10 Greatest People of all time ???
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Dan - 02 Mar 2004 01:36 GMT The Greeks never practised democracy. This is myth that we are still taught in schools. Power was held by all citizens, but women were not citizens. And of course neither were the slaves.
How can you judge the greatest literature when most literature was lost with the fall of civilisations? Book burnings before mass printing would destroy originals.
Jewish people have made a great contribution to western societies. But to me, we are talking about a community within a society. They are a western elite, but not a civilisation apart as the Greeks or Romans. All things considered art, technology, literature, trade, and social control, the Chinese would top the list if you were to take the whole of mans history to the modern day into account.
Today's art, technology etc is an amalgamation of all the peoples of the world. And most of us live in cosmopolitan societies, so perhaps rankings are not relevant any more.
Shishimai - 02 Mar 2004 02:02 GMT On 1 Mar 2004 17:36:51 -0800, in article <157c968b.0403011736.3098c3d1@posting.google.com>, dan_rockandroll@yahoo.co.uk
>The Greeks never practised democracy. This is myth that we are still >taught in schools. Power was held by all citizens, but women were not [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >the world. And most of us live in cosmopolitan societies, so perhaps >rankings are not relevant any more. All of these divisions are artificial, anyway. You don't have to go back very far to find a common mother for all of us. Interestingly, a research group at Berkeley deduced our common African ancestress by comparing mitochondrial DNA from 147 women of different origins: European, African, Asian, Australian and New Guinean. As a general rule, the differences within races were much larger than the differences between them. Read that sentence again. It's rather startling, and it puts these racial superiority freaks in their place. (As if they could even clearly delineate a human race anyway; human biologists are beginning to reject even the very idea of races.)
Different cultures have contributed greatly to human advancement at various times. Trying to rank them is a fool's game. Sure, Chinese culture made great advances early. But the creative spirit died, or when into deep hibernation, or was suppressed. Chinese culture had to be dragged kicking and screaming into the modern world. I expect it to contribute once again now that it has clearly arrived there. Fortunately, some group is always on the vanguard of advancement, and the human race, despite its incredibly destructive tendencies, moves on.
Shishimai
Iskandar Baharuddin - 02 Mar 2004 04:29 GMT | On 1 Mar 2004 17:36:51 -0800, in article | <157c968b.0403011736.3098c3d1@posting.google.com>, dan_rockandroll@yahoo.co.uk [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] | advancement, and the human race, despite its incredibly destructive tendencies, | moves on. The greater variability within a racial group compared with variability between racial groups is statistically inevitable. The greater the number of entities, the greater the spread.
Which is why no one should get upset over findings that races differ. It is inconceivable that they would not differ.
The important point is that, as always, it is impossible to apply a statistical statement to a single entity.
The smartest Irishman is far smarter than the average pom. The smartest black is far smarter than the average Jew.
So what?
Izzy
Agamemnon - 02 Mar 2004 04:59 GMT > | On 1 Mar 2004 17:36:51 -0800, in article > | <157c968b.0403011736.3098c3d1@posting.google.com>, [quoted text clipped - 68 lines] > inevitable. The greater the number of entities, the greater > the spread. CUT THE CODSWALLOP.
A racial group is defined in such a way so as to make all racial groups mutually exclusive.
If you want to compare differences between members of one racial group and another you have to classify them as part of the universal group under the definition of a SPECIES so that they are not mutually excusive. As part of the universal group of Homos Sapiens Sapiens two homo sapiens sapiens from Europe will be LESS differentiated and LESS varied than one homo sapiens sapiens from Europe and another form Africa.
> Which is why no one should get upset over findings that > races differ. It is inconceivable that they would not [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > The smartest Irishman is far smarter than the average pom. > The smartest black is far smarter than the average Jew. Jews are a religious group. They come in all colours. The smartest black might actually be Jewish.
> So what? > > Izzy Iskandar Baharuddin - 02 Mar 2004 05:15 GMT | > | On 1 Mar 2004 17:36:51 -0800, in article | > | <157c968b.0403011736.3098c3d1@posting.google.com>, [quoted text clipped - 70 lines] | | CUT THE CODSWALLOP. I gather you slept through Stats 101.
Izzy
| A racial group is defined in such a way so as to make all racial groups | mutually exclusive. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] | Europe will be LESS differentiated and LESS varied than one homo sapiens | sapiens from Europe and another form Africa. You definitely slept through Stats.
