Bush Crimes: Deployed British Troops who will die
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Shan - 22 Oct 2004 16:23 GMT "UK to redeploy troops to central Iraq after it asked for assistance.
"Five hundred Black Watch soldiers and 350 support personnel will move from Basra to the US sector in central Iraq, but remain under British control."
The British troops who redeploy and WILL DIE because of this POLITICALLY MOTIVATED request from Bush are and should be considered BUSH CRIMES.
<SmirkS> - 22 Oct 2004 17:09 GMT Shan posted:
> Deployed British Troops who will die British-Iraqi hostage Margaret Hassan made an emotional appeal for British forces to withdraw from Iraq, in a videotape broadcast on Arabic television channel Al Jazeera on Friday.
 Signature TheTruthHurts.
Al - 23 Oct 2004 01:59 GMT ***Your subject line is pure BS. Bush requested deployment, the British command did the deployment. The Brits could have said "no."
Al
> "UK to redeploy troops to central Iraq after it asked for assistance. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > POLITICALLY MOTIVATED request from Bush are and should be considered > BUSH CRIMES. RT - 23 Oct 2004 15:20 GMT > ***Your subject line is pure BS. Bush requested deployment, the British > command did the deployment. The Brits could have said "no." Exactly Al... and it should be noted Blair did this in light of his own political standing within the UK.
Glad to have the Brits with us - hats off to 'em and godspeed.
MACHINE_NAME - 23 Oct 2004 15:44 GMT | > ***Your subject line is pure BS. Bush requested deployment, the British | > command did the deployment. The Brits could have said "no." [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] | | Glad to have the Brits with us - hats off to 'em and godspeed. Hats off to them for what? Halliburton's profits [pipe fitters ready before the troops]? There's no honor in the Iraq war. The whole thing is a debacle and a disgrace. By any rights, Bush should be impeached for his [successful] attempt to deceive Congress and the American public. And as far as 'godspeed' even the Pope was against this stupid war and he's the Vicar of Christ on Earth. Godspeed my a.s.
Oliver Cromwell - 24 Oct 2004 00:19 GMT > | > ***Your subject line is pure BS. Bush requested deployment, the > British [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > 'godspeed' even the Pope was against this stupid war and he's the Vicar of > Christ on Earth. Godspeed my a.s. Temper, temper little boy. You denigrate better men than the likes of you as you rant and rave because of your fear that they just might get it right. That really has to scare you, that better men than you are willing to do right and actually help people. All you seem to know how to do is to cut, chop and whine like your buddies Kerry, Edwards and Barney Frank.
Al - 24 Oct 2004 00:51 GMT > > | > ***Your subject line is pure BS. Bush requested deployment, the > > British [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > right and actually help people. All you seem to know how to do is to cut, > chop and whine like your buddies Kerry, Edwards and Barney Frank. ***And don't forget Barney Fife!
<G>
Shan - 24 Oct 2004 19:20 GMT > > | > ***Your subject line is pure BS. Bush requested deployment, the > British [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > right and actually help people. All you seem to know how to do is to cut, > chop and whine like your buddies Kerry, Edwards and Barney Frank. Oliver Cromwell is a traitor of the British crown.
Al - 24 Oct 2004 00:24 GMT > | > ***Your subject line is pure BS. Bush requested deployment, the British > | > command did the deployment. The Brits could have said "no." [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > 'godspeed' even the Pope was against this stupid war and he's the Vicar of > Christ on Earth. Godspeed my a.s. ***And your "godspeed" suggestion for fighting the war on the terrorists is? (I'll bet, like Kerry, you would rather fight terrorists on U.S. soil than take the fight to them.)
Al
MACHINE_NAME - 24 Oct 2004 01:46 GMT .
| > | > ***Your subject line is pure BS. Bush requested deployment, the | British [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] | | Al I would take neither Kerry's nor Bush's course. If I decided to 'fight terrorists', I would take the fight to the terrorist. That's if I did. Bush dropped the fight on terrorism for to fight for Halliburton. Kerry's in a dreamworld.
For the most part, all the U.S. government need do is operate with sense. Secure the borders well and sensibly. Make agreements with Mexico and especially Canada to help create a N. American defence perimeter. But the current gov't's policies make no snese. For instance, banning mother's milk on flights but letting on lighters and matches makes no sense to me. But it does to Bush and company. But then they are not fighting the war against terror - they're fighting to secure oil supplies for greedy corporations.
It would probably be a botch under Kerry too. In his hyperliberal ways he'd launch all sorts of studies on the status of women and at the border.
You people assume too much. Just because Bush's agenda makes me want to puke doesn't mean I like Kerry's putrid agenda neither.
I think anyone who would twist or convolute his or herself to support a Bush or a Kerry agenda is commiting an act more abominable than homosexual sodomy.
