McCain's Conservative Model? -- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
Thread rating:  |
D. Spencer Hines - 13 Jul 2008 01:12 GMT Theodore Roosevelt -- Progressive [In The True Sense Of That Word -- Not A Limp Euphemism For Socialist As "Liberal" Democrats Use It Today] -- Master of The Square Deal & Apostle of the New Nationalism -- My Favorite President.
EXCELLENT EXECUTIVE MODEL...
But I'm Not At All Sure McCain Measures Up To T.R.
He Has A Lot To Prove...
And T.R. Was Only 42 When He Became President...The Youngest Ever.
Whereas McCain Would Be The Oldest Ever To Become President -- At 72...
But He Often Shows He Has Good Instincts...
 Signature DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor
July 13, 2008
McCain's Conservative Model? Roosevelt (Theodore, That Is)
By ADAM NAGOURNEY and MICHAEL COOPER The New York Times
HUDSON, Wis. - Senator John McCain in a wide-ranging interview called for a government that is frugal but more active than many conservatives might prefer. He said government should play an important role in areas like addressing climate change, regulating campaign finance and taking care of "those in America who cannot take care of themselves."
"I count myself as a conservative Republican, yet I view it to a large degree in the Theodore Roosevelt mold," Mr. McCain said, referring to Roosevelt's reputation for reform, environmentalism and tough foreign policy.
The views expressed by Mr. McCain in the 45-minute interview here Friday illustrated the challenge the probable Republican presidential nominee faces as he tries to navigate the sensibilities of his party's conservative base and those of the moderate and independent voters he needs to defeat Senator Barack Obama, his Democratic rival.
His responses suggested that he was basically in sync with his party's conservative core but was not always willing to use the power of the federal government to impose those values. He also expressed a willingness to deploy government power and influence where free-market purists might hesitate to do so and to consider unleashing military force for moral reasons.
In recent weeks, Mr. McCain has left many Republicans unsettled about his ideological bearings by toggling between reliably conservative issues like support for gun owners' rights and an emphasis on centrist messages like his willingness to tackle global warming and provide a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants.
Those tensions were apparent in the interview as well, as Mr. McCain offered a variety of answers - sometimes nuanced in their phrasing, sometimes not - about his views on social issues.
Mr. McCain, who with his wife, Cindy, has an adopted daughter, said flatly that he opposed allowing gay couples to adopt. "I think that we've proven that both parents are important in the success of a family so, no, I don't believe in gay adoption," he said.
But he declined to take a specific position when asked whether only evolution should be taught in public schools. "It's up to the school boards," he said. "That's why we have local control over education." Mr. McCain has said he believes in evolution.
Many social conservatives strenuously oppose California's decision to allow same-sex marriage. But Mr. McCain, who also opposes same-sex marriage, has always said that the issue is up to the states, and in the interview he said he would stick to that position as president even if California chose to continue allowing gay marriage after putting the matter to a statewide vote in November. "I respect the right of the states to make those decisions," he said.
Asked if he considered himself an evangelical Christian, Mr. McCain responded, "I consider myself a Christian."
"I attend church," he said. "My faith has sustained me in very difficult times." Asked how often he attended, he responded: "Not as often as I should." He has recently been photographed going to church as his campaign has begun to make public the times he attends services.
Mr. McCain sat down for the interview, conducted after he held a town-hall-style meeting on economic issues, at the end of a week that his campaign had hoped would mark a turning point in a candidacy that has been plagued with missteps and often seemed unsure of its message.
After a period in which his campaign again endured internal battling and staff upheaval, Mr. McCain argued that competing tensions in an organization - be it a presidential campaign or a White House - can be good thing, up to a point.
"Because of the bubble that a president is in, and the bubble that a candidate is in, sometimes you find out afterwards something that, 'Oh boy, I wish I had heard thus and such and so and so,' " he said. "So I appreciate and want some of the tension. I don't want too much of it."
When asked if he felt that it was more difficult to run against Mr. Obama because of the sensitivities of race, Mr. McCain responded wryly: "I'd like to make a joke, but I can't."
"We are in a situation today where all words are parsed, all comments are diagnosed and looked at for whatever effect they might have," he said. "We have to feed the beast, the hourly cable shows, the instant news in the blogs and all that. That is just the situation that we're in, and I'm not complaining about it, because that would be both foolish and a waste of time."