Statististics have nothing to do with individuals.
Izzy
| > Which is why no one should get upset over findings that | > races differ. It is inconceivable that they would not [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] | > | > Izzy Susan Cohen - 02 Mar 2004 06:32 GMT > | "Iskandar Baharuddin" <brengsek@mcpc.net.au> wrote in > message [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > I gather you slept through Stats 101. You might want to check thru the archives for mor of this poster's posts.
Susan
Seanie O'Kilfoyle - 02 Mar 2004 17:44 GMT > > | "Iskandar Baharuddin" <brengsek@mcpc.net.au> wrote in > > message [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Susan Then again you might not
Nobody deserves to bore themselves into a stupor by reading the rabid ramblings of Merizis Fagamemnon
jj - 02 Mar 2004 18:31 GMT > > > | "Iskandar Baharuddin" <brengsek@mcpc.net.au> wrote in > > > message [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > Nobody deserves to bore themselves into a stupor by reading the rabid > ramblings of Merizis Fagamemnon Just to find out in the end that Merizis Fagamemnon is only telling lies, lies and more lies. MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Susan Cohen - 02 Mar 2004 23:51 GMT > > > "Agamemnon" <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Nobody deserves to bore themselves into a stupor by reading the rabid > ramblings of Merizis Fagamemnon But it would keep him from reading any *more*....
Susan
pcam pxd - 02 Mar 2004 08:08 GMT Me and my nine best clones.
Agamemnon - 02 Mar 2004 04:45 GMT > On 1 Mar 2004 17:36:51 -0800, in article > <157c968b.0403011736.3098c3d1@posting.google.com>, dan_rockandroll@yahoo.co.uk > > >The Greeks never practised democracy. This is myth that we are still > >taught in schools. Power was held by all citizens, but women were not > >citizens. And of course neither were the slaves. WRONG. Greek Women WERE Citizens. In Pericles time both your parents had to be citizens in order for you to be allowed citizenship.
Slaves, ie. migrant workers had as much right to Athenian citizenship as migrant workers have in America, NONE AT ALL.
> >How can you judge the greatest literature when most literature was > >lost with the fall of civilisations? Book burnings before mass [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > they could even clearly delineate a human race anyway; human biologists are > beginning to reject even the very idea of races.) CODSWALLOP. What you are insunating is that my 2000th cousin who might be German whereas I am Greek is less related to me than my 3000th cousin who might be African or Japanese.
Take your racist nonsense and shove it.
> Different cultures have contributed greatly to human advancement at various > times. Trying to rank them is a fool's game. Sure, Chinese culture made great [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > advancement, and the human race, despite its incredibly destructive tendencies, > moves on. Watch Gods in the Sky presented by Allan Chapman for the reasons why Chinese Astronomy failed to develop into a science whereas Greek astronomy did. Everything we know today is based on the Greek scientific principles which were derived from Assyro-Babylonian astronomical records.
> Shishimai Shishimai - 02 Mar 2004 05:29 GMT On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 04:45:34 -0000, in article <c213hg$bc2$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Agamemnon" <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 1 Mar 2004 17:36:51 -0800, in article >> <157c968b.0403011736.3098c3d1@posting.google.com>, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >WRONG. Greek Women WERE Citizens. In Pericles time both your parents had to >be citizens in order for you to be allowed citizenship. Try to get your attribution right, if nothing else. I didn't post that; you were just too lazy to get to the top of the thread -- just one level up.
Shishimai
>Slaves, ie. migrant workers had as much right to Athenian citizenship as >migrant workers have in America, NONE AT ALL. [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > >> Shishimai Seanie O'Kilfoyle - 02 Mar 2004 17:46 GMT > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 04:45:34 -0000, in article > <c213hg$bc2$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Agamemnon" <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Try to get your attribution right, if nothing else. I didn't post that; you > were just too lazy to get to the top of the thread -- just one level up. Thats why the fat troll has never had a job outside of his free appearances on Ethnic Hatred FM the pirate Northants fringe radio shack
jj - 02 Mar 2004 18:33 GMT > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 04:45:34 -0000, in article > > <c213hg$bc2$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Agamemnon" [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > Thats why the fat troll has never had a job outside of his free appearances > on Ethnic Hatred FM the pirate Northants fringe radio shack *LOL*
Who in their right mind would give a *lying* fat troll who never had a job outside of his free appearances on Ethnic Hatred FM the pirate Northants fringe radio shack anyway?
