Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / British History / April 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

George Orwell -- Words Of Wisdom -- Today

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
D. Spencer Hines - 25 Apr 2004 21:49 GMT
George Orwell [1903-1950] -- whose Real Name was Eric Blair -- is just
as right today as he was in 1945.

Yep -- the same guy who wrote _Animal Farm_ and _Nineteen Eighty-Four_.

Let's also keep in mind that Orwell was a "Man Of The Left" for most of
his life -- so this heartfelt statement of accumulated Orwellian wisdom
and bitter experience in the Fantasy- World of the Left has a special
poignancy.

DSH
---------------------------------------

"One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe things like that: no
ordinary man could be such a fool."

George Orwell ---- _Notes on Nationalism_, May, 1945

----------------------------------------

"It is, I think, true to say that the intelligentsia have been more
wrong about the progress of the war than the common people, and that
they were more swayed by partisan feelings.

The average intellectual of the Left believed, for instance, that the
war was lost in 1940, that the Germans were bound to overrun Egypt in
1942, that the Japanese would never be driven out of the lands they had
conquered, and that the Anglo-American bombing offensive was making no
impression on Germany.

He could believe these things because his hatred for the British ruling
class forbade him to admit that British plans could succeed.

There is no limit to the follies that can be swallowed if one is under
the influence of feelings of this kind.

I have heard it confidently stated, for instance, that the American
troops had been brought to Europe not to fight the Germans but to crush
an English revolution.  One has to belong to the intelligentsia to
believe things like that: no ordinary man could be such a fool."

George Orwell ---- _Notes on Nationalism_, May, 1945
-----------------------------------------------

Lest We Forget....

'Nuff Said...

D. Spencer Hines

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Vires et Honor
Hagar - 25 Apr 2004 23:34 GMT
> George Orwell [1903-1950] -- whose Real Name was Eric Blair -- is just
> as right today as he was in 1945.

Well, he was off by 20 years - but in 2004 the Bush junta is
certainly doing all it can to implement 'Big Brother'.

" Since about that time, war had been literally continuous,
though strictly speaking it had not always been the same war.

For several months during his childhood there had been confused
street fighting in London itself, some of which he remembered
vividly. But to trace out the history of the whole period, to
say who was fighting whom at any given moment, would have been
utterly impossible, since no written record, and no spoken word,
ever made mention of any other alignment than the existing one.
At this moment, for example, in 1984 (if it was 1984), Oceania
was at war with Eurasia and in alliance with Eastasia. In no
public or private utterance was it ever admitted that the three
powers had at any time been grouped along different lines.
Actually, as Winston well knew, it was only four years since
Oceania had been at war with Eastasia and in alliance with
Eurasia. But that was merely a piece of furtive knowledge which
he happened to possess because his memory was not satisfactorily
under control. Officially the change of partners had never
happened. Oceania was at war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania had
always been at war with Eurasia.

The enemy of the moment always represented absolute evil, and it
followed that any past or future agreement with him was
impossible."

George Orwell, 1984

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
John Cartmell - 26 Apr 2004 12:11 GMT
> George Orwell [1903-1950] -- whose Real Name was Eric Blair -- is just
> as right today as he was in 1945.

> Yep -- the same guy who wrote _Animal Farm_ and _Nineteen Eighty-Four_.

> Let's also keep in mind that Orwell was a "Man Of The Left" for most of
> his life -- so this heartfelt statement of accumulated Orwellian wisdom
> and bitter experience in the Fantasy- World of the Left has a special
> poignancy.

I'm sure that it would be totally beyond you to appreciate that much of
what Orwell foretold actually happened in the 80s and 90s.
Slight differences of course but the fact that Big Brother carried a
handbag didn't material change the warning nor the way it was ignored.

Signature

    John Cartmell    john@ followed by finnybank.com    FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527
    Qercus magazine & FD Games    www.finnybank.com  www.acornuser.com
Qercus - a fusion of Acorn Publisher & Acorn User magazines

Julian Richards - 26 Apr 2004 13:10 GMT
>I'm sure that it would be totally beyond you to appreciate that much of
>what Orwell foretold actually happened in the 80s and 90s.
>Slight differences of course but the fact that Big Brother carried a
>handbag didn't material change the warning nor the way it was ignored.