Mr. McCain went on to say that he did not consider running against Mr. Obama any more complicated than running against, say, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. "No, I have to base my approach to Senator Obama as one of respect," he said. "As long as I do that, then I don't have to worry about any language I might use."
He said, ruefully, that he had not mastered how to use the Internet and relied on his wife and aides like Mark Salter, a senior adviser, and Brooke Buchanan, his press secretary, to get him online to read newspapers (though he prefers reading those the old-fashioned way) and political Web sites and blogs.
"They go on for me," he said. "I am learning to get online myself, and I will have that down fairly soon, getting on myself. I don't expect to be a great communicator, I don't expect to set up my own blog, but I am becoming computer literate to the point where I can get the information that I need."
Asked which blogs he read, he said: "Brooke and Mark show me Drudge, obviously. Everybody watches, for better or for worse, Drudge. Sometimes I look at Politico. Sometimes RealPolitics."
At that point, Mrs. McCain, who had been intensely engaged with her BlackBerry, looked up and chastised her husband. "Meghan's blog!" she said, reminding him of their daughter's blog on his campaign Web site. "Meghan's blog," he said sheepishly.
As he answered questions, sipping a cup of coffee with his tie tight around his neck, his aides stared down at their BlackBerries.
As they tapped, Mr. McCain said he did not use a BlackBerry, though he regularly reads messages on those of his aides. "I don't e-mail, I've never felt the particular need to e-mail," Mr. McCain said.
The interview underscored the extent to which Mr. McCain defies easy ideological characterization, a fact that might help him in a general election but has been a persistent cause of concern among some conservatives. Mr. McCain has long argued that his stances are evidence of his political independence; many of his critics say it is more an example of a politician deftly trying to shade positions to win an election in complicated electoral terrain.
Mr. McCain said he believed that the United States government had an obligation to intervene to stop genocide, though only if it was clear that a solution was possible. Mr. McCain also said that the Federal Reserve was right to step in during the collapse of the investment firm Bear Stearns, and that he would similarly support some sort of aggressive action to avert a meltdown of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the nation's two largest mortgage finance companies, should that prove necessary.
"I don't know if a government, quote, bailout is necessary now," he said. "Because there are other courses of action that are being explored in order to ensure their survival. But I don't believe we can afford to have them fail, because of their impact on the overall economy."
Asked to name a conservative model, he skipped over the suggestions of three names typically associated with the conservative movement - Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush and Barry Goldwater, the founder of the modern-day conservative movement who occupied the Senate seat Mr. McCain holds today - to settle on Theodore Roosevelt.
Mr. McCain has long admired Roosevelt, and in the interview he identified with him as a fellow reformer and environmentalist and also touched on his assertive foreign policy. The choice might to some extent be an indication of how Mr. McCain would like to position himself now that he has moved from the primary to the general election.
"I believe less governance is the best governance, and that government should not do what the free enterprise and private enterprise and individual entrepreneurship and the states can do, but I also believe there is a role for government," Mr. McCain said. He added: "Government should take care of those in America who can not take care of themselves."
J A - 13 Jul 2008 02:03 GMT > Theodore Roosevelt -- Progressive [In The True Sense Of That Word -- Not A > Limp Euphemism For Socialist As "Liberal" Democrats Use It Today] -- > Master > of The Square Deal & Apostle of the New Nationalism -- My Favorite > President. Totally laughable.
McCain is used as a dupe by crooks.
He was involved with an S&L scam a long time time ago and was brought up on ethics charges.
His friend for 25 years, and currently chief economic adviser, is x-Sen Phil Gramm, who recently said Americans were just "whiners" about current economic problems.
Sen. Gramm, surreptitiously got Congress to pass some laws in 2000 that allowed the de-regulation of the various types of "financial instruments" that led to the present mortgage crisis.
Also, Gramm got bills passed allowing Enron (casued California brownouts and major financial scams) to start trading energy "financial instruments" that led to major problems.
Gramm and/or his wife got jobs with Enron and got paid large sums by the company, before it collapsed and was inundated with fraud investigations.
Gramm's wife was chairman of the commission which regulated futures instruments.
Carly Fiorina is a prominent McCain adviser and spokeswoman. She was booted out of her CEO position at Hewlet Packard.
People were complaining that she was wrecking the company - she wanted to cure it's problems by firing people and doing mergers, instead of actually improving the ineer workings of Hewlett, which of course, she was clueless about.
Those are the type of people McCain seeks guidance from.
