Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / General Topics / February 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The BLOOD SPORT: Expect Obama to get Swift Boated big time

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TheReturnoftheROMAN - 23 Feb 2008 19:39 GMT
Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
normal. Look for Obama to get savaged! Politics is the most dirty game
in the world and Obama will be introduced to this like never before.
Just as the liberal press will turn on McCain.
SgtMinor - 23 Feb 2008 19:54 GMT
> Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
> make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
> normal. Look for Obama to get savaged! Politics is the most dirty game
> in the world and Obama will be introduced to this like never before.
> Just as the liberal press will turn on McCain.

Where does one find "the liberal press?"
PerfectlyAble - 23 Feb 2008 20:03 GMT
> > Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
> > make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Where does one find "the liberal press?"

Obama, another Man in the White House.
Casual D - 23 Feb 2008 22:37 GMT
Obama a man??

Not... We'll be sending a boy to do a mans job...

>> > Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
>> > make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Obama, another Man in the White House.
Sid9 - 23 Feb 2008 23:16 GMT
331 days and...

The next president ....

will not be a WASP
will not be Southerner
will not be a Republican

will be self made
will be Magna Cum Laude...

Will not have been given a free ride at the Navel Academy
Will not have graduated fifth from the bottom of the class
Will not have been promoted through political pull
Will not have a short fuse and his finger on the trigger
Will not have been a hypocrite regarding lobbyists
Will not have been part of the S & L scandal

> Obama a man??
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>> Obama, another Man in the White House.
FDR - 23 Feb 2008 20:17 GMT
>> Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
>> make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Where does one find "the liberal press?"

In the big book of myths.
explorer - 23 Feb 2008 20:31 GMT
>> Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
>> make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Where does one find "the liberal press?"

From what I've been able to decipher -- the 'liberal press' is anything that
isn't Faux News.

Did you know Faux News tried to branch into the UK and regulators would not
license them because they did not meet the basic requirements for a 'news
organisation'.  They were ruled to be propaganda programming and were turned
down flat.
Jim E - 23 Feb 2008 20:53 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> 'news organisation'.  They were ruled to be propaganda programming and
> were turned down flat.

So, what else would you expect from a socialist government?

               Jim E
Docky Wocky - 23 Feb 2008 22:06 GMT
explorer sez:

"Did you know Faux News tried to branch into the UK and regulators would not
license them because they did not meet the basic requirements for a 'news
organisation'.  They were ruled to be propaganda programming and were turned
down flat..."
_____________________
By regulators, you mean BBC?

No wonder.

There is only room for one propaganda outfit in merrry old, and they have
had the exclusive rights for half a century or more.
yD - 24 Feb 2008 22:45 GMT
> >> Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
> >> make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> organisation'.  They were ruled to be propaganda programming and were turned
> down flat.

Murdoch has Sky News in the UK, he doesn't need Fox over there.
yD
Jim E - 23 Feb 2008 20:52 GMT
>> Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
>> make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Where does one find "the liberal press?"

Any TV network, or the print media.

           Jim E
Dano - 23 Feb 2008 21:05 GMT
>>> Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
>>> make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Any TV network, or the print media.

You guys must get over the persecution complex.  This current administration
has gotten away with murder...literally.  The *media* have rolled over big
time for you right wingers.  It's actually quite disgraceful.  They're all
about ratings and commercial dollars now.  More entertainment news than hard
news today.  You must be young if you think they've been tough on
Republicans.  Have you forgotten the savage treatment of Clinton?  They made
far more of a damn blow job than Bush raping the Constitution and wiping his
a.s with it.
Justin Pate - 24 Feb 2008 03:51 GMT
> > Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
> > make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Where does one find "the liberal press?"

ABC, NBC, CBS News divisions.  Just to name a few.
explorer - 24 Feb 2008 04:22 GMT
>> > Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
>> > make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> ABC, NBC, CBS News divisions.  Just to name a few.

BWAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!!
feloniousmouse@aol.com - 25 Feb 2008 18:11 GMT
On Feb 23, 11:54 am, SgtMinor <Sa...@the.old.folks.home.invalid>
wrote:
> > Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
> > make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Where does one find "the liberal press?"

