Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / General Topics / February 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

US Balance Of Payments To Japan

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Representative Trantis - 22 Dec 2003 14:51 GMT
I am looking for someone with a little more knowledge of this to explain it
to me.

I have heard that America has problems with balance of payments to Japan,
and that Japan has the power to swamp America (economically) tomorrow if it
so wished. Throughout the cold war, no-one wanted to see America suffer a
dint, as many countries relied upon them to protect them from the USSR.
However, that's not the case now.
I have also heard it said that Japans attempt to damage America would result
in America retaliating by printing enough extra Dollers to write off the
debt, thus taking Japan down with it...

What's the current situation with Japan and America competing for top
economic superpower status?
nshinede@columbus.rr.com - 22 Dec 2003 17:43 GMT
I would not worry so much about Japan, alone, Representative.
Look at China, South America, the whole Pacific Rim, India.

NAFTA, "Free trade, "Globalization." We have given our country away.

Ross Perot's "giant sucking sound" is now an operating reality.

Over half the ocean containers we receive go back empty. We have exported
entire industries for the slave labor, lack of regulation, very low to no
taxes, and other benefits elsewhere.

These old, American companies are no longer American. They are "global."

Job creation when the stock market rises? Yes, out of our country.

And BOTH of our major political parties are up to their necks in this, for
money, or because their just too stupid in some cases to understand the
details.

> I am looking for someone with a little more knowledge of this to explain it
> to me.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> What's the current situation with Japan and America competing for top
> economic superpower status?
carlp - 22 Dec 2003 18:23 GMT
I am looking for someone with a little more knowledge of this to explain it
to me.

I have heard that America has problems with balance of payments to Japan,
and that Japan has the power to swamp America (economically) tomorrow if it
so wished. Throughout the cold war, no-one wanted to see America suffer a
dint, as many countries relied upon them to protect them from the USSR.
However, that's not the case now.
I have also heard it said that Japans attempt to damage America would result
in America retaliating by printing enough extra Dollers to write off the
debt, thus taking Japan down with it...

What's the current situation with Japan and America competing for top
economic superpower status?
////////////////////
Your right about America;s balance of payment  with the rest of the world
Japan is just one nation that the Americans have the problem with, but it is
China that is the biggest threat. i/e no one nation could cause the effect.
that you mention, but the remedy is in the hands of Americans it is called
tightening your belts, stop buying so much,  purchase home grown /produce.
Cut down on energy imports use more insulation and buy less oil. cheap
Chinese products are killing your economy, the solution is loyalty, and stop
letting the  Chinese steal all your cash and secrets.
Representative Trantis - 23 Dec 2003 00:40 GMT
> I am looking for someone with a little more knowledge of this to explain it
> to me.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Chinese products are killing your economy, the solution is loyalty, and stop
> letting the  Chinese steal all your cash and secrets.

Secrets is the key word there. I have read one essay that says that whiles
the 20th c entury was the American cerntury, adn the 19th was the British,
the 21st could be the Chinesse and it's all due to allowing the Chineese to
get hold of American/western technology, then improove upon it.

Anyone care to elaborate?
onegod - 25 Dec 2003 01:39 GMT
> > Cut down on energy imports use more insulation and buy less oil. cheap
> > Chinese products are killing your economy, the solution is loyalty, and
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Anyone care to elaborate?

That is probably right.  Basically only way usa is successful is bulling
others with patents and law (kind
of ambulance chasing).  This is due to fact that farm, factory, and now even
high tech jobs moving to over seas.  Patents were meant to be for new
invention with HUGE improvement, not some minor engineering improvement.

Chinese is more immune to some of bogus patents as well as military/economic
threats by usa.
Also, old communist probably collaberating with evil power in usa such as
kissinger, pearle, bush etc.  That's why not much chinese bashing where
there was huge japanese bashing before.
Ken Sisby - 05 Jan 2004 15:31 GMT
The solution to US economic problems will not be found by blaming non-white
nations for stealing jobs.  Trade increases jobs it doesn't destroy them.
The United States is by far the richest country in the world.  What's the
problem?  War is the problem.  The US has a current account deficit with
China of 125 billion dollars per year.  But keeping the US on a war footing
is costing much, much more.  US foreign policy has half the world scared and
the other half pissed off.  Billions of people in the world simply refuse to
buy US goods as a way of protesting US foreign policy.