I don't think McCain is corrupt - I think he's clueless and gets manipulated, and he thinks it's 1970, and he's exactly the wrong person for the type of problems the country faces.
Raymond O'Hara - 13 Jul 2008 02:41 GMT >> Theodore Roosevelt -- Progressive [In The True Sense Of That Word -- Not >> A [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > manipulated, and he thinks it's 1970, and he's exactly the wrong person > for the type of problems the country faces. wingnuts always are trying to compare these fools like the chimpenfuhrer and mccan't with truly great men its their obvious flaws and lack of character that they are trying to hide by these comparisons.
Eris - 15 Jul 2008 03:19 GMT On Jul 12, 9:41 pm, "Raymond O'Hara" <raymond-oh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Theodore Roosevelt -- Progressive [In The True Sense Of That Word -- Not > >> A [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > its their obvious flaws and lack of character that they are trying to hide > by these comparisons. I think the wing nuts have disappointed all but the special people.
J A - 13 Jul 2008 16:19 GMT > Theodore Roosevelt -- Progressive [In The True Sense Of That Word -- Not A > Limp Euphemism For Socialist As "Liberal" Democrats Use It Today] -- [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > EXCELLENT EXECUTIVE MODEL... By the way, beHines, TR was a powerful intellect, I think he read a book a day, and he well understood the issues of his day.
He did NOT graduate near the bottom of his class - figuratively or litterally....
From what he says, McCain actually thinks running a couple extra US brigades into Iraq is what slowed the insurgency, versus paying off the Sunnis in Anbar (at a rate 6 times higher than what General Garner was going to pay them, before the neocons fired the Iraqi army and banned the Baathists).
McCain is nowhere near up to the job, and that's just the truth. It's not 1970 anymore.
J A - 13 Jul 2008 21:20 GMT Sen McCain supported the Cheney/Rove/Bush administration's re-election in 2004.
Excert from a NYT editorial--- "The Real-Life ‘24’ of Summer 2008" By FRANK RICH
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/13/opinion/13rich.html?th&emc=th
So hot is the speculation that war-crimes trials will eventually follow in foreign or international courts that Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell’s former chief of staff, has publicly advised Mr. Feith, Mr. Addington and Alberto Gonzales, among others, to “never travel outside the U.S., except perhaps to Saudi Arabia and Israel.” But while we wait for the wheels of justice to grind slowly, there are immediate fears to tend. Ms. Mayer’s book helps cement the case that America’s use of torture has betrayed not just American values but our national security, right to the present day.
In her telling, a major incentive for Mr. Cheney’s descent into the dark side was to cover up for the Bush White House’s failure to heed the Qaeda threat in 2001. Jack Cloonan, a special agent for the F.B.I.’s Osama bin Laden unit until 2002, told Ms. Mayer that Sept. 11 was “all preventable.” By March 2000, according to the C.I.A.’s inspector general, “50 or 60 individuals” in the agency knew that two Al Qaeda suspects — soon to be hijackers — were in America. But there was no urgency at the top. Thomas Pickard, the acting F.B.I. director that summer, told Ms. Mayer that when he expressed his fears about the Qaeda threat to Mr. Ashcroft, the attorney general snapped, “I don’t want to hear about that anymore!”
Jack Linthicum - 16 Jul 2008 12:15 GMT > Sen McCain supported the Cheney/Rove/Bush administration's re-election in > 2004. [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > expressed his fears about the Qaeda threat to Mr. Ashcroft, the attorney > general snapped, “I don’t want to hear about that anymore!” Local bit in Washington was that Cheney thought he had been poisoned with anthrax.
Cheney Thought He Had Lethal Anthrax Dose Scare Prompted Veep to Take Hard Line on Terror Suspects, New Book Contends By MARK MOONEY
July 14, 2008—
In the days after 9/11, when fears of another terrorist strike were at their peak, Vice President Dick Cheney was convinced that he had been subjected to a lethal dose of anthrax, according to a new book.
White House insiders from that white-knuckle time told author Jane Mayer, who authored "The Dark Side, The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals," that the scare contributed to Cheney's insistence on hard-line tactics for fighting terror.
Mayer, a writer for the New Yorker, claims that the vice president became the driving force in pushing for tougher interrogation tactics that critics charge went over the legal line and constitute torture.
In the days after the horror of 9/11, the country seemed to be under assault from many sides, with anthrax letters showing up in Congress and newsrooms.
