Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / General Topics / September 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

A Better Mousetrap?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Toady Lickspittle - 24 Aug 2007 18:40 GMT
In Robert Campin's Annunciation Tryptich, also called
the Merode Alterpiece Joseph is seen working near a mousetrap
(click it to zoom), but I cannot see how it works merely by
looking at his picture. Any ideas how it functioned? It's on
the table next to his right elbow:

http://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/images/arth_214images/Campin/Merode_r
ight.jpg


http://tinyurl.com/yvf7lb

Accompanying text:

http://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/arth214_folder/campin.html
Scaly Lizard - 25 Aug 2007 10:12 GMT
>In Robert Campin's Annunciation Tryptich, also called
>the Merode Alterpiece Joseph is seen working near a mousetrap
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>http://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/images/arth_214images/Campin/Merode_r
ight.jpg

Hi Toady,

It's difficult to see in the small picture online, but there are
two mousetraps in the picture: the one on the table is 'armed'
and the one on the windowsill in the background is 'at rest'.  

How do they work?  I could draw this to show you, much
easier than trying to describe it with words, but here's how
they worked:  

What's difficult to see about the one on the table is that
there is a slab extending at a downward slope, almost
directly away from the viewer, from the upraised crossbar
to the rear edge of the base of the contraption.  Campin's
technique renders the slab almost invisible, and one wonders
whether he did it to prove his mastery of perspective, or to
theologically minimize the importance of the device's lethal
purpose, since it obviously represents Jesus.  

The slab would have been brick or stone in these models,
because they are not very thick.  If it was wooden, it would
be much larger to get the necessary weight, heavy enough
to crush a mouse.  

Between the upright arms which support the crossbar, a pin
is inserted to support the slab.  The lower end of the pin rests
on a movable piece of wood directly below the crossbar.  
The skill factor comes into play here.  The lower sill must
contact the trigger, but also be free to move.  Then you
must try to balance the pin on top of it as precariously as
you can, while still supporting the weight of the slab.  

The ridge you see along the base serves two purposes.  
First, it helps to stabilize the slab when setting the trap.  
Second, it provides another few milliseconds of indecision
in the mouse's brain, greatly improving the trap's value.  

Below the loose piece of wood, a curved piece is inserted
with the ends pointing upwards... one end thick and the
other one, thinner and pointy, on the inside of the trap.  
This is the trigger.  

What looks like a keyhole in the base in your image is actually
the left edge of the thicker end of this curved piece, facing
outward.  Campin was pretty good at perspective, but he still
had issues with visualizing light sources.  The leftmost panel
in this triptych has a shadow pattern with the light emanating
from the central panel, the Annunciation.  

The rightmost panel of Joseph has two light sources: an
emanation from the central panel as reflected in the tools,
and another source from the open shutters.  For his reasons,
Campin chose to shadow everything above the mousetrap
as illuminated by the windows.  So what did he do at the
border between these two light sources?  He places the
main mousetrap and a small bowl.  Follow that horizontal
line across Joseph's chest.  Everything above is lit by
window, everything below is lit by the Annunciation.  

The bowl and his clothes are smoothly lit from both lights,
but the mousetrap is lit unevenly, with some parts reflecting
only from the windows, and other parts only reflecting light
from the central panel.  The face of the mousetrap's base
which shows towards the viewer is shadowed by light
through the windows, but the higher crossbar is shadowed
as if lit from the central panel of the triptych.  

This is why it looks like there is a hole in the base of the
trap.  Rather, this is the thick end of the curved trigger,
with a mistake in shadowing, either unintended by Campin
or by design to emphasize the mysticality of the device.  

The pointy end of the trigger is behind the pin in this image,
directly under the slab.  The pointy end is to secure the bait,
to make the mouse work hard to get it.  It's curved to ensure
that moving the thinner end will disturb the thicker end.  

The idea is that when jostling the bait, the mouse jiggles
the curved piece, which then dislodges the free piece of
wood supporting the lower end of the pin.  As soon as
that moves, the pin flies out and the slab comes down,
crushing the mouse.  

Why is the trigger curved?  So it doesn't break when the
slab crashes down, and also to minimize the space it allows
between the slab and the base.  The outward end pivots
upward when the slab crashes down, so you don't have
to replace the trigger every time you smoosh a rodent.  