Susan Cohen - 02 Mar 2004 05:02 GMT > The Greeks never practised democracy. This is myth that we are still > taught in schools. Power was held by all citizens, but women were not > citizens. And of course neither were the slaves. They practiced the closest thing to democracy the word had ever known & they called it such. No, it was not democracy by our standards; most people were still slaves in that society (not citizens).
> How can you judge the greatest literature when most literature was > lost with the fall of civilisations? Book burnings before mass > printing would destroy originals. > > Jewish people have made a great contribution to western societies. But > to me, we are talking about a community within a society. "The Gifts of the Jews" argues that Jewish thought changed the way the Western world *thought*. Since this is the same guy who wrote how the Irish saved Western Civilization later, I took it with a grain of salt, but not too much salt; he makes some persuasive points.
They are a
> western elite, but not a civilisation apart as the Greeks or Romans. > All things considered art, technology, literature, trade, and social [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > the world. And most of us live in cosmopolitan societies, so perhaps > rankings are not relevant any more. I think the original poster was just trying to say that racism is nonsense because all have contributed.
Susan
Iskandar Baharuddin - 02 Mar 2004 05:19 GMT | > The Greeks never practised democracy. This is myth that we are still | > taught in schools. Power was held by all citizens, but women were not [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] | Civilization later, I took it with a grain of salt, but not too much salt; | he makes some persuasive points. Is he the same person who explained how the Scots created the British Empire?
Izzy
(They did, you know.)
| They are a | > western elite, but not a civilisation apart as the Greeks or Romans. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] | | Susan Susan Cohen - 02 Mar 2004 06:31 GMT > | "The Gifts of the Jews" argues that Jewish thought changed > the way the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Is he the same person who explained how the Scots created > the British Empire? I have no idea, but I could check.
Susan
> Izzy > > (They did, you know.) Dan - 02 Mar 2004 17:54 GMT I should have included the original "10 greatest people" post. Just giving credit where credit is due by acknowledging china. I think all societies have made great contributions.
These rankings that crop up from time to time are based on the little recorded knowledge when have access to today. What then is the validity.
There are many historical inaccuracies. The ancient Greeks were a great people. But there was no democracy, that only refers to the decision making process where all the heads of the community voted. Democracy and slavery are mutually exclusive.
China dragged kicking and screaming into modernity? This modernity you speak of was founded on slavery and the plunder of other nations resources. Life now may seem egalitarian but lets not forget the price paid to get where we are today. Dragged? are you not aware of the historical barriers put up to china's advancement from the west. Trade terms were dictated through military threats, boxer rebellion, opium wars. Japanese in ww2. They have had more in the way of barriers than help. Even anti-chinese laws stopping ownership of enterprises in the US to halt the prosperity of its communities.
Shishimai - 03 Mar 2004 01:07 GMT On 2 Mar 2004 09:54:14 -0800, in article <157c968b.0403020954.7f5276a8@posting.google.com>, dan_rockandroll@yahoo.co.uk
>I should have included the original "10 greatest people" post. Just >giving credit where credit is due by acknowledging china. I think all [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >China dragged kicking and screaming into modernity? Yes, and it's a well known fact. Chinese leaders had become so conceited and self-centered that they felt they were indeed the center of the world, and that nothing coming from outside China could possibly be of any value whatsoever. Unfortunately, China stopped innovating, and the West passed them by. When the West showed up at China's door, China (more correctly, Chinese leadership) treated them with utter condescension, a huge mistake with a vastly technologically superior visitor.
> This modernity you >speak of was founded on slavery and the plunder of other nations >resources. Actually, that is incorrect. Some individual fortunes were amassed that way, but the modernity was in fact founded on Enlightenment thinking and scientific inquiry. It was the modernity, and the resulting tremendous contrast with less modern cultures, that led to abuses (they became too easy to commit), not the other way around. I will not dispute the fact that tremendous abuses took place, of course. But I will dispute the cart being placed in front of the horse.
And the abuses backfired, as well. In the US, for example, the slavery problem, while enriching a relatively small number of large-plantation cotton farmers in the US south (and likely some textile manufacturers in England), eventually led to the single most devastating war in US history, a war that claimed more US casualties than *all* other US wars *combined*.