As one of my SWP drinking companions said in our University days, if
we were to be ruled by a fascist hag, why couldn't they have chosen
one with decent tits?

--

Julian Richards
medieval "at" richardsuk.f9.co.uk

Usenet is how from the comfort of your own living room, you can converse
with people that you would never want in your house.

THIS MESSAGE WAS POSTED FROM SOC.HISTORY.MEDIEVAL
hippo - 26 Apr 2004 17:38 GMT
"Julian Richards" wrote in message

> >I'm sure that it would be totally beyond you to appreciate that much of
> >what Orwell foretold actually happened in the 80s and 90s.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> we were to be ruled by a fascist hag, why couldn't they have chosen
> one with decent tits?

Chuckle, all you lefties want from government is a big nurturing tit to suck
on. Instead the majority chose a leader with a brain and guts which were
both more needed at the time. They are to be commended for making the wiser
choice. -the Troll
Bryn Fraser - 26 Apr 2004 18:09 GMT
>"Julian Richards" wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>both more needed at the time. They are to be commended for making the wiser
>choice. -the Troll

It helps if the brain in question is larger than the human fist!

Signature

Brian Fraser Lovett-White

http://www.finhall.demon.co.uk
http://thefrasers.com

Michael Kuettner - 26 Apr 2004 18:28 GMT
> >"Julian Richards" wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >
> >Chuckle, all you lefties want from government is a big nurturing tit to suck
------------------------------------------------------------------------^
You've misspelled "Theresa Orloffski".

> >on. Instead the majority chose a leader with a brain and guts which were
> >both more needed at the time. They are to be commended for making the wiser
> >choice. -the Troll
>
> It helps if the brain in question is larger than the human fist!
----------------------^---------------------^

You've misspelled "tits" and "are".
Pulchra sunt ubera quae paululum supereminent.

Cheers,

Michael "since politicians haven't got brains let them at least have tits "
Kuettner
hippo - 26 Apr 2004 18:56 GMT
"Bryn Fraser" wrote in message

> In message hippo writes

> >"Julian Richards" wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> It helps if the brain in question is larger than the human fist!

Fortunately for most of us it isn't the size that counts but how one uses
what one has. The Sovs, Argies, and we poor bastards carrying much of the
burden of the Cold War can attest that she did quite well. She also
understood as a mother that the tit becomes counter-productive after infancy
leading only to perminant dependence. She was right about that too. Here's
to Maggie, God Bless her. -the Troll
Bryn Fraser - 26 Apr 2004 20:01 GMT
>"Bryn Fraser" wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>leading only to perminant dependence. She was right about that too. Here's
>to Maggie, God Bless her. -the Troll

Curiously, while she was in power life did get better for the really
poor. Whether that was intended or not is another question...

History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream and
cancelling the national schools free milk program...

Signature

Brian Fraser Lovett-White

http://www.finhall.demon.co.uk
http://thefrasers.com

Howard Berkowitz - 26 Apr 2004 21:31 GMT
> History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream and
> cancelling the national schools free milk program...

This may be a simple case of two peoples separated by a common tongue,
but what is whippy ice cream? It sounds both kinky and decadent...the
sort of thing to keep feeding Ann Coulter so she won't speak.
Brian Sharrock - 26 Apr 2004 22:47 GMT
> > History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream and
> > cancelling the national schools free milk program...
>
> This may be a simple case of two peoples separated by a common tongue,
> but what is whippy ice cream? It sounds both kinky and decadent...the
> sort of thing to keep feeding Ann Coulter so she won't speak.

I think it's actually "Mr Whippy" ice-cream; a sort of ice-cream that's
very soft. aerated like whipped-cream and extruded into a 'cornet'
( a cone) via a star-shaped nozzle by an operator who twists the
extruding material into a pointy-topped spiral. If you ask nicely and
hand over the appropriate coins, the operator will stick a crumbly
flaky chocolate bar into it - the code is "Make that a Ninety-Nine,  Mate!"

