Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / General Topics / March 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

IF THE MEDIA HAD NOT PROTECTED THE OBAMINATION: HILLARY WOULD HAVE IT     LOCKED UP

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
AlexanderTheGreat - 29 Mar 2008 23:23 GMT
The media went out of their way (even more than usual) to protect this
con man and phony. Obama is nothing more than an empty figure head
controlled by his hate-filled wife and racist minister. He is the most
unqualified and pathetic person to ever run for president of a major
party. He is a liar with nothing more than vague slogans and the
ability to read a teleprompter. He won't do interviews because he
can't think on his feet and is useless without a teleprompter, just
like GWB.
Unique - 29 Mar 2008 23:44 GMT
AlexanderTheGreat <TheRhineFrontier@aol.com> wrote in message:
9f0fc765-7ce4-47a8-8450-ef9e3a573ae2@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com,

> The media went out of their way (even more than usual) to protect this
> con man and phony. Obama is nothing more than an empty figure head
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> can't think on his feet and is useless without a teleprompter, just
> like GWB.

If you're really that cynical, then you should have equal aversion to
Hillary or McCain. They all have "issues" some real, some imagined, that
can be blown equally out of proportion.

Signature

DVDs for sale: http://unique-dvd.com
165 Banned Cartoons, The Unknown War, Centennial Miniseries,
Holocaust, Pearl, Amerika, Space, George Washington, Anzacs,
Marco Polo, Rich Man Poor Man, Peter the Great, Noble House,
and more...

Neolibertarian - 30 Mar 2008 01:20 GMT
In article
<9f0fc765-7ce4-47a8-8450-ef9e3a573ae2@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,

> The media went out of their way (even more than usual) to protect this
> con man and phony. Obama is nothing more than an empty figure head
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> can't think on his feet and is useless without a teleprompter, just
> like GWB.

Actually, GWB isn't good with a teleprompter.

Signature

NeoLibertarian

http://www.elihu.envy.nu/NeoPics/UncleHood.jpg

cloud dreamer - 30 Mar 2008 01:34 GMT
> In article
> <9f0fc765-7ce4-47a8-8450-ef9e3a573ae2@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Actually, GWB isn't good with a teleprompter.

Yeah. It's hard when you don't like to read.

 ..

Signature

We must change the way we live,
   or the climate will do it for us.

   www.ipcc.ch/

Ubiquitous - 30 Mar 2008 02:00 GMT
TheRhineFrontier@aol.com wrote:

>The media went out of their way (even more than usual) to protect this
>con man and phony. Obama is nothing more than an empty figure head
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>can't think on his feet and is useless without a teleprompter, just
>like GWB.

Signature

It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
for them, it's failing.

                          Troll O Meter

       0    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9    10
       ___________________________________________________
       |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |
       ---------------------------------------------------
       ^
       |

Bret Cahill - 30 Mar 2008 18:04 GMT
The problem isn't Obama but the corp. media.   Obama is a corp. media
pump and dump.  They'll pump him until Hillary is gone then they'll
dump him.

The goal of the jingoistic corp. media is the same as when they were
gushing "9/11 changed EEEEEVERYthing" and they have no problems
relying on GOP racism to turn out the bigot vote so that the U. S.
stays in Iraq for another 8 years.

The only problem with Obama is he's a little naive.

Bret Cahill
Dano - 30 Mar 2008 18:41 GMT
> The problem isn't Obama but the corp. media.   Obama is a corp. media
> pump and dump.  They'll pump him until Hillary is gone then they'll
> dump him.

That is a most peculiar read.  Define corp. media please...just for
starters.

Paranoid much?

> The goal of the jingoistic corp. media is the same as when they were
> gushing "9/11 changed EEEEEVERYthing" and they have no problems
> relying on GOP racism to turn out the bigot vote so that the U. S.
> stays in Iraq for another 8 years.

So let me see if I got it right.  You're saying 9/11 *didn't* change
everything?  Anything?  How much changed for you?  Do you enter office
buildings?  Fly on airplanes?  READ A PAPER?

The most racist campaign I've ever seen is the one the Clintons have
waged...ever since they wrote off the black vote.

> The only problem with Obama is he's a little naive.