Shishimai
Bernardz - 02 Mar 2004 13:48 GMT > The Greeks never practised democracy. This is myth that we are still > taught in schools. Power was held by all citizens, but women were not > citizens. And of course neither were the slaves. Only in parts of Greece was any sort of democracy practiced and IIRC about 10% of Athens population actually were citizens that voted.
Conversely almost all peoples outside Greece were citizens of some place but they did not vote at all.
> How can you judge the greatest literature when most literature was > lost with the fall of civilisations? Book burnings before mass > printing would destroy originals. Overtime I suspects that the better books were kept. The books most likely to be lost were the ones that were considered to being less good.
> Jewish people have made a great contribution to western societies. But > to me, we are talking about a community within a society. Why is this important? Many famous writers and thinkers come from minor groups in society.
> They are a > western elite, > but not a civilisation apart as the Greeks or Romans. Jews come from pretty well all societies. Many of which are not Western. Many Jews writing we have come from Greek and/or Roman society eg Philo.
> All things considered art, technology, literature, trade, and social > control, the Chinese would top the list if you were to take the whole > of mans history to the modern day into account. Western civilization overtook years ago Chinese society.
> Today's art, technology etc is an amalgamation of all the peoples of > the world. And most of us live in cosmopolitan societies, so perhaps > rankings are not relevant any more. I would call Western civilization now a global one. Very few places are not under its influence.
 Signature The bouncer causes more fights then anyone at the bar. Yet the roughest bars are those without a bouncer.
Observations of Bernard - No 49
Dorian West - 02 Mar 2004 14:28 GMT Has to be Greeks or Graeco-Romans. Democracy is a very Greek concept, recording of history, philosophy, mathematical advances over and above Egypt and Babylon, same with medicine and science, baths showers, toilets, running water - all Greek. An empire that lasted from 800BC into about 1204AD (I use date of 4th Crusade's treacherous sacking of Constantinople). A testament to its longevity is the number of Greek words in European languages. In English for example, I would say 33% of words are Greek, most scientific, but a lot of everyday stuff.
Oh yeah, 1 more thing the Greeks gave us is Christianity. It is a very Greek religion regardless of whether or not the New Testament was written in Greek.
I can't think of 1 thing the Chinese have done that I use in my daily life other than paper and gun-powder, but I am just a westerner ignorant of east Asian matters.
> The Greeks never practised democracy. This is myth that we are still > taught in schools. Power was held by all citizens, but women were not [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > the world. And most of us live in cosmopolitan societies, so perhaps > rankings are not relevant any more. Karl S - 02 Mar 2004 17:31 GMT >I can't think of 1 thing the Chinese have done that I use in my daily life >other than paper and gun-powder, Gunpowder is a simple mixture of common ingredients. It was probably "invented" several times in different parts of the world.
Many think the Arabs, not the Chinese, were the first to do so.
European knowledge of gunpowder might have come from elsewhere, or it might have been "invented" by one of the many European alchemists.
Karl
Susan Cohen - 02 Mar 2004 23:50 GMT > >I can't think of 1 thing the Chinese have done that I use in my daily life > >other than paper and gun-powder, Moveable type. Spaghetti.
Susan
Shishimai - 03 Mar 2004 01:09 GMT On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 23:50:36 GMT, in article <g591c.12863$rW6.2239@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>, "Susan Cohen" <flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote:
>> >I can't think of 1 thing the Chinese have done that I use in my daily >life [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Susan Dishes, often simply called . . . "China".
Shishimai
Susan Cohen - 03 Mar 2004 04:10 GMT > On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 23:50:36 GMT, in article > <g591c.12863$rW6.2239@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>, "Susan Cohen" [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Dishes, often simply called . . . "China". Oh, how could I have forgotten!! Porcelain!! Good one! Also silk, but most people don't use that every day...(rats, she says, wishing she could do so!)
Susan
jj - 02 Mar 2004 18:36 GMT > Has to be Greeks or Graeco-Romans. Democracy is a very Greek concept, > recording of history, philosophy, mathematical advances over and above Egypt [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > other than paper and gun-powder, but I am just a westerner ignorant of east > Asian matters. Nope racist Dorian, you are just a racist westerner ignorant of anything. That's why you have to rely on the racist remarks from your racist idiot friends.
blondie - 02 Mar 2004 19:03 GMT > Has to be Greeks or Graeco-Romans. Democracy is a very Greek concept, > recording of history, philosophy, mathematical advances over and above Egypt [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > other than paper and gun-powder, but I am just a westerner ignorant of east > Asian matters. you no eat chopsuey or mooshoo pork?
