 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
History Forum / General / General Topics / February 2008NY Slimes: Results are in McCain takes lead of both Demos.
Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. > Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. Yep, those McCain numbers are really soaring. Trouble is, Obama's numbers are soaring a heckuva lot higher. ------------------------------------------------------------- "If the election for president were held today and the candidates were John McCain and Barack Obama, for whom would you vote?" (Names rotated) John McCain ---- 41% Barack Obama --- 51% http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08gen.htm > > Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08gen.htm I do hope that Obama is forming what I call "the hammer"... he'll need it, and a platform. I hope he doesn't think he doesn't need those things...? Someone, tell Obama to finish the job and lets move forward, for the love of God, to get past these crazy Neocons in history. >> Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. > Yep, those McCain numbers are really soaring. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Barack Obama --- 51% > http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08gen.htm http://www.realclearpolitics.com Buckwheat 47.6% McAmnesty 42.4% McAmnesty 47.3% Hitlary 43.7% McAmnesty loses 5% to Buckwheat... Buckwheat 47.8% Hitlary 41.8% Hitlary loses 6% to Buckwheat. HIGHLY consistent numbers. >>> Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. >> Yep, those McCain numbers are really soaring. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > http://www.realclearpolitics.com I see you still haven't learned how to post a proper link, Patriot Lame. > Buckwheat 47.6% McAmnesty 42.4% > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > HIGHLY consistent numbers.  SignatureThe solution to 1984 is 1776 >>>> Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. >>> Yep, those McCain numbers are really soaring. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> http://www.realclearpolitics.com > I see you still haven't learned how to post a proper link, Patriot Lame. Thanks for saving me the time and embarassing yourself in public, again. The data below IS ON THE FIRST PAGE of the Link... Hahahahahahah!!!! >> Buckwheat 47.6% McAmnesty 42.4% >> McAmnesty 47.3% Hitlary 43.7% >> McAmnesty loses 5% to Buckwheat... >> Buckwheat 47.8% Hitlary 41.8% >> Hitlary loses 6% to Buckwheat. >> HIGHLY consistent numbers. Thanks for saving me the time and embarassing yourself in public, again. The data above IS ON THE FIRST PAGE of the Link... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH!!! > >> Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. > > Yep, those McCain numbers are really soaring. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > HIGHLY consistent numbers. Well it's only February for heavens sake. >> >> Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. >> > Yep, those McCain numbers are really soaring. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >> HIGHLY consistent numbers. > Well it's only February for heavens sake. I know, I know.... BUT... This is shaping up to be a seriously tight and very seriously waged battle! > Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. You apparently are not paying attention. The NY Times piece appeared to be something about a sex scandal, and you jumped and called the paper slime. The real legs has to do with McCain possibly not being true to the high standards he set for himself. The "sex scandal" can possibly happen to do with McCain doing inappropriate favors that aren't sexual. For McCain, this is likely the best time for the story to break. He is about to wrap up the nomination, and he has time to put the fire out. Had it broke earlier, Romney or even Rudy could of been the benefactor of it. - Rich On Feb 25, 8:47 pm, richardhut...@gmail.com wrote: > > Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > - Rich ___________________________________________________________________________________________ The Slimes piece was not true and showed no special favors to this young lady: Dick or otherwise. Case Closed! The Times piece was a gift to McCain! If it had come out two months ago, it would have destroyed his campaign. If it were to have come out six months from now, it would have destroyed his campaign. By publishing it after McCain has wrapped up the nomination, it has no effect on him at all. BTW, no one in America calls the Democrats, 'Demos'! We call them 'Dems' for short.'It's Brits that use that term, so I assume you're a British troll trying to start something up. > The Times piece was a gift to McCain! If it had come out two months ago, > it would have destroyed his campaign. If it were to have come out six [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > BTW, no one in America calls the Democrats, 'Demos'! Has somebody suggested that they do? > We call them 'Dems' for short.'It's Brits that use that term, I invite you to give us some verbatim examples, with chapter and verse. > so I assume you're Me? > a British troll trying to start something up. SignatureArfur Moo (NB: Those of you who want to post a reply to this message should read the "Followup-To:" line in my headers and then reinstate any destination group that you want to reinstate.) > On Feb 25, 8:47 pm, richardhut...@gmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > The Slimes piece was not true and showed no special favors to this > young lady: Dick or otherwise. Case Closed! Due to that piece, there is now all this spin that has to do with McCain's relationship to lobbyists. McCain has time to address these charges, which is why it is favorable. However, if you think that McCain will regain a lead, it will only be able to be done, if he can show that he doesn't have ties to lobbyists. Even then, his "100 years in Iraq" speaks volumes here. Why would America be in Iraq unless things continue the way they are or America intends to be occupiers, or use it as a base to invade other nations? - Rich > Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. When will the honeymoon end? It can't go on forever. The media wants a fight, they always do. The numbers will narrow down watch and see. May the best and most qualified man win, McCain. Who knows down the road Obama might return and win eventually. His short tenure in the US Senate qualifies him for most but not President. This is Hillary's only good point as she has run against him, he is not qualified. JMHO > > Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > US Senate qualifies him for most but not President. This is Hillary's > only good point as she has run against him, he is not qualified. JMHO The only thing Buckwheat has going for him is the color his skin.Finally,the guilt riddin white liberals can put a black man in the Whitehuse and PROVE to Mother Oprah that white folks are really nice people after all. > > > Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > the Whitehuse and PROVE to Mother Oprah that white folks are really > nice people after all. Obama is such a rookie compared to McCain. We can always "hope" that the US won't ever be attacked again. >>>> Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. >>> When will the honeymoon end? It can't go on forever. The media wants [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Obama is such a rookie compared to McCain. We can always "hope" that > the US won't ever be attacked again. Agreed. Those terrorists are very diabolical. First, they fill a van full of explosives, and try to blow up the World Trade Center, but they are several megatons off. Then, they take another 8 years to come up with a cunning plan, and hijack airplanes with box cutters. Man, nobody could've forseen terrorists hijacking planes, just like nobody could've anticipated the breach of the levees in New Orleans. Those terrorists are so stealthy and cunning that only a man with experience like McCain will keep us safe. Hell, those guys might try hijacking trains and running them off the track into nuclear reactors next, or even come after us with pointed sticks. > >>>> Please keep up the Yellow journalism and watch McCain's numbers soar. > >>> When will the honeymoon end? It can't go on forever. The media wants [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > are several megatons off. Then, they take another 8 years to come up > with a cunning plan, and hijack airplanes with box cutters. True. Which is why your hero Clinton should've stopped it, huh? :) Man, nobody > could've forseen terrorists hijacking planes, just like nobody could've > anticipated the breach of the levees in New Orleans. Those terrorists [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > - Show quoted text - |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.