The only problem with you is you're a little delusional.
Bret Cahill - 30 Mar 2008 19:10 GMT
> > The problem isn't Obama but the corp. media. � Obama is a corp. media
> > pump and dump. �They'll pump him until Hillary is gone then they'll
> > dump him.

> That is a most peculiar read. �

That's because you a most naive 20 something.

> Define corp. media please...just for
> starters.

Media who get their sponsorship from corp. interests.

That's why they hype social issues like naked nazi flagburner parades
during the debates to preclude economic issues such as health care.

With party activists like you Democrats can be thankful that Bill
Clinton has already put the party of Gipper on the ash heap of
history.

. . .

> > The goal of the jingoistic corp. media is the same as when they were
> > gushing "9/11 changed EEEEEVERYthing" and they have no problems
> > relying on GOP racism to turn out the bigot vote so that the U. S.
> > stays in Iraq for another 8 years.

> So let me see if I got it right. �

You are really slow aren't you?

> You're saying 9/11 *didn't* change
> everything? �

When was the last time you heard any corp. media whore gush, "9/11
changed EEEEVERYthing?"

And yes, I _will_ insist on a date in a cite.

> Anything? �How much changed for you? �

Nada.  Nothing zip.

> Do you enter office
> buildings? �

I enter federal courthouses they same way as before.

> Fly on airplanes?

The same except for taking off shoes which wascaused by the shoe
bomber, not 9/11.

> The most racist campaign I've ever seen is the one the Clintons have
> waged...

Now you have to explain why,

1.  black family income increased faster under "the first black
president" than under any president since the Emancipation
Proclamation, and,

2.  most of the civil rights community supports Hillary Clinton.

Bret Cahill
Dano - 30 Mar 2008 21:24 GMT
>>> The problem isn't Obama but the corp. media. � Obama is a corp.
>>> media pump and dump. �They'll pump him until Hillary is gone then
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> That's because you a most naive 20 something.

Really?  You think so?  Well, wrong again.

>> Define corp. media please...just for
>> starters.
>
> Media who get their sponsorship from corp. interests.

Uh...that's everyone...except bloggers I guess.  So where do you get *your*
news and information.  I guess you consider it all worthgless.

> That's why they hype social issues like naked nazi flagburner parades
> during the debates to preclude economic issues such as health care.

Oooh...I missed that one.  Link please?

> With party activists like you Democrats can be thankful that Bill
> Clinton has already put the party of Gipper on the ash heap of
> history.

If that's so...what are you so worried about.  You might as well take this
election off.

> . . .
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> I enter federal courthouses they same way as before.

Now you're flat out lying...oh wait...you always were.

<more silly lies snipped>

No need to proceed.  You aren't worth the time.  PLONK.
Bret Cahill - 30 Mar 2008 23:41 GMT
> >>> The problem isn't Obama but the corp. media. � Obama is a corp.
> >>> media pump and dump. �They'll pump him until Hillary is gone then
> >>> they'll dump him.

> >> That is a most peculiar read. �

> > That's because you a most naive 20 something.

> Really?  You think so?  Well, wrong again.

Then you are just naive way past the age most people with an IQ above
single digits figure out the basics.

> >> Define corp. media please...just for
> >> starters.
>
> > Media who get their sponsorship from corp. interests.

> Uh...that's everyone...

No, it is _not_ everyone.  It's a small minority of whores paid by
corp. boss interests to hype nonsense like "9/11 changed EEEVERYthing"
to help enable Dumbya Bush to invade Iraq.

The very corp. media who were paid to gush hype Obama ("Obama you are
so beautiful") are the very same folk who want to turn America into a
jihad nation and stay in Iraq for 100 years.

Democracy for America, an Obama supporter, recently pointed out that
jihad Joe Liberman is still "up to his old tricks."  Jihad Joe wants
America to stay in Iraq 100 years.

Do you really believe the media now gush hyping Obama aren't up to
their old tricks?

You really believe the media no longer want to convert America into a
jihad nation?

That the media really want Obama to actually become president?

If so you are naive beyond belief.

> except bloggers I guess.

Bloggers are only media not earning their pay check sucking up to a
jingoistic corp. boss.

> So where do you get *your*
> news and information.  I guess you consider it all worthgless.

It's worthless if you are as naive as a 20 something.

All the facts in the world are useless if you are lying to yourself
about the GOP's 20 million bigots who will turn out to vote against
the black guy.