[Etymologists write learned treatise on the derivation of the 'ninety-nine'
nomenclature - some insist that the bars of chocolate flake are 99mm.]

Signature

Brian

J.T. McDaniel - 27 Apr 2004 02:01 GMT
> > > History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream and
> > > cancelling the national schools free milk program...
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> [Etymologists write learned treatise on the derivation of the 'ninety-nine'
> nomenclature - some insist that the bars of chocolate flake are 99mm.]

A concept perhaps most easily conveyed on this
side of the pond by using the words Dairy Queen.
Watch "Help!" to see the rig.
Signature

Jack

Fred J. McCall - 27 Apr 2004 05:17 GMT
:> > History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream and
:> > cancelling the national schools free milk program...
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
:( a cone) via a star-shaped nozzle by an operator who twists the
:extruding material into a pointy-topped spiral.

So after all these years, the British have discovered Dairy Queen
soft-serve ice cream?
Brian Sharrock - 27 Apr 2004 07:44 GMT
> :> > History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream and
> :> > cancelling the national schools free milk program...
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> So after all these years, the British have discovered Dairy Queen
> soft-serve ice cream?

I expect it's an enigma over when soft ice-cream was 'discovered'
and by whom ... certainly when Mr McCullough was developing
his product the residents of the UK were up to their eyeballs
in debris and coping with the Luftwaffe's urban remodelling
programme.Still, thank goodness the arsenal of democracy was
not distracted by tiny details such as Taranto.

Signature

Brian

raymond o'hara - 28 Apr 2004 04:47 GMT
> :> > History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream and
> :> > cancelling the national schools free milk program...
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> So after all these years, the British have discovered Dairy Queen
> soft-serve ice cream?

soft serve is ice milk not ice cream . the lower fat content is what makes
it softer .
Fred J. McCall - 28 Apr 2004 06:56 GMT
:> :> > History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream and
:> :> > cancelling the national schools free milk program...
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
:soft serve is ice milk not ice cream . the lower fat content is what makes
:it softer .

I don't think so.  If that was what made it softer, it wouldn't freeze
hard when you took it home and shoved it in the freezer for a week.

What makes it softer is that it is not as cold and is whipped for
dispense.

Signature

"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable
man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore,
all progress depends on the unreasonable man."
                                     --George Bernard Shaw

Howard Berkowitz - 28 Apr 2004 07:58 GMT
> :> :> > History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream
> :> :> > and
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> What makes it softer is that it is not as cold and is whipped for
> dispense.

Whipping the ice cream before it comes out of the dispenser...Fred, have
you been looking again at the picture of Ann Coulter in a dominatrix
outfit on her website? :-)
John Cartmell - 28 Apr 2004 10:52 GMT
> soft serve is ice milk not ice cream . the lower fat content is what
> makes it softer.

That's a slur on the reputation of milk.

Signature

    John Cartmell    john@ followed by finnybank.com    FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527
    Qercus magazine & FD Games    www.finnybank.com  www.acornuser.com
Qercus - a fusion of Acorn Publisher & Acorn User magazines

John Cartmell - 28 Apr 2004 10:50 GMT
> So after all these years, the British have discovered Dairy Queen
> soft-serve ice cream?

This *is* a history ng and the comments refer to (about) 1960. I don't know
when 'Dairy Queen' hit the streets...

Signature

    John Cartmell    john@ followed by finnybank.com    FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527
    Qercus magazine & FD Games    www.finnybank.com  www.acornuser.com
Qercus - a fusion of Acorn Publisher & Acorn User magazines

Grey Satterfield - 28 Apr 2004 12:22 GMT
On 4/28/04 4:50 AM, in article 4ca6a6bf55john@cartmell.demon.co.uk, "John
Cartmell" <john@cartmell.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>> So after all these years, the British have discovered Dairy Queen
>> soft-serve ice cream?
>
> This *is* a history ng and the comments refer to (about) 1960. I don't know
> when 'Dairy Queen' hit the streets...

