lahdittydahtdahtdah.
cheers!
Doc
p.s. if israel occupied california... would i be unjustified in attacking
them? then why are the palestinian peoples unjustified in attacking the
people that have occupied the land vouchsafed to them by the united nations
in the 1947 partition of palestine.
p.p.s. gee... a nation where israel controls the airspace and water
supply... what a sweet offer. i'm sure the people of palestine were just
drooling for that scenario.
> p.s. if israel occupied california... would i be unjustified in attacking
> them?
That would depend on whether or not California had been consistently
used as a base from which to mount attacks on Israeli civilians.
Doc Martian - 25 Jul 2004 19:56 GMT
even if israel was funding those attacks?
cheers!
Doc
Israel funded arab militant groups for 20 years.
www.indybay.org/news/2002/06/132088.php
Israel has puppeted arab groups before.
http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/1298/9812057.html
israel has killed their own before. http://www.ukar.org/orr01.htm
even the u.s. gov't agrees... that israel likes to dress up as arabs.
http://www.public-action.com/911/sams.html
israelis also like to celebrate after attacks on america instead of catching
the obviously israeli perpetrators beforehand.... a headscarf on your head
and a koran in your hand is not half as damning as the israeli practice of
getting drunk at stripclubs before getting onstage and acting like arabs.
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=75266&contrassID=2&su
bContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
> > p.s. if israel occupied california... would i be unjustified in attacking
> > them?
>
> That would depend on whether or not California had been consistently
> used as a base from which to mount attacks on Israeli civilians.
Jeffrey E. Salzberg - 25 Jul 2004 20:20 GMT
> even if israel was funding those attacks?
Even if your tin-foil helmet falls off.
> lahdittydahtdahtdah.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> people that have occupied the land vouchsafed to them by the united nations
> in the 1947 partition of palestine.
Let's see, are you speaking for the Native Americans who originally owned
California, or for the Spaniards/Mexicans who controlled it before we
conquered it from Mexico. You're an idiot. Like the irrational PLO
leadership, Hamas leadership, and the rest. They know nothing except getting
others to die for them, and they will continue to be that way until they die
and their children (hopefully) will decide the killing has gone on too long.
Roughly half the population of Israel consists of Jews whose familes lived
for centuries in other parts of the middle east. These are people who had to
leave their homes or die - because of the Arabs and other muslims who
rejected them. Sort of like the Kurds in north Iraq around the oil wells who
Saddam removed and replaced with Sunnis.
The Israelis aren't leaving. The Palestinians are living in a dream world or
on drugs to think otherwise. Their choice is to negotiate an end to the
violence or continue their idiotic suicide attacks while eliminating any
chance theyb have to build a decent life for thier families.
> p.p.s. gee... a nation where israel controls the airspace and water
> supply... what a sweet offer. i'm sure the people of palestine were just
> drooling for that scenario.
Right. Suicide bombers will get them that. Yeah, sure. That is about as
rational as bin Laden or Jerry Falwell or any of the other fundamentalists
and Fascists/Communists.
As long as the PLO refuses to negotiate in good faith, they will have
nothing except death and suicide - which is what their current leadership
wants.
Until some rational Palestinian leaders take over, the Israelis will simply
have to continue giving them what they want - death and suicide.
Unfortunately, Araffat and his ilk are dragging down the roughly 90% of
peace-loving decent Palesitnians with them. Until the Palestinians decide to
get rational (liek the Soviet Communists finally did in 1989) there is
nothing the Israelis can do except what they are doing now.
You are one of those people who blame the Polish people for WW II because
they shot back when the Germans attacked them. That is exactly what you are
doing here to the Israelis. You are blaming them for defending themselves
against the aggressors.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Doc Martian" <docmartian@verizon.net>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> > thing of the past and both nations would be on the way to becoming good
> > places to raise children.
Ty Beard - 26 Jul 2004 13:30 GMT
> The Israelis aren't leaving. The Palestinians are living in a dream world or
> on drugs to think otherwise. Their choice is to negotiate an end to the
> violence or continue their idiotic suicide attacks while eliminating any
> chance theyb have to build a decent life for thier families.
There's also the little problem that the Arabs have set a standard for
military ineptitude that makes the WWII French and Italians look like
Patton's Third Army. Seems highly unlikely to me that they will be able to
remove the Israelis.
...
> Until some rational Palestinian leaders take over, the Israelis will simply
> have to continue giving them what they want - death and suicide.
> Unfortunately, Araffat and his ilk are dragging down the roughly 90% of
> peace-loving decent Palesitnians with them. Until the Palestinians decide to
> get rational (liek the Soviet Communists finally did in 1989) there is
> nothing the Israelis can do except what they are doing now.
> You are one of those people who blame the Polish people for WW II because
> they shot back when the Germans attacked them. That is exactly what you are
> doing here to the Israelis. You are blaming them for defending themselves
> against the aggressors.
And where, I wonder, is his criticism of the Palestinians' "Arab brothers"
who keep hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in concentration camps,
rather than letting them settle in other Arab nations? Somehow, that's
okay...
--Ty