Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

History Forum / General / General Topics / April 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Indentured Servanthood in the contemporary age

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John Wolf - 23 Apr 2004 01:27 GMT
I think that the mass amount of people that are in debt today is a more
contemporary form of "Indentured Servanthood".  Any history buffs here
can tell me what they think.  But the way I see it, it looks like 90% of
the populous will be paying back their debts most if not all of their
lives.

John
John Gilmer - 24 Apr 2004 04:10 GMT
> I think that the mass amount of people that are in debt today is a more
> contemporary form of "Indentured Servanthood".  Any history buffs here
> can tell me what they think.  But the way I see it, it looks like 90% of
> the populous will be paying back their debts most if not all of their
> lives.

True.

But so what?

Folks can CHOOSE to go into debt or stay out of debt.

So, even if we accept your model, it's a voluntary indenture.

Moreover, it you only go into debt to secure income producing property (or
income producing education) then debt is simply a business arrangement.

Most credit card debt is (obviously to those with common sense) dewnright
self-destructive.   Debt for a modest automobile or a home is reasonable and
"business like" if the debt service is less expensive than alterrnative
arrangements for transportation or housing.

> John
Pantheras - 24 Apr 2004 20:34 GMT
> Folks can CHOOSE to go into debt or stay out of debt.
> So, even if we accept your model, it's a voluntary indenture.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> "business like" if the debt service is less expensive than alterrnative
> arrangements for transportation or housing.

With the economy the way it is now, there are one hell of a lot of young
people out there with out jobs that would disagree with you.

80% of the users of credit cards don't understand the trap that the card
companies set for them with the minimum payment scheme either.
John Gilmer - 24 Apr 2004 23:03 GMT
> With the economy the way it is now, there are one hell of a lot of young
> people out there with out jobs that would disagree with you.

There are plenty of jobs "out there."   Maybe jobs are tight in some areas
but a young person willing to move can find something.   In any case, there
is always the military.

> 80% of the users of credit cards don't understand the trap that the card
> companies set for them with the minimum payment scheme either.

Only making the "minimum" payment is a choice.   A rational person who finds
himself "short" because of an unexpected expense (e.g.: car repair)  may
have to pay the "minimum" for a month or two until things get back to near
"normal."

Moreover, young folks should seriously consider borrowing from relatives
BEFORE not paying in full a credit card bill.
Les Cargill - 25 Apr 2004 01:47 GMT
>>With the economy the way it is now, there are one hell of a lot of young
>>people out there with out jobs that would disagree with you.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Moreover, young folks should seriously consider borrowing from relatives
> BEFORE not paying in full a credit card bill.

But young people probably should not consider avoiding credit cards
altogether, at least if they ever think they'll need a mortgage.

Carrying a modest balance for a few months isn't *that* egregious,
but anything over a year should be reexamined carefully.

Signature

--
Les Cargill

onegod - 29 Apr 2004 05:16 GMT
It is CONNEDsumer spending that's 60% of economy.  They pay interest, tax,
etc. and suffer the consequence of federal deficit etc.   Mean while,
there's super rich that inherit things and hardly pay any tax as well as
profiteer from deficite and death and destructions such as tabacco, oil, war
merchants.

"voluntary indenture"

So is drug abuse, prostitution, gambling etc.

> > I think that the mass amount of people that are in debt today is a more
> > contemporary form of "Indentured Servanthood".  Any history buffs here
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> > John
John Gilmer - 29 Apr 2004 14:18 GMT
> It is CONNEDsumer spending that's 60% of economy.  They pay interest, tax,
> etc. and suffer the consequence of federal deficit etc.

1)  The CHOOSE to pay interest.   Some consumers choose not to.

2)   Deficits tend to help consumers who get into debt: they pay back the
loans with cheaper dollars.   But you knew that, didn't you.

>  Mean while,
> there's super rich that inherit things and hardly pay any tax as well as
> profiteer from deficite and death and destructions such as tabacco, oil, war
> merchants.

The "super rich" avoid taxes by accepting lower returns.   OTOH, the tax
free bonds help pay for schools, roads, etc.

> "voluntary indenture"

Except that with indenture the contract is binding and there is no legal way
out.

A consumer in debt can:  1) change his lifestyle and work his way out of
debt; or 2) dismiss most/all of his debt with bankrupty and then change his
lifestyle.

I would recommend that any consumer who is willing to do what it takes to
stop living on borrowed money consider one of the two above options.   If
his credit card debt exceeds six month's wages, he should became bankrupt.

> So is drug abuse, prostitution, gambling etc.

NO.  These things are exactly what they are.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.