Dairy Queen soft serve was first developed in 1938 and the first DQ store
was opened in Joliet, IL in 1940.  The first store in Canada opened in 1953.
I don't know when the first British store opened but there if a photograph
on the Web taken of a group in "Dairy Queen of Britain" in 1957.[1]

http://www.oregon-web.net/dq/history.htm

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Dairy%20Queen

http://www.gtj.org.uk/item.php?lang=en&id=23235&t=1

Grey Satterfield

[1] Anybody who really thinks I knew this stuff should think again -- Google
is my friend.  :>)
Fred J. McCall - 28 Apr 2004 14:24 GMT
:> So after all these years, the British have discovered Dairy Queen
:> soft-serve ice cream?
:
:This *is* a history ng and the comments refer to (about) 1960. I don't know
:when 'Dairy Queen' hit the streets...

August 4, 1938, in Kankakee, Illinois.  There were over 1400 of them
in 1950 and some 2600 of them by 1955.

So just assume my comment was made in 1960.  It still applies.
John Cartmell - 28 Apr 2004 10:03 GMT
> I think it's actually "Mr Whippy" ice-cream; a sort of ice-cream that's
> very soft. aerated like whipped-cream and extruded into a 'cornet' ( a
> cone) via a star-shaped nozzle by an operator who twists the extruding
> material into a pointy-topped spiral. If you ask nicely and hand over
> the appropriate coins, the operator will stick a crumbly flaky chocolate
> bar into it - the code is "Make that a Ninety-Nine,  Mate!"

> [Etymologists write learned treatise on the derivation of the
> 'ninety-nine' nomenclature - some insist that the bars of chocolate
> flake are 99mm.]

They didn't make mms when 99s first appeared! ;-)

Signature

    John Cartmell    john@ followed by finnybank.com    FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527
    Qercus magazine & FD Games    www.finnybank.com  www.acornuser.com
Qercus - a fusion of Acorn Publisher & Acorn User magazines

Fred J. McCall - 27 Apr 2004 05:11 GMT
:> History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream and
:> cancelling the national schools free milk program...
:
:This may be a simple case of two peoples separated by a common tongue,
:but what is whippy ice cream? It sounds both kinky and decadent...the
:sort of thing to keep feeding Ann Coulter so she won't speak.

Oh, I don't think you'd feed it to her.  Like the Bill Cosby routine
"Tonsils", it sounds more appropriate to smear it ... all over her
body....  ;-)
John Cartmell - 28 Apr 2004 10:02 GMT
> > History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream and
> > cancelling the national schools free milk program...

> This may be a simple case of two peoples separated by a common tongue,
> but what is whippy ice cream? It sounds both kinky and decadent...the
> sort of thing to keep feeding Ann Coulter so she won't speak.

It's plasticised air sold as an alternative to real ice cream. It has no
taste and no food value but because it's not frozen it can be dispensed at
speed in order to maximise profits.

Signature

    John Cartmell    john@ followed by finnybank.com    FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527
    Qercus magazine & FD Games    www.finnybank.com  www.acornuser.com
Qercus - a fusion of Acorn Publisher & Acorn User magazines

William Black - 28 Apr 2004 16:29 GMT
> > > History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream and
> > > cancelling the national schools free milk program...
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> taste and no food value but because it's not frozen it can be dispensed at
> speed in order to maximise profits.

I am led to believe that Mrs Thatcher's contribution is the use of pork fat
as an emulsifying agent.

Signature

William Black
------------------
Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords
is no basis for a system of government

hippo - 27 Apr 2004 00:27 GMT
"Bryn Fraser" wrote in message

> In message hippo writes
> >
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream and
> cancelling the national schools free milk program...

She will naturally prefer the US histories where she will be lionized as the
iron maiden standing in the ruins of the Evil Empire and vast dumps of
broken up nuclear weapons. History usually wants the big picture where the
entire world is effected. Milk cartons do not usually make it into print
unless, of course, it is her wee minded pink-panty-wearing opposition
writing it. It's great pulling your nose again. :^) -the Troll
D. Spencer Hines - 27 Apr 2004 01:11 GMT
The ragamuffin cadre of sorry-arsed Brits -- [which is certainly NOT ALL
the Brits we have here] -- pretty much uniformly Left-Wing and yearning
for a Socialist Britain -- all seem to want to focus on the DOMESTIC
records and accomplishments of their Prime Ministers -- NOT the FOREIGN
POLICY accomplishments.