The pin has an eyelet at the top to attach a string.  
When the trap springs, the pin will fly out.  If you don't
want to spend fifteen minutes fishing the pin out from
under a cupboard, you tie a string to it.  In fact, this
design won't work if a string is not suspending the
pin from above.  As the slab comes down, it pushes
the string outward, ensuring that the pin flies outward.  

Without a string, or with a string attached to any other
place, the pin will fall inwards half the time, allowing the
mouse some wiggle room and a half-caught mouse will
have a chance to survive.  

This is why the upright arms and crossbar are
necessary: the pin must fly outwards or it's now
a mousescarer, not a mousetrapper.  

Why is the base sloped in a wedge shape?  That
decreases the distance the slab must travel, and
so decreases the time that an alert mouse has to
escape.  It's a game of milliseconds.  

For the same reason, the triggers on both mousetraps
in this image are on the right side of the mechanism.  
It was meant to be placed along a wall with the trigger
close in, blocking off the victim's quickest exit route.  

This website has a short video of a similar mousetrap
in operation.  This one uses a brick as the slab, and
clearly has forgotten some useful design elements
which the Dutch knew about in the early 1400's...  

http://youtube.com/watch?v=HmvMEyyStYM

As for the explanation of the presence of a mousetrap in
Joseph's workshop, the page you link to does a good job
of relating Joseph's religious role in producing God's Cosmic
Deviltrap.  But this image is full of other double-meanings...  

The upper mousetrap (outside the house) is already sprung
and the one on the table is ready to go.  This expresses the
idea that Jesus is forever protecting the faithful, but mankind
must toil to keep their spiritual defenses ready.  This attitude
was a key philosophy in the European executions of witches
at the time it was painted.  

Note Campin's crafty use of perspective in placing the
mousetrap on the windowsill... look just above it and see
the relative size of the people in the city square.  The
mousetrap would be the size of a gallows sitting in the
square, and Campin has adjusted the position of the
upright arms and crossbar to reinforce this impression.  

The theological double-entendre is clear.  The same trap
that snares the devil is also the basis for justice in a good
god-fearing society.  What undoes the devil also spells
doom for the townsfolk who the devil himself has snared.  

Remember the string hanging down on the upper mousetrap?  
As a gallows, this is the noose.  As a mousetrap, this is the
technological innovation that ensures the mouse's demise.  
The two meanings are that man's laws reflect god's laws,
and that mankind is expected to fight the devil, using Jesus
(the vigilant mousetrap on the table) as an example.  

Joseph is making a sieve, but over the arm of his bench, not
on the table next to the mousetrap.  Thus leaning to his left,
Joseph is out of the arc of the shutters precariously suspended
from the ceiling.  If the shutter (slab?) above him should fall,
Joseph is safe.  The double-entendre about Joseph's posture
is that divine protection is bestowed to Joseph because he is
making an object which separates the good from the bad...
and that he is blessed because he separates his pious work
on God's Cosmic Mousetrap from his daily carpentry tasks.  

I know it sounds goofy, but in the early 1400's this was meaty
stuff!  In those days, all European art was religious.  The only
measure of creative expression a Dutch artist of the early
1400's could show was in the level of cleverness he could
inject while depicting biblical scenes.  

Hope that answers your question about the trap (and the painting)  

SL
Toady Lickspittle - 27 Aug 2007 17:13 GMT
>Hope that answers your question about the trap (and the painting)  

Great stuff, thanks! The You Tube video was interesting as
well. Still difficult to see how such a small device could have
the necessary oomph to kill the intruding beastie, but it does
seem it must have worked for them way back when.

At risk of wearing out my welcome, you seem quite well
versed in techniques of the Old Masters, so perhaps I can
pose another query. Did fingers pointing upward have some
sort of significance other than the obvious one of Heaven?

http://cgfa.sunsite.dk/vinci/p-vinci1.htm

http://cgfa.sunsite.dk/eyck/p-eyck8.htm

http://www.nga.gov/cgi-bin/pimage?45853+0+0

http://www.philipresheph.com/demodokos/helen/pic24.htm

http://www.philipresheph.com/demodokos/helen/pic42.htm

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6496/2150/1600/blake.4.jpg

http://www.wga.hu/frames-e.html?/html/p/parmigia/v_jerome.html

http://www.colours-art-publishers.com/prod1691.htm

http://www.wga.hu/frames-e.html?/html/c/correggi/noli_me.html

http://www.artchive.com/artchive/L/leonardo/lastsupp.jpg.html (image
viewer enlarges)

http://www.artchive.com/artchive/R/raphael/raphael_athens_plato.jpg.html

Even the trees are doing it!

http://www.nga.gov/cgi-bin/pimage?300+0+0

Toady
Scaly Lizard - 28 Aug 2007 07:49 GMT
>>Hope that answers your question about the trap (and the painting)  
>
>Great stuff, thanks! The You Tube video was interesting as
>well. Still difficult to see how such a small device could have
>the necessary oomph to kill the intruding beastie, but it does
>seem it must have worked for them way back when.

