Historical Facts:
You've got it basically correct, however, Benjamin Disraeli (1804-1881)
was actually 12, rather than 15, when he was baptized on 31 July 1817.
He was born on 21 December 1804, in London -- in his father, Isaac
D'Israeli's home at 6 King's Road, Bedford Row, later named 22
Theobald's Road, near Gray's Inn.
In _Tancred_ and other writings, as well as in casual and Parliamentary
speeches, Disraeli makes it quite clear he sees himself as an ethnic and
cultural Jew ---- no question about it.
For anyone to say peremptorily, as Gans is doing, that Disraeli was NOT
Jewish, is quite foolish and wrong.
>>Disraeli?
>
>Wasn't Jewish. Came from a one-time Jewish family though. [pjg]
Hilarious!
Disraeli was INTENSELY PROUD of his Sephardic Jewish Ancestry and
RIGHTLY SO.
He held the quite controversial view, for his day, that Christians owed
the Jews for the foundations of their Religion because:
1. Jesus and all his disciples were Jewish.
2. Without the Jews having turned Jesus over to the Romans for
judgement there could have been no Crucifixion, no Resurrection and no
Atonement.
Disraeli often seems to regard Christ's Jewishness as more important
than his Divinity.
Disraeli is known to have referred to _YOUR Christianity_ when
addressing his Parliamentary opponents on the floor of the House of
Commons, during the debates over the removal of civil disabilities on
the Jews.
Gans, who is not a practicing Jew himself, but a self-confessed,
cynical, desiccated, Greenwich-Village Atheist ---- is obviously quite
ignorant about these important Historical Facts concerning Benjamin
Disraeli. They are Historical Facts he has no particular interest
in ---- so he ignores them ---- as "INCONVENIENT FACTS."
Not Surprising, Not Surprising In The Least....
Gans is ignorant about all SORTS of things of which he tries to speak
authoritatively.
As we saw with RACE ---- and RACISTS....
We also saw him take a massive pratfall just yesterday when he posted
errant gibberish concerning Succession To The Office Of President of the
United States.
Gans said the Speaker of the House is THIRD in line to succeed to the
Presidency ---- rather than the CORRECT SECOND in line ---- right after
the Vice President.
Gans Pontificates From The Pit Of Ignorance, Continuously...Never Forget
It....
D. Spencer Hines
Deus Vult
Sholem Aleichem.
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
"Don Aitken" <don-aitken@freeuk.com> wrote in message
news:tomo10daml2umqi0gt15qptnq67463rmvq@4ax.com...
| "One-time" being until he reached the age of 15, when his father had
| him baptised (without, however, being baptised himself). That seems
| pretty Jewish to me, which is the way he himself, and his
| contemporaries, saw it too. His writings harp on the topic of
| Jewishness incessantly, as if he was determined not to let people
| forget it. Of course, he could not have been an MP without being
| formally Christian.
|
| --
| Don Aitken
D. Spencer Hines - 01 Feb 2004 11:52 GMT
This is one of my favorite Disraeli quotations:
---------------------------------------
"Arabs are only Jews on horseback."
Benjamin Disraeli
-----------------
D. Spencer Hines
Deus Vult
Sholem Aleichem.
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
D. Spencer Hines - 01 Feb 2004 12:35 GMT
>>Disraeli?
----------
>Wasn't Jewish. Came from a one-time Jewish family though.
P. Jonathan Gans ---- Left-Wing NYU chemist
----------------------------------------
Nonsense!
Here's another of my favorite Disraeli quotations, which certainly puts
paid to Gans's anserine, thoughtless, uninformed comment above:
"Yes, I am a Jew, and when the ancestors of the right honourable
gentleman were brutal savages in an unknown island, mine were priests in
the temple of Solomon."
Benjamin Disraeli ---- Reply to a taunt by Daniel O'Connell
----------------------------------------------------
Capital!
D. Spencer Hines
Deus Vult
Sholem Aleichem.