On Oct. 18, 2001, a White House alarm went off indicating that sensors had detected dangerous levels of radioactive, chemical or biological agents. According to Mayer, anyone who had entered the White House situation room, including Cheney, had been exposed.
"They thought Cheney was already lethally infected," said a former administration officer who had kept the White House secret until now, according to the book.
Despite the unnerving news, Cheney calmly reported the emergency to the National Security Council. It turned out that the detection system had malfunctioned and there was no hazard.
But in the days after the incident, Cheney was taking no chances. Eleven days later, Cheney insisted on leaving the White House and retreating to one of his "secure, undisclosed locations," the book claims.
Cheney and other Cabinet members took turns hunkering down in one of several cold war era bunkers built to survive a nuclear attack. The bunkers, deep underground, were crammed with communications gear and Cheney would stay in what was dubbed the "The Commander in Chief's Suite," Mayer writes.
When vice president wasn't in the bunker, Mayer claims that "a sense of constant danger followed Cheney everywhere." The route was altered daily during the veep's commute to his above-ground office. On the back seat next to him would be a duffel bag stuffed with a gas mask and biochemical survival suit. And a doctor nearly always traveled with him, "The Dark Side" claims.
Cheney's deputy press secretary Megan Mitchell told ABC News, "On-the- record, we have not seen the book, so we really can't comment on it."
Mayer suggests that the shock of 9/11 coupled with his anthrax scare changed Cheney and made him an overpowering force in the administration arguing for significantly tougher interrogation techniques.
"The Dark Side" claims that former White House legal counsel and later attorney general Alberto Gonzales confided to colleagues that he agreed with administration lawyers who claimed the tactics were torture and illegal.
Gonzales reportedly told James Comey, the former deputy attorney general, that he was under too much pressure from Cheney to oppose him on the issue.
The book also reveals that a Red Cross report submitted to the CIA concluded that the treatment of 9/11 suspects, admitted mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Abu Zubaydah, amounted to torture and war crimes.
The Red Cross made its report after being granted access to the detainees when they were transferred to the prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Among the tactics the detainees said they were subjected to: kept naked in a frigid room and doused with water, kept in a small box called the "coffin" for hours at a time, arms shackled over their heads so they had to stand on tiptoes for up to eight hours straight.
Those claims by the 9/11 detainees could not be confirmed, but Mayer said several detainees told consistent versions of the tactics to the Red Cross although they were not allowed to communicate with each other.
Dom - 17 Jul 2008 16:59 GMT > Sen McCain supported the Cheney/Rove/Bush administration's re-election in > 2004. [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > expressed his fears about the Qaeda threat to Mr. Ashcroft, the attorney > general snapped, “I don’t want to hear about that anymore!” For the rrecord, the following is on page 265 of "The 9/11 Commission Report," Authorized Edition, W. W. Norton:
"There is a dispute regarding Ashcroft's interest in [Acting FBI Director] Pickard's briefings about the terrorist threat situation. Pickard told us that after two such briefings Ashcroft told him that he did not want to hear about the threats anymore. Ashcroft denies Pickard's charge."
!Jones - 15 Jul 2008 03:32 GMT >But I'm Not At All Sure McCain Measures Up To T.R. McCain is an honorable man. He's not Theodore and, for that, we should be thankful. I can see very few parallels... and Theodore, love him or hate him, is one of my favorite historical nut cases.
I could live with a McCain presidency; although, I'm not sure that I'll vote for him. He was a real pilot in a real war; of course, that does not qualify him to be president. OTOH, we seemed willing to accept GWB(2)'s cowardly stint (sort of) in the ANG as some kind of service to his country.
I'm waiting for one of the candidates to have the balls to admit that we, as a nation, are in deep sh.t and could easily go the way of the USSR. I don't expect him to have a nice, pat solution that involves a tax cut... I just want him to acknowledge that he's in touch with reality.
Jones
La N - 15 Jul 2008 04:31 GMT > I'm waiting for one of the candidates to have the balls to admit that > we, as a nation, are in deep sh.t and could easily go the way of the > USSR. I don't expect him to have a nice, pat solution that involves a > tax cut... I just want him to acknowledge that he's in touch with > reality. Yabbut, what kind of slogans would that candidate spout that would sell his platform? Think, Jonesy, think!
- nilita, who can t hink of one - "Follow me, Lemmings!"