The crushing blow doesn't always have to be lethal for
the trap to work.  

Mice are tough critters, but will asphyxiate even if they
survive the slab smacking down.  Similarly, if caught by
the tail, a mouse will be finished off by the next cat, dog,
or person who comes by.  

>At risk of wearing out my welcome, you seem quite well
>versed in techniques of the Old Masters, so perhaps I can
>pose another query.

Don't worry about taking up my time, it's still a week before
i'm back to the grind.  By the way, interesting q's.  Are you
building a lesson plan for Fall students?  

>Did fingers pointing upward have some >sort of significance
>other than the obvious one of Heaven?
<snipt links>
>Even the trees are doing it!
> http://www.nga.gov/cgi-bin/pimage?300+0+0
>
>Toady

Errg, there are ten "yes" answers, but at the end of the
day the answer is "no," because they all boil down to
some facet of spirituality... so the gesture in western art
always means some sort of reference to heaven.  

Nice assortment of links, many finger-pointers.  St. Jerome,
various angels, apostles and of course Hermes in the
Judgement Of Paris.  Hermes almost always points up.  

The images you refer to are from the late medieval and
the renaissance, but the tradition of the "We're Number
One" pose has longer history in western art than that.  
Check out these Ravenna mosaics from 1,000 years
earlier:  

http://www.hp.uab.edu/image_archive/ulj/mosaic10.jpg
http://www.hp.uab.edu/image_archive/ulj/mosaic11.jpg

Two fingers pointed up meant the same thing as one
in the renaissance, and the inclusion of the middle
finger might have been a sign of respect towards
heaven, since pointing a single index finger at things
was a common feature of persistent pagan-based
traditions and superstitions.  

Dogma is that the index finger pointed up is instruction
to the viewer, to turn to god for salvation.  Noveau
conspiracy theories claim that the pose is used by
certain artists to reflect a heretical christian belief, pick
your favorite one from a whole spectrum of heresies.  

Other theories say that outright pagan beliefs prospered
in Europe, and offer the ancient origins of the pose as
evidence.  And still more theories propose that the index
finger pointing up recalls an erect penis, or forms the
letter "J" with the thumb.  Obviously, when one has a
real letter to work with, this hand pose can be linked to
any word which has ever started with the letter "J" and
the possibilities are only as bounded as the feverish
investigator's imagination.  

The truth is more mundane.  An extended index finger
symbolically names an object, and makes it part of the
pointer's version of reality.  In many cultures today,
pointing at another person is forbidden, for fear of black
magic.  In the Far East, pointing your fingers (or your
chopsticks) at another person is a bad insult.  

Even today in the US, you still hear a parent admonishing
their child for pointing at another person with index finger,
and the anti-pointing custom survives in common games
and local slangs.  Pointing at people was forbidden in
most European cultures until just the last century.  

In general theological sense, the upward finger has
meant 'heaven' for all of recorded history.  The tower
of Babel aimed high for divine knowledge, as did
Daedalus.  Smoke from offerings and volcanos went
up.  Gods routinely lived high in mountains, from Sinai
to Olympus, to Etna and Valhalla.  

Bottom line: Up means Heaven.  Pointing up means
calling out a connection between heaven and earth
in the form of the one who is pointing.  In classical art,
Hermes and Mercury point upwards because they are
the Greek and Roman expressions of communication
between the gods and people.  

Simple physical factors may have reinforced this custom.  
At sea, electrostatic forces cause St. Elmo's Fire to
appear at the tops of masts, recognized long before
there was an Elmo.  A similar phenomenon can occur
on the tops of trees on land.  When conditions are just
right before a lightning storm, an electrostatic halo of
light can even be produced by a person holding one
finger high in the air in a clearing.  Unfortunately, this
means the person is likely to get struck by a bolt soon,
so don't try it.  

