for this specific time and place.
--------------------------------
There are certainly passages in his writings that seem to suggest that Cromwell was searching for a more equitable solution to the problems of governing England.
And at one point seems to be reaching for a written constitution of some sort.
"In every government there must be somewhat fundamental, somewhat like a magna charta, that should be standing and unalterable"
And of course, his words against the perpetuation of power are famous:
"That parliaments should not make themselves perpetual is a fundamental."
And he certainly seems to have regretted some of his actions. He asked his chaplain:
'If a man finds redemption then is it possible for him to loose it?'
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
D. Spencer Hines - 03 Jul 2008 17:52 GMT Yes.
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas ------------------------------------------------
> It is possible (nay probable) that Washington was well aware of Cromwell's > failings and so deliberately avoided following the path to tyranny. Raymond O'Hara - 05 Jul 2008 16:56 GMT > Yes. > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >> Cromwell's failings and so deliberately avoided following the path to >> tyranny. the founding fathers were schooled in the classics and the ideal of republican rome and the story of cinncinnatus was a powerful example of how to act. one of GW's generals named a city for cinncinnatus in ohio ,
and whilr OC was a severe in the extreme puritan GW while always the correct and prioper gentleman was also very personable and highly charismatic and personable, everyone who met him came away won over.
D. Spencer Hines - 05 Jul 2008 17:07 GMT >> Yes. >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > how to act. one of GW's generals named a city for cinncinnatus [sic] in > ohio , And GW followed the example of Cincinnatus after his Victory in the War of Independence and again after his two terms as President, when he could easily have been reelected for a third term.
> and whilr OC was a severe in the extreme puritan GW while always the > correct and prioper gentleman was also very personable and highly > charismatic and personable, everyone who met him came away won over. Indeed. He was unique and irreplaceable as both General and President.
William Black - 05 Jul 2008 17:32 GMT >> Yes. >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > and whilr OC was a severe in the extreme puritan Nope.
He most certainly danced until dawn at his daughter's wedding.
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
conwaycaine - 04 Jul 2008 15:49 GMT > "conwaycaine" <conwaycaine@bellsouth.net> wrote in message <Snip>
>> Comparing Oliver Cromwell to George Washington are we? > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > cavalry do more than one charge per battle... > Washington was certainly a better politician... Ummm, no. Cromwell was a bloodthirsty terrorist who happened to have a rather large army (which he used quite effectively). Washington was a patriot who wanted the English out of America.
John Briggs - 04 Jul 2008 15:56 GMT >> "conwaycaine" <conwaycaine@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > <Snip> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > large army (which he used quite effectively). > Washington was a patriot who wanted the English out of America. Umm - they were "British" rather than "English", and that applied to just about about all white settlers, and Washington wasn't trying to expel those, was he? Of the colonies, nearly all had previously been "English" (wasn't only Nova Scotia Scottish?), but Georgia was founded after the Act of Union, so could only be "British".
 Signature John Briggs
conwaycaine - 04 Jul 2008 17:55 GMT >>> "conwaycaine" <conwaycaine@bellsouth.net> wrote in message >> <Snip> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > (wasn't only Nova Scotia Scottish?), but Georgia was founded after the Act > of Union, so could only be "British". Well, we thought we were English but you people soon disabused us of that notion. Hence the Revolution.
I think back then PC wasn't high on anyone's priority list and few *nglismen really gave a damn about Welsh, Scottish, or Irish sensibilities. So "England" and "English" was the common term for all you Pommies. There were (and are) so many more of the *nglish, don't you see?
("Act of Union", what a farce)
Raymond O'Hara - 05 Jul 2008 17:04 GMT >>> "conwaycaine" <conwaycaine@bellsouth.net> wrote in message >> <Snip> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > (wasn't only Nova Scotia Scottish?), but Georgia was founded after the Act > of Union, so could only be "British". English, screw the british crap. the rest were conquered peoples. and many "scots-irish' and scots had already settled in the appalachian mts in the western carolinas, Va and Pa. NY had many german settlers brought over by billy johnson{a good irish lad} to settle the mohawk valley. the american force at the battle of oriskany was a german speaking force. the dutch were also in new york along the hudson river. albany was still a dutch town at that time.
William Black - 04 Jul 2008 18:22 GMT >> "conwaycaine" <conwaycaine@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > <Snip> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > army (which he used quite effectively). > Washington was a patriot who wanted the English out of America. Oh...
Go and read a book, I can't be bothered with you today...
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
conwaycaine - 05 Jul 2008 15:37 GMT >>> "conwaycaine" <conwaycaine@bellsouth.net> wrote in message >> <Snip> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Go and read a book, I can't be bothered with you today... And where might I find a book that supports your particular prejudices?
D. Spencer Hines - 05 Jul 2008 15:52 GMT Start with _The Communist Manifesto_.
DSH
>>>> "conwaycaine" <conwaycaine@bellsouth.net> wrote in message >>> <Snip> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > And where might I find a book that supports your particular prejudices? conwaycaine - 05 Jul 2008 16:01 GMT > Start with _The Communist Manifesto_.
>>>> Ummm, no. >>>> Cromwell was a bloodthirsty terrorist who happened to have a rather [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >> >> And where might I find a book that supports your particular prejudices? A staunch Socialist such as Mister Black would consider Marx too far to the right for his political tastes.
William Black - 05 Jul 2008 17:31 GMT >> Start with _The Communist Manifesto_. > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > A staunch Socialist such as Mister Black would consider Marx too far to > the right for his political tastes. And idiot (ijit?) as well as being ill read.
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
conwaycaine - 06 Jul 2008 17:31 GMT >>> Start with _The Communist Manifesto_. >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > And idiot (ijit?) as well as being ill read. "Ijit" would be one of the kinder things I've been called. ("Not very well read" would be a more suitable phrase)
William Black - 05 Jul 2008 17:30 GMT > Start with _The Communist Manifesto_. There you go again.
I'm a Fabian remember.
At last that's what you called me last time.
So I must believe in the validity of the democratic process.
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
William Black - 05 Jul 2008 17:28 GMT >>>> "conwaycaine" <conwaycaine@bellsouth.net> wrote in message >>> <Snip> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > And where might I find a book that supports your particular prejudices? Christopher Hill's "God's Englishman" is a good start.
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea.
conwaycaine - 06 Jul 2008 17:37 GMT > "conwaycaine" <conwaycaine@bellsouth.net> wrote in message <Snip>
>> And where might I find a book that supports your particular prejudices? >> > Christopher Hill's "God's Englishman" is a good start. Which Christopher Hill? My research turned up at least half a dozen. But wait, it was the commie, pinko faggot what wrote "God's Englishman". And no, I can't read it. If I did, the Bush Boys would be along to jail me without charges in some Naval brig.. Perhaps after the upcoming election.
William Black - 06 Jul 2008 18:29 GMT >> "conwaycaine" <conwaycaine@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > <Snip> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > without charges in some Naval brig.. > Perhaps after the upcoming election. He certainly wasn't a faggot, and ceased to be a Communist well before our current Foreign Secretary, you know, the one who gets on so well with Condi Rice...
So you might be allright, as long as they haven't burned that particular book down at your local public library.
Oh, wait a moment, don't the FBI have a system that checks up on what books you take out from the library?
 Signature William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets pas
|
|