Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
General TopicsAncient HistoryMedieval PeriodBritish HistoryWhat IfArchaeology
War History
War HistoryWorld War IIUS Civil War
HistoryKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Re: Was that the real cause?



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free HistoryKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: Was that the real cause?

scribe771602 Sep 2006 23:01
> Dear Group,
>     Many people say that the Civil War was fought over slavery, and then
> again many say that it was fought over States Rights.  My question is, what
> do you think is the correct answer?

Per the words of the slave south the only state's right at hazard was
the right to own and treat as property other human beings.  It was the
slave south's desire to protect slavery from what it imagined as a
threat from an incoming "Black Republican" administration that brought
secession, and it was secession/rebellion that brought the north to
fight to preserve the Union.

snip

>     I am asking this because, slavery existed in this country for over 200
> years prior to the Civil War.  Not once did a Confederate flag fly over a
> flag ship.

But the Confederate flag flew over slavery every day that the
Confederacy existed.

>  So who is really to blame for those men, women, and children
> being in bondage?

The slave south cleaved to slavery and argued to expand slavery long
after the north and the rest of the western world gave it up.

>     However, since the Confederacy started to realize that it was no longer
> economically sound to keep slaves, wouldn't slavery been a thing of the past
> before to long?

When did the slave south start to recognize that slavery was no longer
an economic benefit?  Who in the slave south said so?  How about the
fact that slavery was the only way that white southerners could see as
a means of social control of blacks?

>  Was the North really fighting to preserve the Union?

Yep.

> Were
> they really fighting to free those in bondage?

Starting with the Confiscation Acts and going through the Emancipation
Proclaimation freeing slaves was a war measure designed to weaken the
Confederacy.  A total end to slavery had always been a war aim for some
in the north, and it became a war aim for nearly all.

>     What about Lincoln's plan to colonize those in bondage in a different
> country, would it have worked?

No, which is part of the reason why Lincoln abandoned it.

Nathan Estervig02 Sep 2006 11:43
Dear Group,
   Many people say that the Civil War was fought over slavery, and then
again many say that it was fought over States Rights.  My question is, what
do you think is the correct answer?  Or is either of the answers correct?
   I am asking this because, slavery existed in this country for over 200
years prior to the Civil War.  Not once did a Confederate flag fly over a
flag ship.  So who is really to blame for those men, women, and children
being in bondage?
   However, since the Confederacy started to realize that it was no longer
economically sound to keep slaves, wouldn't slavery been a thing of the past
before to long?  Was the North really fighting to preserve the Union?  Were
they really fighting to free those in bondage?
   What about Lincoln's plan to colonize those in bondage in a different
country, would it have worked?  What do you think?

Nate

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.