> Did the ancient Romans have any laws prohibiting the possession of
> weapons by private citizens
No, but there was a ban on carrying weapons inside the city walls in
peactime. Walking around under the protection of arms - the bodyguard of
lictors with the fasces and the axe - was the privilege of public officers,
first the (etruscan) kings, then the consuls etc. AFAIK the carrying of
weapons inside the city in peacetime was also not customary (I don't know if
it was unlawful) in greek Athens; or else to permit Peisistratos to have a
bodyguard of 80 men with clubs would not have been so remarkable.
> or subjugated people
They either served in the legions or as auxiliaries. I know of no "disarmed"
peoples under roman rule. Maybe there were, though.
> like most dictatorships?
Such a ban was upheld also under republican periods. It was not a result of
dictatorship, but of pride in the rule of law rather than the rule of
violence in the life of a city state. Perhaps something to be learned from
the ancients.
T
wth - 07 Mar 2004 17:46 GMT
> > Did the ancient Romans have any laws prohibiting the possession of
> > weapons by private citizens
You couldnt carry automatic weapons or handguns inside ancvient Rome.