Every channel but FNC basically. Try not to cry :)
Sid9 - 25 Feb 2008 18:39 GMT
> On Feb 23, 11:54 am, SgtMinor <Sa...@the.old.folks.home.invalid>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Every channel but FNC basically. Try not to cry :)

Calumny!
WQ - 23 Feb 2008 20:02 GMT
> Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
> make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
> normal. Look for Obama to get savaged! Politics is the most dirty game
> in the world and Obama will be introduced to this like never before.
> Just as the liberal press will turn on McCain.

--- Naa, he's going to get a free ride.  The reason why they've used
kid gloves on him so far is that if anybody hit any harder they'd be
ripped to shreds for being racist.  America doesn't want another race
war on its hands, not with somebody who's steamrolling with virtually
universal appeal among his supporters [blacks, whites, midgets,
fairies, etc.]  to what looks like it could be a win for him to lead
the Dems.  It's easier to turn on a white guy like McCain and, geez,
that guy looks as white as white can get.
CliffB - 23 Feb 2008 22:37 GMT
> > Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
> > make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> the Dems.  It's easier to turn on a white guy like McCain and, geez,
> that guy looks as white as white can get.

Olbama will have his day in the dock; nobody is that perfect as not to
have a few human frailties. He will handle it with aplomb though, as
he seems pretty imperturbable. The problem for him may end up that his
intemperate wife will probably have some kind of fit or meltdown when
the sh.t hits the fan. The way she has been so contrary toward the
press and (quote-unquote) "cynical of the political process" could
imply that she knows there is some crap due to come down in Deus ex
machina fashion on the revivalist Obama parade. The question will be,
can she keep it together in the midst of the shitstorm.......look for
her to lash out harshly and turn off some fence sitters.
pinky - 24 Feb 2008 04:35 GMT
> > > Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
> > > make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> can she keep it together in the midst of the shitstorm.......look for
> her to lash out harshly and turn off some fence sitters.- Hide quoted text -

It's always the fault of those tempermental women, isn't it?  The
gathering gender with enough diplomacy not to wage war!  The mothers
of compromise!  Enough!

pink
CliffB - 24 Feb 2008 06:33 GMT
> > > > Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
> > > > make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> It's always the fault of those tempermental women, isn't it?  The
> gathering gender with enough diplomacy not to wage war!  

Except with each other. Did you hear Michelle's catty broad-sides
toward Hillary? There would be some great catfights, claws out, if
they were forced to share space in the West Wing. Poor Barack caught
in the middle of all that........I guess Hillary's out as a possible
V.P.

> The mothers
> of compromise!  Enough!
>
> pink

Will you settle for ballbusting Michelle as An Hillaryesque First
lady?
pinky - 24 Feb 2008 14:30 GMT
> > > > > Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
> > > > > make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

If I were Michelle I'd be angry at HIllary too.  Hillary turns Barack
into a non-stop babbling fool.  ;p

pink
Dano - 24 Feb 2008 19:20 GMT
If I were Michelle I'd be angry at HIllary too.  Hillary turns Barack
into a non-stop babbling fool.  ;p

________________________________

Takes one to know one.

Hillary is going down...and not on Bill.
pinky - 27 Feb 2008 05:10 GMT
> If I were Michelle I'd be angry at HIllary too.  Hillary turns Barack
> into a non-stop babbling fool.  ;p
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Hillary is going down...and not on Bill.

Ya.  You're listening to a drug-addicted moron and voting Obama.  You
are a stellar example of wisdom in action.

pink
Jenny - 24 Feb 2008 00:54 GMT
And not to mention, he is O-L-D.  How old is the guy, anyway?  80+?

> > Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
> > make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> the Dems.  It's easier to turn on a white guy like McCain and, geez,
> that guy looks as white as white can get.
Winston Smith, American Patriot - 23 Feb 2008 22:28 GMT
TheReturnoftheROMAN <ROMANPAX@gmail.com> wrote in alt.politics.bush:

> Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
> make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
> normal. Look for Obama to get savaged! Politics is the most dirty game
> in the world and Obama will be introduced to this like never before.

They're not so much going to use the N-word---which they will do because
it works on a few million or ten of such voters----but rather they will
more effectively use the M-word against Obama.  That will play with a good
20-30 million voters, and it could be the edge in several PURPLE states
that just might tilt red.

This is why Hillary is the better pick for the Democrats.  Yes, I know
she's been a triangulating bitch who has looked like a Republican at
times.

But doncha all just know that when she is president----the first woman
president ever----that she's going to use that power to be the woman she's
always been....that 25- or 30-year old idealist who took on Nixon and put
the common man on the street ahead of the corporations?

