History Forum / General / General Topics / May 2006

EVIDENCE OF DNA MANIPULATION IN OUR DISTANT PAST

Forwarded messages:

Forwarded message from "Jagannath Chatterjee" <jagchat01@yahoo.com>

[ Subject: Evidence of DNA manipulation in our distant past.
[ From: "Jagannath Chatterjee" <jagchat01@yahoo.com>
[ Date: Fri, 26 May 2006
   
Chromosome Fusion

Evidence of DNA manipulation in our distant past? Was man
"created"?

(In the Vedas we have it that man was created on the
banks of river Saraswati. - Jagannath)

The Human Genome Project has dished up some real
surprises to scientists. The first surprise was the vast
percentage of the human DNA that is inactive. It is
estimated that at least 97% of our DNA is in actual fact
a waste of space, as it does not contain any active genes
that actually carry the code for any of our physical
makeup. Then within the genes there are Introns - parts
that do not carry any code; and Exons - sections that
carry some sort of genetic code.  The full length of our
DNA is made up of some 20 000 genes that have now been
identified. These genes carry the blueprint for the
structure of our entire body. What is very puzzling is
the fact that Homo sapiens, as the supposed pinnacle if
civilized evolution on this planet, should have such
large parts of unused DNA. We seem to have the longest
DNA molecule among all other species, but we use the
smallest part of it in proportion to the other species.
In other words, all the other creatures use much more of
their DNA than humans do. Some species use as much as 98%
of their DNA.

This flies directly in the face of the principles of
evolution. Humans should have the most complex and
evolved DNA of all creatures, to have reached levels of
civilization seemingly much higher than any other species
on Earth over millions of years of evolution. What is
even more curious is the predicted number of genes in
species. The numbers seem to increase steadily from basic
organisms to the most advanced. We would expect that
humans should end up having most genes, but strangely
this is not the case. Here are some examples of the
predictions for total number of genes in species. Fruit
Fly 21 000; Zebrafish 50 000; Chicken 76 000; Mouse 81
000; Chimp 130 000; Human 68 000.

Can you see the problem here? The Chimp is our closest
know genetic relative and yet it has almost twice as many
genes as humans. And then we get to the anomaly of the
chromosomes. Our DNA is broken up into 23 pairs of
chromosomes. By comparison, all apes have 24 pairs. One
would expect that Homo erectus, our immediate
evolutionary precursor would then also have had 24
chromosome pairs.

Just one year ago on 6 April 2005, researchers from the
National Human Genome Research Institute announced that
"A detailed analysis of chromosomes 2 and 4 has detected
the largest "gene deserts" known in the human genome and
uncovered more evidence that human chromosome 2 arose
from the fusion of two ancestral ape chromosomes" as
reported in Nature. It is also the second largest
chromosome we possess and it seems to make no sense why 2
primordial chromosomes should have merged to make us
human, if this new chromosome gives us no apparent
advantage for survival.

So when we read in the Sumerian tablets that humans were
cloned as a sub-species between Homo erectus and a more
advanced human-like species that arrived on Earth some
400 000 years ago, it suddenly makes a little bit more
sense. The tablets describe how our maker removed certain
parts of the "Tree of life" to trim the ability of the
new "creature" and how they struggled to make the perfect
"primitive worker" so that it could understand commands
but not be too smart to question their existence. Similar
suggestions of genetic cloning are made in The Koran and
Hindu Laws of Manu.  

Laws of Manu:

o  19. But from minute body (-framing) particles of
these seven very powerful Purushas springs this (world),
the perishable from the imperishable.

o  20. Among them each succeeding (element) acquires the
quality of the preceding one, and whatever place (in the
sequence) each of them occupies, even so many qualities
it is declared to possess.

The Koran:

o  Ya Sin: "Is man not aware that We created him from a
little germ?"

o  The Believers - God says almost verbatim what the
Sumerian tablets tell us. "We first created man from an
essence of clay; then placed him a living germ in a
secure enclosure. The germ we made a clot of blood, and
the clot a lump of flesh. This we fashioned into bones,
then clothed the bones with flesh..."

Notice the reference to "We" by the creator. The cloning
of humans as a more primitive worker or "lulu amelu"
suddenly does not seem so far fetched and the strange
genetic anomalies seem to support some genetic
manipulation in our distant past. The modern-day
researchers go further to say that this "fusion" of our
chromosome 2 is what makes us human.

Are we getting closer to proving that humans were created
by his MAKER? It certainly seems like it.

Michael Tellinger.
2006.

  "Our ideal is not the spirituality that withdraws from
  life but the conquest of life by the power of the
  spirit." -  Aurobindo.

End of forwarded message from "Jagannath Chatterjee" <jagchat01@yahoo.com>

- - - - - - -

Forwarded message from "atsingh" <atsingh@yahoo.com>

[ Subject: Re: Evidence of DNA manipulation in our distant past.
[ From: "atsingh" <atsingh@yahoo.com>
[ Date: Fri, 26 May 2006
   
What is the source of this article ??

End of forwarded message from "atsingh" <atsingh@yahoo.com>

- - - - - - -

Forwarded message from "S.Kalyanaraman" <kalyan97@gmail.com>

[ Subject: Re: Evidence of DNA manipulation in our distant past.
[ From: "S.Kalyanaraman" <kalyan97@gmail.com>
[ Date: Sat, 27 May 2006

The source is: http://tinyurl.com/o77yf

But, there is a more detailed article, excerpted below on
Chromosome 2.

Conclusion

The evidence that human chromosome 2 is a fusion of two
of the common ancestor's chromosomes is overwhelming.

Human Chromosome 2 is a fusion of two ancestral
chromosomes

Alec MacAndrew

Introduction

All great apes apart from man have 24 pairs of
chromosomes. There is therefore a hypothesis that the
common ancestor of all great apes had 24 pairs of
chromosomes and that the fusion of two of the ancestor's
chromosomes created chromosome 2 in humans. The evidence
for this hypothesis is very strong.

The Evidence

Evidence for fusing of two ancestral chromosomes to
create human chromosome 2 and where there has been no
fusion in other Great Apes is:

1)  The analogous chromosomes (2p and 2q) in the non-
human great apes can be shown, when laid end to end, to
create an identical banding structure to the human
chromosome 2. (1)

2) The remains of the sequence that the chromosome has on
its ends (the telomere) is found in the middle of human
chromosome 2 where the ancestral chromosomes fused. (2)

3) the detail of this region (pre-telomeric sequence,
telomeric sequence, reversed telomeric sequence, pre-
telomeric sequence) is exactly what we would expect from
a fusion. (3)

4) this telomeric region is exactly where one would
expect to find it if a fusion had occurred in the middle
of human chromosome 2.

5) the centromere of human chromosome 2 lines up with the
chimp chromosome 2p chromosomal centromere.

6) At the place where we would expect it on the human
chromosome we find the remnants of the chimp 2q
centromere (4).

Not only is this strong evidence for a fusion event, but
it is also strong evidence for common ancestry; in fact,
it is hard to explain by any other mechanism.

http://www.evolutionpages.com/chromosome_2.htm

End of forwarded message from "S.Kalyanaraman" <kalyan97@gmail.com>

End of forwarded messages

Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/a5ljc
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

    o  Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
    o  If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
    o  Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to:  http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.