The tales about secret symbolism are entertaining, but
pointing to the sky is one of those gestures which has
survived unchanged from ancient times right into modern
screenplays.  Other hand poses survived unchanged
from ancient times too: joined hands in front of heart or
face always means "pray".  Hands at belly-level, palms
up and tilted inwards always means "please help".  

In late medieval and renaissance art, the pose means
the same thing it meant throughout the early medieval,
classical and ancient worlds:

1.  The pointer is in heaven, or
2.  The pointer plans to go to heaven, or
3.  The pointer is in contact with heaven, or
4.  The pointer wants the viewer to think more about heaven.  

SL
Toady Lickspittle - 28 Aug 2007 22:00 GMT
>Don't worry about taking up my time, it's still a week before
>i'm back to the grind.  By the way, interesting q's.  Are you
>building a lesson plan for Fall students?  

Nah, I just following up on some things that have caused me to scratch
my head when I first saw them. Consequently, I always have a slew of
little pieces of paper scattered about with cryptic notes on them.

I feel sure there are tons of 'private jokes' out there from ancient
masters that I am missing. Like the collection of lost proverbs being
illustrated in Brueghel's pieces, for example.

http://www.answers.com/topic/netherlandish-proverbs

I have been studying Jan Steen's works for a couple of weeks now -
fascinating stuff! Still, I just know there are hidden meanings in
many of them that I will never discover. Broken tobacco pipes, egg
shells, baskets full of crutches and other oddities hanging from
ceilings, where the meanings have not survived the centuries. A couple
of works show games of 'skittles' where a ball is being rolled at a
series of pins, much like bowling today. But I can see there are only
nine pins and in the shape of a diamond (like the nine-ball pool
game), and it would appear almost impossible to achieve a 'strike'
with such a set up.

One also sees such things as a half-peeled lemon:

http://cgfa.sunsite.dk/steen/p-steen11.htm

The oysters were probably suggestive of debauchery, as they are today,
but the lemon is a mystery. That has got to be Jan himself sitting
next to the fireplace, chortling at us from history. Looks like a game
of backgammon going on through the open doorway, and for some reason
Steen's characters are always holding their wineglasses by the bottom
part of the stem. Could be a meaning there; could be it just keeps the
wine cooler. Dunno. The painting above the fireplace is suggestive of
something, but I cannot place it.

And what about the 'sawhorse' looking thingee in the one below? On the
top of the building at the center of the picture where the woman is
looking out of her doorway:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Jan_Steen_Peasants_before_an_Inn.jpg

Perhaps the vines are growing to/from it? Dunno.
Scaly Lizard - 05 Sep 2007 07:34 GMT
>>Don't worry about taking up my time, it's still a week before
>>i'm back to the grind.  By the way, interesting q's.  Are you
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>my head when I first saw them. Consequently, I always have a slew of
>little pieces of paper scattered about with cryptic notes on them.

Ha!  The one single thing i hate about LCD flatpanel
monitors is that there's nowhere to stick a postit.  

>I feel sure there are tons of 'private jokes' out there from ancient
>masters that I am missing. Like the collection of lost proverbs being
>illustrated in Brueghel's pieces, for example.
>http://www.answers.com/topic/netherlandish-proverbs

The written word is the only source to clear that matter up.  
Verbal colloquialisms only live as long as people.  Most
Americans would not know what you meant by "bee's
knees" today, although the phrase was in common use
only 50 years ago.  50 years from now, an early modern
work of art or design might be appreciated, but they might
be baffled about why the piece emphasizes the knees of
a bee.  

>I have been studying Jan Steen's works for a couple of weeks now -
>fascinating stuff! Still, I just know there are hidden meanings in
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>http://cgfa.sunsite.dk/steen/p-steen11.htm

Looks like an orange, and may be peeled as an air-freshener.  
Today, we only use the meat or juice of citrus fruits, but they
were highly prized in past centuries because of their aromatic
skin.  As spices slowly became more available in Europe, a
useful technique for perfuming a room was to stick whole
clove stalks into an orange, set it on a plate, then let it
decompose for a few weeks.  It really does work.  

The thing near the citrus fruit in question is a dog, who we
know will not eat it.  The open window shows leafed trees,
so it's sometime from April to September.  In the main room,
the kavalier is being pampered by a servant shucking
oysters and a comely maid offering wine.  A boy refills a
wine flask, two goblets sit on the floor behind him, and
two men play a boardgame in the aft room.  