Al - 24 Oct 2004 02:08 GMT > . > | [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > dropped the fight on terrorism for to fight for Halliburton. Kerry's in a > dreamworld. ***You are living in a fantasy world. Keep in mind that in Iraq Halliburton is only a subcontractor to Bechtel.
> For the most part, all the U.S. government need do is operate with sense. Secure > the borders well and sensibly. Make agreements with Mexico and especially Canada [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > I think anyone who would twist or convolute his or herself to support a Bush or > a Kerry agenda is commiting an act more abominable than homosexual sodomy. ***You just lost your credibility.
Shan - 23 Oct 2004 19:04 GMT > > ***Your subject line is pure BS. Bush requested deployment, the British > > command did the deployment. The Brits could have said "no." [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Glad to have the Brits with us - hats off to 'em and godspeed. Simpleton.
Jeffrey Salzberg - 23 Oct 2004 19:20 GMT
> > > ***Your subject line is pure BS. Bush requested deployment, the British > > > command did the deployment. The Brits could have said "no." Gee, that's exactly the same type of logic the Republicans used to defend Nixon.
 Signature =================================== Edward Smith "stayed the course" and the Titanic struck an iceberg and sank with over 1,000 people.
Custer "stayed the course" and the 7th Cavalry was massacred.
George Walker Bush promises to "stay the course"....
Al - 24 Oct 2004 00:26 GMT > > > > ***Your subject line is pure BS. Bush requested deployment, the British > > > > command did the deployment. The Brits could have said "no." > > Gee, that's exactly the same type of logic the Republicans used to > defend Nixon. ***There is no "logic" involved. This is exactly what took place. Fact is fact.
Al
***...and sink the crap outta the Demonrats...er...Demoncrats...er...
Al - 24 Oct 2004 00:25 GMT > > > ***Your subject line is pure BS. Bush requested deployment, the British > > > command did the deployment. The Brits could have said "no." [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Simpleton. ***What's tyhe matter, Shan. Can't stand the British helping us out? What a guy!
Al
Shan - 24 Oct 2004 19:17 GMT > > "RT" <xcaliber@future.net> wrote in message > news:<lMted.9119$q%7.6942@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>... [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > ***What's tyhe matter, Shan. Can't stand the British helping us out? What a > guy! Simpleton number 2.
Al - 24 Oct 2004 23:08 GMT > > > "RT" <xcaliber@future.net> wrote in message > > news:<lMted.9119$q%7.6942@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>... [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Simpleton number 2. ***The writer of the above is the Grand Poo-Bah Simpleton.
Shan - 25 Oct 2004 13:36 GMT > > "Al" <A_G_G@no_spam.net> wrote in message > news:<clep9u01kkd@enews3.newsguy.com>... [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > ***The writer of the above is the Grand Poo-Bah Simpleton. Sorry. Correction: You are not simpleton number 2; you are f.cked up in the brain.
Al - 25 Oct 2004 16:03 GMT > > > "Al" <A_G_G@no_spam.net> wrote in message > > news:<clep9u01kkd@enews3.newsguy.com>... [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Sorry. Correction: You are not simpleton number 2; you are f.cked up in the brain. ***Wow! There he goes again. Cannot argue rationally, so he resorts to four-letter words. What a guy! A guy with no credibility! Yippee!
Shan - 26 Oct 2004 00:06 GMT > > "Al" <A_G_G@no_spam.net> wrote in message > news:<clh95m02msg@enews1.newsguy.com>... [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > ***Wow! There he goes again. Cannot argue rationally, so he resorts to > four-letter words. What a guy! A guy with no credibility! Yippee! When you grow up you will find out that you are worst idiot that ever was.
Al - 26 Oct 2004 14:16 GMT > > > "Al" <A_G_G@no_spam.net> wrote in message > > news:<clh95m02msg@enews1.newsguy.com>... [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > When you grow up you will find out that you are worst idiot that ever was. ***I just love your attempt at puberty! Keep up the good work! How about some different four-letter words in your next reply??
Shan - 23 Oct 2004 19:03 GMT > ***Your subject line is pure BS. Bush requested deployment, the British > command did the deployment. The Brits could have said "no." Instead of dwelling on stupid comments, ask why re-deploy the Brits? The answer is obvious: For U.S. politicial purposes not because they are needed in the military sense.
Are you that stupid or you just say stupid things thinking that people would believe you regardless.
> > "UK to redeploy troops to central Iraq after it asked for assistance. > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > POLITICALLY MOTIVATED request from Bush are and should be considered > > BUSH CRIMES. Al - 24 Oct 2004 00:28 GMT > > ***Your subject line is pure BS. Bush requested deployment, the British > > command did the deployment. The Brits could have said "no." > > Instead of dwelling on stupid comments, ask why re-deploy the Brits? > The answer is obvious: For U.S. politicial purposes not because they > are needed in the military sense. ***Well, asking the Brits for help kinda follows Kerry's thought process of getting the allies to do more. Duh!!