You might think that she's the version of Bill Clinton who wears the
dress---instead of "stains" them----but I think she has some surprises for
a lot of people.  Unpleasant ones for the extreme right wing...but those
a.sholes don't matter anyway.

> Just as the liberal press will turn on McCain.

You mean the NY Times, that paper who ENDORSED McCain for the GOP
nomination and could very well endorse in November if he really does end
up being the liberal the extreme right-wing says he is?
Sid9 - 23 Feb 2008 23:23 GMT
> TheReturnoftheROMAN <ROMANPAX@gmail.com> wrote in alt.politics.bush:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> nomination and could very well endorse in November if he really does end
> up being the liberal the extreme right-wing says he is?

331 days and...

The next president ....

will not be a WASP
will not be Southerner
will not be a Republican

will be self made
will be Magna Cum Laude...

Will not have been given a free ride at the Navel Academy
Will not have graduated fifth from the bottom of the class
Will not have been promoted through political pull
Will not have a short fuse and his finger on the trigger
Will not have been a hypocrite regarding lobbyists
Will not have been part of the S & L scandal
Winston Smith, American Patriot - 24 Feb 2008 00:20 GMT
"Sid9" <sidg9@bellsouth.net> wrote in alt.politics.bush:

>> TheReturnoftheROMAN <ROMANPAX@gmail.com> wrote in alt.politics.bush:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> will not be Southerner
> will not be a Republican

well, at least you got 1 outta 3 right.

BTW, Bush is not a "Southerner."

> will be self made
> will be Magna Cum Laude...

overrated.  I know one person very well who made the Dean's List several
times but admits to being a disappointment to his own expectations and
goals because he did not apply himself and/or made decisions too risky for
his career.

Craig Ventner, OTOH, was an academic f.ck-up but went on to be the
spiritual driving force and major player in the sequencing of the human
genome.

> Will not have been given a free ride at the Navel Academy

I have no problem with legacies.

> Will not have graduated fifth from the bottom of the class

[see the remarks above]

> Will not have been promoted through political pull

Okay, so McCain was helped by nepotism!  Let's string him up and everyone
else who gained an advantage of any kind through nepotism.  I think that
means exterminating 3 in 4 of the world's population.

> Will not have a short fuse and his finger on the trigger

If McCain submitted to a heavy battery of independent psychological
profiling, would that be enough to answer that question?

> Will not have been a hypocrite regarding lobbyists

The right wing is sure trying to trash that NYT story.  Not sure if they
are worried about the adultery or the fact that the mistress was a
lobbyist.  If in fact McCain got horizontal with this woman, I'd have to
give him high fives for bagging someone exactly half his age and who could
easily be his daughter.

> Will not have been part of the S & L scandal

There are many other things to criticize McCain about...those are not any
of them!
667@hotmail.com - 24 Feb 2008 21:16 GMT
>> Will not have been promoted through political pull
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>There are many other things to criticize McCain about...those are not any
>of them!

You right wing fascist f.ck tard war mongering douche bags have had
your day.  We now have a country so in debt because the only way you
can prove your manhood is by committing murder and destruction in a
phony war that has cost taxpayers billions of dollars to appease
filthy shriveled dicks like yourself.  You brain dead bitches are so
stupid you confuse patriotism with filling the pockets of Haliburton.
Do the world a favor; take your weapon put it in your mouth and pull
the trigger.  Hitler and all the other fascists are waiting for you in
hell.
TheReturnoftheROMAN - 24 Feb 2008 22:48 GMT
On Feb 24, 1:16 pm, 6...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >> Will not have been promoted through political pull
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

_________________________________________________________________________________
Please keep up your deranged rants. They are a source of not only
abject stupidity and hate, but do provide comic relief.
mikeha.ca@gmail.com - 25 Feb 2008 11:45 GMT
> Hillary could not attack Obama with any consistency due to the racial
> make up of her party. The Reps will get even fewer Black votes than
> normal. Look for Obama to get savaged! Politics is the most dirty game
> in the world and Obama will be introduced to this like never before.
> Just as the liberal press will turn on McCain.

Hillary is guaranteed to win the presidency, as she was anointed by
the Bilderberg group in 2006 when she illegally attended the meeting
in Ottawa. Sitting politicians are not allowed to attend secret
meetings like this, so they had to keep her attendance quiet.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.