On the main table, draped by a carpet, there is no meat.  
Bread has been barely nibbled, but there is an empty
serving platter under the maid's outstretched arm.  Just
to drive the point home, an empty oystershell occupies
the foreground on that corner of the table.  

>The oysters were probably suggestive of debauchery, as they are today,
>but the lemon is a mystery. That has got to be Jan himself sitting
>next to the fireplace, chortling at us from history.

Sure he's chortling... he's drunk.  The forescene is all
about excess.  He looks drunk, he's getting a drink, and
a full new pitcher of wine is being prepared for him.  He
is holding his utensil horizontally, suggesting that he has
an oyster on it right now, a fresh one is being shucked
for him, and the room is littered with evidence that a large
oysterfeast has already occurred.  

Also note that the nude female in the art above the hearth
is exactly above the servingmaid, perfectly balancing the
godess's billowing veil with the wench's outstretched hand.  

The only message i see is "eat, drink, and be merry with the
serving girl."  

>Looks like a game of backgammon going on through the open doorway,

I can't see that it's backgammon, but it is obviously a gaming
table of some sort.  It just adds to the forescene, saying that
the kavalier at the heart of the action has every bachelor's
dream: wenches, wine, and buddies to fire up the Playstation
with.  

>and for some reason Steen's characters are always holding their
>wineglasses by the bottom part of the stem. Could be a meaning there;
>could be it just keeps the wine cooler. Dunno.

No hidden meaning there; it's just proper serving form.  Obviously
this doesn't matter if wine is not served at the correct temperature,
but the best practice is to serve a glass while grasping the base,
so the recipient can grasp it by the stem.  Holding a wineglass by
the stem keeps heat from the hand away from the liquid.  After all,
that's why the stemmed glass was invented.  

That's what our serving maid is doing here, offering the glass by
holding the base.  It just reinforces the effect: the kavalier doesn't
just have everything, he has the *best* of everything.  His wenches
know polite maneuvers, he eats oysters not mutton, and his buddies
clear out to the gameroom when he wants to have his fun.  

>The painting above the fireplace is suggestive of something,
>but I cannot place it.

Yeah, i'm having trouble placing that image too.  Could be
Diana, associated with the moon and stretching a crescent
moon into a bow since Diana is also goddess of the hunt.  
As strange as it is to say, I seem to recall seeing a similar
figure as a hood ornament on an antique automobile.  

>And what about the 'sawhorse' looking thingee in the one below? On the
>top of the building at the center of the picture where the woman is
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Perhaps the vines are growing to/from it? Dunno.

I have absolutely no idea.  And look at the spike at the
rightmost peak of the roof.  This is 1653, so it can't be
a lightning rod, can it?  My guess would be a local
tradition/superstition caught Steen's eye.  The vines
are clearly not suspended from it, but have grown
towards it.  Perhaps it's a perch for birds, to discourage
them from building nests in the eaves?  

SL
Toady Lickspittle - 06 Sep 2007 22:42 GMT
>>The painting above the fireplace ...

Thanks again for an enlightening response. Just guessing
on the painting, but it looks enough like the one below to
be a good guess. One can assume Steen was familiar with
it, given the date of c. 1615:

http://www.insecula.com/us/oeuvre/photo_ME0000059214.html

And the theme of easy come easy go fits as well.
Scaly Lizard - 07 Sep 2007 06:15 GMT
>>>The painting above the fireplace ...
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>And the theme of easy come easy go fits as well.

You're right, that's Fortuna/Tyche in the Steen.  In the
Francken, it's clearly her, posed on a ball and even without
a cornucopia, she's shooting abundance right out of her
hand, which is bizarre.  No rudder, no wheel, but the
billowed cloth might be a sail, filling the allegorical role of
Tyche's usual rudder: let the sea carry you where it will.  

In the Steen, she might be standing on a ball, with one
foot higher on something that might be a gaming die with
the face of 5 showing.  This would also make sense for
Tyche, but the biggest clue is the pose and billowed cloth,
identical to Francken's impression of Tyche 40-something
years earlier.  

Interesting that Steen's dog shows up in almost all of his
work, sometimes as the comic relief and other times as
the only sober thing in the scene.  

SL
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.