Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Re: How were the incas and aztecs conquered easily by Conquistadors?



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free HistoryKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: How were the incas and aztecs conquered easily by Conquistadors?

Madhusudan Singh21 Jan 2004 01:37
>> >> > The conquistadors were small as atoms compared to a whole nation!!!
>> >> > Were the incas and aztecs just retarded or something?  This is a
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> NL

Are you so stupid and uninformed that you do not know of the viciousness of
the Spaniards and their endless Iniquisitions ? Which they got from endless
war with their endless thumping of their version of the Bible (like the sun
going around the earth) ? And you call them 'advanced' ? Grow up.

Neville Lindsay18 Jan 2004 03:37
> >> > The conquistadors were small as atoms compared to a whole nation!!!
> >> > Were the incas and aztecs just retarded or something?  This is a
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Happy reinventing !

Are you so stupid and uninformed that you do not know of the viciousness of
the Aztecs and their endless human sacrifices? Which they got from endless
war with their neighbours? And you call them 'peaceful'? Grow up.

NL

Madhusudan Singh17 Jan 2004 16:41
>> > The conquistadors were small as atoms compared to a whole nation!!!
>> > Were the incas and aztecs just retarded or something?  This is a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> NL

Neville at his denial games again, I guess.

Most historians agree that the Spaniards brought nothing but contempt and
destruction for local traditions.

To speak of a Dark Ages European "civilization" with a talent for
Iniquisition as being somehow more advanced than an ancient civilization
that had a well developed system of mathematics and astronomy only reveals
more about you - that you consider people with ability to blow up and
destroy to be more advanced than people who build.

Happy reinventing !

Neville Lindsay17 Jan 2004 15:20
> > The conquistadors were small as atoms compared to a whole nation!!!
> > Were the incas and aztecs just retarded or something?  This is a
> > serious question, it just boggles the mind!
>
> Even a small population of blood thirsty religious zealots hungry for gold
> can destroy a larger advanced civilization if it is peaceful.

Of course the Aztec and Incan empires were very bloodthirsty, which is why
the Spaniards had no trouble in getting Indian allies.

NL

Madhusudan Singh17 Jan 2004 08:26
> The conquistadors were small as atoms compared to a whole nation!!!
> Were the incas and aztecs just retarded or something?  This is a
> serious question, it just boggles the mind!

Even a small population of blood thirsty religious zealots hungry for gold
can destroy a larger advanced civilization if it is peaceful.

SuperOutland17 Jan 2004 04:49
The conquistadors were small as atoms compared to a whole nation!!!
Were the incas and aztecs just retarded or something?  This is a
serious question, it just boggles the mind!

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.