> > That's why they hype social issues like naked nazi flagburner parades
> > during the debates to preclude economic issues such as health care.

> Oooh...I missed that one.  

Not surprising. You were in middle school when the ACLU was called on
that one.

.  . . .

> > With party activists like you Democrats can be thankful that Bill
> > Clinton has already put the party of Gipper on the ash heap of
> > history.

> If that's so...what are you so worried about.  

I wasn't.

By exposing the corp. media's stake in gush hyping Obama, now, before
the nomination, I help Obama in the general election.

If the media "suddenly" discover a lot of negative material on Obama
_after_ the nomination I'll be telling everyone, Democrats as well as
Republicans, "look at my posts way back in March, February and
January.  I was predicting a pump and dump and guess what the corp.
media are doing now?  Exactly what I predicted.  They want us to stay
in Iraq for 100 years."

. .  .

> >>> The goal of the jingoistic corp. media is the same as when they were
> >>> gushing "9/11 changed EEEEEVERYthing" and they have no problems
> >>> relying on GOP racism to turn out the bigot vote so that the U. S.
> >>> stays in Iraq for another 8 years.

> >> So let me see if I got it right. �

> > You are really slow aren't you?
>
> >> You're saying 9/11 *didn't* change
> >> everything? �

> > When was the last time you heard any corp. media whore gush, "9/11
> > changed EEEEVERYthing?"

> > And yes, I _will_ insist on a date in a cite.

No answer?

Is that going to be Obama's response when the corp. media dump him?

No answer?

Bret Cahill
Shrikeback - 31 Mar 2008 17:18 GMT
> >> Define corp. media please...just for
> >> starters.

It's private media, as opposed to state-controlled
media.

> > Media who get their sponsorship from corp. interests.

> Uh...that's everyone...

> No, it is _not_ everyone.  It's a small minority of whores paid by
> corp. boss interests to hype nonsense like "9/11 changed EEEVERYthing"
> to help enable Dumbya Bush to invade Iraq.

> The very corp. media who were paid to gush hype Obama ("Obama you are
> so beautiful") are the very same folk who want to turn America into a
> jihad nation and stay in Iraq for 100 years.

Interestingly, Hitlery has already stated that she intends to
stay in Iraq for 100 years.  Yet you don't seem aware of
it.
Tom - 31 Mar 2008 18:06 GMT
> > >> Define corp. media please...just for
> > >> starters.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> stay in Iraq for 100 years.  Yet you don't seem aware of
> it.

Cite? Please?

Tom
Dano - 31 Mar 2008 19:06 GMT
> Interestingly, Hitlery has already stated that she intends to
> stay in Iraq for 100 years.  Yet you don't seem aware of
> it.

Another friggin' idiot.  That was McCain that said that.  No wonder we got
two terms of W.  Morons like you voted.  Plonk.
Bret Cahill - 31 Mar 2008 19:38 GMT
> > Interestingly, Hitlery has already stated that she intends to
> > stay in Iraq for 100 years. �Yet you don't seem aware of
> > it.

> Another friggin' idiot. �That was McCain that said that. �No wonder we got
> two terms of W. �Morons like you voted.

He's so screwed up he cannot even remember to conceal his bigotry when
he's trying to "mainstream" himself.  He might as well join the openly
nazi neonazis attracted to his foaming mouth.

He tries to sound like a GOP shilltank economist but it's clear he is
too ignorant, irrational and dysfunctional to make much more than 0.1%
of average mean income, i. e., minimum wage, so he pays little in
taxes and his no stake in Republican tax cuts for the rich.

He doesn't care how bad he lives.  His only concern in politics,
indeed in life, is to keep blacks out of power.

That's what I've been trying to tell you.

Just look at the rightards on these newsgroups.

Virtually all the foaming at the mouth racists hide behind handles and
slither around like disreputable cowards.   More than a few of them
are lying to pollsters right now that they will vote for Obama in
November.

The GOP's 20 million hate filled bigots would ordinarily not vote for
McCain because of amnesty but they hate blacks even more than they
hate Mexicans so rightards will come out of the wood work to vote
against Obama.

Then we spend 8 more years in Iraq.

The corp. media are a little better at concealing their goals than
high school drop out newsgroups rightards.