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
Paul Abeles - 01 Feb 2004 23:09 GMT
> Historical Facts:
>
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
> | --
> | Don Aitken
Under Halacha [Jewish law] Disraeli is considered a heretic and idolater.
amigocabal - 02 Feb 2004 02:20 GMT
> > Historical Facts:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 84 lines]
>
> Under Halacha [Jewish law] Disraeli is considered a heretic and idolater.
Much difference does it make! He was good for England that is all that
matters!
amigocabal - 02 Feb 2004 02:18 GMT
What differnce does it make whether he was a Jew or not? It can easily
proved that Hitler was part Jewish. Do you want the bastard?
> Historical Facts:
>
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
> | --
> | Don Aitken
Bernardz - 02 Feb 2004 10:48 GMT
> What differnce does it make whether he was a Jew or not? It can easily
> proved that Hitler was part Jewish. Do you want the bastard?
Alex, I accept your challenge! Prove that Hitler was part Jewish. I can
think of several quite eminent historians that have discussed this issue
and reached the reverse conclusion.

Signature
More quantity is easier to produce then higher quality.
39th observation of Bernard
The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe - 03 Feb 2004 10:19 GMT
>> What differnce does it make whether he was a Jew or not? It can easily
>> proved that Hitler was part Jewish. Do you want the bastard?
>
>Alex, I accept your challenge! Prove that Hitler was part Jewish. I can
>think of several quite eminent historians that have discussed this issue
>and reached the reverse conclusion.
G'day Bernie,
You people aren't supposed to believe in the concept of "part jewish".
Are you some kind of renegade?
Bernardz - 03 Feb 2004 12:56 GMT
> >> What differnce does it make whether he was a Jew or not? It can easily
> >> proved that Hitler was part Jewish. Do you want the bastard?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> You people aren't supposed to believe in the concept of "part jewish".
> Are you some kind of renegade?
Hiya
You should know better then to assume that Alex makes sense.

Signature
An outsider will find that the doors of a house are shut. However once
he gets inside he will find that almost all doors are open.
40th observation of Bernard
Susan Cohen - 03 Feb 2004 22:06 GMT
> > >> What differnce does it make whether he was a Jew or not? It can easily
> > >> proved that Hitler was part Jewish. Do you want the bastard?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> You should know better then to assume that Alex makes sense.
Trust him to be too dumb to see the trap being set.
Susan
JGB - 02 Feb 2004 18:12 GMT
A Jew had to become a Christian in order to get a seat in the
Parliament
of liberal England, and still was considered a Jew anyway - only
proving
that conversion may get you a good job, but it still won't get you any
respect :)
There is, however, a jewish porn star named Ron Jeremy, who though
Jewish
does get respect from gentile females, because he has a 10" penis.
Which only goes to prove, it's not who you are, or even what you are,
but rather what you're packing that gets you respect.
> Historical Facts:
>
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
> | --
> | Don Aitken
Susan Cohen - 02 Feb 2004 18:39 GMT
> A Jew had to become a Christian in order to get a seat in the
> Parliament
> of liberal England, and still was considered a Jew anyway - only
> proving
> that conversion may get you a good job, but it still won't get you any
> respect :)
Funny, I experienced just the opposite (Oh, wait.... (-: )
> There is, however, a jewish porn star named Ron Jeremy, who though
> Jewish
> does get respect from gentile females, because he has a 10" penis.
But did he "convert"?? :-)
Susan
> Which only goes to prove, it's not who you are, or even what you are,
> but rather what you're packing that gets you respect.
[quoted text clipped - 85 lines]
> > | --
> > | Don Aitken
Martin Reboul - 02 Feb 2004 20:39 GMT
> > A Jew had to become a Christian in order to get a seat in the
> > Parliament
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> But did he "convert"?? :-)
Well, he must be circumsized at least?
Susan Cohen - 02 Feb 2004 18:39 GMT
> Historical Facts:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> For anyone to say peremptorily, as Gans is doing, that Disraeli was NOT
> Jewish, is quite foolish and wrong.
According to Catholic rules, he wasn't.
Gans is as entitled to his belief as anyone, but, of course, Jews are going
to say that Disraeli was Jewish, just an apostate.