> > The Greeks never practised democracy. This is myth that we are still > > taught in schools. Power was held by all citizens, but women were not [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > the world. And most of us live in cosmopolitan societies, so perhaps > > rankings are not relevant any more. SuperOutland - 02 Mar 2004 21:20 GMT > I can't think of 1 thing the Chinese have done that I use in my daily life > other than paper and gun-powder, but I am just a westerner ignorant of east > Asian matters. Hot and sour soup? I dont know where i'd be without it.
nameless - 02 Mar 2004 23:03 GMT Military structure. Architecture. Medicine.
> > I can't think of 1 thing the Chinese have done that I use in my daily life > > other than paper and gun-powder, but I am just a westerner ignorant of east > > Asian matters. > > Hot and sour soup? I dont know where i'd be without it. Dan - 03 Mar 2004 00:19 GMT > Has to be Greeks or Graeco-Romans. Democracy is a very Greek concept, > recording of history, philosophy, mathematical advances over and above Egypt [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > other than paper and gun-powder, but I am just a westerner ignorant of east > Asian matters. It would seem so. First things first, I not bashing the Greeks here, just the democracy issue was a good example of the inaccuracy in what we are taut as history.
Im not sure if you saw the original 10 greatest people post, but it basically consisted of all the EU states. Just correcting the matter and am not saying that westerners are ignorant and should bow down to the history of east asia.
I acknowledge how long Greek civilisation lasted, 800BC-1204. All power to them. But you do not mention Chinas's, 2200BC-Today. And were the richest country up until 1750s.
I think China's problem throughout history was arrogance. They never followed through their vital breakthroughs in maths and physics and wrote off Caucasians as barbarians. But now Im seeing the same arrogance and complacency from the west.
Mutual respect anyone?
Thien Nguyen - 03 Mar 2004 19:13 GMT China's Age of Invention http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/lostempires/china/age.html
Chinese invented restaurants to serve traveling officials and merchants.
Gunpowder was used in Chinese rocket launchers to shoot fireworks - and weapons of war.
The development of printing enabled Chinese officials to distribute important documents.
Faster growing rice distributed during the Song Dynasty helped prevent famine.
The Chinese invented the compass and then used it to travel the open seas. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE GENIUS THAT WAS CHINA http://www2.newpaltz.edu/~knappr/48260/GeniusThatWasChina.html
1. The horse collar 2. The wheelbarrow 3. The moldboard plow 4. Paper money 5. Cast iron 6. The helicopter rotor and the propeller 7. The decimal system 8. The seismograph 9. Matches 10. Circulation of the blood 11. Paper 12. Brandy and Whiskey 13. The Kite 14. The rocket and multi-staged rockets -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Greeks never practised democracy. This is myth that we are still > taught in schools. Power was held by all citizens, but women were not [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > the world. And most of us live in cosmopolitan societies, so perhaps > rankings are not relevant any more. Karl S - 05 Mar 2004 04:50 GMT >China's Age of Invention >http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/lostempires/china/age.html > >Chinese invented restaurants to serve traveling officials and >merchants. Had it existed back then, they would have won a Nobel Prize for this great accomplishment, for sure.
Shishimai - 05 Mar 2004 11:54 GMT On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 19:50:54 -0900, in article <jk1g40dl9foe2be7oj73agpmjtgb84b5u9@4ax.com>, Karl S <karlsch@-s-p-a-m-ak.net> wrote:
>>China's Age of Invention >>http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/lostempires/china/age.html [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Had it existed back then, they would have won a Nobel Prize for this >great accomplishment, for sure. This is the kind of wild claim, too, that makes people just laugh. I rather doubt anyone can actually verify this.
Shishimai
ville terminale - 05 Mar 2004 20:28 GMT > >China's Age of Invention > >http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/lostempires/china/age.html [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Had it existed back then, they would have won a Nobel Prize for this > great accomplishment, for sure. under what category? economics? yeah, there's money in that for sure.
|
|
|