- nilita
D. Spencer Hines - 15 Jul 2008 08:31 GMT Hilarious!
The Chicken Little Syndrome...
Writ Large...
 Signature DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor
----------------Cordon Sanitaire---------------------------
>> I'm waiting for one of the candidates to have the balls to admit that >> we, as a nation, are in deep sh.t and could easily go the way of the >> USSR. Raymond O'Hara - 15 Jul 2008 05:23 GMT >>But I'm Not At All Sure McCain Measures Up To T.R. > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Jones tough talkgets you canned, just ask jimmy carter
!Jones - 16 Jul 2008 04:03 GMT >> I'm waiting for one of the candidates to have the balls to admit that >> we, as a nation, are in deep sh.t and could easily go the way of the [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > tough talkgets you canned, just ask jimmy carter Well, JC, for all of his foibles, was an honorable, honest man. Of course, honest people only get elected on a fluke... people want bumper stickers and tax cuts, not honesty.
Jones
Raymond O'Hara - 16 Jul 2008 04:48 GMT >>> I'm waiting for one of the candidates to have the balls to admit that >>> we, as a nation, are in deep sh.t and could easily go the way of the [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Jones Honesty is seen as weakness.
!Jones - 16 Jul 2008 16:11 GMT >> Well, JC, for all of his foibles, was an honorable, honest man. Of >> course, honest people only get elected on a fluke... people want >> bumper stickers and tax cuts, not honesty. > >Honesty is seen as weakness. I don't think that's quite the case. We value honesty... just not when it forces our leaders to articulate that which we'd prefer not to face.
On the other hand, there's a gorilla on the couch and we really cannot continue to ignore it. The value of the dollar is dropping radically, yet we continue to bury our heads and claim that inflation is running 3 or 4%. We get that by *not* factoring in food and fuel; yes, consumer electronics have, in fact, dropped in price.
It's time for an honest leader, someone who will face the facts of life and the hard, economic reality that we are close to national bankruptcy. Moreover, there simply isn't a quick fix for it.
We need to take several steps:
1) Bring the armed forces back to US soil immediately; we lost.
2) Start paying down the war debt; this means a tax increase.
3) Cut government spending down to the nub.
4) Tighten the money supply. This will drive up interest rates and, almost certainly, send us into recession. The alternative is that the US dollar won't be worth the paper on which it's printed very soon. A painful economic recession is in our future... postponing the inevitable won't change that; it'll just make it worse when it does happen.
5) Fund the highway infrastructure with a gasoline tax instead of income tax. This will double the pump price of gasoline; however, it will encourage conservation. At some point, people stop driving and get on a bus... we need to find that point.
All of these will hurt. Let's face them. Every junkie knows that he or she has to dry-out sooner or later... just not *today*; tomorrow will be fine, though.
Jones
La N. - 16 Jul 2008 20:02 GMT > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:48:52 -0400, in alt.war.vietnam "Raymond > [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > or she has to dry-out sooner or later... just not *today*; tomorrow > will be fine, though. Great ideas, Jonesy. You aren't afraid to say what many are thinking. But you are unelectable. The truth "hurts" too much. Not enough feel- good slogans.
- nilita
Dan - 17 Jul 2008 01:52 GMT >>> Well, JC, for all of his foibles, was an honorable, honest man. Of >>> course, honest people only get elected on a fluke... people want [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > > Jones Perfect recipe for another Great Depression. Good going!
Dan
!Jones - 17 Jul 2008 02:34 GMT >Perfect recipe for another Great Depression. Good going! Well, depressions do happen. They are like the tide... like the fire season in the western states. You can try to hold back the tide; however, it always wins. You can run around frantically putting out the fires; however, the fuel accumulates... either action only makes the inevitable worse.
Yes, the next depression is coming. We can pretend it isn't and make matters much worse or we can accept it and survive.
Jones
Raymond O'Hara - 17 Jul 2008 05:57 GMT >>Perfect recipe for another Great Depression. Good going! > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Jones the economy is not the weather. we actully do control it.
!Jones - 17 Jul 2008 13:43 GMT >> Yes, the next depression is coming. We can pretend it isn't and make >> matters much worse or we can accept it and survive. > >the economy is not the weather. >we actully do control it. There we disagree. As you look back through history, worldwide depressions occur on roughly five decade intervals... on the average, I mean; it's a little longer, but *every* generation in history has lived through a global depression.