Bret Cahill
Ubiquitous - 30 Mar 2008 18:42 GMT
BretCahill@aol.com wrote:

>The problem isn't Obama but the corp. media.   Obama is a corp. media
>pump and dump.  They'll pump him until Hillary is gone then they'll
>dump him.

Bwah ha ha! Thanks for the good laugh!

At the end of the day, the liberal media roots for whomever is
the Democrat.

Signature

It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
for them, it's failing.

Bret Cahill - 30 Mar 2008 18:55 GMT
> >The problem isn't Obama but the corp. media. � Obama is a corp. media
> >pump and dump. �They'll pump him until Hillary is gone then they'll
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> At the end of the day, the liberal media roots for whomever is
> the Democrat.

And they'll do it in a way that guarantees the Repug gets elected.

> It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
> the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
> our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
> for them, it's failing.

Iraq is a regular libertopia!

1.  No taxes

2.  No gummint.

3.  Everyone is armed and gittin' pushed too far.

Bret Cahill
Jerry Okamura - 30 Mar 2008 22:45 GMT
> >The problem isn't Obama but the corp. media. � Obama is a corp. media
> >pump and dump. �They'll pump him until Hillary is gone then they'll
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> At the end of the day, the liberal media roots for whomever is
> the Democrat.

And they'll do it in a way that guarantees the Repug gets elected.

So, what you are saying is the the voters are stupid?
Bret Cahill - 30 Mar 2008 23:49 GMT
> > >The problem isn't Obama but the corp. media. � Obama is a corp. media
> > >pump and dump. �They'll pump him until Hillary is gone then they'll
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> So, what you are saying is the the voters are stupid?

No just that the corp. media will be forced to rely more and more on
their Goebbels lie by hype as the internet puts them out of business.

Once they are gone everything will be democratic but in the meantime
they aren't going to make a graceful exit.   Instead they want to
saddle future generations with as many amputees, debt, bad laws and
corruption as possible.

And they are willing to pretend that the GOP doesn't have 20 million
bigots who will vote against the black man in order to accomplish
their goal.

Bret Cahill
Immortalist - 31 Mar 2008 07:07 GMT
> The problem isn't Obama but the corp. media.   Obama is a corp. media
> pump and dump.  They'll pump him until Hillary is gone then they'll
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> relying on GOP racism to turn out the bigot vote so that the U. S.
> stays in Iraq for another 8 years.

I don't think that it is their goal since the "corp media" have no
choice but to be afraid when the money making catastrophe happens,
they will be forced to put whatever Bush can arrange in front of
everything else. Then the fear disease will spread to all the networks
because of competition and the people will forget all about obama and
choose Bus/McCane for 8 more years.

An October surprise is American political jargon describing a news
event with the potential to influence the outcome of an election,
particularly one for the presidency. It is so called because Election
Day in the U.S. is the Tuesday after the first Monday in November, and
events shortly before the election have greater potential to swing
votes. Most of the time, the term is used to label actions of a
sitting president, especially with regard to military or foreign
policy matters, but it can also apply to news stories unfavorable to
the incumbent administration. "Historically, news outlets avoid
investigative pieces critical of candidates within days of an election
to avoid appearing partisan."  Particularly since the 1980 election,
the term has been pre-emptively used to discredit late-campaign news
by one side or the other.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_surprise

> The only problem with Obama is he's a little naive.

Obama will have to compete with Bush's secularized version of "Fire
and Brimstone" and he may lose. But people may not care and vote for
the Democrats anyway.

Fire and brimstone is a pejorative term used to describe a motif in
Christian preaching which uses vivid descriptions of judgment, and the
damnation to Hell of sinners forever to encourage repentance out of
fear of divine wrath and punishment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_and_brimstone

> Bret Cahill
J Jones - 31 Mar 2008 19:31 GMT
> The problem isn't Obama but the corp. media.   Obama is a corp. media
> pump and dump.  They'll pump him until Hillary is gone then they'll
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> The only problem with Obama is he's a little naive.

> Bret Cahill

off topic for alt philosophy
J Jones - 31 Mar 2008 20:32 GMT
> The problem isn't Obama but the corp. media.   Obama is a corp. media
> pump and dump.  They'll pump him until Hillary is gone then they'll
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Bret Cahill

off topic for altphilosophy
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.