From time immemorial, one fact has been true.  The richer a nation becomes,
the more costly its labour becomes.  When that happens, as it has to the US,
Japan, Germany and Britain, labour intensive industries look for cheaper
labour.  The US is not the only country that is having these problems.  The
Japanese used South Korea for cheap labour and are now investing heavily in
China, Vietnam and India because they are politically stable, have educated
but cheap workforces and have strong work ethics.  The same is true of
German investments in Eastern Europe.  If the US doesn't buy foreign goods
then where will foreign countries get the money to buy US goods.

US economic problems are partly cyclical, as in a hangover from the boom of
the Clinton years, it is partly a distrust of US securities markets because
of Enron and other scandals.  But it is also because George W Bush is viewed
as a bull in a china shop.  The world views the US as an extremely unstable
country right now.  Foreign investment in the US is at a long time low
because the world is holding back until some sense of order returns to the
US.  Public bad-mouthing the French and Germans simply means French and
German consumers and investors are avoiding anything made in the USA.  The
same is true of Japan and China bashing.  They get revenge by dumping the
dollar which causes increases in the US current account as a lower dollar
means higher import prices.  They then slowly start buying back the dollar
and make a fortune, all paid for by the average American.

If George W Bush gets re-elected who will he attack next?  What weapons of
mass delusion will be discovered in some other defenceless country of brown
people.  If Americans want to know why the world is avoiding them, they
should try reading foreign newspapers, watching foreign television or best
of all books from other countries.  Wake up, climb out of your cocoons and
listen.  The US is no longer in control of the world.  The leading engine of
economic growth today is China.  Within two years the EU will replace the US
as the largest economic community.  Why isn't the US selling in these
markets?  Trade is the answer to economic problems but the US government is
obsessed with dropping bombs on countries that can't fight back.  The
problem is George W Bush.  Replace him with a good leader, either Republican
or Democrat the world doesn't care.  Until then, who knows.

Ken

 Bush has started erecting trade barriers and this has resulted in other
countries beginning to erect equal amounts of trade barriers against the US.
The trouble is that American trade barriers are being erected in industries
that cannot supply the entire US market.  The result is that US consumers
are paying more for the cars because imported steel now costs more.  They
are paying more for their homes because Canadian lumber now costs 27 percent
more with no real benefit to the US economy.  However, the US is selling
less of it's products in the export market because of the resulting trade
wars that have developed.

> I am looking for someone with a little more knowledge of this to explain it
> to me.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Chinese products are killing your economy, the solution is loyalty, and stop
> letting the  Chinese steal all your cash and secrets.
Mick - 22 Dec 2003 18:55 GMT
> I have also heard it said that Japans attempt to damage America would result
> in America retaliating by printing enough extra Dollers to write off the
> debt, thus taking Japan down with it...

Nixon did exactly that to the Japanese in the early 70s (the "nixon shocku")

Basically, "debt" is a meaningless concept unless you have the military
power to physically collect what is owed - the Japanese don't have that that
power, so this is really a one-way relationship

The Japanese tolerate the situation out of fear of China (and formerly the
Soviet Union). From their point of view, these loans to the US are a form of
military insurance
Robert Cohen - 22 Dec 2003 20:31 GMT
re: Japan

They have had a serious economic recession for at least 10 years.

Their population is rapidly ageing.

Their cars--imho--are no longer  far superior in price & quality, because, for
instance, Korea is becoming "Japan's Japan" with its electronic and automotive
exports. I currently have 3 Korean-made cars.

The Japanese are seemingly threatened by North Korea and PRC/China; and thus do
depend upon the U.S., but that bad p.r. in Okinawa is a downer.

The Japanese also still do not open up all their agriculture and consumer goods
markets to "free trade," and thus they do seem to tread lightly regarding
beating the sh.t out of the U.S.

CHINA IS POTENTIALLY FIVE JAPANS

South Korea is simply amazing

India, which has nearly a billion people, is definitely adapting itself to the
21st century.

The U.S. currently lacks the smarts of a more adaptive Clinton Administration,
and many of our people are thus understanably pleading for some protectionism.

Yes: If Japan, Saudia Arabia etal call-in their loans (do not renew their debt
holdings), the U.S. financial supremecy expires and the world goes to hell with
us.

It has long been my theory that this is much part of the real reason that real,
substantive energy alternatives to oil have   been a bunch of horseshit.

