Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / General Topics / August 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

FBI says Osama Innocent of 9-11

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kilgore - 11 Jul 2006 05:53 GMT
Like most Americans when it first happened, I accepted the generic
vanilla explanation of 9-11. Osamam  Bin Ladin and some cooky Ayrabs did
it. Our FBI doesnt believe this. Osama is not wanted for 9-11. THEY CANT
f.cking PROVE IT! What a  laugh. I always knew that the whole thing was
bull. The fire that never goes out. The Bldg 7 that collapses even tho
it is never hit. Silverstein and his insurance policys.There is
something rotten in Manhattan. This isnt conspiracy stuff. Go to the FBI
most wanted page..Look and see what Osama is wanted for. If he didnt do
it ; then what the hell were we doing running around Afghanistan??And
Godonlyknows where they got the idea that secular Muslims like Sadaam
would pass the time of day with zealots. The Iraq connection never made
sense to anyone over the age of ten. I dotncare what you"knew" etc. It
was stoopid. Just like Georgie. Only a crackhead would accept that logic
. Ifd Osama is innocent of 9-11...who did it??
Moussauia(spelling?)That yoyo. He couldnt organize a pizza order with
enough left for a tip. He didnt know sh.t. He was a fall guy. ANd to
think that these bloodthirsty housewives were calling for his blood.
What nice people we have become. I tend to think that this operation
involved planning and organization on a professional level. SOmeone who
is comfortable in the middle east. Has connections, speaks the
languages.(The US Army hasnt yet been able to train one GD unit that
speaks Arabic. WHat morons. Just something I read. I still thought Osama
was being blamed for it, even tho I long ago figured it was a railroad job.
Signature

"All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed,
 second it is violently opposed,  &
  third, it is accepted as self-evident."

- Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher, 1788-1860

Robert Cohen - 11 Jul 2006 14:23 GMT
You're rattling cages & baiting.

While:

I suppose It's okay to try to de-construct what an establishment claims
as inviolate truth.

The internet is full of such off-the-wall fodder.

Our terrific
vehicle of anonymity allows anybody to post anything.

The legalities & customs here in 2006 are in their infancy.

The newspaper of a few generation ago were often sleazey tabloid
cockomanie
medicine-peddling sheets.

C'est la vie.

C'est la morte

C'est la absurdite

There is  thus a sort of absurdist-reductive
Gresham law or phenomenon of the internet.

Good-faith postings (all of mine, of course)
are seemingly being
diminished by horse-appleries.

So, a
faint-praise by damnation
cliche is: "I read it on the interenet."

Given the above caveat qualifier:

Osama acknowledges 9-11 as
his handiwork on widely circulated AL JAZEERA TV
& internet
video & audio more than once.

He does not disclaim/de-claim 9-11.

Those that continue to debunk
his fully claimed
masterpiece of infamy:

Are merely
playing with history--and there are certainly rightful places for
semi-terrific mockingnesses.

The degrees of
credibility & credence of the internet are
(should be) understood on the basis of its democratic wide-open medium,
&
satire is as young as classical
Greece, isn't it?

Analogy to illustrate what I'm trying to put forth:

THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION is thought to have originally been
a French author's satire: A 19th century semi-cloisterd monk playing
with himself.

The Czar's helpers allegedly revise it
for obvious purposes.

Henry Ford
cranked it out like so many P Models in the DEARBORN INDEPENDENT.

H luved it so much that he almost won WW II utilizing it as a major
part of
his rationale/rationalism--as I pointed-out to alt. philosophy a few
months ago with little to
no support from the philosophy
n.g. ,
because they just could not
bring themselves to openly acknowledge that folks  were reasoned with
by the demagogic method.

To conclusde another long note:

THANKS to the Pentagon and Al Gore, you're allowed to play the schnook
role, and I'm allowed to obsess with my posting compulsions such as
taking your bait about exculpating bin Laden.

> Like most Americans when it first happened, I accepted the generic
> vanilla explanation of 9-11. Osamam  Bin Ladin and some cooky Ayrabs did
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> - Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher, 1788-1860
kilgore trout - 29 Aug 2006 04:59 GMT
> You're rattling cages & baiting.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> The legalities & customs here in 2006 are in their infancy.

Yes I grant you that. Been awhile since Ive been on this machine or I
woulda answered to this earlier. Did I lie?? Is he wanted for the
bombing??I thought it was carved in stone too. But what was the deal
with Iraq? And now it seems Israel is about to have a calf for us to
beat up Iran for them. And we aint got the resources. If we are gonna
give the Jooze 6Billion a year....Look at FBI most wanted tho. Godknows
you shouldnt take my word for nothing. If they had any proof at all,
they would charge him. Why do you just suck up all the drivel that AIles
and Murdoch pump out. I predicted that JonBenet thing was a hoax too. As
well as the London liquid bombs. Look its unsettling to me, to be RIGHT
all the time. I always hoped that the world was run by people who were
at least smarter than me. Now Im startin' to wonder if they are smarter
than my Pizza Delievry Driver. At least he knows what he's doing.
Robert Cohen - 29 Aug 2006 17:21 GMT
To sort of support/reinforce
your cynical, warped, semi-preposterous
pov, see a recent Mike Luckovich political cartoon, which I'll try to
link here.

Luckovich can be so biting & humorous simultaneously that NEWSWEEK will
probably also re-publish the cartoon I recall.

So far as the Jooze:

Well, some of my best friends are drinkers, but I wouldn't want my
daughter to ...

www.ajc.com

> > You're rattling cages & baiting.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> at least smarter than me. Now Im startin' to wonder if they are smarter
> than my Pizza Delievry Driver. At least he knows what he's doing.
Robert Cohen - 29 Aug 2006 17:35 GMT
Damneit, I can't find the particular cartoon, and so the one I was
thinking of may not be a Luckovich work afterall. Maybe a Mike
Peters...name your favorites.

Hey, when ya get this oldddd, bad memory & shite happen.

> To sort of support/reinforce
> your cynical, warped, semi-preposterous
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> > at least smarter than me. Now Im startin' to wonder if they are smarter
> > than my Pizza Delievry Driver. At least he knows what he's doing.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.