The economy is more like personal health than it is the weather. A person may have a healthful or an unhealthful lifestyle and, thus, exercise some manner of influence upon his or her general health; however, the person does not control it per se. In our case, we have been living on borrowed money since the early '70s and the books always balance in the end.
The US is like a morbidly obese person. If we go out and try to run 10 miles, we will die. OTOH, if we don't lose weight, we die from that. We have backed ourselves into a very bad spot and could easily go bankrupt. Our banks are holding lots of bad real estate loans; they must have low interest to move them. The dollar is falling like a rock; we must tighten interest to end its tailspin.
It took us 38 years of unhealthful economic practice to get here; we're not going to find a quick-fix. I say, go ahead and screw down the money supply. The US will immediately go into sharp recession and banks will fail; however, we might (emphasis on "might") emerge on the other side in a few years.
It's time to bite the bullet.
Jones
D. Spencer Hines - 17 Jul 2008 20:52 GMT Silly Air-Headed Rhetoric in an Election Year.
 Signature DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor
>>> Yes, the next depression is coming. We can pretend it isn't and make >>> matters much worse or we can accept it and survive. [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > Jones !Jones - 18 Jul 2008 02:18 GMT >Silly Air-Headed Rhetoric in an Election Year. You appear to disagree with something I said. I suggest that it would help if you would write in complete sentences; however, that's just my preference. It would help me to understand that of which you write, though.
I'm sorry that you disagree; I do hope you manage to get over it.
Jones
Jack Linthicum - 16 Jul 2008 12:45 GMT > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:23:43 -0400, in alt.war.vietnam "Raymond > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Jones I always quote Hamilton Jordan on why Carter failed "If we get Cyrus Vance for Secretary of State we have failed". IE The Democratic Party didn't want Carter and made sure he got none of his trusted friends into real government positions. Of course, many of his trusted friends were as crooked as the people who took their places.
Tiglath - 15 Jul 2008 17:49 GMT > Theodore Roosevelt -- Progressive [In The True Sense Of That Word -- Not A > Limp Euphemism For Socialist As "Liberal" Democrats Use It Today] -- Master [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > But He Often Shows He Has Good Instincts... > -- Oldest, a lot to prove, not measuring up to T.R. Sounds like hardly worth getting out of bed for...
Ah!
But his good instincts, his gut, is what endears McCain to Mr. Hines.
In view of recent, and not so recent, posts, here is...
A bit of friendly advice, Mr. Hines, try not to think with your gut.
Dom - 17 Jul 2008 16:46 GMT > Theodore Roosevelt -- Progressive [In The True Sense Of That Word -- Not A > Limp Euphemism For Socialist As "Liberal" Democrats Use It Today] -- Master > of The Square Deal & Apostle of the New Nationalism -- My Favorite > President. I recall reading that, among other proposals, the 1912 platform of the National Progressive (Bull Moose) Party included a national health insurance plan.
D. Spencer Hines - 17 Jul 2008 20:54 GMT Do you have the details?
 Signature DSH Lux et Veritas et Libertas Vires et Honor
>> Theodore Roosevelt -- Progressive [In The True Sense Of That Word -- Not >> A [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > National Progressive (Bull Moose) Party included a national health > insurance plan. Dom - 18 Jul 2008 18:56 GMT I do not have any details. I read this many years ago, or it may be that I heard it during a political discussion on TV. I also remember either hearing or reading that in 1948 Harry Truman wanted to include a national health insurance plan in the Democratic Party platform.
> Do you have the details? > -- [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > National Progressive (Bull Moose) Party included a national health > > insurance plan. Dom - 19 Jul 2008 16:48 GMT David McCullough’s “Truman” contains several references to health insurance, in particular the following two.
Shortly after Truman became president in 1945: “He asked for national compulsory health insurance to be funded by payroll deductions. Under the system, all citizens would receive medical and hospital service irrespective of their ability to pay.” [p 474]
In a speech “delivered before Congress on Wednesday, January 7, 1948 … In less than an hour at the podium, Truman called for a national health insurance program, a massive housing program, increased support for education, increased support for farmers, the conservation of natural resources, and a raise in the minimum wage from 45 to 75 cents an hour.” [p 586]
> I do not have any details. I read this many years ago, or it may be > that I heard it during a political discussion on TV. I also remember [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > > National Progressive (Bull Moose) Party included a national health > > > insurance plan.
|
|
|