The U.S. fears the dis-continuance of the "petro-dollar."

If the stronger Euro now becomes the most popular preferred financial currency,
then the U.S. dollar/petro-dollar is more vulnerable to collapse because of our
trillions in D-E-B-T.

If such doesn't scare ya, then you ain't paying attention.

Seemingly the World fears & dislikes the U.S. more now than before 9/11, and
yet everybody (the U.S., Europe, Russia, the Far East, South America, Africa)
is more complexly  inter-dependent too.

This is why I do not think there is going to be an alternative energy paradigm
established.

When the politicos talk about energy conservation, they are not fooling me.

The Russians have also become more dependent upon their oil revenues.
onegod - 22 Dec 2003 21:56 GMT
> > I have also heard it said that Japans attempt to damage America would
> result
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> power to physically collect what is owed - the Japanese don't have that that
> power, so this is really a one-way relationship

Although it is one way, so is just about  everything else.  Also, usa can
hurt japan WAY more than japan
can hurt usa economically.

On the military front, despite major misconceptions, japan is a major
military power.  Japan probably have
many nukes or capacity and technology to build hundreds in short period of
time.  It has factories and owns factories through out the world.  It has
the best technologies for tankers and cargo ships.
And surprising fact is it's navy is modern and 2nd only to usa.

> The Japanese tolerate the situation out of fear of China (and formerly the
> Soviet Union). From their point of view, these loans to the US are a form of
> military insurance

Japan is wimpy nation with economy centered on export to usa mainly.
Lord Possum - 23 Dec 2003 00:28 GMT
[snipped for brevity]

I have heard that America has problems with balance of payments to Japan,
and that Japan has the power to swamp America (economically) tomorrow if it
so wished.

[snipped, as well]
==================================================

The problem with observations such as from 'Trantis' above stems from a
lack of education.

Japan is an exceeding poor country.  So poor, in fact, that they cannot ...
absolutely c-a-n-n-o-t exist without the assistance of their major markets,
which means ... the U.S.    Japan has NO, repeat NO, natural resources.
No forests. Not much fresh water. No minerals; coal, iron, chemicals, etc.
Everything MUST come from other lands.  Their only saving grace is a
subservient willingness to take an idea and run with it.  They work well
like ants in a colony, going out into the world to get raw materials,
bringing
it back to do something with it.   Why do you think they launched their
attempts to conquer the Pacific rim during WW2?   Resources and manpower
to work them, that's why.

Don't they teach history in school anymore?
Representative Trantis - 23 Dec 2003 00:44 GMT
> [snipped for brevity]
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> The problem with observations such as from 'Trantis' above stems from a
> lack of education.

Yes, I admit, that I do not know much about modern world economic, it is
simply an offshoot of my knowledge of history, hence I am specifically
starting this thread in the hope that someone can fill in the blanks.
I have no real interest in economics, but a big interest in hisstory, hence
I am wanting someone to fill in the blanks...
Pantheras - 23 Dec 2003 02:27 GMT
>Yes, I admit, that I do not know much about modern world economic, it is
>simply an offshoot of my knowledge of history, hence I am specifically
>starting this thread in the hope that someone can fill in the blanks.
>I have no real interest in economics, but a big interest in hisstory, hence
>I am wanting someone to fill in the blanks...

Turn your way-back machine to 1975. Brazil announced that they had no
intention of paying back
the $1.7 Billion the owed the US from loaned. I thought at the time that
we should nuke them for
their attitude since we were not going to get our money back. But
wait....they claimed that no one
wanted the debt paid off, that that is not the way countries work. It is
the interest that counts. The
money remain in play.

It is when some one does not want to play by the rules that things get a
bit out of hand such as 1962
when de Gaulle demanded that the US pay war reparations in gold because
he did not like the US
currency (which was not floating at the time). I am sure there have been
many other such blips on
the international scene.

>  
>
Signature

                 

DDB - 23 Dec 2003 03:22 GMT
> > [snipped for brevity]
> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> I have no real interest in economics, but a big interest in hisstory, hence
> I am wanting someone to fill in the blanks...

He or she just did.
Tron Furu - 05 Jan 2004 08:35 GMT
> > [snipped for brevity]
> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> I have no real interest in economics, but a big interest in hisstory, hence
> I am wanting someone to fill in the blanks...