Susan
D. Spencer Hines - 02 Feb 2004 13:08 GMT
And the Jews who say Disraeli was Jewish but an apostate make perfect
sense.
Gans, however, does NOT make perfect sense.
Gans is ignorant and farblondjet ---- even by his OWN rules.
Gans initially INSISTED Disraeli was NOT Jewish.
But THEN he told us:
"For me there are only two bases for terming someone Jewish: they either
claim to be Jewish or they practice Judaism."
Well, Disraeli DID claim to be Jewish. I proved that:
"Yes, I am a Jew, and when the ancestors of the right honourable
gentleman were brutal savages in an unknown island, mine were priests in
the temple of Solomon."
Benjamin Disraeli ---- Reply to a taunt by Daniel O'Connell
-------------------------------------------------
SO, Gans is WRONG ---- EVEN by his OWN definitions.
Benjamin Disraeli WAS Jewish.
Gans, once again, has been hoist upon his own petard....
KAWHOMP!!!
KERSPLAT!!!
Hilarious!
Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi _Asinum.
D. Spencer Hines
Deus Vult
Sholem Aleichem.
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
| > Historical Facts:
| >
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
|
| Susan
Susan Cohen - 03 Feb 2004 04:20 GMT
> And the Jews who say Disraeli was Jewish but an apostate make perfect
> sense.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> "For me there are only two bases for terming someone Jewish: they either
> claim to be Jewish or they practice Judaism."
I find it extremely arrogant for non-Jews to make rules about who is/not
Jewish.
> Well, Disraeli DID claim to be Jewish. I proved that:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> SO, Gans is WRONG ---- EVEN by his OWN definitions.
Well, he's got time to admit that - right?
Susan
D. Spencer Hines - 02 Feb 2004 18:55 GMT
Good Points....
See Below.
DSH
| > And the Jews who say Disraeli was Jewish but an apostate make
| > perfect sense.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
| I find it extremely arrogant for non-Jews to make rules about who
| is/not Jewish.
Yes, I think you have a good argument there.
The U. S. Government takes that tack. They ask US what race or ethnic
group we belong to and they generally don't ask us our religion ----
except in special circumstances. The Armed Forces should know whether
you want a religious funeral ---- and a Cross, A Star Of David or a
Crescent on your headstone ---- or nothing.
I don't know whether Gans considers himself as Jewish or not. He
belongs to no synagogue and does not believe in God ---- he HIMSELF has
told us that much. He does not appear to practice Judaism per se ----
but that is for him to say.
| > Well, Disraeli DID claim to be Jewish. I proved that:
| >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
|
| Susan
And you think he WILL admit that?
O.K. ---- Let's See....
Spencer
Susan Cohen - 03 Feb 2004 04:54 GMT
> Good Points....
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Yes, I think you have a good argument there.
I don;' think any outsider has a right to make up rules for other people.
For example, I get angry at Jews who say that "The Inquisition was Xian" in
the face of Xians who insist that it was a perversion of their religion. I
figure *they* would know better than I, & at best (or worst) I would say
that the Inquisition thought they were Xian. That's NOT the same thing.
> The U. S. Government takes that tack. They ask US what race or ethnic
> group we belong to and they generally don't ask us our religion ----
> except in special circumstances. The Armed Forces should know whether
> you want a religious funeral ---- and a Cross, A Star Of David or a
> Crescent on your headstone ---- or nothing.
FWIU, they have several pages filled with every possible answer, and you get
to pick one. ONE.
I know someone who picked "Druid" just to be a jerk.
> I don't know whether Gans considers himself as Jewish or not. He
> belongs to no synagogue and does not believe in God ---- he HIMSELF has
> told us that much. He does not appear to practice Judaism per se ----
> but that is for him to say.
I had no idea there was any question.
But Jewish law states that if one's mother is Jewish, or one has had a
genuine conversion, then one is a Jew.
> | > Well, Disraeli DID claim to be Jewish. I proved that:
> | >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> O.K. ---- Let's See....
Let me know :-)
Susan
D. Spencer Hines - 02 Feb 2004 20:25 GMT
Please see below.