So, we see this sort of puerile trivia about "whippy ice cream."

It seems to be a matter of how much the PM enlarged the PUBLIC TEAT they
so love to suck on, OR reduced it ---- ergo, that's all they worry
about.

REAL BRITS have other, more important, priorities.

"Look George, this is no time to go wobbly.  We can't fall at the first
fence"-- or words to that effect -- one of Lady Thatcher's greatest
lines.  [3 August 1990 -- to Bush 41]

D. Spencer Hines

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Vires et Honor

| > History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream
| > and cancelling the national schools free milk program...
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
| pink-panty-wearing opposition writing it.  It's great pulling
| your nose again. :^) -the Troll
Bryn Fraser - 27 Apr 2004 07:10 GMT
>"Bryn Fraser" wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>unless, of course, it is her wee minded pink-panty-wearing opposition
>writing it. It's great pulling your nose again. :^) -the Troll

You are far too reasonable for this place... Nice to see you..

*#;-)

Signature

Brian Fraser Lovett-White

http://www.finhall.demon.co.uk
http://thefrasers.com

John Cartmell - 28 Apr 2004 10:00 GMT
> History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream

We once did an analysis at school. Totally without any food value...

Signature

    John Cartmell    john@ followed by finnybank.com    FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527
    Qercus magazine & FD Games    www.finnybank.com  www.acornuser.com
Qercus - a fusion of Acorn Publisher & Acorn User magazines

Bryn Fraser - 28 Apr 2004 10:49 GMT
>> History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream
>
>We once did an analysis at school. Totally without any food value...

AH! But nothing in it to do you any immediate harm!

Signature

Brian Fraser Lovett-White

http://www.finhall.demon.co.uk
http://thefrasers.com

Julian Richards - 28 Apr 2004 11:15 GMT
>> History will no doubt remember her for inventing whippy ice cream
>
>We once did an analysis at school. Totally without any food value...

Many of the rest of the Conservative party are fond of a bit of whippy
as well. How do you condense the film "Seven " into ten minutes? Have
the killer murder a Tory MP.

--

Julian Richards
medieval "at" richardsuk.f9.co.uk

Usenet is how from the comfort of your own living room, you can converse
with people that you would never want in your house.

THIS MESSAGE WAS POSTED FROM SOC.HISTORY.MEDIEVAL
Drew Nicholson - 27 Apr 2004 13:45 GMT
> Chuckle, all you lefties want from government is a big nurturing tit to suck
> on. Instead the majority chose a leader with a brain and guts which were
> both more needed at the time.

Then how did Thatcher and Reagan get into office?  Let me guess -- the
Supreme Court!

Signature

Drew
----
We have an appointment with life in the present moment. If we miss the
present moment, we miss our appointment with life." - Thich Nhat Hanh

Keith Willshaw - 27 Apr 2004 14:27 GMT
> > Chuckle, all you lefties want from government is a big nurturing tit to
> suck
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Then how did Thatcher and Reagan get into office?  Let me guess -- the
> Supreme Court!

A good trick when there is no Supreme Court in the UK

Keith
Andrew Chaplin - 27 Apr 2004 14:48 GMT
> > Then how did Thatcher and Reagan get into office?  Let me guess -- the
> > Supreme Court!
>
> A good trick when there is no Supreme Court in the UK

But there is the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council which serves
as one, does it not?
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)
Keith Willshaw - 27 Apr 2004 16:19 GMT
> > > Then how did Thatcher and Reagan get into office?  Let me guess -- the
> > > Supreme Court!
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> But there is the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council which serves
> as one, does it not?

The Appellate Committee of the House of Lords is
the highest court of appeak in the UK as I recall
and of course has no say in the selection of PM.
The legal fiction is that the first minister is selected
by the Monarch, the reality is that its the leader
of the party which can command a majority in
the commons.

