HistoryKB presents sourced mainstream scholarship. Where historians genuinely disagree — on the scale of the demographic collapse after 1492, on the causes of the fall of the Western Roman Empire, on the chronology of the Indus Valley script — we say so plainly in the body of the entry and link to the competing peer-reviewed readings. We do not adjudicate the dispute for the reader. We do, however, refuse to publish a "balanced" framing that elevates a fringe position into a manufactured symmetry with the established record; contested claims are labeled as contested.
No claim is presented without a source. Every entry is cross-referenced against at least three primary or peer-reviewed sources, and the inline footnotes are not optional — they are the entry. Entries are written by trained editors and verified by credentialed reviewers; we do not assert, and never will, that every word is written by a PhD. The boundary between editor and reviewer is disclosed because hiding it would cost the reader the ability to weigh what they are reading.
AI-assisted drafting tools are used for repetitive tasks — boilerplate transliteration cleanup, index normalization, citation formatting — and every AI-edited passage is reviewed by a human editor before publication. AI-generated text is never presented as authoritative without human review, and is never the sole author of a claim about a contested historical event.