DSH
| > Good Points....
| >
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
| to pick one. ONE.
| I know someone who picked "Druid" just to be a jerk.
Yes, I understand.
We'd never let them get away with that here.
Here in Hawai'i people regularly pick two or even write in alternatives
when they can.
Chinese and Hawaiian
Vietnamese and Caucasian
Chinese and Caucasian
Japanese and Caucasian
Hawaiian and Caucasian
Are some popular choices.
People also describe themselves as "Portuguese" or Samoan, Tongan,
Tahitian ---- and so forth.
Spencer
| > I don't know whether Gans considers himself as Jewish or not. He
| > belongs to no synagogue and does not believe in God ---- he HIMSELF has
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
|
| Susan
Drew Nicholson - 03 Feb 2004 04:32 GMT
> > And the Jews who say Disraeli was Jewish but an apostate make perfect
> > sense.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I find it extremely arrogant for non-Jews to make rules about who is/not
> Jewish.
Paul is jewish. And you're making a big mistake even pretending to ally
with Hines, a known anti-semite.

Signature
Drew
----
"Some who get credit for being Conservative are merely stupid."
D. Spencer Hines - 04 Feb 2004 08:42 GMT
I told you Gans, our farblondjet Left-Wing NYU chemist would not admit
he was DEAD WRONG about Disraeli ---- EVEN by Gans's OWN criteria for
determining who is Jewish and who is not.
That's ANOTHER massive PRATFALL for Gans.
PRATFALL!!!
KAWHOMP!!!
KERSPLAT!!!
My pet goose is off to an EXCELLENT start in February.
Top Form...For The Top Banana.
D. Spencer Hines
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
D. Spencer Hines - 06 Feb 2004 09:08 GMT
Hmmmmmm...
Gans certainly has his work cut out for him....
Susan Cohen has obviously been making some very telling points.
Judaism 101:
http://www.jewfaq.org/whoisjew.htm
"Who is a Jew?"
"A Jew is any person whose mother was a Jew or any person who has gone
through the formal process of conversion to Judaism."
"It is important to note that being a Jew has nothing to do with what
you believe or what you do. A person born to non-Jewish parents who has
not undergone the formal process of conversion but who believes
everything that Orthodox Jews believe and observes every law and custom
of Judaism is still a non-Jew, even in the eyes of the most liberal
movements of Judaism, and a person born to a Jewish mother who is an
atheist and never practices the Jewish religion is still a Jew, even in
the eyes of the ultra-Orthodox. In this sense, Judaism is more like a
nationality than like other religions, and being Jewish is like a
citizenship. See What Is Judaism?"
[...]
http://www.jewfaq.org/whoisjew.htm#Who
D. Spencer Hines
Deus Vult
Sholem Aleichem.
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
D. Spencer Hines - 09 Feb 2004 08:05 GMT
Gans just continues to waffle, lie and throw out red herrings in this
thread.
This is another standard tactic he uses.
He hopes his opponent, Susan Cohen, will simply give up in disgust ----
which frequently happens.
DSH
D. Spencer Hines - 28 Feb 2004 09:10 GMT
Yep...
By his OWN narrow definition, Gans is NOT a Jew -- so he doesn't get to
decide who is a Jew.
Susan Cohen is correct.
He says he is NOT a religious Jew and that is, according to Gans, the
only way one can be a Jew.
Gans insists any OTHER sort of Jewishness is "without real content."
So, once again, Gans has been hoist with his own petard.
KAWHOMP!!!
KERSPLAT!!!
This is like shooting fish in a barrel.
DSH
| [snip rest of desperate blather]
|
| Grow up.
| We are discussing feelings towards other's religious beliefs, not how
I feel
| about this thread.
| Now, instead of making up ridiculous things for you to pretend you are
right
| about, & throwing around childish ad hominem to try to make yourself
feel
| better at being thoroughly defeated throughout this entire discussion,
why
| don't you just admit that you were wrong to ever suggest that non-Jews
get
| to decide who is/not a Jew?
|
| Susan