> Are you that stupid or you just say stupid things thinking that people > would believe you regardless. ***Stating that the Brits complied with the U.S. request to deploy is hardly stupid, unless you think that stating facts is stupid...which just shows your stupidity.
***thanks for letting me point that out!
Al
Shan - 24 Oct 2004 19:16 GMT > > "Al" <A_G_G@no_spam.net> wrote in message > news:<clcaec01l15@enews3.newsguy.com>... [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > ***Well, asking the Brits for help kinda follows Kerry's thought process of > getting the allies to do more. Duh!! NO help required. Tony Blair is simply covering Bush's exposed a.s but it is not going to cut it.
The POLITICAL motives of the re-deployment are clear.
> > Are you that stupid or you just say stupid things thinking that people > > would believe you regardless. > > ***Stating that the Brits complied with the U.S. request to deploy is hardly > stupid, unless you think that stating facts is stupid...which just shows > your stupidity. Listen, ass-hole, the fact remains that any British blood spilled because of the Bush request to cover his a.s is a crime against Bush.
> ***thanks for letting me point that out! You can't think without me. I know.
Al - 24 Oct 2004 23:11 GMT > > > "Al" <A_G_G@no_spam.net> wrote in message > > news:<clcaec01l15@enews3.newsguy.com>... [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > NO help required. Tony Blair is simply covering Bush's exposed a.s > but it is not going to cut it. ***Can you document your statement or is the statement just the opinion of an irrational person?
> The POLITICAL motives of the re-deployment are clear. ***So clear that you have not clarified? What a guy!
> > > Are you that stupid or you just say stupid things thinking that people > > > would believe you regardless. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Listen, ass-hole, the fact remains that any British blood spilled > because of the Bush request to cover his a.s is a crime against Bush. ***Ah, when silly arguments fail, the defeated individual resorts to filthy epithets. What a guy. Typical liberal leftist!!
> > ***thanks for letting me point that out! > > You can't think without me. I know. ***If we all relied on you to do our thinking for us, the world would come to an end! Spare yourself the shame of insulting yourself.
Shan - 25 Oct 2004 13:35 GMT > > "Al" <A_G_G@no_spam.net> wrote in message > news:<clepge01kra@enews3.newsguy.com>... [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > ***Can you document your statement or is the statement just the opinion of > an irrational person? The fact remains. No help is required but a political move to cover Bush's a.s. There are no documents required to prove the obvious. If the US needed more troops, it would have shipped them from the US, idiot.
> > The POLITICAL motives of the re-deployment are clear. > > ***So clear that you have not clarified? What a guy! When I tell you, you are an idiot, don't question me. You prove it over and over with your stupid questions.
> > > > Are you that stupid or you just say stupid things thinking that people > > > > would believe you regardless. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > ***Ah, when silly arguments fail, the defeated individual resorts to filthy > epithets. What a guy. Typical liberal leftist!! You are diverting from the point and that is "every British life lost because of the unnecessary deployment is a crime on Bush."
> > > ***thanks for letting me point that out! > > > > You can't think without me. I know. > > ***If we all relied on you to do our thinking for us, the world would come > to an end! Spare yourself the shame of insulting yourself. You contradict yourself by saying "thanks for letting me point that out" then you reverse yourself. Conclusion, you are an idiot and an ass-hole.
Al - 25 Oct 2004 16:04 GMT > > > "Al" <A_G_G@no_spam.net> wrote in message > > news:<clepge01kra@enews3.newsguy.com>... [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > out" then you reverse yourself. Conclusion, you are an idiot and an > ass-hole. ***Wow! there he goes again. When Shan is backed into a corner and cannot argue his way out, he resorts to filthy language. What a guy! A guy wholly discredited!
Shan - 26 Oct 2004 00:04 GMT > > > > You can't think without me. I know. > > > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > argue his way out, he resorts to filthy language. What a guy! A guy wholly > discredited! Which corner, air-head. Eat sh.t and die.
Cary Kittrell - 26 Oct 2004 00:28 GMT > > > > > You can't think without me. I know. > > > > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Which corner, air-head. Eat sh.t and die. You rest his case.
-- cary
Al - 26 Oct 2004 14:17 GMT > > > > > > You can't think without me. I know. > > > > > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > -- cary ***Careful, Cary, or he'll tell you to east something, too!
Al - 26 Oct 2004 14:16 GMT > > > > > You can't think without me. I know. > > > > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Which corner, air-head. Eat sh.t and die. Oooooooo! We just love it when you talk dirty!!
Al - 25 Oct 2004 16:05 GMT ***Are you sure you are not Nick Kobbs in drag?