If you haven't already, read "The Future of Capitalism" by Lester Thurow;
AFAIR there was a chapter on the mechanics of the USA - Japan (or Pacific
Rim Economies) trades deficits and the inherent risks. The book is a couple
of years old, but then, so is the problem.

TF
onegod - 25 Dec 2003 01:53 GMT
> [snipped for brevity]
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Don't they teach history in school anymore?

Dont you know that values are education and to some extent money itself?
You can convert sand into intel p4/itanium etc.   Of course it dont help if
rest of world get educated
with cheap computers.

About history....  Japan was one of most isolated country for 200 years.
And it has raining season at beginning of summer which are awesome for
farming.

Recently japan was so successful in 80s it had to stop their ways and teach
the population to spend money on junk such as fashion, cell phones etc.
Also it is funny that currency has to be kept so high value when it should
be 180yen to dollar.
Ken Sisby - 24 Dec 2003 00:29 GMT
Japan and the US are not competing for superpower status.  Japan has no
interest in competing militarily even though it spends enormous sums of
money on defence and has the third largest (but unassembled and therefore
not counted) nuclear arsenal on the planet.

The US has a huge problem with their current account deficit.  Americans buy
more than they sell and as a nation must borrow more than 5 billion dollars
a day just to service that deficit.  That's not government debt, that's the
country as a whole.  Mercedes, BMW's, Toyotas, consumer electronics,
clothing etc etc.  Coupled with the 5 trillion dollars that the US
government owes it is quite significant.  Most of that debt is owed to
foreigners such as rich Arabs, Japan and increasingly China.  One of the
main reasons that the US dollar is falling is that foreigners are becoming
wary of it.  The US still hasn't paid off the loans it took out to pay for
Vietnam.  And nobody wants to buy a currency that is devaluating.  If and it
is a big if, China and Japan sold off all of their US securities at once,
the dollar would fall so far that the US would be back in depression like
never before.  That could happen but it's doubtful because everyone would
lose.

The US treasury could not just print enough to write off the debt, because
the debt is in US dollars.  You can't buy dollar debts with dollars.  If
everybody is selling dollars it's because they don't want dollars.
Obviously they would want another currency otherwise they wouldn't get
anywhere.  Anyway, no country can just print money, that's what happened to
Nazi Germany and why they went broke.  If a country starts printing money,
their currency becomes worthless.  Money is created by debt, not printing
presses.

The problem is that the US could not repatriate it's massive debts without
using foreign (as in non-American) currency.  In a monetary crisis the US
would have nothing to buy those foreign currencies with.  The Japanese keep
their currency undervalued by buying American government debt in US dollars.
But they spend yen to buy those securities.  Americans use those yen to buy
Japanese consumer goods.  This has been going on for decades because
Americans have always bought more from Japan than Japan buys from the US.
This is now also the case with China and India (software).  And this also
has to do with geopolitics.  America always wanted a strong and wealthy,
capitalist Japan close to Communist China as an example of what it was like
to be associated with the West.  That's one of the reasons for US government
acquiescence when dealing with a very uneven trading relationship with
Japan.

There is a simple fact of economics that was identified by (of all people)
Karl Marx and that is that capital always flows to areas with cheap labour.
The fact is that China can produce just about anything cheaper than the US
can.  There is really nothing that the US can do.  Japan is an expensive
place to manufacture, but the most important thing about Japanese
manufacturing is their obsession with quality workmanship.  When the
Japanese re-industrialized they went to Germany to study manufacturing, not
the US.  And if there is only one thing to say about German workmanship it
is quality.  So the US cannot compete with the Japanese on quality (at least
price wise).

The simple fact is that the US has been on a spending binge for a long time,
regardless of the kind of spending.  It's time to tighten the belt.

Kenny

> I am looking for someone with a little more knowledge of this to explain it
> to me.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> What's the current situation with Japan and America competing for top
> economic superpower status?
Ty - 24 Dec 2003 01:37 GMT
> Japan ..has the third largest (but unassembled and therefore
> not counted) nuclear arsenal on the planet.

I've not heard about this before. Could you elaborate?