Keith
Andrew Chaplin - 27 Apr 2004 17:21 GMT
> The Appellate Committee of the House of Lords is
> the highest court of appeak in the UK as I recall
> and of course has no say in the selection of PM.

What happened to the JCPC?
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)
Don Aitken - 27 Apr 2004 19:16 GMT
>> The Appellate Committee of the House of Lords is
>> the highest court of appeak in the UK as I recall
>> and of course has no say in the selection of PM.
>
>What happened to the JCPC?

It is still around, but, being a Committee of the Council, it is
debarred, by the legislation of the 1640s which abolished the Star
Chamber, from having any competence, whether by way of appeal or
otherwise, in matters which are tried by the normal courts within the
UK. For what it actually does, see
http://www.privy-council.org.uk/output/Page32.asp

Signature

Don Aitken

Mail to the addresses given in the headers is no longer being
read. To mail me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com".

Andrew Chaplin - 27 Apr 2004 19:41 GMT
> It is still around, but, being a Committee of the Council, it is
> debarred, by the legislation of the 1640s which abolished the Star
> Chamber, from having any competence, whether by way of appeal or
> otherwise, in matters which are tried by the normal courts within the
> UK. For what it actually does, see
> http://www.privy-council.org.uk/output/Page32.asp

Neat. Someone a few weeks back was asking why a Canadian historian would be
interested in AHB. The JCPC was, until 1947 amendments to the Supreme Court
Act, the court of last resort for Canada. Some of its judgements are still
controvertial, notably that of Hankey around 1910 that effectively accepted
the compact view of confederation, while others were sensible slap in the
face for the Canadian establishment, such as the so-called "Persons Case"
that ruled that the SCC had erred when it decided that women were not
persons and could not be appointed to the Senate. These were major
intersects of Canadian and British history that produced impacts still felt
today.
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)
Joe Osman - 29 Apr 2004 17:49 GMT
> >> The Appellate Committee of the House of Lords is
> >> the highest court of appeak in the UK as I recall
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Mail to the addresses given in the headers is no longer being
> read. To mail me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com".

Prize Courts are mentioned at the bottom of the cited page. Does Britain
still have them?

Joe
Don Aitken - 29 Apr 2004 18:45 GMT
[irrelavant groups chopped]

>> >> The Appellate Committee of the House of Lords is
>> >> the highest court of appeak in the UK as I recall
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Prize Courts are mentioned at the bottom of the cited page. Does Britain
>still have them?

I believe that Prize Courts (which apply the international law of the
sea, not English or Scottish law) can sit only during time of formally
declared war. They certainly sat during WWI, and, I think, during WWII
as well. The UK has not been in a state of war since 1945.

Signature

Don Aitken

Mail to the addresses given in the headers is no longer being
read. To mail me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com".

Bryn Fraser - 27 Apr 2004 16:35 GMT
>> > Chuckle, all you lefties want from government is a big nurturing tit to
>> suck
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>A good trick when there is no Supreme Court in the UK

Yet!

Signature

Brian Fraser Lovett-White

http://www.finhall.demon.co.uk
http://thefrasers.com

Julian Richards - 27 Apr 2004 23:02 GMT
>> Chuckle, all you lefties want from government is a big nurturing tit to
>suck
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Then how did Thatcher and Reagan get into office?  Let me guess -- the
>Supreme Court!

The way that democracy really works well is that there is always a
left (of sorts) and a right (of sorts). One is in power until it loses
its way and then it is elected out. It then has to set its house in
order so that it can be re-elected when time is up for its opponents.
Both of the above were elected for the first time when their
opposition got themselves into a muddle. They stayed in power for as
long as they did due to the length of time that it took their
opponents to regroup. In the UK case, at least, the Conservatives were
defeated after quite some time by a radical reform of the Labour
party. For them to regain power, they may well have to reform quite
considerably even from where they are now.

--

Julian Richards
medieval "at" richardsuk.f9.co.uk

Usenet is how from the comfort of your own living room, you can converse
with people that you would never want in your house.

THIS MESSAGE WAS POSTED FROM SOC.HISTORY.MEDIEVAL
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.