> You contradict yourself by saying "thanks for letting me point that > out" then you reverse yourself. Conclusion, you are an idiot and an > ass-hole. Ghod - 25 Oct 2004 21:08 GMT : The fact remains. No help is required but a political move to cover : Bush's a.s. There are no documents required to prove the obvious. : If the US needed more troops, it would have shipped them from the US, : idiot. And what troops are those? Hmmmmm? Do you really think that we have a surplus of trained soldiers, just lying around on the beach somewhere? Why do you think that people's tours are being extended?
Bob Dog - 24 Oct 2004 09:58 GMT > "UK to redeploy troops to central Iraq after it asked for assistance. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > POLITICALLY MOTIVATED request from Bush are and should be considered > BUSH CRIMES. The Band of the Black Watch will soon watch black armbands.
Bob Dog
Mark Fox - 24 Oct 2004 17:25 GMT > shankarees@yahoo.com (Shan) wrote... > > "UK to redeploy troops to central Iraq after it asked for assistance. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > POLITICALLY MOTIVATED request from Bush are and should be considered > > BUSH CRIMES. You and your stupid comments should be considered internet crimes.
wbarwell - 24 Oct 2004 20:09 GMT >> shankarees@yahoo.com (Shan) wrote... >> > "UK to redeploy troops to central Iraq after it asked for assistance. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > You and your stupid comments should be considered internet crimes. So you want good men to die because of Bush's lies?
You are a net criminal.
 Signature Kerry - two medals a silver and bronze star. Bush? Well they don't give medals for going AWOL, missing your medical and getting grounded or falling off of a bar stool. Kerry - a hero, Bush - a zero
Cheerful Charlie
Al - 24 Oct 2004 23:13 GMT > >> shankarees@yahoo.com (Shan) wrote... > >> > "UK to redeploy troops to central Iraq after it asked for assistance. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > You are a net criminal. ***If Kerry is a 4-month war hero, why won't he authorize release of his military records? Because he has something to hide from the American public, that's why!
wbarwell - 25 Oct 2004 01:22 GMT >> >> shankarees@yahoo.com (Shan) wrote... >> >> > "UK to redeploy troops to central Iraq after it asked for [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > military records? Because he has something to hide from the American > public, that's why! Damn, you are stupid.
He's got two medals. Bush got a dental exam.
Bush lied us into a war.
Kerry's DD214 is on the net. He was honorable discharged. All you have is a lying rhetorical question to hide the fact Bush was a useless AWOL lier.
Kerry a hero, Bush a man who lied us into a war.
Where did all these hate filled, brain damaged far right un-America sh.t monkies come from anyway?
Stupid a.sholes!
 Signature Kerry - two medals a silver and bronze star. Bush? Well they don't give medals for going AWOL, missing your medical and getting grounded or falling off of a bar stool. Kerry - a hero, Bush - a zero
Cheerful Charlie
ElKabong - 29 Oct 2004 07:47 GMT >>shankarees@yahoo.com (Shan) wrote... >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > You and your stupid comments should be considered internet crimes. If you are still supporting Bush then you havent been listening. Are you stupid? He has never been wrong. That should make anyone suspicious. Everyone makes mistakes, but not Bush. Right.
Oliver Cromwell - 30 Oct 2004 01:06 GMT >>>shankarees@yahoo.com (Shan) wrote... >>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > stupid? He has never been wrong. That should make anyone suspicious. > Everyone makes mistakes, but not Bush. Right. You will no doubt vote for the Al-Qaeda candidate, John Kerry.
Mark Fox - 30 Oct 2004 04:35 GMT > >>shankarees@yahoo.com (Shan) wrote... > >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > > > You and your stupid comments should be considered internet crimes.
> If you are still supporting Bush then you havent been listening. Are you > stupid? He has never been wrong. That should make anyone suspicious. > Everyone makes mistakes, but not Bush. Right. I listen to everyone and all media outlets. I sift through tons of politically motivated garbage spewed by idiots in order to get to the truth. I listen to CNN, ABC, NPR and Fox. I read the new york times. I also noticed my tax bill went down last April 15th. After all that, I will vote for President Bush this November.
By the way, name even one mistake that President Bush has made? Then explain to us how you are sure its a mistake.
Al - 24 Oct 2004 23:12 GMT > > "UK to redeploy troops to central Iraq after it asked for assistance. > > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > The Band of the Black Watch will soon watch black armbands. ***What will they be watching the armbands for?
Iain - 26 Oct 2004 09:19 GMT > "UK to redeploy troops to central Iraq after it asked for assistance. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > POLITICALLY MOTIVATED request from Bush are and should be considered > BUSH CRIMES. What's your point: that soldiers might get killed or that war is politically motivated? We already know both these facts.
~Iain
|
|
|