--Ty
Robert Cohen - 24 Dec 2003 01:59 GMT
re: japan nukes as huge "arsenal"

if the breeder reactor thing is considered a (necessary?) precursor to a huge
nuke collection/agglomeration, then...yeah, because i think they have the
breeder technology on-going--for ostensible energy production of course

the north koreans are pushing the proverbial envelope by implicitly threatening
japan (shooting a missle near/over it within past coupla years)
onegod - 25 Dec 2003 02:12 GMT
> > Japan ..has the third largest (but unassembled and therefore
> > not counted) nuclear arsenal on the planet.
>
> I've not heard about this before. Could you elaborate?

it does not take much technology to build nuke
japan has technology
they have nuclear power plants (and need energy as well as fussion
eventually)
japan has rockets
japan has money
russia is poor country
it takes money to disarm former ussr...
japan can buy plutonim/enriched uranium etc to save russian from maintenance
as well as less risk for it to ends up in hands of unfriendly nation or
terrorists....

And japan is threatened by china/south korea etc.
Japan has us military base as well as payment of troops etc.  They probably
can hold nuke and not count toward japan owning them.
Ken Sisby - 29 Feb 2004 19:08 GMT
This is not a secret.  It's been reported in the Economist, which is one of
the most reputable magazines in the world.  The obvious reason why is
proximity to eastern Russia and China to a lesser extent.  Unassembled
nuclear weapons are not counted as nuclear weapons, meaning that the world
has many more of such devices than are commonly reported.  This is a
holdover from the Cold War and undoubtedly was in coordination with the US
and Nato.  Japan also has one of the world's highest defence budgets even
though their constitution prohibits foreign ventures.  None of this is
surprising if you consider that Japan is the only country to have been
attacked with nuclear weapons (for which they have never forgiven the US).

I don't know what Japan intends to do with this stockpile in the future now
that they are on friendly terms with both China and Russia.  I would imagine
that they will hold on to them until everyone else disarms.  Being a small
country, nuclear weapons would be their only defence to US style warfare in
which everyone and everything is a target, especially civilians (at least
that has been their experience with the US).

Ken

> > Japan ..has the third largest (but unassembled and therefore
> > not counted) nuclear arsenal on the planet.
>
> I've not heard about this before. Could you elaborate?
>
> --Ty
cc - 24 Dec 2003 06:43 GMT
Why don't you read this:

http://www-hoover.stanford.edu/publications/digest/974/friedman.html

> I am looking for someone with a little more knowledge of this to explain it
> to me.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> What's the current situation with Japan and America competing for top
> economic superpower status?
Leo Schmit - 28 Dec 2003 13:05 GMT
Read R. Heusinger in ZEIT.DE (week 52):

US needs 50 bln a month from non-US investors to keep up the good life.

Private int. investors are backing out. Currently the CB's of China, Japan
and HK support the USD (against Yen, Renminbi and HK$) with public money, to
protect their exports.

When C, J and HK stopp doing this (soon?) H predicts a collapse of USD (down
to 1.6-to 1 Euro) over the medium term (5-10 years), provided the US can
stop overconsuming.

My conclusion, if EU could regain growth and take over from US as main
export markets of C, J, and HK (and Singapore plus SEA), the party is over
for US.

See your other query on EU-US competition and my reply there. From this it
follows that the failure of EU (as a unified economic/political entity) is
in the interest of US (for the above reason).

But first sell your buck, because next months USD will be down another 20
points and by mid 04, 40 points down compared to the 1.25 they are now at.

Best LS

> I am looking for someone with a little more knowledge of this to explain it
> to me.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> What's the current situation with Japan and America competing for top
> economic superpower status?
Steve andersen - 13 Feb 2004 15:43 GMT
> I am looking for someone with a little more knowledge of this to
> explain it to me.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> What's the current situation with Japan and America competing for top
> economic superpower status?

Many asian nations are trying to keep their currency artificially low
compared to the dollar
to do this they are buying treasury bonds at rediculously low rates to
try and keep the dollar strong

while this allows the US to deficit spend with the Asian tax payer
picking up part of the tab, sooner or later even the Asain central banks
are going to want a better interest rate

Printing money is not the answer.  As the US learned in the 70s inflation
is very unpopular politically

what should happen is that the dollar should be allowed to fall further
this would greatly help our curent account balance

the other thing that needs to be done is to get the deficit back under
control

As for the US and Japan... we have comparable per capita GDPs.  The US
population is gowing and Japan's isn't so unless they see some order of
maginitude productivity increases they will continue to have the smaller
ecconomy
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.