The American Judicial System is functioning precisely as it SHOULD, by
bringing issues such as this to the fore:
-------------------------------------------------------
"Judge Helps Experts Help Terrorists"
"What would terrorists do without experts? They may not need to find
out, thanks to a ruling by Judge Audrey Collins, who sits on a federal
trial court in California. The Associated Press reports that on Friday
Collins "declared unconstitutional a portion of the USA Patriot Act that
bars giving expert advice or assistance to groups designated foreign
terrorist organizations."
The AP reports that Collins, a Clinton appointee, "said the ban on
providing 'expert advice or assistance' is impermissibly vague" because
it prohibits giving advice on "lawful, nonviolent activities" -- even
though the ban applies only to advice whose recipients the U.S.
government has designated terror groups.
Here's a question for John Kerry and John Edwards, both of whom are now
waging demagogic campaigns against the Patriot Act, despite having voted
for it: Do you believe the U.S. Constitution protects the right to give
expert advice and assistance to terrorist groups? And if so, do you
pledge to appoint judges who share this view?"
James Taranto
The Wall Street Journal
--------------------------
It will be interesting to see how this one turns out.
Deus Vult
Sholem Aleichem
D. Spencer Hines
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
raymond o'hara - 28 Jan 2004 16:02 GMT
> The American Judicial System is functioning precisely as it SHOULD, by
> bringing issues such as this to the fore:
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Vires et Honor
the constitution garauntees advice for everybody , do you have a problem
with that .
i like your phrase " goverment designates as terror groups " . judges
arwe to apply the law fairly and not to fold up to to fascist housing
officers as yourself . the constitutional protections were designed to curb
people like yourself who hate freedom .