 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
History Forum / General / General Topics / January 2006Dots
Maybe Norah O'Donnell isn't a bimbo. If not, let her connect the dots between Bush's repetition of his goal to protect Americans and his letting Rachel Corrie be bulldozed without protest, trying to protect a pharmacist's home. Bush Sr., not Kissinger, played the China card, putting the student facing the tank in Tiananmen Square on the cover of Time. Rachel Corrie was hardly mentioned in Time. Rachel Corrie was no kind of bimbo. Connect the dots. Any objective journalist or historian knows that Bush Sr. played the China card and that Rachel Corrie was what we all should be. www.star.net/silence > Any objective journalist or historian knows that Bush Sr. played the China > card and that Rachel Corrie was what we all should be. So you're suggesting we all should be clumsy, clueless, irrational Useful Idiots and be manipulated by terrorist savages? My aspirations run a bit higher than that. --Ty >> Any objective journalist or historian knows that Bush Sr. played the >> China card and that Rachel Corrie was what we all should be. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > --Ty Apparently not. > "Ty" <tybeardSPAM@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >>> Any objective journalist or historian knows that Bush Sr. played the >>> China card and that Rachel Corrie was what we all should be. >> So you're suggesting we all should be clumsy, clueless, irrational Useful >> Idiots and be manipulated by terrorist savages? >> My aspirations run a bit higher than that. > Apparently not. Well, then please explain to us why we should all be clueless, irrational, clumsy Useful Idiots? --Ty >> "Ty" <tybeardSPAM@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > --Ty You're essentially asking whether I've stopped beating my wife. I'm not married, and you're entirely wrong about Rachel. I'm sorry my generation is separate from hers. Except that she is useful, in many ways. I hope for the best those ways. www.star.net/silence > "Ty" <tybeardSPAM@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >> Well, then please explain to us why we should all be clueless, >> irrational, clumsy Useful Idiots? > You're essentially asking whether I've stopped beating my wife. True. My question assumed facts not in evidence in my post. But I think that the record is pretty clear that she was either stunningly ignorant or that she willfully blinded herself to the fact that she supported murderous Islamist terrorists. And I think her death, while unfortunate, was due to her own negligence and has been cynically manipulated by the terrorists (and their supporters) she so loved. She was, in so many ways, the epitome of the Useful Idiot. Therefore, I see little to admire in her. > Except that she is useful, in many ways. Oh yes. Her death continues to be cynically manipulated by terrorist savages and their supporters. --Ty >> "Ty" <tybeardSPAM@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > --Ty Cynicism originally was open-mindedness, not quitting on hope, not pessimism. All deaths are unfortunate, unless we believe in martyrdom, Christian or not; or unless we believe that hope springs eternal, as perennial flowers tell. She did not try to support terrorists. She tried to support children. That child should have been the pride of every honest parent. The Holy Land is most holy in that it shows our bigotry. Rachel Corrie was neither ignorant nor negligent. She gave her life attending to all she could. But bigots do manipulate her memory. I hope that child springs eternal, as I hope we all shall do www.star.net/silence |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.