Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Re: Longbow vs. armour



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free HistoryKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: Longbow vs. armour

Matt Giwer05 Jul 2009 05:14
>>>>>>> There was a lively discussion a while back (fortunately
>>>>>>> troll-free) on the merits of longbows versus chainmail
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>> Not according to the group definition, posted here regularly.
>>         Perhaps you will have to post it again as I have not seen it here in years.

> Strange. I've seen it numerous times in just the last few months.
> Perhaps you should spend more time reading posts rather than insulting
> people. There doesn't seem much point in me posting it yet again if
> you're not reading it when others post it.

    Then you will have absolutely no problem posting again in this thread.

Signature

Zionism is a political cult dedicated to murdering Palestinians
and stealing their property.
    -- The Iron Webmaster, 4165
 http://www.giwersworld.org/holo3/ a12
Sun Jul  5 01:13:57 EDT 2009


imipak04 Jul 2009 20:54
> >>>>> There was a lively discussion a while back (fortunately
> >>>>> troll-free) on the merits of longbows versus chainmail
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>         Perhaps you will have to post it again as I have not seen it here in years.

Strange. I've seen it numerous times in just the last few months.
Perhaps you should spend more time reading posts rather than insulting
people. There doesn't seem much point in me posting it yet again if
you're not reading it when others post it.

Matt Giwer04 Jul 2009 12:40
>>>>> There was a lively discussion a while back (fortunately
>>>>> troll-free) on the merits of longbows versus chainmail
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Not according to the group definition, posted here regularly.

    Perhaps you will have to post it again as I have not seen it here in years.

Signature

The national mythos of ancient Greece was the Iliad.
The national mythos of the United States is WWII.
In both cases the truth is far different from the mythos.
    -- The Iron Webmaster, 4152
 http://www.giwersworld.org/palestine/answers.phtml a9
Sat Jul  4 08:39:29 EDT 2009


imipak04 Jul 2009 06:50
> >>> There was a lively discussion a while back (fortunately
> >>> troll-free) on the merits of longbows versus chainmail
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>         Last I read this group ends with the fall of the Roman empire in the west.

Not according to the group definition, posted here regularly.

Matt Giwer04 Jul 2009 04:34
>>> There was a lively discussion a while back (fortunately
>>> troll-free) on the merits of longbows versus chainmail
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> the presence of trolls, then. Glad to see you're finally admitting you
> are one.

    Last I read this group ends with the fall of the Roman empire in the west.

Signature

Dumb people have one thing going for them.
They cannot do stupid things.
    -- The Iron Webmaster, 4151
 http://www.giwersworld.org/holo3/ a12
Sat Jul  4 00:34:11 EDT 2009


imipak04 Jul 2009 03:13
> > There was a lively discussion a while back (fortunately
> > troll-free) on the merits of longbows versus chainmail
> > and platemail.
>
> Impossible. At least in an ANCIENT history newsgroup.

The Vikings had longbows and chainmail (and weren't the inventors of
either) by the 9th C AD, well within the remit of the group, so you're
obviously not referring to the discussion. You must be referring to
the presence of trolls, then. Glad to see you're finally admitting you
are one.

JTEM04 Jul 2009 01:23
> There was a lively discussion a while back (fortunately
> troll-free) on the merits of longbows versus chainmail
> and platemail.

Impossible. At least in an ANCIENT history newsgroup.

imipak04 Jul 2009 00:15
There was a lively discussion a while back (fortunately troll-free) on
the merits of longbows versus chainmail and platemail. I discovered
some interesting Youtube demonstrations on research done on this topic
that might be of interest.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3997HZuWjk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4gPgHyaG1Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtTyOf8OCKg

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.