I was asked for my opinion of the new movie Fahrenheit 9/11. I have not
seen it. But my reaction is that the Republicans have a constant
criticism of Democrats via radio with their droning of Conservative
views. Democrats seem to be unable to compete via radio. So I think this
film offers the Democrats a way to compete. And maybe that was the way
things were moving that the philosophy of Republicans is to hammer their
idealogy via radio to drivers (me, I only want to hear real news on the
radio and no talk show or music). And the Democrats perhaps have found a
niche of Films. So perhaps Republicans can preach on radio and Democrats
can preach on Films.
Maybe that is what Conservatism channel was fated to settle into of
radio transmission which is not a good medium for Democrats and their
liberal viewpoints but that Film would be their medium of expression.
What would be interesting to measure how popular the film Fahrenheit
becomes and whether some connection to the votes come November. Films
can arouse senses and emotions more strong than can talk on radio
because you have not only thoughts but the pictorial graphics to
remember such as Mr. Bush playing golf whilst USA soldiers are sweating
in 120 degrees. Radio does not have graphic images.
So, is it natural that Conservative Republicans find and end up with
Radio and that liberal Democrats find and end up with filmmaking. Are
the Republicans so much less talented in art that they flock around
radios and the Democrats more talented in art that they produce films
for upcoming elections.
I did see the film Wag the Dog, only the sitting president was a
Democrat.
But not a bad idea. Have the Republicans waste their money on radio
yakkity yack and have the Democrats spend millions on comedy films.
Nice to know that both Republicans and Democrats are helping the arts.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.archimedesplutonium.com
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Vaughan Sanders - 26 Feb 2005 12:20 GMT
"Vaughan Sanders" <jamie@chalkwell-windsurfing.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in
message news:...
snip
> > Hmmm, Severus died at York in 211. His being 'African' didn't make
any
> > difference in culture since the whole place incorporated into the
> Roman
> > Empire had been well Romanized for several centuries by that time.
> Both well
> > out-of-culture burial practices are going to drive historians nuts
for
> some
> > time. I can't find where Severus is buried.........two tonnes, huh.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Mummified with gypsum plaster, which I hadn't heard of before but
> appears to be not uncommon. Apparently it will only be x-rayed etc,
now
> you mention it I think Severus possibly did die at York but I don't
know
> if the coffin has been dated to the period.
>
> Jamie
Here's the links.
Mystery over decapitated Roman skeletons found under York street
http://www.thisisyork.co.uk/york/news/YORK_NEWS_ROMANS1.html
Archaeologists dig up Roman stone coffin
http://www.thisisyork.co.uk/york/news/YORK_NEWS_ROMANS3.html
Jamie
Vaughan Sanders - 28 Feb 2005 09:08 GMT
"Vaughan Sanders" <jamie@chalkwell-windsurfing.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in
message news:...
> > "Vaughan Sanders" wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> grave
> > diggers with a sense of humor putting executed criminals or
prisoners
> in the
> > ground with less effort. -the Troll
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Jamie
There's a group of execution burials at Sutton Hoo, some beheadings, the
placement of the heads in the graves doesn't appear to have any pattern.
Radio carbon couldn't date them accurately, but they might be as early
as AD 640.
Jamie